All Forums | College Basketball

Sunday Matchup/Situational Play Alert

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 4597
Posts: 42
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2008
Posts: 902
Posted: #26
man kine i missed you play... congrats on ur win and cant wait to see you when the semester ends
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 8237
Posted: #27
Quote Originally Posted by KineProfessor:



Hahaha - I don't even think I like this game as much as you do!  Depaul is super inconsistent but this seems to be a good matchup and spot for them - nothing would surprise me on this game - just gotta go with the numbers and the numbers say lay 3 with Depaul.  I'll also say that nomatter what the score is at half, i won't feel like its a win or a loss with these two teams involved.
Excellent call.
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 17534
Posted: #28
NICE HIT
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 55436
Posted: #29
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2005
Posts: 774
Posted: #30
i remember u from last year CBB and have been looking for ya!! so glad ur back!!
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2005
Posts: 774
Posted: #31
are u still utilizing kenpom to come up with the plays? thanks again.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 20924
Posted: #32
Quote Originally Posted by ClubDirt:

nice call KP.  never in doubt.    
I was also on them as well, but to say never in doubt when they were down 12 at the half is just . Down 12 at the half had definitely raised some doubt from me. That said I had no problem's betting the same price I had on the full game @ -3.5 on them -5.5 in the 2nd half. I would say the 2nd half bet was the one that was never in doubt but the full game was most surely no east task...


Nice play Kine the situation was nice...
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2003
Posts: 28196
Posted: #33
Quote Originally Posted by oddsbuster:

I was also on them as well, but to say never in doubt when they were down 12 at the half is just . Down 12 at the half had definitely raised some doubt from me. That said I had no problem's betting the same price I had on the full game @ -3.5 on them -5.5 in the 2nd half. I would say the 2nd half bet was the one that was never in doubt but the full game was most surely no east task...


Nice play Kine the situation was nice...

that was sarcasm, oddbuster.   and  are my sarcasm icons.  always good to stay positive when guys like KP give out picks.  KP obviously puts a lot of work and thought into these picks and we all appreciate it, especially those of us who can't pick CBB ourselves.

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2005
Posts: 21480
Posted: #34
missed this as I was glued to football but as usual, well done Kine
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 11636
Posted: #35
Quote Originally Posted by ClubDirt:

that was sarcasm, oddbuster.   and  are my sarcasm icons.  always good to stay positive when guys like KP give out picks.  KP obviously puts a lot of work and thought into these picks and we all appreciate it, especially those of us who can't pick CBB ourselves.

 

I think I might start giving "clubdirt sarcasm alerts"--- it appears that a lof of people don't get you dirt

nice hit kine, didn't mean any disrespect by my post, personally, I just tend to stay away from games that are that heavily favored by the public, in my experience, it works out better than not, and from what i've seen, your games usually tend to be more under the rader, that's why I was surprised to see you on Depaul, anyway, well done as always

 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2010
Posts: 16864
Posted: #36
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 20924
Posted: #37
Quote Originally Posted by ClubDirt:

that was sarcasm, oddbuster.   and  are my sarcasm icons.  always good to stay positive when guys like KP give out picks.  KP obviously puts a lot of work and thought into these picks and we all appreciate it, especially those of us who can't pick CBB ourselves.

Just checking. You past the test. I was just hoping I didn't get the WTF are you talking about response. Kine knows his shit yes...
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2003
Posts: 28196
Posted: #38
Quote Originally Posted by cacabware:

 

I think I might start giving "clubdirt sarcasm alerts"--- it appears that a lof of people don't get you dirt

nice hit kine, didn't mean any disrespect by my post, personally, I just tend to stay away from games that are that heavily favored by the public, in my experience, it works out better than not, and from what i've seen, your games usually tend to be more under the rader, that's why I was surprised to see you on Depaul, anyway, well done as always

there was a time when everything i said was sarcastic.  i''ve been working on it and have cut it down to about 75%. 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 4619
Posted: #39
Quote Originally Posted by ClubDirt:

that was sarcasm, oddbuster.   and  are my sarcasm icons.  always good to stay positive when guys like KP give out picks.  KP obviously puts a lot of work and thought into these picks and we all appreciate it, especially those of us who can't pick CBB ourselves.



I took it as sarcasm and had no problem with it at all

Your welcome in any of my threads anytime - we are all in this together.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 4619
Posted: #40
Quote Originally Posted by cacabware:

 

I think I might start giving "clubdirt sarcasm alerts"--- it appears that a lof of people don't get you dirt

nice hit kine, didn't mean any disrespect by my post, personally, I just tend to stay away from games that are that heavily favored by the public, in my experience, it works out better than not, and from what i've seen, your games usually tend to be more under the rader, that's why I was surprised to see you on Depaul, anyway, well done as always


First, I don't worry at all about the "public" mainly because there is no real gauge for the public.  So many of those websites that track consensus are total BS.  If you do handicap according to "the public" which I don't recommend at all, you should only concern yourself with the money being bet. 

I tracked the DePaul numbers on matchbook and it was one of the LEAST bet games on the site yesterday.  It was in NO WAY a public game. 

Most of "the public" was betting/watching nfl, winning money on Arizona and losing money on Texas. 

The "public" bets favorites, ranked teams, and televised games so they can watch their bets. 

Trust me when I say there is NO PUBLIC concerning themselves with the Depaul vs Central Michigan game, especially on a NFL Sunday, not even in the least bit.


 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 182
Posted: #41
Quote Originally Posted by KineProfessor:


First, I don't worry at all about the "public" mainly because there is no real gauge for the public.  So many of those websites that track consensus are total BS.  If you do handicap according to "the public" which I don't recommend at all, you should only concern yourself with the money being bet. 

I tracked the DePaul numbers on matchbook and it was one of the LEAST bet games on the site yesterday.  It was in NO WAY a public game. 

Most of "the public" was betting/watching nfl, winning money on Arizona and losing money on Texas. 

The "public" bets favorites, ranked teams, and televised games so they can watch their bets. 

Trust me when I say there is NO PUBLIC concerning themselves with the Depaul vs Central Michigan game, especially on a NFL Sunday, not even in the least bit.


  you are a good and kine man,  happy holidays my friend
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2008
Posts: 469
Posted: #42

Good work.   You are really showing your skill.  Props. 

All Forums | College Basketball
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.