Posted:
#101
??
0
Billy Walters Bowl Picks
Posted:
#106
Quote Originally Posted by gcwrestling08:
lol...care to expound? i'm not sure how a sarcastic comment can be interpreted as "dumb." i realize you have a limited vocabulary, but you may need to be a bit more specific about what was so "dumb."
lol...care to expound? i'm not sure how a sarcastic comment can be interpreted as "dumb." i realize you have a limited vocabulary, but you may need to be a bit more specific about what was so "dumb."
Dumb would be calling the Browns the PLAY OF THE YEAR in Week 1
If it wasn't for buffer you'd be the dumbest user on Covers
"Posted: 9/11/2016 11:49:19 AM
seeing some people on the Eagles -4 and laughing quietly to myself...this will be the only game this season that they're favored. they are god awful, starting a rookie with sore ribs. Browns actually have a good team now.BROWNS +4 by far the best play of the week, possibly the entire season"
https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=21&sub=102312878
0
Posted:
#107
Quote Originally Posted by BWS77:
BROWNS +4 by far the best play of the week, possibly the entire season"
Dumb would be calling the Browns the PLAY OF THE YEAR in Week 1
If it wasn't for buffer you'd be the dumbest user on Covers
"Posted: 9/11/2016 11:49:19 AM
seeing some people on the Eagles -4 and laughing quietly to myself...this will be the only game this season that they're favored. they are god awful, starting a rookie with sore ribs. Browns actually have a good team now.BROWNS +4 by far the best play of the week, possibly the entire season"
https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=21&sub=102312878
And he has the nerve to troll my threads
0
Posted:
#108
Quote Originally Posted by Roggs05:
Papa - great info... 100% believe what you are saying... THE ONLY THING TO CAUTION HERE - even if you watched the 60 minutes or know Billy he is notorious for setting up middles for himself... So lets say this information is accurate... We do not necessarily know if he did this to set up middles... For example tonight he is sitting on BYU -8 - we will never know if he capped the game at 10 and is trying to hit the other side wyoming +11 before kick etc... I am assuming this is why you said take this information for what it is... His record is 4 - 1 now which is good... Just something to consider guys
Papa - great info... 100% believe what you are saying... THE ONLY THING TO CAUTION HERE - even if you watched the 60 minutes or know Billy he is notorious for setting up middles for himself... So lets say this information is accurate... We do not necessarily know if he did this to set up middles... For example tonight he is sitting on BYU -8 - we will never know if he capped the game at 10 and is trying to hit the other side wyoming +11 before kick etc... I am assuming this is why you said take this information for what it is... His record is 4 - 1 now which is good... Just something to consider guys
Even if he is setting up middles, none have hit.
And the middle on the BYU game is a tough one to get. The number closed at -11 late so his only chance to middle is 10. But it was 10 for the overwhelming majority of the week. And if he bought in at 10 he'd be middling 9, a dead, almost worthless middle.
And there can't be a middle on the Army game as he bought in at -10. So take these picks at face value IMO.
0
Posted:
#115
Quote Originally Posted by firesox:
Billy/Papa is 1-3
Billy/Papa is 1-3
Billy is currently 4-4 right now. I didn't and haven't bet any of his picks. As I stated in a different post, someone sent me his other picks including Army and Clemson with 4 totals after the games were over. He was 3-1 in totals and has been 1-3 in sides so far.
He has left pending that I know of...
Florida State +7
Air Force -12.5
Louisville +3.5
Clemson +140
Again, I never told anyone to tail and I never said I was betting them either. I don't tail random people's picks, including Billy Walters, especially after lines have already moved away from his numbers. If you blindly tail his picks and lose, it's your fault.
0
Posted:
#116
Quote Originally Posted by PapaShango:
Billy is currently 4-4 right now. I didn't and haven't bet any of his picks. As I stated in a different post, someone sent me his other picks including Army and Clemson with 4 totals after the games were over. He was 3-1 in totals and has been 1-3 in sides so far.
