Rum what are you thinkin on these games tonight? Colorado down 3 of their top 4 players.
@JSN2Deep
Just to chime in..im on Oklahoma, definitely like to hear what rum has to say. These guys have been off for a few weeks. I actually have Sooners by 15-20
@JSN2Deep
Just to chime in..im on Oklahoma, definitely like to hear what rum has to say. These guys have been off for a few weeks. I actually have Sooners by 15-20
taking Minnesota tonight over Baylor i just think Minnesota will want to play in this more than Baylor could be wrong , but its how i see it ..and Big 10 has been doing well
Minnesota +4.5
if colorado has guys out i cant find it
one tease over 158.5/okla over 146.5 rutgers
gl tonight
taking Minnesota tonight over Baylor i just think Minnesota will want to play in this more than Baylor could be wrong , but its how i see it ..and Big 10 has been doing well
Minnesota +4.5
if colorado has guys out i cant find it
one tease over 158.5/okla over 146.5 rutgers
gl tonight
well for some reason at hardrock the line has went down from oklahoma -9.5 to -8.5 , colorado missing 3 of their best players?? i mean it seems too easy to take Oklahoma
well for some reason at hardrock the line has went down from oklahoma -9.5 to -8.5 , colorado missing 3 of their best players?? i mean it seems too easy to take Oklahoma
yes i was wanting to play over team total on oklahoma but they are not offering it just taking oklahoma -8.5 if they play like they were i do not see how they do not win this by 13+
yes i was wanting to play over team total on oklahoma but they are not offering it just taking oklahoma -8.5 if they play like they were i do not see how they do not win this by 13+
Well kind of wishing I would have never seen that colorado was missing players...lol. the over looks possible. But this colorado team came to play. Good for them. Honestly did not know anything about players being gone.
Well kind of wishing I would have never seen that colorado was missing players...lol. the over looks possible. But this colorado team came to play. Good for them. Honestly did not know anything about players being gone.
Minnesota simply did not have enough competent players to compete… one starter played 30 minutes… 2 points…. That simply will not cut it. …and didn’t. Look at box score… they just didn’t have enough.
Minnesota simply did not have enough competent players to compete… one starter played 30 minutes… 2 points…. That simply will not cut it. …and didn’t. Look at box score… they just didn’t have enough.
yes i seen they were missing some role players but the line threw me off for sure on that game, if baylor was -6.5 or 7 or more i would have taken them, sounds strange i know , but 3.5 4.5 it seemed minnesota was getting some respect , and to be blunt with teams not playing for awhile its hard to get a read, but dont matter now itwas 0-2 just glad the colorado game went over kept my teaser alive for tonight ... seen a lot of people in here tonight on minnesota colorado really surprised me and thats why you cant let guys being out control your wagering because that line had been about the same and the odds makers know who is playing so they figure that in already, but they gave it their all for sure
yes i seen they were missing some role players but the line threw me off for sure on that game, if baylor was -6.5 or 7 or more i would have taken them, sounds strange i know , but 3.5 4.5 it seemed minnesota was getting some respect , and to be blunt with teams not playing for awhile its hard to get a read, but dont matter now itwas 0-2 just glad the colorado game went over kept my teaser alive for tonight ... seen a lot of people in here tonight on minnesota colorado really surprised me and thats why you cant let guys being out control your wagering because that line had been about the same and the odds makers know who is playing so they figure that in already, but they gave it their all for sure
I hate wasting money on stupid games and now that I see you didn't have it completely researched and you "would have taken them at -6.5 or 7" but not 3.5 or 4.5 makes no sense whatsoever RUM, almost like flipping a coin. This is what I meant weeks ago that when you write going around in circles and woulda coulda comments it is difficult to really understand sometimes, but like you said it is simply an 0-2 and we move onward. Oh well, lesson learned. Good luck the last couple of games.
I hate wasting money on stupid games and now that I see you didn't have it completely researched and you "would have taken them at -6.5 or 7" but not 3.5 or 4.5 makes no sense whatsoever RUM, almost like flipping a coin. This is what I meant weeks ago that when you write going around in circles and woulda coulda comments it is difficult to really understand sometimes, but like you said it is simply an 0-2 and we move onward. Oh well, lesson learned. Good luck the last couple of games.
