East Carolina should not be laying this number to anyone in their conference right now... not anyone.
Isn't that a red flag when u see they are laying a high number? Laying it for a reason because if it was 3 or 4 everyone would hammer East Car. They set it at 6 to try and attract some Tulane action which clearly for some reason u got on. Always trying to outsmart a line and that's why the past few months you've been horrible. Some times it works but most of time it doesn't. Tulane is trash yet you cone up with a huge story as to why/how they cover a 6 pt spread.
East Carolina should not be laying this number to anyone in their conference right now... not anyone.
Isn't that a red flag when u see they are laying a high number? Laying it for a reason because if it was 3 or 4 everyone would hammer East Car. They set it at 6 to try and attract some Tulane action which clearly for some reason u got on. Always trying to outsmart a line and that's why the past few months you've been horrible. Some times it works but most of time it doesn't. Tulane is trash yet you cone up with a huge story as to why/how they cover a 6 pt spread.
I just checked (after game). Apparently, we were the public. 85% ATS and 90% SU money was on Tulane
Tough loss
You see the strangest, couldn't win if life depended on it anti-public wins on the day before SB — but far be it from me to make any association that public's profits are bad for biz, unload pockets so John Q. can reach down deeper in order to bet the SB the next day.
Let's just say the books are just "luckier than thou."
Quote Originally Posted by fadeORdie:
I just checked (after game). Apparently, we were the public. 85% ATS and 90% SU money was on Tulane
Tough loss
You see the strangest, couldn't win if life depended on it anti-public wins on the day before SB — but far be it from me to make any association that public's profits are bad for biz, unload pockets so John Q. can reach down deeper in order to bet the SB the next day.
Let's just say the books are just "luckier than thou."