He has left pending that I know of...
Florida State +7
Air Force -12.5
Louisville +3.5
Clemson +140
Again, I never told anyone to tail and I never said I was betting them either. I don't tail random people's picks, including Billy Walters, especially after lines have already moved away from his numbers. If you blindly tail his picks and lose, it's your fault.
If that's the case, what was the point of starting this thread in the first place? lol You wanted to tell people what Billy Walter's picks were but also recommend that nobody play them because it's dumb to blindly tail someone's picks?
0
Posted:
#118
Quote Originally Posted by CallingYouOut69:
If that's the case, what was the point of starting this thread in the first place? lol You wanted to tell people what Billy Walter's picks were but also recommend that nobody play them because it's dumb to blindly tail someone's picks?
If that's the case, what was the point of starting this thread in the first place? lol You wanted to tell people what Billy Walter's picks were but also recommend that nobody play them because it's dumb to blindly tail someone's picks?
I was just sharing information I received. When did I recommend not to play his picks? I said I didn't play his picks and I don't blindly tail people. And I said if you blindly tail people and lose, it's your fault. Don't put words in my mouth.
0
Posted:
#119
Quote Originally Posted by CallingYouOut69:
If that's the case, what was the point of starting this thread in the first place? lol You wanted to tell people what Billy Walter's picks were but also recommend that nobody play them because it's dumb to blindly tail someone's picks?
If that's the case, what was the point of starting this thread in the first place? lol You wanted to tell people what Billy Walter's picks were but also recommend that nobody play them because it's dumb to blindly tail someone's picks?
He told you the picks. You can fade them if you'd like. I was shocked he got Army -10 when it opened at -7. That really cost him of true and seemed square-ish from the alleged #1 sharp.
Got me really thinking about that game and spread and what side I should be on. Whether BW won or lost was meaningless to me. Just starting the thought process about a game that didn't interest me was helpful.
0
Posted:
#120
Quote Originally Posted by PapaShango:
I was just sharing information I received. When did I recommend not to play his picks? I said I didn't play his picks and I don't blindly tail people. And I said if you blindly tail people and lose, it's your fault. Don't put words in my mouth.
Your exact words were "I don't tail random people's picks, including Billy Walters, especially after lines have already moved away from his numbers. If you blindly tail his picks and lose, it's your fault."
So you are basically saying "Here are Billy Walter's picks. I don't tail random people's picks, though. You guys can do whatever you want with this information but the lines have already moved away from his numbers and if you blindly tail his picks and lose, it's not my fault, it's yours."
Am I taking crazy pills? Isn't that what you just said? You are sharing what appears to be information that is difficult for the general public to see, yet you aren't even playing any of those plays yourself, and you also tell everyone that if you tail his picks and lose, it's everyone's fault for tailing blindly.
Again, what was the purpose of posting his plays in the first place if you (a seasoned veteran gambler apparently) don't even feel the plays are worthy enough to tail? It just seems like this thread caused way more negativity than anything else and achieved nothing. You had to have known people were going to jump all over you after you posted this and claim you don't really have his picks. Yet, you were never even going to play any of them in the first place. So why should anyone else?
I'm sure if his plays 7-1 instead of 4-4 at the moment, you probably would be basking in the love that everyone would be praising you with for sharing the info. Once the sides went 1-3, you start acting like it would have been dumb for anyone to tail those picks blindly. How long have you been on Covers? You know how many degenerates are on this site, salivating for information and plays like this. Seems a bit irresponsible and just a huge attention grab on your part.
0
Posted:
#121
Quote Originally Posted by CallingYouOut69:
Your exact words were "I don't tail random people's picks, including Billy Walters, especially after lines have already moved away from his numbers. If you blindly tail his picks and lose, it's your fault."
