Play loading……..
looking like a great day ![]()
Fact check: 50-49 last 10 days
I am a run of the mill average bettor with insufficient skills or expertise to profit consistently (in short, I suck, just like most) I observe other cappers in an effort to pick up tips that can improve my handicapping. I DO NOT tail anyone. This post is intended to be informative. In no way whatsoever is this intended to be mean-spirited. If you read it that way then YOU are reading it wrong.
I have been observing Fizzle's threads and I have counted the picks results:
20-21 in his first 5 days posting picks, then:
4-2 Jan11
3-3 Jan12
1-1 Jan13
4-2 Jan14 plus a push
4-6 Jan15
= YTD: 36-35 to finish January 15 (net loss on juice)
There would be no logical reason for anyone to be blindly betting his picks at this point or shortly after. It would be foolish. Experienced gamblers would have skipped the next few days while waiting to see if his picks would turn the corner and become profitable.
They did: over the next 4 days his picks scored 22-11! So that was the evidence needed for some to begin jumping on board believing a profit train was coming after Jan19. It did! 66-46 between Jan20 and Jan30! With a mean average of -113.5 vig associated with his picks that yielded about +13.8 net units for Fizzle! ![]()
But although good profits for him, it's unlikely most achieved anywhere close, since that would entail monitoring the computer screen dilligently from 4 to 10 hours daily, in hopes of getting down on every single pick, day and night, often with only moments until game start, at the same or better odds he posted. Reading the threads it is very clear that many missed quite a few wins and in many cases took a different line which resulted in close losses instead of wins.
Then beginning Jan31, these results:
9-12
5-5
4-3
4-3
7-5
3-4
0-3 Martingale Night
12-8
4-3
2-3
= 50-49 with many on the bandwagon the past 10 days. (does not include the 2 losses on SB) At the mean avg of -113.5 vig associated with his picks and what the majority could get, this resulted in negative 5.61 units
It is my understanding that with any angle, the most recent segment, is always the most important.
Good luck everyone.
Fact check: 50-49 last 10 days
I am a run of the mill average bettor with insufficient skills or expertise to profit consistently (in short, I suck, just like most) I observe other cappers in an effort to pick up tips that can improve my handicapping. I DO NOT tail anyone. This post is intended to be informative. In no way whatsoever is this intended to be mean-spirited. If you read it that way then YOU are reading it wrong.
I have been observing Fizzle's threads and I have counted the picks results:
20-21 in his first 5 days posting picks, then:
4-2 Jan11
3-3 Jan12
1-1 Jan13
4-2 Jan14 plus a push
4-6 Jan15
= YTD: 36-35 to finish January 15 (net loss on juice)
There would be no logical reason for anyone to be blindly betting his picks at this point or shortly after. It would be foolish. Experienced gamblers would have skipped the next few days while waiting to see if his picks would turn the corner and become profitable.
They did: over the next 4 days his picks scored 22-11! So that was the evidence needed for some to begin jumping on board believing a profit train was coming after Jan19. It did! 66-46 between Jan20 and Jan30! With a mean average of -113.5 vig associated with his picks that yielded about +13.8 net units for Fizzle! ![]()
But although good profits for him, it's unlikely most achieved anywhere close, since that would entail monitoring the computer screen dilligently from 4 to 10 hours daily, in hopes of getting down on every single pick, day and night, often with only moments until game start, at the same or better odds he posted. Reading the threads it is very clear that many missed quite a few wins and in many cases took a different line which resulted in close losses instead of wins.
Then beginning Jan31, these results:
9-12
5-5
4-3
4-3
7-5
3-4
0-3 Martingale Night
12-8
4-3
2-3
= 50-49 with many on the bandwagon the past 10 days. (does not include the 2 losses on SB) At the mean avg of -113.5 vig associated with his picks and what the majority could get, this resulted in negative 5.61 units
It is my understanding that with any angle, the most recent segment, is always the most important.
Good luck everyone.
@zircon
That’s some great stuff and very insightful. Many don’t keep records so this will help quite a few people and I just want to salute the time you took to research and post.
I’ve also gotten lucky to miss some of the losing plays and hit some winners by the skin of my teeth but DK seems to have differing lines at times and so I tend to sit out due to that.
@zircon
That’s some great stuff and very insightful. Many don’t keep records so this will help quite a few people and I just want to salute the time you took to research and post.
I’ve also gotten lucky to miss some of the losing plays and hit some winners by the skin of my teeth but DK seems to have differing lines at times and so I tend to sit out due to that.
