I'm curious to compare the public and how they fare against the spread and O/U. So I am listing the side where 80% of the bets are on one side. Here are this week's teams where the public has 80%+ confidence. It should be interesting. Utah -7 Colorado -3 Kansas St -16.5 N Dame -7.5 Fla Atlantic -3.5 Oklahoma -16 Oregon -6 Florida St -31 Okla St -3 O/U (all of these are overs, no unders) Utah/Baylor 46.5 Ball St/Georgia 52.5 N Dame/NC State 50.5 App St/N Carolina 82 Cincy/Pitt 45 Oregon/Tx Tech 69 UCLA/SDSU 48.5 S Miss/Fla St 53.5 Auburn/Cal 54.5 Hoping to see some patterns to fade the public down the road.
Public percentages for noon games:
Utah -7 87%
Utah/Baylor 45.5 O 83%
Colorado -3 88%
Georgia -42 86%
Ball St/Georgia 53 O 92%
Kansas St -15 83%
ND -7 87%
0
Quote Originally Posted by jackedward32:
I'm curious to compare the public and how they fare against the spread and O/U. So I am listing the side where 80% of the bets are on one side. Here are this week's teams where the public has 80%+ confidence. It should be interesting. Utah -7 Colorado -3 Kansas St -16.5 N Dame -7.5 Fla Atlantic -3.5 Oklahoma -16 Oregon -6 Florida St -31 Okla St -3 O/U (all of these are overs, no unders) Utah/Baylor 46.5 Ball St/Georgia 52.5 N Dame/NC State 50.5 App St/N Carolina 82 Cincy/Pitt 45 Oregon/Tx Tech 69 UCLA/SDSU 48.5 S Miss/Fla St 53.5 Auburn/Cal 54.5 Hoping to see some patterns to fade the public down the road.
I'm curious to compare the public and how they fare against the spread and O/U. So I am listing the side where 80% of the bets are on one side. Here are this week's teams where the public has 80%+ confidence. It should be interesting. Utah -7 Colorado -3 Kansas St -16.5 N Dame -7.5 Fla Atlantic -3.5 Oklahoma -16 Oregon -6 Florida St -31 Okla St -3 O/U (all of these are overs, no unders) Utah/Baylor 46.5 Ball St/Georgia 52.5 N Dame/NC State 50.5 App St/N Carolina 82 Cincy/Pitt 45 Oregon/Tx Tech 69 UCLA/SDSU 48.5 S Miss/Fla St 53.5 Auburn/Cal 54.5 Hoping to see some patterns to fade the public down the road.
Week 2 Results:
Utah -7 T
Colorado -3 W
Kansas St -16.5 W
N Dame -7.5 W
Fla Atlantic -3.5 L
Oklahoma -16 W
Oregon -6 W
Florida St -31 W
Okla St -3 W
Utah/Baylor 46.5 L
Ball St/Georgia 52.5 L
ND/NC St 50.5 W
App St/N Carolina 82 L
Cincy/Pitt 45 W
Oregon/Tx Tech 69 L
UCLA/SDSU 48.5 L
S Miss/Fla St 53.5 W
Auburn/Cal 54.5 L
The public crushed it vs the spread, but got beat vs the total.
ATS 7-1-1
O/U 3-6
Will keep track all season.
1
Quote Originally Posted by jackedward32:
I'm curious to compare the public and how they fare against the spread and O/U. So I am listing the side where 80% of the bets are on one side. Here are this week's teams where the public has 80%+ confidence. It should be interesting. Utah -7 Colorado -3 Kansas St -16.5 N Dame -7.5 Fla Atlantic -3.5 Oklahoma -16 Oregon -6 Florida St -31 Okla St -3 O/U (all of these are overs, no unders) Utah/Baylor 46.5 Ball St/Georgia 52.5 N Dame/NC State 50.5 App St/N Carolina 82 Cincy/Pitt 45 Oregon/Tx Tech 69 UCLA/SDSU 48.5 S Miss/Fla St 53.5 Auburn/Cal 54.5 Hoping to see some patterns to fade the public down the road.
Week 2 Results:
Utah -7 T
Colorado -3 W
Kansas St -16.5 W
N Dame -7.5 W
Fla Atlantic -3.5 L
Oklahoma -16 W
Oregon -6 W
Florida St -31 W
Okla St -3 W
Utah/Baylor 46.5 L
Ball St/Georgia 52.5 L
ND/NC St 50.5 W
App St/N Carolina 82 L
Cincy/Pitt 45 W
Oregon/Tx Tech 69 L
UCLA/SDSU 48.5 L
S Miss/Fla St 53.5 W
Auburn/Cal 54.5 L
The public crushed it vs the spread, but got beat vs the total.
