Posted:
#101
UAB 
0
$$$ PURDUE NCAABB Tourney Thread $$$
Posted:
#106
Alright guys locking these plays in for Thursday and Friday (more to come but want to get these in)
SYRACUSE -6 (7U - BIG Play) - you kidding me here? I can see Butler hanging around but covering 6 is a tall order. Fortunate to get this line at sportsbook and it's the best I've seen and probably the best you will get up until gametime.
WASHINGTON +5 (4U) - Loved them before the injury to Bryant, and the line has dropped since the news as it was +6.5 this morning 
Was getting a bit greedy and was hoping for it to continue to climb but I don't think you will get it better now
Will be playing several of the other games, including the Purdue-Duke game, just want to keep analyzing the lines and looking at as much info as possible. I have a good idea of who I will be playing but being patient and trying to get the best possible lines for the other games 
0
Posted:
#107
UPDATED TOURNEY RECORD: 14-15-1 (+.3U)
UPDATED OVERALL RECORD: 253-218-16 (+35.23U)
TUESDAY: 1-2 (-1.2U)
TEXAS TECH +9 (2U)
UAB -4 (2U)
TEMPLE Women 1H +17.5 (1U)
Well after this first week, roughly even which is not where I would have liked to be. No plays tomorrow, all preparation for Thursday and Friday's big games, ready to hit it hard
0
Posted:
#108
Hey buddy... WVU line is now at 3.5 - Im thinking this may be a good value going the other way now? Do you really see Bryant's abscence playing that big of a role? Especially if you buy the hook bringing it to 3. I realize this isnt the play for you as you seem to be on the UW train but I was just curious as to how big a role you think the Bryant absence will play? BOL
0
Posted:
#109
Quote Originally Posted by Gfunkera86:
Hey buddy... WVU line is now at 3.5 - Im thinking this may be a good value going the other way now? Do you really see Bryant's abscence playing that big of a role? Especially if you buy the hook bringing it to 3. I realize this isnt the play for you as you seem to be on the UW train but I was just curious as to how big a role you think the Bryant absence will play? BOL
Hey buddy... WVU line is now at 3.5 - Im thinking this may be a good value going the other way now? Do you really see Bryant's abscence playing that big of a role? Especially if you buy the hook bringing it to 3. I realize this isnt the play for you as you seem to be on the UW train but I was just curious as to how big a role you think the Bryant absence will play? BOL
post#110 - i already locked in Washington - two of my books has +4.5 still....but like i said, even before the injury i still liked Washington to cover, this injury only enhances the bet...and no, i dont play into the "well the injury will help motivate the team even more" in casepeople wondered - not in this circumstance.
BOL to whoever you play 
0
Posted:
#112
Quote Originally Posted by Gfunkera86:
no I was saying the line drop seems to be an overreaction to me. The line was near 6 this morning and now 3.5? I dont think Bryant plays that huge of a role?
no I was saying the line drop seems to be an overreaction to me. The line was near 6 this morning and now 3.5? I dont think Bryant plays that huge of a role?
Washington is a HUGE guard oriented team, and Bryant was their starting guard. He would've had a big impact on both ends of the floor. Mazzula will have to step up and play major minutes for them.
0
Posted:
#120
GL buddy!! With you here on Cuse!! I think that line is a bargain!! You think N Iowa can do it again?? Mich St is a different team without Lucas. And, Northern Iowa very comfortable in that gym since they play the Valley tourney there every year, and of course they just won that tournament there a few weeks ago.
I think that line is a bargain!! You think N Iowa can do it again?? Mich St is a different team without Lucas. And, Northern Iowa very comfortable in that gym since they play the Valley tourney there every year, and of course they just won that tournament there a few weeks ago.
0
Posted:
#124
Quote Originally Posted by 702underdog:
How do you think the injury will effect the total of the game? 
The Mountaineers might want to really control the tempo without the PG.
i would lean the under actually, i can see WVU slowing the game down as much as possible bc of the way Wash. plays up and down and trying to get half court sets for butler and co, and without their starting guard being able to push the tempo when they are on offense will mean longer possessions the way i see it....dont play many totals though
0
Posted:
#125
Purdue, I don't know you and you are probally a nice guy but your knowledge of college basketball seems limited judging from your record as well as your picks (it sounds insulting but I'm not trying to be). I know I'm new and only posted a few on the site but since we are holding records I will add more games. Had I done that at the start of the season my record would have spoke for me. So I'll tell you what I'll make a friendly wage with you if I don't win those two games wv & mich st (I have to win both ats) I will post "I'm and Idiot!" just for you in big print. If you lose...just say the devil is great! lol Do we have a deal???
0
Hot Forum Topics
