the play at the end of the half between the eagles and the giants should open the wounds wide for the nebraska fans....clearly philly should have gotten the ball and 2 seconds put back on the clock....but they said it was a non reviewable play....
how was that play different from the texas/nebraska game?
if anyone has the answer from the rule books it would be appreciated...i can't see a difference
at the 7:55 second mark in the 2nd half of the giants/eagles game mccoy gets shoved out of bounds....the clock ran until the whistle was blown leaving 7:54 seconds and 1 second was not put back on the clock even though the ball was clearly out of bounds at the 7:55 mark....there was one second on the clock in the texas/neb game but up until that moment and even now...it is the only time when they put time back on the clock for the ball being the moment when the clock is supposed to stop...if the ball is the mark of the clock than the time keeper is more powerful than the offical when it comes to determining when to stop the clock.....
the texas game was right....but fuck nebraska fans...its like being bitch slapped everytime you watch a football game when they choose not to put time on the clock even though the ball is clearly out of bounds and the clock takes a second to stop.....
the time is not reviewable!!! is this right or wrong ???
wrong... surely you have seen a ref stop the game and tell the time keeper to set the clock to some time???
under your logic if the timer forgets to stop the clock or the clock malfunctions and doesn't stop.. too bad... time lost, can't review... bye bye.... too bad soo sad....
...or....
maybe there is just an evil plot of timekeepers nationwide to keep Nebraska fans down... so that continue to have something to point to as to why they don't matter each year... maybe....
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