so far it seems like most are on U conn, line has dropped and i am glad about that i said back when illinois won their game i was most likely taking Illinois, just think they have what it takes plenty of size, good guard play, good shooters, just think they match up well with many teams, and if they shoot well they can play with anyone....Illinois out rebounds their opponents by double digits usually and i think they will cause problems for U conn, same as dike caused for most of the game...and they do not really rely on one star player, they can score from anywhere, they got good inside game, and some guys that can really shoot, but when they played Iowa they actually had a poor shooting night and still won easily, and with Silas Demary limited due to that high ankle sprain, that could cause problems even more
so far it seems like most are on U conn, line has dropped and i am glad about that i said back when illinois won their game i was most likely taking Illinois, just think they have what it takes plenty of size, good guard play, good shooters, just think they match up well with many teams, and if they shoot well they can play with anyone....Illinois out rebounds their opponents by double digits usually and i think they will cause problems for U conn, same as dike caused for most of the game...and they do not really rely on one star player, they can score from anywhere, they got good inside game, and some guys that can really shoot, but when they played Iowa they actually had a poor shooting night and still won easily, and with Silas Demary limited due to that high ankle sprain, that could cause problems even more
tonight taking auburn, but it seems easy . also need the over already in the rutgers games.... yes new mexico is really good against the 3 and tulsa relys on the 3, new mexico has won by double digits soi far but all were at home, but they are just 1-3 ats away from the pit last 4 , so if ya think defense is the way to go than NM would be the play, if ya think tulsa's great 3 point shooting prevails maybe ya like tulsa , i think this will be a good game N Mexico away from the Pit is not great, N mexico is 1-2 ats at neutral sites tulsa is 4-2 at neutral sites , ive always been an offensive guy, but this game in my opinion is really close
tonight taking auburn, but it seems easy . also need the over already in the rutgers games.... yes new mexico is really good against the 3 and tulsa relys on the 3, new mexico has won by double digits soi far but all were at home, but they are just 1-3 ats away from the pit last 4 , so if ya think defense is the way to go than NM would be the play, if ya think tulsa's great 3 point shooting prevails maybe ya like tulsa , i think this will be a good game N Mexico away from the Pit is not great, N mexico is 1-2 ats at neutral sites tulsa is 4-2 at neutral sites , ive always been an offensive guy, but this game in my opinion is really close
@CabernetTrey
you do not understand what i said??? i said it sounds crazy like you said i did not give any opinions as to why i liked either play last night...i went with oklahoma basically because of 3 main guys out, like many did....what i meant about minnesota was, going into the game andnot having a opinion before hand, i would have thought Baylor would have been a bigger favorite, but when i seen it had been around 3-4 it got me wondering, as to why is it only 3-4 , if it was 6-7 i knew why....ya know last night there were many people on oklahoma and minnesota maybe some gave writeups and explained why they liked them i didnt, if its really frustrating you then follow someone else OR look over the games yourself and trust yourself , or dont gamble , i cant believe you have never looked at a line and wondered why is it low or high? thats what i meant by what i said, and you are absolutely correct i did not research games last night, except being told players were out for colorado, ... look for explanations if thats what you want see if ya agree ., many times i do give reasoning, last night i did not you said it yourself you hate wasting money on stupid games i cannot believe you played those last night because of me, there had to of been others you follow on them also, sounds like your pissed that ya lost, and if ya get pissed thats a sign that maybe this aint for you..... then your going to have an idiot trigger ya even more....lol he thrives on that.... take a break brother... if its bother you that bad, apparently you didnt follow me a few weeks ago when i was 44-15 for the week im sorry , or maybe thats what got you to follow...personally i just post what i like sometimes with my reasons and if games lose by a point oh well seems like your looking at a few people , i suggest handicap yourself trust yourself no opinion dont play but dont blame someone else who just said what he was betting and he didnt give any reasoning whatsoever ..
gl
@CabernetTrey
you do not understand what i said??? i said it sounds crazy like you said i did not give any opinions as to why i liked either play last night...i went with oklahoma basically because of 3 main guys out, like many did....what i meant about minnesota was, going into the game andnot having a opinion before hand, i would have thought Baylor would have been a bigger favorite, but when i seen it had been around 3-4 it got me wondering, as to why is it only 3-4 , if it was 6-7 i knew why....ya know last night there were many people on oklahoma and minnesota maybe some gave writeups and explained why they liked them i didnt, if its really frustrating you then follow someone else OR look over the games yourself and trust yourself , or dont gamble , i cant believe you have never looked at a line and wondered why is it low or high? thats what i meant by what i said, and you are absolutely correct i did not research games last night, except being told players were out for colorado, ... look for explanations if thats what you want see if ya agree ., many times i do give reasoning, last night i did not you said it yourself you hate wasting money on stupid games i cannot believe you played those last night because of me, there had to of been others you follow on them also, sounds like your pissed that ya lost, and if ya get pissed thats a sign that maybe this aint for you..... then your going to have an idiot trigger ya even more....lol he thrives on that.... take a break brother... if its bother you that bad, apparently you didnt follow me a few weeks ago when i was 44-15 for the week im sorry , or maybe thats what got you to follow...personally i just post what i like sometimes with my reasons and if games lose by a point oh well seems like your looking at a few people , i suggest handicap yourself trust yourself no opinion dont play but dont blame someone else who just said what he was betting and he didnt give any reasoning whatsoever ..
gl

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.