Posted:
#676
PSU LUNDY fouls out late.......so I just threw a TON on Purdue at heavy odds
*no, it won't count on my 90 -43 record
1
🤢🥴_ Fubah's 2023 Hoops Thread _😲🥵
Posted:
#680
Quote Originally Posted by Zeus4par:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: PSU LUNDY fouls out late.......so I just threw a TON on Purdue at heavy odds *no, it won't count on my 90 -43 record
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: PSU LUNDY fouls out late.......so I just threw a TON on Purdue at heavy odds *no, it won't count on my 90 -43 record
Vig had to be around 1500 at that stage
-1400
I wasn't risking any of my original BR stake, just hard-earned profits.....but in hindsight, that was damn foolish, unnecessary, and greedy. Probably arrogance as well. And "life" darned near made me pay bigtime for that foolishness 
in the final frantic seconds. Had it lost I would have deserved the lesson.
Yes, the odds of winning that bet, at that moment LUNDY fouled out, were very high ....but the point is I should *NEVER* risk such high funds on a meagre payout. Flukes happen all the time. It was STUPID!
I will NOT do that again.
3
Posted:
#681
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by Zeus4par: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: PSU LUNDY fouls out late.......so I just threw a TON on Purdue at heavy odds *no, it won't count on my 90 -43 record Vig had to be around 1500 at that stage -1400 I wasn't risking any of my original BR stake, just hard-earned profits.....but in hindsight, that was damn foolish, unnecessary, and greedy. Probably arrogance as well. And "life" darned near made me pay bigtime for that foolishness in the final frantic seconds. Had it lost I would have deserved the lesson. Yes, the odds of winning that bet, at that moment LUNDY fouled out, were very high ....but the point is I should *NEVER* risk such high funds on a meagre payout. Flukes happen all the time. It was STUPID! I will NOT do that again.
Quote Originally Posted by Zeus4par: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: PSU LUNDY fouls out late.......so I just threw a TON on Purdue at heavy odds *no, it won't count on my 90 -43 record Vig had to be around 1500 at that stage -1400 I wasn't risking any of my original BR stake, just hard-earned profits.....but in hindsight, that was damn foolish, unnecessary, and greedy. Probably arrogance as well. And "life" darned near made me pay bigtime for that foolishness in the final frantic seconds. Had it lost I would have deserved the lesson. Yes, the odds of winning that bet, at that moment LUNDY fouled out, were very high ....but the point is I should *NEVER* risk such high funds on a meagre payout. Flukes happen all the time. It was STUPID! I will NOT do that again.
Lesson hopefully learned and can leave it at that.
0
Posted:
#682
North Carolina entered the season as the No. 1 team in America in the Associated Press preseason poll.
After an improbable fall that ended without a spot in the NCAA tournament on Selection Sunday, UNC's campaign has ended.
The Tar Heels, the first team to start No. 1 and miss the NCAA tournament since it expanded in 1985, announced they will not accept an invite to the NIT.
0
Posted:
#683
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
North Carolina entered the season as the No. 1 team in America in the Associated Press preseason poll. After an improbable fall that ended without a spot in the NCAA tournament on Selection Sunday, UNC's campaign has ended. The Tar Heels, the first team to start No. 1 and miss the NCAA tournament since it expanded in 1985, announced they will not accept an invite to the NIT.
North Carolina entered the season as the No. 1 team in America in the Associated Press preseason poll. After an improbable fall that ended without a spot in the NCAA tournament on Selection Sunday, UNC's campaign has ended. The Tar Heels, the first team to start No. 1 and miss the NCAA tournament since it expanded in 1985, announced they will not accept an invite to the NIT.
They need to give their players the time to write up their press releases announcing their intent to enter the portal.
1
Posted:
#684
YTD MENS: 90 - 43
-----------------------------
FIRST FOUR: my pregame takes:
SEMO Redhawks vs. TXAMCC Islanders
Redhawks, 2nd place and 14 - 8 in a weak Ohio Valley conference; won Conf in OT vs 3rd place team
Mediocre play in recent weeks.
No significant injuries during conf play affecting record.
All top players available.
My NCAA ranking: 233
Islanders, 1st place and 16 - 4 in a weak Southland conference; defeated 2nd place team to win Conf.
Mediocre play in recent weeks.
No significant injuries during conf play affecting record.
