All Forums | College Basketball

NCAAB WED

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 38268
Posts: 165
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 16296
Posted: #76
BOL UNC  
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 217
Posted: #77
Quote Originally Posted by UNCforever:

As I have some free time here.

 

Looking at

NM +5.5

UNC +5.5

 

 

Be back later tonight to update things...


Duke is going to slaughter Carolina & cover. yes sir, that is correct. Duke is a better team overall.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 757
Posted: #78

I for one and NOT touching this game with a 100 dollar bill.

The Dukies are a better team but this IS UNC v. Duke.  All rules go out the window.

Can the Heels pull this out and win/cover, yep.  Could the Dukies win by 15, yep.

I'm off this one but good luck UNC

person SAYS MAKE & PUNISH YOUR BOOK

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 1728
Posted: #79
Quote Originally Posted by UNCforever:

 

IT WAS A 2ND HALF PLAY. AT WHAT POINT WAS KU +2? THE 2ND HALF LINE WAS KU +2.

 IF YOU READ THE THREAD DABEARS POSTED THAT I WOULD MORE THAN LIKELY BE BACK FOR A SECOND HALF PLAY.

    At what point did I mention it went off at +2 ( the game line ) ? Obviously I'm refering to the second half spread if you read my posts. Kansas -2 at tipoff should have rated the stronger play, not to mention taking them to cover the 1st half, which was even more favorable.  

    

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 8280
Posted: #80
Quote Originally Posted by mischkin04:

    At what point did I mention it went off at +2 ( the game line ) ? Obviously I'm refering to the second half spread if you read my posts. Kansas -2 at tipoff should have rated the stronger play, not to mention taking them to cover the 1st half, which was even more favorable.  

    

 

What are you talking about? It was a 2nd half play is it really that hard to undertstand? I have never done anyhting to inflate my record or post plays late. So I am not sure why you are trying to look like a dumbass.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 308
Posted: #81
ahahhahaahhaaha
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 308
Posted: #82
hey unc..if you could clarify a couple things for me about your pick id apperciate it

from the angles i looked at..UNC's losses at home recently have come to teams who's guards dominate the game and give carolina's guards a tough time matchup wise... duke can also get to the line pretty well and they shoot a good percentage..

just wondering if you think unc's guards can have any success covering nolan smith n john scheyer while keeping their key players like ed davis and deon thompson out of foul trouble
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2008
Posts: 26206
Posted: #83
bol UNC, hope you not doing this  all game long! 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 45
Posted: #84
Quote Originally Posted by mischkin04:

    At what point did I mention it went off at +2 ( the game line ) ? Obviously I'm refering to the second half spread if you read my posts. Kansas -2 at tipoff should have rated the stronger play, not to mention taking them to cover the 1st half, which was even more favorable.  

    

 

Maybe if you were watching the game mischkin you wouldve seen the momentum of the game and how well kansas was playing (opposite of how they played in colorado..) there was more value in a second half bet on this game as both texas and kansas (mostly texas) has shown that they can be inconsistent at times. kansas brought their A game and the second half bet was the right one. If you have a problem with UNC's style of posting then dont read it. If you felt the game line of -2 was a better value play than you shouldve taken it. stop wasting space with your unsupported arguments

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 183
Posted: #85
the underclassmen for Texas just dont get it...
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 1728
Posted: #86
Quote Originally Posted by alex247cs:

 

Maybe if you were watching the game mischkin you wouldve seen the momentum of the game and how well kansas was playing (opposite of how they played in colorado..) there was more value in a second half bet on this game as both texas and kansas (mostly texas) has shown that they can be inconsistent at times. kansas brought their A game and the second half bet was the right one. If you have a problem with UNC's style of posting then dont read it. If you felt the game line of -2 was a better value play than you shouldve taken it. stop wasting space with your unsupported arguments

     So both can be inconsistant.

 

   Here's a post from UNC's monday thread contributed by joek21:

"Bet KU first half.  Texas has only covered the first half spread twice this year.  As a matter of fact of late they have been losing (whether home or away) going into halftime.  On the flipside, KU is a much better first half team.  They have lead going into halftime everytime but twice this season.  Texas is a much better second half team than first half team.  It is definately possible that Texas wins at home and God knows that they need it but I think it happens in the second half."

    I'm trusting the thread to be truthfull. Think there may be substance to my point?

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 960
Posted: #87
Quote Originally Posted by mischkin04:

     So both can be inconsistant.

 

   Here's a post from UNC's monday thread contributed by joek21:

"Bet KU first half.  Texas has only covered the first half spread twice this year.  As a matter of fact of late they have been losing (whether home or away) going into halftime.  On the flipside, KU is a much better first half team.  They have lead going into halftime everytime but twice this season.  Texas is a much better second half team than first half team.  It is definately possible that Texas wins at home and God knows that they need it but I think it happens in the second half."

