Posted:
#1201
Duke now 161, down 3
Rider down to 156.5, down .5
0
2017-2018 cbb
Posted:
#1202
Quote Originally Posted by GoodBadUgly:
Good morning, pederson16.
Kraken doesn't seem to give a garbage about customer service or acquiring new customers, as shown by the extended time that their "Get Verified" button has been disabled. I've signed up for an account with them for more than a week now but still can't verify. Is there another exchange you would recommend for U.S. customers for XRP? Thanks.
Good morning, pederson16.
Kraken doesn't seem to give a garbage about customer service or acquiring new customers, as shown by the extended time that their "Get Verified" button has been disabled. I've signed up for an account with them for more than a week now but still can't verify. Is there another exchange you would recommend for U.S. customers for XRP? Thanks.
open on bitstamp or another site
0
Posted:
#1203
Quote Originally Posted by domedriver:
Hey Pederson. Where are u seeing a 100 diff in Off Eff between Ohio and Akron?
I'm seeing Ohio Off Eff of 100.4 with a 231 rank.
Akron Off Eff of 100.6 with a 227 rank.
Ohio Def Eff is ranked 155 vs 244 for Akron. So Ohio Def Eff is 89 better than Akron.
Just trying to make sure I'm reading the.same as you.
DEF EFF . typo sorry. OFF EFF is a essentially a wash DEF EFF Is where the differentiation is ., thank you for point out my error as i was on my phone replying and toggling between internet pages on iphone
Ohio is 128th and Akron is 260th... do you subscribe to kenpom? if so, go to efficiency page and look at defensive efficiency
0
Posted:
#1205
Quote Originally Posted by JBender:
Duke now 161, down 3
Duke now 161, down 3
Rider down to 156.5, down .5
overnight lines have movement....and you don't have all the info either...so its a gamble as lines can move either way... I honestly dont care as 500$ is a tiny bet to me...i don't mean this in the wrong way, but it's basically inconsequential for my bet size, bankroll, and what I am up this season...so no worries, just won't add to it and will trust my initial gut feeling.
0
Posted:
#1208
Ticket#:142455472
Jan 23 04:00 PM
Jan 23 04:00 PM
INTERNET / -1 Jan 23 02:42 PM
CBB
CBB
REVERSE ACTION (2000 USD) (1 of 1)
[524] TEXAS TECH -8½-120 (B+½)
[526] VIRGINIA -9½-110
4800 / 8000
2 blowouts 2k each leg each way.... think both home teams dispose of the visitors with ease.... clemson w/out grantham after acl tear is going to get smashed...not only do they have to play UVA top defense in the nation....but also its their first game without his dd points and presence so that will be a huge adjustment in and off itself.
And ok st just beat oklahoma so.....they partied way way too hard after that game at home and now go on the road to lubbock to get smashed
0
Posted:
#1209
MU [8752] M KEYS +140 (ANGELIQUE KERBER vrs M KEYS) 500.00 USD / 700.00 USD
have the future on her so i'm going to press and say she wins here....it's women's tennis so who the F really knows, let's be real.... i mean, betting on an event that features a couple Vajajays that could be getting their period and moods thrown all over the place by the earths' axis and rotational pull moving waves in the ocean or the ebb and flow of sand in the sahara...point being...its gambling...but other than that, we judge by what we see, no? And what i see is Keys destroying chicks and Kerber struggling with unranked asians that don't even have sponsorship deals.... so.....with that said...PRESS>... for Keys to win this tourney and cash my future, she has to get by the lumbering german, which i think she does... good luck
0
Posted:
#1211
TEXAS TECH -8.5 -122
VIRGINIA -8.5 -137
1 parlay of 2 Teams
Risk: $2000 Win: $4295.8