So you are basically saying "Here are Billy Walter's picks. I don't tail random people's picks, though. You guys can do whatever you want with this information but the lines have already moved away from his numbers and if you blindly tail his picks and lose, it's not my fault, it's yours."
Am I taking crazy pills? Isn't that what you just said? You are sharing what appears to be information that is difficult for the general public to see, yet you aren't even playing any of those plays yourself, and you also tell everyone that if you tail his picks and lose, it's everyone's fault for tailing blindly.
Again, what was the purpose of posting his plays in the first place if you (a seasoned veteran gambler apparently) don't even feel the plays are worthy enough to tail? It just seems like this thread caused way more negativity than anything else and achieved nothing. You had to have known people were going to jump all over you after you posted this and claim you don't really have his picks. Yet, you were never even going to play any of them in the first place. So why should anyone else?
I'm sure if his plays 7-1 instead of 4-4 at the moment, you probably would be basking in the love that everyone would be praising you with for sharing the info. Once the sides went 1-3, you start acting like it would have been dumb for anyone to tail those picks blindly. How long have you been on Covers? You know how many degenerates are on this site, salivating for information and plays like this. Seems a bit irresponsible and just a huge attention grab on your part.
Your exact words were "I don't tail random people's picks, including Billy Walters, especially after lines have already moved away from his numbers. If you blindly tail his picks and lose, it's your fault."
So you are basically saying "Here are Billy Walter's picks. I don't tail random people's picks, though. You guys can do whatever you want with this information but the lines have already moved away from his numbers and if you blindly tail his picks and lose, it's not my fault, it's yours."
Am I taking crazy pills? Isn't that what you just said? You are sharing what appears to be information that is difficult for the general public to see, yet you aren't even playing any of those plays yourself, and you also tell everyone that if you tail his picks and lose, it's everyone's fault for tailing blindly.
Again, what was the purpose of posting his plays in the first place if you (a seasoned veteran gambler apparently) don't even feel the plays are worthy enough to tail? It just seems like this thread caused way more negativity than anything else and achieved nothing. You had to have known people were going to jump all over you after you posted this and claim you don't really have his picks. Yet, you were never even going to play any of them in the first place. So why should anyone else?
I'm sure if his plays 7-1 instead of 4-4 at the moment, you probably would be basking in the love that everyone would be praising you with for sharing the info. Once the sides went 1-3, you start acting like it would have been dumb for anyone to tail those picks blindly. How long have you been on Covers? You know how many degenerates are on this site, salivating for information and plays like this. Seems a bit irresponsible and just a huge attention grab on your part.
These fu**ing trolls. This isn't even about Papa. I just have to rid the site of these bast ards.
I post Colin Cowherd's picks on occassion.
To some he's the sharpest capping mind in public broadcasting.
To others he's a huge square.
I don't care how people read into it. I post the picks because it is in the public sphere.
Who the hell are you to say BW's picks are square or sharp? They didn't affect any of my bets. If they affected yours, so be it. If they didn't why the hell would you care if they affected nameless faceless posters???
0
Posted:
#122
Quote Originally Posted by CallingYouOut69:
Your exact words were "I don't tail random people's picks, including Billy Walters, especially after lines have already moved away from his numbers. If you blindly tail his picks and lose, it's your fault."
So you are basically saying "Here are Billy Walter's picks. I don't tail random people's picks, though. You guys can do whatever you want with this information but the lines have already moved away from his numbers and if you blindly tail his picks and lose, it's not my fault, it's yours."
Am I taking crazy pills? Isn't that what you just said? You are sharing what appears to be information that is difficult for the general public to see, yet you aren't even playing any of those plays yourself, and you also tell everyone that if you tail his picks and lose, it's everyone's fault for tailing blindly.