All top players available.
My NCAA ranking: 200
Fubahs view:
Close matchup; very slight edge to Islanders su;
Line on Islanders should be -2.0/-2.5 max
3
Posted:
#685
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
YTD MENS: 90 - 43----------------------------- FIRST FOUR: my pregame takes: SEMO Redhawks vs. TXAMCC Islanders Redhawks, 2nd place and 14 - 8 in a weak Ohio Valley conference; won Conf in OT vs 3rd place teamMediocre play in recent weeks.No significant injuries during conf play affecting record.All top players available.My NCAA ranking: 233 Islanders, 1st place and 16 - 4 in a weak Southland conference; defeated 2nd place team to win Conf.Mediocre play in recent weeks.No significant injuries during conf play affecting record.All top players available.My NCAA ranking: 200 Fubahs view: Close matchup; very slight edge to Islanders su; Line on Islanders should be -2.0/-2.5 max
YTD MENS: 90 - 43----------------------------- FIRST FOUR: my pregame takes: SEMO Redhawks vs. TXAMCC Islanders Redhawks, 2nd place and 14 - 8 in a weak Ohio Valley conference; won Conf in OT vs 3rd place teamMediocre play in recent weeks.No significant injuries during conf play affecting record.All top players available.My NCAA ranking: 233 Islanders, 1st place and 16 - 4 in a weak Southland conference; defeated 2nd place team to win Conf.Mediocre play in recent weeks.No significant injuries during conf play affecting record.All top players available.My NCAA ranking: 200 Fubahs view: Close matchup; very slight edge to Islanders su; Line on Islanders should be -2.0/-2.5 max
CORRECTION to above:
Murdix is out for TXAMCC after suffering season ending injury last game!
He is their top playmaker/ball-handler, leads the team in steals, and #3 scorer! Without him they still were able to defeat the #2 team in conference in a close final game, when they got a one-off nightshooting an incredible 57%!! Your guess as good as mine as to how his loss will affect them going forward, starting Tuesday night.
0
Posted:
#686
YTD MENS: 90 - 43
------------------------
My pregame takes:
Pittsburgh Panthers vs. Mississippi State Bulldogs
Panthers,
Tied for 4th place with 15 - 7 in a good Atlantic Coast Conference; blown out by DUKE last game
Mixed results in recent weeks.
No significant injuries during conf play affecting record.
All top players available.
My NCAA ranking: 62
Bulldogs,
10th place with 9 - 10 losing record in SEC; lost by 23 pts to Bama last game; somehow voted into First Four above a better team, 13 - 8 Vanderbilt, to whom they lost March 4!
Very competitive team vs good teams but mediocre play in recent weeks.
No significant injuries during conf play affecting record.
All top players available.
My NCAA ranking: 52
Fubahs view:
Close matchup; very thin edge to Bulldogs
Bulldogs should be favs of -1.5 max
Pass.
3
Posted:
#687
YTD MENS: 90 - 43
------------------------
Fairleigh Knights vs Texas Southern Tigers
Knights,
• 2nd place with 12 - 7 in a ugly bad NEC; lost by a pt to top team for conference title but Merrimack is ineligible so Knights get in.
• No significant injuries during conf play that affected 12 - 7 record.
• Mixed results in recent weeks.
• All top players available.
My NCAA ranking: 272
Tigers,
• 6th place with 10 - 11 losing record in ugly bad SWAC;
• surprising finish with 3 wins, but close games, to win ugly SWAC
• In recent weeks, most of their games are very close, against good or bad conference teams.
• *NOTE: #2 scorer Henry, missed first 20 days of January schedule and team went just 1 - 5 without him then, thereby negatively affecting the overall perception of the strength of the team; #4 scorer, Nicholas also missed 3 of those same games!
• All top players available.
