Posted:
#51
Quote Originally Posted by chazutx:
Rough start for the system...0-3 so far.
2-1 so far
0
2019 Bowl Under Systerm :)
Posted:
#54
Quote Originally Posted by HashToker:
You bet 1.1 units to win 1 first half and if it loses you bet 2.2 on the second half. So you end up betting 3.3 units to win .9 units, which would be roughly equal to betting a -400 ml favorite. Gl with that.
this system could be a shortcut to bankruptcy court.
You bet 1.1 units to win 1 first half and if it loses you bet 2.2 on the second half. So you end up betting 3.3 units to win .9 units, which would be roughly equal to betting a -400 ml favorite. Gl with that.
0
Posted:
#57
Quote Originally Posted by Roggs05:
Under 24 mtsuLol we get thru this day it will be legendary
Under 24 mtsuLol we get thru this day it will be legendary
Damn. I really thought we were going to breathe easy at least for this last game. However, still the system is 3-1 on the day with one pending. Currently, if bet correctly, one would be up about +1.52u (depending on your lines of course but I went with the best line available of my four books (BetOnline, BookMaker, 5Dimes, BetDSI).
0
Posted:
#61
I have to agree. Although I want everyone to kick the mans ass, this system is too risky. Suicide and one will go broke real quick. Maybe, just a rough start but. Man. I play first half for 55 and second half for 110. I’m quite certain I can add as I’m down -$80. The system didn’t even look promising. Man 3 or 4 more days like this and your broke before the playoffs start. I do wish all luck as this is one opportunity that I will pass... way more value elsewhere...
0
Posted:
#65
12/15/18 Sat
1:30pm Louisiana Lafayette vs Tulane (Cure Bowl)
1H U31 (-105 BookMaker): 34 pts scored / Lost -1.05u
2H U28 (-115 5Dimes; -110 BetDSI): 31 pts scored / Lost -2.47u
Total: -3.52u
2:00pm North Texas vs Utah St. (New Mexico Bowl)
1H U35 (-110 5Dimes/BetOnline): 45 pts scored / Lost -1.1u
2H U28.5 (-125 BetOnline/BookMaker): 20 pts scored / Won +2.1u
Total: +1
0
Posted:
#66
3:30pm Arizona St. vs Fresno St. (Las Vegas Bowl)
1H U27.5 (-118 BookMaker): 34 pts scored / Lost -1.18u
2H U27 (+100 5Dimes): 17 pts scored / Won +2.18u
Total: +1u
5:30pm Georgia Southern vs Eastern Michigan (Camellia Bowl)
1H U23 (-105 5Dimes): 24 pts scored / Lost -1.05u
2H U21.5 (-107 5Dimes): 20 pts scored / Won +2.05u
Total: +1u
0
Posted:
#67
9:00pm Middle Tenn. vs Appalachian St. (New Orleans Bowl)
1H U24 (-109 BookMaker): 30 pts scored / Lost -1.09u
2H U24 (-120 BetDSI; BookMaker; BetOnline; 5Dimes); 28 pts scored / Lost -2.51u
Total: -3.6u
Next Bowls
12/18/18 Tue - Boca Raton Bowl
12/19/18 Wed - Frisco Bowl
12/20/18 Thu - Gasparilla Bowl
12/21/18 Fri - Bahamas Bowl; Idaho Potato Bowl
12/22/18 Sat - Birmingham Bowl; Armed Forces Bowl; Dollar General Bowl; Hawaii Bowl
0
Posted:
#68
Apologies for any errors. Just wanted to share what I've been keeping for myself to assess profitability.
Probably won't be able to keep it up but will try to share what and when I can. Thanks to Roggs05 for getting us clued into the system some years ago.
Also, I've been wondering if it would be smart to consider the teams' offensive styles because the premise of this system relies on one angle which is that elongated periods of time between games creates "rust" in team's offenses. However, this would seem true typically of offenses who rely more on the pass than the run. Offenses relying on the pass involve timing, chemistry, QB to receiver connection, whatever you want to call it.
However, I would imagine that offenses that rely on the run need much less timing. Any such timing is within the ability of one player, the RB. This is juxtaposed to offenses relying on the pass whose timing relies on two players: the QB and the WR/TE/RB.
I thought this as I watched Gerogia Southern who is definitely a strong running team and has almost no passing game to speak of. They killed both halves offensively. However, my issue is that I don't know most of these teams playing so I'd have to dig a little more on each matchup but I guess it's not that much more work given it won't take long to assess a given team's general offensive strategies.
Anyway, just some thoughts. Would love to hear others'.