Go back a week or even 2 weeks ago. On your list which teams have covered all their games ? which team were high on the consensus list last week and covered. Usually lines adjust against those public teams the next week. the books job is to make betting random and volatile. I don’t think the current week alone provides value. The previous weeks along with heavily bet teams are most trusted. Don’t just stay in the current week. The books hang a number and most times the adjustment comes sooner than later.
Good points. Just started tracking week 2. Will look back and see what adjustments in the lines were made.
0
Quote Originally Posted by spottie2935:
Go back a week or even 2 weeks ago. On your list which teams have covered all their games ? which team were high on the consensus list last week and covered. Usually lines adjust against those public teams the next week. the books job is to make betting random and volatile. I don’t think the current week alone provides value. The previous weeks along with heavily bet teams are most trusted. Don’t just stay in the current week. The books hang a number and most times the adjustment comes sooner than later.
Good points. Just started tracking week 2. Will look back and see what adjustments in the lines were made.
Quote Originally Posted by spottie2935: Go back a week or even 2 weeks ago. On your list which teams have covered all their games ? which team were high on the consensus list last week and covered. Usually lines adjust against those public teams the next week. the books job is to make betting random and volatile. I don’t think the current week alone provides value. The previous weeks along with heavily bet teams are most trusted. Don’t just stay in the current week. The books hang a number and most times the adjustment comes sooner than later. Good points. Just started tracking week 2. Will look back and see what adjustments in the lines were made.
Youi can add something to my game. I am too busy doing my thing so your work and findings will be helpful and profitable.
Nothing is ever in the bank until it is in the bank
0
Quote Originally Posted by jackedward32:
Quote Originally Posted by spottie2935: Go back a week or even 2 weeks ago. On your list which teams have covered all their games ? which team were high on the consensus list last week and covered. Usually lines adjust against those public teams the next week. the books job is to make betting random and volatile. I don’t think the current week alone provides value. The previous weeks along with heavily bet teams are most trusted. Don’t just stay in the current week. The books hang a number and most times the adjustment comes sooner than later. Good points. Just started tracking week 2. Will look back and see what adjustments in the lines were made.
Youi can add something to my game. I am too busy doing my thing so your work and findings will be helpful and profitable.
First observation - there are a lot of road dogs with big numbers that the public loves this weekend. Could this be a weekend Vegas gets some revenge on the public?
The following teams won by 20+ last week and have the public riding them in high numbers:
Colorado
Georgia
ND
Kansas St
TOSU
Penn St
Clemson
Toledo
I'll track these and see how the public does. I won't be able to update tomorrow as I will be in East Lansing watching what the Mel Tucker effect will be against Michael Pennix & Co.
Best of luck this weekend.
0
Week 3 where 80%+ of the public is on one side:
Florida St -26
Penn St -14.5
Kansas St -4
Iowa St -3
Wake -14
ND -34.5
Duke -18.5
NC -7.5
Alabama -33
Oklahoma -28.5
TOSU -29.5
Tulane -13
Tenn -6.5
Nebraska -11
Okla St -7
Toledo -7
UAB -2.5
Clemson -24.5
TCU -7
Oregon -38
Colorado -24
Kansas -28
Arizona -18
O/U (All are for over the total)
FSU/BCU 48
PSU/Illinois 48.5
So Cal/Georgia 54.5
SDSU/Oregon St 48.5
ECU/App St 47.5
ULM/TxA&M 53.5
Miami, Oh/Cincy 44.5
S Alabama/Okla St 48.5
JMU/Troy 46.5
FAU/Clemson 51.5
Wyoming/Texas 48.5
First observation - there are a lot of road dogs with big numbers that the public loves this weekend. Could this be a weekend Vegas gets some revenge on the public?
The following teams won by 20+ last week and have the public riding them in high numbers:
Colorado
Georgia
ND
Kansas St
TOSU
Penn St
Clemson
Toledo
I'll track these and see how the public does. I won't be able to update tomorrow as I will be in East Lansing watching what the Mel Tucker effect will be against Michael Pennix & Co.
One other interesting thing I started tracking this week was looking at bets where there were significant differences between the number of betters compared with a significant reduction of money put down.