My NCAA ranking: 259
Fubahs view:
Tigers may have a thin edge to win su
I would also consider either team if getting +3 or better
2
Posted:
#690
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
YTD MENS: 90 - 43------------------------ Fairleigh Knights vs Texas Southern Tigers Knights, • 2nd place with 12 - 7 in a ugly bad NEC; lost by a pt to top team for conference title but Merrimack is ineligible so Knights get in. • No significant injuries during conf play that affected 12 - 7 record. • Mixed results in recent weeks. • All top players available.My NCAA ranking: 272 Tigers, • 6th place with 10 - 11 losing record in ugly bad SWAC; • surprising finish with 3 wins, but close games, to win ugly SWAC • In recent weeks, most of their games are very close, against good or bad conference teams. • *NOTE: #2 scorer Henry, missed first 20 days of January schedule and team went just 1 - 5 without him then, thereby negatively affecting the overall perception of the strength of the team; #4 scorer, Nicholas also missed 3 of those same games! • All top players available.My NCAA ranking: 259 Fubahs view: Tigers may have a thin edge to win suI would also consider either team if getting +3 or better
YTD MENS: 90 - 43------------------------ Fairleigh Knights vs Texas Southern Tigers Knights, • 2nd place with 12 - 7 in a ugly bad NEC; lost by a pt to top team for conference title but Merrimack is ineligible so Knights get in. • No significant injuries during conf play that affected 12 - 7 record. • Mixed results in recent weeks. • All top players available.My NCAA ranking: 272 Tigers, • 6th place with 10 - 11 losing record in ugly bad SWAC; • surprising finish with 3 wins, but close games, to win ugly SWAC • In recent weeks, most of their games are very close, against good or bad conference teams. • *NOTE: #2 scorer Henry, missed first 20 days of January schedule and team went just 1 - 5 without him then, thereby negatively affecting the overall perception of the strength of the team; #4 scorer, Nicholas also missed 3 of those same games! • All top players available.My NCAA ranking: 259 Fubahs view: Tigers may have a thin edge to win suI would also consider either team if getting +3 or better
Good writeups, Fubah 
I like Texas Southern to hold their momentum on Tuesday and make the cut so they can get squashed by Alabama
1
Posted:
#691
Quote Originally Posted by Zeus4par:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: YTD MENS: 90 - 43------------------------ Fairleigh Knights vs Texas Southern Tigers Knights, • 2nd place with 12 - 7 in a ugly bad NEC; lost by a pt to top team for conference title but Merrimack is ineligible so Knights get in. • No significant injuries during conf play that affected 12 - 7 record. • Mixed results in recent weeks. • All top players available.My NCAA ranking: 272 Tigers, • 6th place with 10 - 11 losing record in ugly bad SWAC; • surprising finish with 3 wins, but close games, to win ugly SWAC • In recent weeks, most of their games are very close, against good or bad conference teams. • *NOTE: #2 scorer Henry, missed first 20 days of January schedule and team went just 1 - 5 without him then, thereby negatively affecting the overall perception of the strength of the team; #4 scorer, Nicholas also missed 3 of those same games! • All top players available.My NCAA ranking: 259 Fubahs view: Tigers may have a thin edge to win suI would also consider either team if getting +3 or better
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: YTD MENS: 90 - 43------------------------ Fairleigh Knights vs Texas Southern Tigers Knights, • 2nd place with 12 - 7 in a ugly bad NEC; lost by a pt to top team for conference title but Merrimack is ineligible so Knights get in. • No significant injuries during conf play that affected 12 - 7 record. • Mixed results in recent weeks. • All top players available.My NCAA ranking: 272 Tigers, • 6th place with 10 - 11 losing record in ugly bad SWAC; • surprising finish with 3 wins, but close games, to win ugly SWAC • In recent weeks, most of their games are very close, against good or bad conference teams. • *NOTE: #2 scorer Henry, missed first 20 days of January schedule and team went just 1 - 5 without him then, thereby negatively affecting the overall perception of the strength of the team; #4 scorer, Nicholas also missed 3 of those same games! • All top players available.My NCAA ranking: 259 Fubahs view: Tigers may have a thin edge to win suI would also consider either team if getting +3 or better
Good writeups, Fubah I like Texas Southern to hold their momentum on Tuesday and make the cut so they can get squashed by Alabama
i think u meant get squashed by purdue
"I'm the MOST HONEST human being that GOD EVER created!" - Donald "the felon" Trump
0
Posted:
#692
YTD MENS: 90 - 43
-----------------------------------
Nevada Wolfpack vs Arizona State Sun Devils
Wolfpack,
• 4th best team in a surprisingly GOOD MWC with 12 - 7!
• 7 - 4 vs MWC squads roughly around ranking of Arizona State;
• BAD finish, losing final 3 games - all teams with weaker records;
• play very close in high percentage of games
• No significant injuries during MWC play that affected 12 - 7 record.