0
Posted:
#70
Quote Originally Posted by Roggs05:
Moderator please. ... 6 years straight clowns come hating
Rough start,,, IGGY those ass clowns that bash this system buddy. What we, are like 4 bowl. games in.. Clowns are already bashing it,, LOL.. Like 30 more games to go,, so that makes 60 wagers,, to go,, vs 8 wagers .. So they are declaring the system no good? Idiots.. All good Roggs,,, iggy them
Moderator please. ... 6 years straight clowns come hating
0
Posted:
#72
Quote Originally Posted by BigMoney777:
Time to shut it down buddy...stop pimping this garage and losing everyones money 1st halves 0-5 (-5.5 units) 2nd halves 3-2 (6.0 - 4.4) Total loss so far -3.9 units
The system kicked ass for 2 yrs.. flat last year I think,, To come in here and bash it is not cool,, There are many of games to go... like 60 more wagers o this system and you are claiming no good? There has only been what 4 bowl games played? so that is 8 wagers vs 60 to go,, You can not claim the system has failed,, you are smarter than that my friend,,
Time to shut it down buddy...stop pimping this garage and losing everyones money 1st halves 0-5 (-5.5 units) 2nd halves 3-2 (6.0 - 4.4) Total loss so far -3.9 units
0
Posted:
#73
Quote Originally Posted by thekoreanmang:
Apologies for any errors. Just wanted to share what I've been keeping for myself to assess profitability. Probably won't be able to keep it up but will try to share what and when I can. Thanks to Roggs05 for getting us clued into the system some years ago. Also, I've been wondering if it would be smart to consider the teams' offensive styles because the premise of this system relies on one angle which is that elongated periods of time between games creates "rust" in team's offenses. However, this would seem true typically of offenses who rely more on the pass than the run. Offenses relying on the pass involve timing, chemistry, QB to receiver connection, whatever you want to call it. However, I would imagine that offenses that rely on the run need much less timing. Any such timing is within the ability of one player, the RB. This is juxtaposed to offenses relying on the pass whose timing relies on two players: the QB and the WR/TE/RB. I thought this as I watched Gerogia Southern who is definitely a strong running team and has almost no passing game to speak of. They killed both halves offensively. However, my issue is that I don't know most of these teams playing so I'd have to dig a little more on each matchup but I guess it's not that much more work given it won't take long to assess a given team's general offensive strategies. Anyway, just some thoughts. Would love to hear others'.
makes sense I was thinking the same way as yourself,,
Apologies for any errors. Just wanted to share what I've been keeping for myself to assess profitability. Probably won't be able to keep it up but will try to share what and when I can. Thanks to Roggs05 for getting us clued into the system some years ago. Also, I've been wondering if it would be smart to consider the teams' offensive styles because the premise of this system relies on one angle which is that elongated periods of time between games creates "rust" in team's offenses. However, this would seem true typically of offenses who rely more on the pass than the run. Offenses relying on the pass involve timing, chemistry, QB to receiver connection, whatever you want to call it. However, I would imagine that offenses that rely on the run need much less timing. Any such timing is within the ability of one player, the RB. This is juxtaposed to offenses relying on the pass whose timing relies on two players: the QB and the WR/TE/RB. I thought this as I watched Gerogia Southern who is definitely a strong running team and has almost no passing game to speak of. They killed both halves offensively. However, my issue is that I don't know most of these teams playing so I'd have to dig a little more on each matchup but I guess it's not that much more work given it won't take long to assess a given team's general offensive strategies. Anyway, just some thoughts. Would love to hear others'.
0
Posted:
#74
Quote Originally Posted by GoldjaBoy:
why not watch first half and bet second half accordingly?
Quote Originally Posted by thekoreanmang:
Apologies for any errors. Just wanted to share what I've been keeping for myself to assess profitability. Probably won't be able to keep it up but will try to share what and when I can. Thanks to Roggs05 for getting us clued into the system some years ago. Also, I've been wondering if it would be smart to consider the teams' offensive styles because the premise of this system relies on one angle which is that elongated periods of time between games creates "rust" in team's offenses. However, this would seem true typically of offenses who rely more on the pass than the run. Offenses relying on the pass involve timing, chemistry, QB to receiver connection, whatever you want to call it. However, I would imagine that offenses that rely on the run need much less timing. Any such timing is within the ability of one player, the RB. This is juxtaposed to offenses relying on the pass whose timing relies on two players: the QB and the WR/TE/RB. I thought this as I watched Gerogia Southern who is definitely a strong running team and has almost no passing game to speak of. They killed both halves offensively. However, my issue is that I don't know most of these teams playing so I'd have to dig a little more on each matchup but I guess it's not that much more work given it won't take long to assess a given team's general offensive strategies. Anyway, just some thoughts. Would love to hear others'.
makes sense I was thinking the same way as yourself,,Apologies for any errors. Just wanted to share what I've been keeping for myself to assess profitability. Probably won't be able to keep it up but will try to share what and when I can. Thanks to Roggs05 for getting us clued into the system some years ago. Also, I've been wondering if it would be smart to consider the teams' offensive styles because the premise of this system relies on one angle which is that elongated periods of time between games creates "rust" in team's offenses. However, this would seem true typically of offenses who rely more on the pass than the run. Offenses relying on the pass involve timing, chemistry, QB to receiver connection, whatever you want to call it. However, I would imagine that offenses that rely on the run need much less timing. Any such timing is within the ability of one player, the RB. This is juxtaposed to offenses relying on the pass whose timing relies on two players: the QB and the WR/TE/RB. I thought this as I watched Gerogia Southern who is definitely a strong running team and has almost no passing game to speak of. They killed both halves offensively. However, my issue is that I don't know most of these teams playing so I'd have to dig a little more on each matchup but I guess it's not that much more work given it won't take long to assess a given team's general offensive strategies. Anyway, just some thoughts. Would love to hear others'.
0
Posted:
#75
Quote Originally Posted by BigMoney777:
Time to shut it down buddy...stop pimping this garage and losing everyones money 1st halves 0-5 (-5.5 units) 2nd halves 3-2 (6.0 - 4.4) Total loss so far -3.9 units
HE isn't losing anyone's money. That is beyond stupid tp say. People are responsible for their own bets. So many are looking for an easy way to win. No one is being forced to follow this. They can make the choice themselves. Pretty phucking simple
Time to shut it down buddy...stop pimping this garage and losing everyones money 1st halves 0-5 (-5.5 units) 2nd halves 3-2 (6.0 - 4.4) Total loss so far -3.9 units
Here is a thought. Worry about YOUR money. Let others worry about THEIR money. IF they follow and they lose, that's the decision they made
Histrionic personality disorder. It's sad
0
Hot Forum Topics
