FOLLOW IF YOU’D LIKE:
UNLV 1h +2
OHIO STATE 1h ML
LIBERTY 1h -2
Creighton 1h -4.5
Creighton FG -8
Utah 1h +2
PARLAY ACTION
Ohio State 1h ML
Liberty 1h -2
Creighton FG -8
FOLLOW IF YOU’D LIKE:
UNLV 1h +2
OHIO STATE 1h ML
LIBERTY 1h -2
Creighton 1h -4.5
Creighton FG -8
Utah 1h +2
PARLAY ACTION
Ohio State 1h ML
Liberty 1h -2
Creighton FG -8
FOLLOW IF YOU’D LIKE:
UNLV 1h +2
OHIO STATE 1h ML
LIBERTY 1h -2
Creighton 1h -4.5
Creighton FG -8
Utah 1h +2
PARLAY ACTION
Ohio State 1h ML
Liberty 1h -2
Creighton FG -8
"I thought you were going to keep posting your record with your plays? What happened?"
The return to the norm happened.
1-11 in his last 12 happened.
He's in the red as always happened.
And he tried to hide it.
54% (28-24, 53% really) is in the red when you factor in the 1st half money line losses he posts, where the prices ranged from -120 to as high as -140 like Fla Atl.
On the plus side, even at a losing 53% he's still way above his three year documented average of 45%.
But give it time, he'll get there. He always does.
"I thought you were going to keep posting your record with your plays? What happened?"
The return to the norm happened.
1-11 in his last 12 happened.
He's in the red as always happened.
And he tried to hide it.
54% (28-24, 53% really) is in the red when you factor in the 1st half money line losses he posts, where the prices ranged from -120 to as high as -140 like Fla Atl.
On the plus side, even at a losing 53% he's still way above his three year documented average of 45%.
But give it time, he'll get there. He always does.
@VeritasAlways
It is actually 53.70% and not trying to hide anything. You’re such a clown I shouldn’t even give you the curiosity of a response but here it is…..
@VeritasAlways
It is actually 53.70% and not trying to hide anything. You’re such a clown I shouldn’t even give you the curiosity of a response but here it is…..
