Quote Originally Posted by WISEGUY36: BYU / Navy is seeing some line movement right now. Down to - 1 , 1' Total down to 53 . GL FWIW, I bought my positions on this matchup as soon as it opened , thinking to add more later . Now, I may not get the chance to add at the same prices. Oh well . GLTA
Helping Kama'aina to beat their " Local " since 1994.
0
Quote Originally Posted by WISEGUY36:
Quote Originally Posted by WISEGUY36: BYU / Navy is seeing some line movement right now. Down to - 1 , 1' Total down to 53 . GL FWIW, I bought my positions on this matchup as soon as it opened , thinking to add more later . Now, I may not get the chance to add at the same prices. Oh well . GLTA
Yeah Jabari Laws was a bit of a passer and we got Asher O'hare on the other side... ~54 seems a bit high where Army is projected winner ... really seemed like the passing game is what lit a spark in that AF offense last year only 5 receptions but averaged 25 yards per completion... maybe we get more than 2 or 3 passes per game outta them this year....
SMU / Tex St total movin up fast up to 70.5, maybe on the Brady McBride as Tex St starter news? It does look like if anything works for them this year it'll be on offense and at times they put a few points up last year ... got 64.5 in a parlay yesterday .. commence fireworks please!!
0
Yeah Jabari Laws was a bit of a passer and we got Asher O'hare on the other side... ~54 seems a bit high where Army is projected winner ... really seemed like the passing game is what lit a spark in that AF offense last year only 5 receptions but averaged 25 yards per completion... maybe we get more than 2 or 3 passes per game outta them this year....
SMU / Tex St total movin up fast up to 70.5, maybe on the Brady McBride as Tex St starter news? It does look like if anything works for them this year it'll be on offense and at times they put a few points up last year ... got 64.5 in a parlay yesterday .. commence fireworks please!!
Yeah Jabari Laws was a bit of a passer and we got Asher O'hare on the other side... ~54 seems a bit high where Army is projected winner ... really seemed like the passing game is what lit a spark in that AF offense last year only 5 receptions but averaged 25 yards per completion... maybe we get more than 2 or 3 passes per game outta them this year.... SMU / Tex St total movin up fast up to 70.5, maybe on the Brady McBride as Tex St starter news? It does look like if anything works for them this year it'll be on offense and at times they put a few points up last year ... got 64.5 in a parlay yesterday .. commence fireworks please!!
Buddy, I'm not a fan of laying a lot on huge totals for Week 1. Without Spring and with
limited reps this fall for some programs , I think defenses will be well ahead of Offenses
early in the season. Seems like laying over 70 in week 1 is a stretch..... even for SMU or
Memphis.
Bridge
Helping Kama'aina to beat their " Local " since 1994.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Bridge1:
Yeah Jabari Laws was a bit of a passer and we got Asher O'hare on the other side... ~54 seems a bit high where Army is projected winner ... really seemed like the passing game is what lit a spark in that AF offense last year only 5 receptions but averaged 25 yards per completion... maybe we get more than 2 or 3 passes per game outta them this year.... SMU / Tex St total movin up fast up to 70.5, maybe on the Brady McBride as Tex St starter news? It does look like if anything works for them this year it'll be on offense and at times they put a few points up last year ... got 64.5 in a parlay yesterday .. commence fireworks please!!
Buddy, I'm not a fan of laying a lot on huge totals for Week 1. Without Spring and with
limited reps this fall for some programs , I think defenses will be well ahead of Offenses
early in the season. Seems like laying over 70 in week 1 is a stretch..... even for SMU or
Oh yeah I'm with you Wise ... And relying on Tex St to do anything on offense is like a funhouse you don't want to visit ... really just noting the 6 pt swing there ..
0
Oh yeah I'm with you Wise ... And relying on Tex St to do anything on offense is like a funhouse you don't want to visit ... really just noting the 6 pt swing there ..
Oh yeah I'm with you Wise ... And relying on Tex St to do anything on offense is like a funhouse you don't want to visit ... really just noting the 6 pt swing there ..
For sure bud . I'm looking at the line movement on the Army / MTSU matchup right now .
I see the matchup as even. Not sure why Army was layin 5' on the open. Either side is
just a coverage bust away from winning that one .
Helping Kama'aina to beat their " Local " since 1994.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Bridge1:
Oh yeah I'm with you Wise ... And relying on Tex St to do anything on offense is like a funhouse you don't want to visit ... really just noting the 6 pt swing there ..
For sure bud . I'm looking at the line movement on the Army / MTSU matchup right now .
I see the matchup as even. Not sure why Army was layin 5' on the open. Either side is
Quote Originally Posted by WISEGUY36: Heritage just posted Navy at PK - 105 . BOL has BYU - 1 . FYI , Total is starting to move down to 52 ' at some shops . SMU is now up to - 22 ' at some shops
BYU is now moving to - 1' at some shops
Helping Kama'aina to beat their " Local " since 1994.
0
Quote Originally Posted by WISEGUY36:
Quote Originally Posted by WISEGUY36: Heritage just posted Navy at PK - 105 . BOL has BYU - 1 . FYI , Total is starting to move down to 52 ' at some shops . SMU is now up to - 22 ' at some shops
Thats a little weird about Blades at A&M ... I've only seen that the #3 QB opted out of A&M and figured some of the 'teams of destiny' would have an 'all-in' attitude by now ... certainly for a returning/proj starter... it does look like a pretty deep CB field in Phil at least and says he's returning next year so maybe just a calculated draft prospect move than real covid concerns ...
