Here is how I work it. I have the Bookie, I take bets from about 8 of my buddies. If I like the other side I take the bet and make the juice. If I dont I submit to my bookie. So sometimes my winning bets pay me +110
Ok now that makes sense ... I though it was just one roommate or buddy .... good for you bro .. Im still pissed but i can laugh about it .. you have to if you dont want to go insane
0
Quote Originally Posted by mrquija27:
Here is how I work it. I have the Bookie, I take bets from about 8 of my buddies. If I like the other side I take the bet and make the juice. If I dont I submit to my bookie. So sometimes my winning bets pay me +110
Ok now that makes sense ... I though it was just one roommate or buddy .... good for you bro .. Im still pissed but i can laugh about it .. you have to if you dont want to go insane
Stanford was the better team all night long. Stanford has played at a new level all season long. And even though Ok-St was favored, Stanford should have won that game the way they outplayed OSU and the home field advantage too.
If it wasn't fixed we'd all be rich. How do you not go for it from the half a yard line? Then again, even if he got it, the score would have been 38-35 Stanford instead of 38-31 and Oklahoma State would have played a different drive. Instead of 1st down passes in Stanford territory they would have milked clock and kick the tying FG with no time left.
Maybe if OSU scores a TD to make it 42-38, Stanford has a better chance to go all the way to the endzone with Andrew Luck needing absolutely a TD with 4 downs all the way than get that FG once in FG range.
0
Stanford was the better team all night long. Stanford has played at a new level all season long. And even though Ok-St was favored, Stanford should have won that game the way they outplayed OSU and the home field advantage too.
If it wasn't fixed we'd all be rich. How do you not go for it from the half a yard line? Then again, even if he got it, the score would have been 38-35 Stanford instead of 38-31 and Oklahoma State would have played a different drive. Instead of 1st down passes in Stanford territory they would have milked clock and kick the tying FG with no time left.
Maybe if OSU scores a TD to make it 42-38, Stanford has a better chance to go all the way to the endzone with Andrew Luck needing absolutely a TD with 4 downs all the way than get that FG once in FG range.
well because LIKE his knee was LIKE down LIKE at the 1 yd line and LIKE the ball LIKE had not LIKE crossed LIKE the goal line, so LIKE that is why it was LIKE ruled LIKE not a touchdown.
LIKE, I mean, do you not LIKE know the rules?
OMG Awesome
0
Quote Originally Posted by smartbets:
well because LIKE his knee was LIKE down LIKE at the 1 yd line and LIKE the ball LIKE had not LIKE crossed LIKE the goal line, so LIKE that is why it was LIKE ruled LIKE not a touchdown.
no we didn't deserve to win that game. it still doesn't make it right to be teased like that.piss on that receiver for not getting in the end zone
Absolutely, that was tough to swallow, to lose it in that fashion. I actually had a feeling he was short from what i could see, but was hoping they would not review it because everyone stormed the field. I felt bad for Stanford though, even though i was on OS - Stanford should have won that game.
0
Quote Originally Posted by mikeike:
no we didn't deserve to win that game. it still doesn't make it right to be teased like that.piss on that receiver for not getting in the end zone
Absolutely, that was tough to swallow, to lose it in that fashion. I actually had a feeling he was short from what i could see, but was hoping they would not review it because everyone stormed the field. I felt bad for Stanford though, even though i was on OS - Stanford should have won that game.
THAT WAS A WIERD ENDING. I HAD STANFORD BUT THOUGHT FOR SURE OKLA. STATE WAS GOING TO RUN THE BALL ON THE 1 YARD LINE AND COVER.MAKES YOU WONDER SOMETIMES ABOUT THE SPREADS. COACHES, REFS, ALOT OF PEOPLE GAMBLE AND NOTHING SURPRISES ME ANYMORE
0
THAT WAS A WIERD ENDING. I HAD STANFORD BUT THOUGHT FOR SURE OKLA. STATE WAS GOING TO RUN THE BALL ON THE 1 YARD LINE AND COVER.MAKES YOU WONDER SOMETIMES ABOUT THE SPREADS. COACHES, REFS, ALOT OF PEOPLE GAMBLE AND NOTHING SURPRISES ME ANYMORE
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
The only play the DB should have made was to go for the strip...Not a leg tackle at the 1..
Hot Forum Topics