In a case where there was around a 30+ difference in handle vs. the total number of bets laid, the sharp money came out on top 17-4. Below is the data:
Mass +7 85 (handle)/41 (% of bets) W
Mass/EMU 50.5 (under) 92/58 W
FIU +7 82/48 W
Miami, Oh +14 70/29 W
S Alabama +7 52/16 W
Louisville/Indiana 50.5 (under) 72/45 W (OK - close to a 30 point differential)
Iowa St/Ohio 42.5 (under) 91/54 W
Wake/ODU 62 (over) 92/41 W
Tulane/S Miss 49.5 (under) 79/29 W
Ga State/Charlotte 52 (under) 97/42 L
N Texas/La Tech 69 (over) 76/36 W
NIU/Nebraska 42 (under) 77/49 L
SJSU/Toledo 56.5 (under) W
JMU/Troy 46.5 (under) 58/15 W
La-Laf/UAB 59.5 (over) 81/50 W
Vandy/UNLV 59 (over) 62/27 W
BYU/Arkansas 47.5 (under) 72/33 L
Akron/Kentucky 49 (under) 71/34 W
Pitt/W Va 48 (under) 84/25 W
NMSU/N Mex 53.5 (under) 85/44 W
UTEP/Arizona 57.5 (over) 92/46 L
2
@jackedward32
One other interesting thing I started tracking this week was looking at bets where there were significant differences between the number of betters compared with a significant reduction of money put down.
In a case where there was around a 30+ difference in handle vs. the total number of bets laid, the sharp money came out on top 17-4. Below is the data:
Mass +7 85 (handle)/41 (% of bets) W
Mass/EMU 50.5 (under) 92/58 W
FIU +7 82/48 W
Miami, Oh +14 70/29 W
S Alabama +7 52/16 W
Louisville/Indiana 50.5 (under) 72/45 W (OK - close to a 30 point differential)
I'm only evaluating CFB. I can try to look at NFL this week and see if there is a similar correlation.
Looking at tonight's games, there is not a significant change between handle and bets. The closest to it is the O/U for Pittsburgh and Cleveland. 52% of the bets are on the under but 75% of the money is, so looking like more money leaning toward the under. But I like the 30 point differential bc it is much more significant.
0
@King Creole42
I'm only evaluating CFB. I can try to look at NFL this week and see if there is a similar correlation.
Looking at tonight's games, there is not a significant change between handle and bets. The closest to it is the O/U for Pittsburgh and Cleveland. 52% of the bets are on the under but 75% of the money is, so looking like more money leaning toward the under. But I like the 30 point differential bc it is much more significant.
GAS on the ML hit last night :)....is there a certain time in the day that you gather your information to make your plays?for the big card on saturdays will u normally look at the night before numbers or wait until near kickoff....Scores and odds also has the splits but i dont think theyre as accurate as vsin.
0
GAS on the ML hit last night :)....is there a certain time in the day that you gather your information to make your plays?for the big card on saturdays will u normally look at the night before numbers or wait until near kickoff....Scores and odds also has the splits but i dont think theyre as accurate as vsin.
GAS on the ML hit last night :)....is there a certain time in the day that you gather your information to make your plays?for the big card on saturdays will u normally look at the night before numbers or wait until near kickoff....Scores and odds also has the splits but i dont think theyre as accurate as vsin.
I start looking at CFB today. If there are games that hit those numbers, I add them to a spreadsheet I have (I'm old school). I will start checking those games to see what is backing up the numbers the public sees (usually perception) and what the money is seeing (more stats, situations, other variables). Once I have an idea of who I want to pick, I will wait until Saturday morning and see where the numbers are. If I can, I check about an hour prior to kick off to see where the public is and what the handle is and if it fits what my research shows, I will wager.
0
Quote Originally Posted by King Creole42:
GAS on the ML hit last night :)....is there a certain time in the day that you gather your information to make your plays?for the big card on saturdays will u normally look at the night before numbers or wait until near kickoff....Scores and odds also has the splits but i dont think theyre as accurate as vsin.
I start looking at CFB today. If there are games that hit those numbers, I add them to a spreadsheet I have (I'm old school). I will start checking those games to see what is backing up the numbers the public sees (usually perception) and what the money is seeing (more stats, situations, other variables). Once I have an idea of who I want to pick, I will wait until Saturday morning and see where the numbers are. If I can, I check about an hour prior to kick off to see where the public is and what the handle is and if it fits what my research shows, I will wager.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.