    I'm trusting the thread to be truthfull. Think there may be substance to my point?

Who cares bud, if you took KAN first half you won, if you took KAN second half u won, if u took them for the game u won, what is the purpose of clogging up someone thread with this bull shit,
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 541
Posted: #88
UNC, your thoughts on Baylor @ Nebr (-2) , it is my understanding Baylor may have a minor injury, but has a very skilled player replacing him...Seems to me that Nebr def is strong, but will their offense be able to outscore this very big Baylor team?
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 960
Posted: #89
Quote Originally Posted by mries:

UNC, your thoughts on Baylor @ Nebr (-2) , it is my understanding Baylor may have a minor injury, but has a very skilled player replacing him...Seems to me that Nebr def is strong, but will their offense be able to outscore this very big Baylor team?
What ive been noticing is that these shit teams getting between 2 and 4 points at home have been losing lately, NEB just doesnt have the talent to run with this BAY team, BAY will win this game by 8-10 points,
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 3853
Posted: #90
GL
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 251
Posted: #91
Quote Originally Posted by mischkin04:

     So both can be inconsistant.

 

   Here's a post from UNC's monday thread contributed by joek21:

"Bet KU first half.  Texas has only covered the first half spread twice this year.  As a matter of fact of late they have been losing (whether home or away) going into halftime.  On the flipside, KU is a much better first half team.  They have lead going into halftime everytime but twice this season.  Texas is a much better second half team than first half team.  It is definately possible that Texas wins at home and God knows that they need it but I think it happens in the second half."

    I'm trusting the thread to be truthfull. Think there may be substance to my point?


bro, its obvious that UNCforever was watching the game and made his 2nd half play according to what he saw.....

but seriously, quit believing everything you read.... if you like a point like the one "joek21" made then do yourself a favor and research it to see if the point is reliable.... otherwise youre just a know-nothing, lazy, dick-riding tailer

and btw, ever see the movie "A Few Good Men"?
to quote jack as best i can with a little twist:
"mischkin, you sleep under the very blanket of capping that UNC provides and then question the manner in which he provides it....... i suggest you either thank him and go on your way or make ur own picks and stand post..... either way no one here gives a damn what you think you are entitled to"

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 1728
Posted: #92

Quote Originally Posted by thepigeoncoup33:

Who cares bud, if you took KAN first half you won, if you took KAN second half u won, if u took them for the game u won, what is the purpose of clogging up someone thread with this bull shit,

       Figure it out, if you can.

     When's this challenge thing gonna start anyway?

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2010
Posts: 9
Posted: #93
UNC, been following alot of your leans and plays, good work my friend, you are the man!  Got UNC +7 locked in for tonights play
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 960
Posted: #94
Im alittle surprised ure not on IND tonight UNC, this should be a close game, IND will want this one and seems to be much better at home
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 3484
Posted: #95
Quote Originally Posted by Dogjimbo:

  This is why drugs and alcohol don't mix when posting.    Just playing Sosana. I know what your saying on that, and believe you got something.  







Wifey was out of town for a few days.....head hurts but still curious on the line...
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2007
Posts: 829
Posted: #96
How about Drex/Hofstra? An actual PKem.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 960
Posted: #97
Quote Originally Posted by mischkin04:

       Figure it out, if you can.

     When's this challenge thing gonna start anyway?

One thing i can figure out is gambling is about money not about challenging some other capper to a capping dual, u should be looking for the girl with the big titters in ure avatar instead of starting a so called capping dual against someone to get noticed, what are u like 15 tears old bud,
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 9812
Posted: #98

Quote Originally Posted by thepigeoncoup33:

One thing i can figure out is gambling is about money not about challenging some other capper to a capping dual, u should be looking for the girl with the big titters in ure avatar instead of starting a so called capping dual against someone to get noticed, what are u like 15 tears old bud,

its because a bunch of guys with big egos feel inferior when a capper like UNC gets so many posts.  Jealousy is a bitch....no disrespect thepigeoncoup33, just tryin to enlighten

 

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 57
Posted: #99

Quote Originally Posted by thepigeoncoup33:

Who cares bud, if you took KAN first half you won, if you took KAN second half u won, if u took them for the game u won, what is the purpose of clogging up someone thread with this bull shit,

 

 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 960
Posted: #100
Quote Originally Posted by madashman:

its because a bunch of guys with big egos feel inferior when a capper like UNC gets so many posts.  Jealousy is a bitch....no disrespect thepigeoncoup33, just tryin to enlighten

 

Ya i know MAD, been around long enough to know how it goes down, happens to every good capper on this site,
All Forums | College Basketball
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.