[Quote: Originally Posted by zircon]Fact check: 50-49 last 10 days I am a run of the mill average bettor with insufficient skills or expertise to profit consistently (in short, I suck, just like most) I observe other cappers in an effort to pick up tips that can improve my handicapping. I DO NOT tail anyone. This post is intended to be informative. In no way whatsoever is this intended to be mean-spirited. If you read it that way then YOU are reading it wrong. I have been observing Fizzle's threads and I have counted the picks results: 20-21 in his first 5 days posting picks, then:4-2 Jan113-3 Jan121-1 Jan134-2 Jan14 plus a push4-6 Jan15 = YTD: 36-35 to finish January 15 (net loss on juice) There would be no logical reason for anyone to be blindly betting his picks at this point or shortly after. It would be foolish. Experienced gamblers would have skipped the next few days while waiting to see if his picks would turn the corner and become profitable. They did: over the next 4 days his picks scored 22-11! So that was the evidence needed for some to begin jumping on board believing a profit train was coming after Jan19. It did! 66-46 between Jan20 and Jan30! With a mean average of -113.5 vig associated with his picks that yielded about +13.8 net units for Fizzle! But although good profits for him, it's unlikely most achieved anywhere close, since that would entail monitoring the computer screen dilligently from 4 to 10 hours daily, in hopes of getting down on every single pick, day and night, often with only moments until game start, at the same or better odds he posted. Reading the threads it is very clear that many missed quite a few wins and in many cases took a different line which resulted in close losses instead of wins. Then beginning Jan31, these results:9-125-54-34-37-53-40-3 Martingale Night12-84-32-3 = 50-49 with many on the bandwagon the past 10 days. (does not include the 2 losses on SB) At the mean avg of -113.5 vig associated with his picks and what the majority could get, this resulted in negative 5.61 units It is my understanding that with any angle, the most recent segment, is always the most important. Good luck everyone... THANKS FOR TAKING THE TIME AND SHARING THIS INFORMATION...
[Quote: Originally Posted by zircon]Fact check: 50-49 last 10 days I am a run of the mill average bettor with insufficient skills or expertise to profit consistently (in short, I suck, just like most) I observe other cappers in an effort to pick up tips that can improve my handicapping. I DO NOT tail anyone. This post is intended to be informative. In no way whatsoever is this intended to be mean-spirited. If you read it that way then YOU are reading it wrong. I have been observing Fizzle's threads and I have counted the picks results: 20-21 in his first 5 days posting picks, then:4-2 Jan113-3 Jan121-1 Jan134-2 Jan14 plus a push4-6 Jan15 = YTD: 36-35 to finish January 15 (net loss on juice) There would be no logical reason for anyone to be blindly betting his picks at this point or shortly after. It would be foolish. Experienced gamblers would have skipped the next few days while waiting to see if his picks would turn the corner and become profitable. They did: over the next 4 days his picks scored 22-11! So that was the evidence needed for some to begin jumping on board believing a profit train was coming after Jan19. It did! 66-46 between Jan20 and Jan30! With a mean average of -113.5 vig associated with his picks that yielded about +13.8 net units for Fizzle! But although good profits for him, it's unlikely most achieved anywhere close, since that would entail monitoring the computer screen dilligently from 4 to 10 hours daily, in hopes of getting down on every single pick, day and night, often with only moments until game start, at the same or better odds he posted. Reading the threads it is very clear that many missed quite a few wins and in many cases took a different line which resulted in close losses instead of wins. Then beginning Jan31, these results:9-125-54-34-37-53-40-3 Martingale Night12-84-32-3 = 50-49 with many on the bandwagon the past 10 days. (does not include the 2 losses on SB) At the mean avg of -113.5 vig associated with his picks and what the majority could get, this resulted in negative 5.61 units It is my understanding that with any angle, the most recent segment, is always the most important. Good luck everyone... THANKS FOR TAKING THE TIME AND SHARING THIS INFORMATION...
on Fla as well as Auburn BOL tonight! ![]()
on Fla as well as Auburn BOL tonight! ![]()
It's Tuesday that happens a lot especially the earlier games. Scoring should pick up it usually and the very first game of the day has been a good pace for both teams. Purdue on fire early, UVA hit a big drought. Good luck with your plays hope your squads wake up ![]()
It's Tuesday that happens a lot especially the earlier games. Scoring should pick up it usually and the very first game of the day has been a good pace for both teams. Purdue on fire early, UVA hit a big drought. Good luck with your plays hope your squads wake up ![]()
Posted by hadenfizzle Milwaukee versus IU Indy first half under 74 1/2 ....WOW the FOULS made ya think SOME forces had "influence" on the over.. insane
Posted by hadenfizzle Milwaukee versus IU Indy first half under 74 1/2 ....WOW the FOULS made ya think SOME forces had "influence" on the over.. insane

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.