actually you are an idiot. your reasoning behind your plays is ass backwards and most of your supposed "trap" plays are actually the sides everyone is on already
hate away man....
you hate and i'll pick/post winners
0
Quote Originally Posted by misfits:
actually you are an idiot. your reasoning behind your plays is ass backwards and most of your supposed "trap" plays are actually the sides everyone is on already
youre an assclown. its hilarious every time i see a thread from you whether its watching your epic fail of a "system" of blindly betting every dog in tennis or these "trap" bets that really arent traps at all to that ridiculous "covers bloodbath" thread where you state 90-95% of all bets are on one side and then when someone asks where you get that from you get all pissy and say tell them you dont have to tell them anything. congrats youve figured out a long known and well used technique of taking an unranked teams getting as small dogs or small favs against ranked opponents, especially in tight conference games. your butler logic was fucking comical and completely off. no one was taking clev st. all the squares would think hey butler only a 6 pt fav over clev who? not the other way around. you have absolutely no clue what you are doing and dont look at anything but the line and team records to decide what your gonna bet on. i wish you would be able to keep posting winners but dumb luck will only carry you so far
0
youre an assclown. its hilarious every time i see a thread from you whether its watching your epic fail of a "system" of blindly betting every dog in tennis or these "trap" bets that really arent traps at all to that ridiculous "covers bloodbath" thread where you state 90-95% of all bets are on one side and then when someone asks where you get that from you get all pissy and say tell them you dont have to tell them anything. congrats youve figured out a long known and well used technique of taking an unranked teams getting as small dogs or small favs against ranked opponents, especially in tight conference games. your butler logic was fucking comical and completely off. no one was taking clev st. all the squares would think hey butler only a 6 pt fav over clev who? not the other way around. you have absolutely no clue what you are doing and dont look at anything but the line and team records to decide what your gonna bet on. i wish you would be able to keep posting winners but dumb luck will only carry you so far
youre an assclown. its hilarious every time i see a thread from you whether its watching your epic fail of a "system" of blindly betting every dog in tennis or these "trap" bets that really arent traps at all to that ridiculous "covers bloodbath" thread where you state 90-95% of all bets are on one side and then when someone asks where you get that from you get all pissy and say tell them you dont have to tell them anything. congrats youve figured out a long known and well used technique of taking an unranked teams getting as small dogs or small favs against ranked opponents, especially in tight conference games. your butler logic was fucking comical and completely off. no one was taking clev st. all the squares would think hey butler only a 6 pt fav over clev who? not the other way around. you have absolutely no clue what you are doing and dont look at anything but the line and team records to decide what your gonna bet on. i wish you would be able to keep posting winners but dumb luck will only carry you so far
It seems you've quite a little fascination with me. I'm flattered really.
0
Quote Originally Posted by misfits:
youre an assclown. its hilarious every time i see a thread from you whether its watching your epic fail of a "system" of blindly betting every dog in tennis or these "trap" bets that really arent traps at all to that ridiculous "covers bloodbath" thread where you state 90-95% of all bets are on one side and then when someone asks where you get that from you get all pissy and say tell them you dont have to tell them anything. congrats youve figured out a long known and well used technique of taking an unranked teams getting as small dogs or small favs against ranked opponents, especially in tight conference games. your butler logic was fucking comical and completely off. no one was taking clev st. all the squares would think hey butler only a 6 pt fav over clev who? not the other way around. you have absolutely no clue what you are doing and dont look at anything but the line and team records to decide what your gonna bet on. i wish you would be able to keep posting winners but dumb luck will only carry you so far
It seems you've quite a little fascination with me. I'm flattered really.
I think your reasoning and logic are quite sound. If it works for you, and you think it'll help others, keep posting. There's no need to justify what and how you make your picks. There isn't much to be gained by arguing with the peanut gallery.
0
I think your reasoning and logic are quite sound. If it works for you, and you think it'll help others, keep posting. There's no need to justify what and how you make your picks. There isn't much to be gained by arguing with the peanut gallery.
I think your reasoning and logic are quite sound. If it works for you, and you think it'll help others, keep posting. There's no need to justify what and how you make your picks. There isn't much to be gained by arguing with the peanut gallery.
Couldn't agree more. The sad reality is most of these haters just float around the forums without anyone caring about anything they post then want to throw rocks at people who are having some success, posting winners, and have a bit of a following. Bitter and jealous. Certainly nothing new.
0
Quote Originally Posted by songdin78:
I think your reasoning and logic are quite sound. If it works for you, and you think it'll help others, keep posting. There's no need to justify what and how you make your picks. There isn't much to be gained by arguing with the peanut gallery.
Couldn't agree more. The sad reality is most of these haters just float around the forums without anyone caring about anything they post then want to throw rocks at people who are having some success, posting winners, and have a bit of a following. Bitter and jealous. Certainly nothing new.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