Got BYU -2 at bookmaker, -125 on the ML .. looks like BM's using standard odds are at -108 .. not sure if that's a temporary thing but cool with me ...
0
Thats a little weird about Blades at A&M ... I've only seen that the #3 QB opted out of A&M and figured some of the 'teams of destiny' would have an 'all-in' attitude by now ... certainly for a returning/proj starter... it does look like a pretty deep CB field in Phil at least and says he's returning next year so maybe just a calculated draft prospect move than real covid concerns ...
Got BYU -2 at bookmaker, -125 on the ML .. looks like BM's using standard odds are at -108 .. not sure if that's a temporary thing but cool with me ...
Thats a little weird about Blades at A&M ... I've only seen that the #3 QB opted out of A&M and figured some of the 'teams of destiny' would have an 'all-in' attitude by now ... certainly for a returning/proj starter... it does look like a pretty deep CB field in Phil at least and says he's returning next year so maybe just a calculated draft prospect move than real covid concerns ... Got BYU -2 at bookmaker, -125 on the ML .. looks like BM's using standard odds are at -108 .. not sure if that's a temporary thing but cool with me ...
Bridge, I think there will still be more opt outs to come before next week.
I'm also kinda surprised that the Southern Miss line @ -15 , 15' is still holding.
Looks expensive to me at those prices. I may be tempted to take a look at S. Ala.
Helping Kama'aina to beat their " Local " since 1994.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Bridge1:
Thats a little weird about Blades at A&M ... I've only seen that the #3 QB opted out of A&M and figured some of the 'teams of destiny' would have an 'all-in' attitude by now ... certainly for a returning/proj starter... it does look like a pretty deep CB field in Phil at least and says he's returning next year so maybe just a calculated draft prospect move than real covid concerns ... Got BYU -2 at bookmaker, -125 on the ML .. looks like BM's using standard odds are at -108 .. not sure if that's a temporary thing but cool with me ...
Bridge, I think there will still be more opt outs to come before next week.
I'm also kinda surprised that the Southern Miss line @ -15 , 15' is still holding.
Looks expensive to me at those prices. I may be tempted to take a look at S. Ala.
Word up Wise, yeah getting up there .. 15.5 now .. a 35-20 game is now a winner ... and S.Bam really found a stride and put up points late LY after the QB change.. sounds like they've settled on some guys they like at WR and could be much tougher this year .. I think though when we look at S.Bam LY getting 3 or so points a few times vs a step up in opponent (which I'd mark S.Miss as being) the potential to fall flat is a bit worrysome .. I'm thinking maybe S.Miss TT Under might be worth a look if it lands at 35 ... S.Bam moving super slow and bit of a sticky D last year just found ways to keep some better opponents under that mark ... And if we get a little more outta the S.Bama offense this year then think we add alot of value to that play the way they worked the clock LY .. tack on the general covid wackyness and S.Miss' losses and I don't expect Eagles O to be operating at a level where Memphis or ULL were on O last year when they broke through that 35 pt mark ..
In other news .. VT - Raheem Blacksheer is..... IN!!! ... appeal granted... really like this ...
0
Word up Wise, yeah getting up there .. 15.5 now .. a 35-20 game is now a winner ... and S.Bam really found a stride and put up points late LY after the QB change.. sounds like they've settled on some guys they like at WR and could be much tougher this year .. I think though when we look at S.Bam LY getting 3 or so points a few times vs a step up in opponent (which I'd mark S.Miss as being) the potential to fall flat is a bit worrysome .. I'm thinking maybe S.Miss TT Under might be worth a look if it lands at 35 ... S.Bam moving super slow and bit of a sticky D last year just found ways to keep some better opponents under that mark ... And if we get a little more outta the S.Bama offense this year then think we add alot of value to that play the way they worked the clock LY .. tack on the general covid wackyness and S.Miss' losses and I don't expect Eagles O to be operating at a level where Memphis or ULL were on O last year when they broke through that 35 pt mark ..
In other news .. VT - Raheem Blacksheer is..... IN!!! ... appeal granted... really like this ...
Just noticing that OK St had 2 proj starting OL's xfer off Phil's depth chart .. Bryce Bray, Ret starter G - Tulsa.... Jacob Farrell, projected staring T ... that makes 4 of LY's starters gone plus Farrell who was a projected starter... woof .. Sanders better learn how to use those feet and throw on the run this year... effectively ..
0
Just noticing that OK St had 2 proj starting OL's xfer off Phil's depth chart .. Bryce Bray, Ret starter G - Tulsa.... Jacob Farrell, projected staring T ... that makes 4 of LY's starters gone plus Farrell who was a projected starter... woof .. Sanders better learn how to use those feet and throw on the run this year... effectively ..
Just noticing that OK St had 2 proj starting OL's xfer off Phil's depth chart .. Bryce Bray, Ret starter G - Tulsa.... Jacob Farrell, projected staring T ... that makes 4 of LY's starters gone plus Farrell who was a projected starter... woof .. Sanders better learn how to use those feet and throw on the run this year... effectively ..
Good stuff , bud . If bettors are not updating rosters before they make a wager ,
they're gonna be sorry .
Bridge
Helping Kama'aina to beat their " Local " since 1994.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Bridge1:
Just noticing that OK St had 2 proj starting OL's xfer off Phil's depth chart .. Bryce Bray, Ret starter G - Tulsa.... Jacob Farrell, projected staring T ... that makes 4 of LY's starters gone plus Farrell who was a projected starter... woof .. Sanders better learn how to use those feet and throw on the run this year... effectively ..
Good stuff , bud . If bettors are not updating rosters before they make a wager ,
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.