Again, what was the purpose of posting his plays in the first place if you (a seasoned veteran gambler apparently) don't even feel the plays are worthy enough to tail? It just seems like this thread caused way more negativity than anything else and achieved nothing. You had to have known people were going to jump all over you after you posted this and claim you don't really have his picks. Yet, you were never even going to play any of them in the first place. So why should anyone else?
I'm sure if his plays 7-1 instead of 4-4 at the moment, you probably would be basking in the love that everyone would be praising you with for sharing the info. Once the sides went 1-3, you start acting like it would have been dumb for anyone to tail those picks blindly. How long have you been on Covers? You know how many degenerates are on this site, salivating for information and plays like this. Seems a bit irresponsible and just a huge attention grab on your part.
Your exact words were "I don't tail random people's picks, including Billy Walters, especially after lines have already moved away from his numbers. If you blindly tail his picks and lose, it's your fault."
So you are basically saying "Here are Billy Walter's picks. I don't tail random people's picks, though. You guys can do whatever you want with this information but the lines have already moved away from his numbers and if you blindly tail his picks and lose, it's not my fault, it's yours."
Am I taking crazy pills? Isn't that what you just said? You are sharing what appears to be information that is difficult for the general public to see, yet you aren't even playing any of those plays yourself, and you also tell everyone that if you tail his picks and lose, it's everyone's fault for tailing blindly.
Again, what was the purpose of posting his plays in the first place if you (a seasoned veteran gambler apparently) don't even feel the plays are worthy enough to tail? It just seems like this thread caused way more negativity than anything else and achieved nothing. You had to have known people were going to jump all over you after you posted this and claim you don't really have his picks. Yet, you were never even going to play any of them in the first place. So why should anyone else?
I'm sure if his plays 7-1 instead of 4-4 at the moment, you probably would be basking in the love that everyone would be praising you with for sharing the info. Once the sides went 1-3, you start acting like it would have been dumb for anyone to tail those picks blindly. How long have you been on Covers? You know how many degenerates are on this site, salivating for information and plays like this. Seems a bit irresponsible and just a huge attention grab on your part.
What in god's green earth are you talking about? Are you okay? This is such an embarrassing post, there's no need to actually respond in full. Good luck with your wagers.
0
Posted:
#123
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
These fu**ing trolls. This isn't even about Papa. I just have to rid the site of these bast ards.
I post Colin Cowherd's picks on occassion.
To some he's the sharpest capping mind in public broadcasting.
To others he's a huge square.
I don't care how people read into it. I post the picks because it is in the public sphere.
Who the hell are you to say BW's picks are square or sharp? They didn't affect any of my bets. If they affected yours, so be it. If they didn't why the hell would you care if they affected nameless faceless posters???
It's just so strange how I am the bad person for sharing some information I attained. These people tail blindly, lose, and then have so much built up frustration that they need to take it out on the Original Poster. It's just weird. It doesn't bother me though because this is a free forum and I didn't lose any money on BW picks. 
0
Posted:
#124
Post #1:
"You can believe me or not, I don't really care. He bet these for $180k each at the Mirage the other day. Do whatever you want with the info. "
"Post #9:
"I'm just trying to give you guys information that could be useful into capping/betting these bowl games because that's what this forum is supposed to be about."
Post #55:
"Good luck to everyone that tails or fades or does nothing with this information. "
"Show me where I suggested to tail his picks or where I said I was tailing his picks. If you want to tail someone, it is your money, you have every right to. But, if you do tail someone, don't come back and bitchh about it. I gave out information I was given about a big bettor that is widely known in the sports betting world. I have no idea if he bet the other way at other casinos or had runners to bet the other way to try to middle games. I was told he bet certain games for $180,000 each. If you blindly tailed his picks or anyone on this forum's picks, it is your fault. If someone gives you a stock or investment tip and you use that information to gamble with your money and lose, it is YOUR fault. Are you paying for the information I gave you? No, you're not. So, nobody has any obligation to make you or anyone else on this forum money.
0
Hot Forum Topics