I'm taking some shots here.....i really like these two games... that's 6800$ risk on these 2 with the reverse and the parlays...this haw now become a set of large wagers for me.... need both to make big $ ... good luck to all
0
Posted:
#1212
Quote Originally Posted by pederson16:
TEXAS TECH -8.5 -122
VIRGINIA -8.5 -137
1 parlay of 2 Teams
Risk: $2000 Win: $4295.8
I'm taking some shots here.....i really like these two games... that's 6800$ risk on these 2 with the reverse and the parlays...this haw now become a set of large wagers for me.... need both to make big $ ... good luck to all
that didn't paste the entire ticket format, here is full
ONLINE
01/23/2018
03:24 PM
[Ticket #: 349927139] PARLAY (2 TEAMS)
01/23/2018 @ 04:00 PM CBB [524] Texas Tech -8.5 -122
01/23/2018 @ 04:00 PM CBB [526] Virginia -8.5 -137
2000.00 4295.80
0
Posted:
#1213
ok, so in summary, action thus far for tonight:
Ohio +2 -110 1100 / 1000
Duke Over 164 -110 550 / 500
Rider Over 157 -110 550 / 500
@bookmaker
PARLAY (2 TEAMS)
01/23/2018 @ 04:00 PM CBB [524] Texas Tech -8.5 -122
01/23/2018 @ 04:00 PM CBB [526] Virginia -8.5 -137
2000.00 4295.80
@local
REVERSE ACTION (2000 USD) (1 of 1)
[524] TEXAS TECH -8½-120 (B+½)
[526] VIRGINIA -9½-110
4800 / 8000
@local
MU [8752] M KEYS +140 (ANGELIQUE KERBER vrs M KEYS) 500.00 USD / 700.00 USD
i'll have more plays likely after 4 pm games cash 
0
Posted:
#1214
also still pending:
ONLINE
01/11/2018
03:16 PM
[Ticket #: 348654131] PARLAY (4 TEAMS)
01/11/2018 @ 05:00 PM CBB Added Game
[595] Belmont -12.5 +107
01/11/2018 @ 06:00 PM CBB [553] Wichita State -24.5 +105
01/13/2018 @ 11:20 AM CBB [544] Xavier -170
01/11/2018 @ 03:16 PM OPEN PLAY
500.00 5933.33
0
Posted:
#1215
Quote Originally Posted by pederson16:
QUOTE Originally Posted by domedriver: Hey Pederson. Where are u seeing a 100 diff in Off Eff between Ohio and Akron? I'm seeing Ohio Off Eff of 100.4 with a 231 rank. Akron Off Eff of 100.6 with a 227 rank. Ohio Def Eff is ranked 155 vs 244 for Akron. So Ohio Def Eff is 89 better than Akron. Just trying to make sure I'm reading the.same as you. DEF EFF . typo sorry. OFF EFF is a essentially a wash DEF EFF Is where the differentiation is ., thank you for point out my error as i was on my phone replying and toggling between internet pages on iphoneOhio is 128th and Akron is 260th... do you subscribe to kenpom? if so, go to efficiency page and look at defensive efficiency
QUOTE Originally Posted by domedriver: Hey Pederson. Where are u seeing a 100 diff in Off Eff between Ohio and Akron? I'm seeing Ohio Off Eff of 100.4 with a 231 rank. Akron Off Eff of 100.6 with a 227 rank. Ohio Def Eff is ranked 155 vs 244 for Akron. So Ohio Def Eff is 89 better than Akron. Just trying to make sure I'm reading the.same as you. DEF EFF . typo sorry. OFF EFF is a essentially a wash DEF EFF Is where the differentiation is ., thank you for point out my error as i was on my phone replying and toggling between internet pages on iphoneOhio is 128th and Akron is 260th... do you subscribe to kenpom? if so, go to efficiency page and look at defensive efficiency
Figured you had a typo.
I do subscribe. The numbers I referenced were off the Conference page. It's a nice summary of all the teams in the conference showing each teams: Overall Record, Conf Record, Projected Conf Record, AdjEM, AdjO, AdjD, AdjT and Conf SOS.
I see now...you are using the Raw numbers instead of the Adjusted numbers.
Thanks for the clarification and continued happy handicappying!
0
Posted:
#1216
I really hope Keys is setting Kerber up or just feeling her out....because you do not beat the German by conventional tennis and just giving her forehands all match....wtf?!?! Her backhand is the weaker shot and if you play loose and random tennis you have a Vance. Trying to outhit her is not going to work. I guess they didn't watch the Hsieh match. Unreal
0
Hot Forum Topics