• All top players available.
My NCAA ranking: 55
Sun Devils,
• 6th place with 13 - 10 in very GOOD PAC12;
• 5 - 5 against PAC12 teams that are roughly equivalent to NEVADA
• mixed results recently; not consistent!
• No significant injuries during conf play that affected 13 - 10 record.
• All top players available.
My NCAA ranking: 61
Fubahs view:
Wolfpack maybe have a razor thin edge here su but there 3 game finish is a substantial concern
PASS
2
Posted:
#694
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
YTD MENS: 90 - 43----------------------------------- Nevada Wolfpack vs Arizona State Sun Devils Wolfpack, • 4th best team in a surprisingly GOOD MWC with 12 - 7! • 7 - 4 vs MWC squads roughly around ranking of Arizona State; • BAD finish, losing final 3 games - all teams with weaker records; • play very close in high percentage of games • No significant injuries during MWC play that affected 12 - 7 record. • All top players available.My NCAA ranking: 55 Sun Devils, • 6th place with 13 - 10 in very GOOD PAC12; • 5 - 5 against PAC12 teams that are roughly equivalent to NEVADA • mixed results recently; not consistent! • No significant injuries during conf play that affected 13 - 10 record. • All top players available.My NCAA ranking: 61 Fubahs view: Wolfpack maybe have a razor thin edge here su but there 3 game finish is a substantial concernPASS
YTD MENS: 90 - 43----------------------------------- Nevada Wolfpack vs Arizona State Sun Devils Wolfpack, • 4th best team in a surprisingly GOOD MWC with 12 - 7! • 7 - 4 vs MWC squads roughly around ranking of Arizona State; • BAD finish, losing final 3 games - all teams with weaker records; • play very close in high percentage of games • No significant injuries during MWC play that affected 12 - 7 record. • All top players available.My NCAA ranking: 55 Sun Devils, • 6th place with 13 - 10 in very GOOD PAC12; • 5 - 5 against PAC12 teams that are roughly equivalent to NEVADA • mixed results recently; not consistent! • No significant injuries during conf play that affected 13 - 10 record. • All top players available.My NCAA ranking: 61 Fubahs view: Wolfpack maybe have a razor thin edge here su but there 3 game finish is a substantial concernPASS
sounds like youre thinkking the wolfpack has given up on their season
"I'm the MOST HONEST human being that GOD EVER created!" - Donald "the felon" Trump
0
Posted:
#695
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by Zeus4par: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: PSU LUNDY fouls out late.......so I just threw a TON on Purdue at heavy odds *no, it won't count on my 90 -43 record Vig had to be around 1500 at that stage -1400 I wasn't risking any of my original BR stake, just hard-earned profits.....but in hindsight, that was damn foolish, unnecessary, and greedy. Probably arrogance as well. And "life" darned near made me pay bigtime for that foolishness in the final frantic seconds. Had it lost I would have deserved the lesson. Yes, the odds of winning that bet, at that moment LUNDY fouled out, were very high ....but the point is I should *NEVER* risk such high funds on a meagre payout. Flukes happen all the time. It was STUPID! I will NOT do that again.
Quote Originally Posted by Zeus4par: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: PSU LUNDY fouls out late.......so I just threw a TON on Purdue at heavy odds *no, it won't count on my 90 -43 record Vig had to be around 1500 at that stage -1400 I wasn't risking any of my original BR stake, just hard-earned profits.....but in hindsight, that was damn foolish, unnecessary, and greedy. Probably arrogance as well. And "life" darned near made me pay bigtime for that foolishness in the final frantic seconds. Had it lost I would have deserved the lesson. Yes, the odds of winning that bet, at that moment LUNDY fouled out, were very high ....but the point is I should *NEVER* risk such high funds on a meagre payout. Flukes happen all the time. It was STUPID! I will NOT do that again.
"I'm the MOST HONEST human being that GOD EVER created!" - Donald "the felon" Trump
0
Posted:
#696
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by Zeus4par: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: PSU LUNDY fouls out late.......so I just threw a TON on Purdue at heavy odds *no, it won't count on my 90 -43 record Vig had to be around 1500 at that stage -1400 I wasn't risking any of my original BR stake, just hard-earned profits.....but in hindsight, that was damn foolish, unnecessary, and greedy. Probably arrogance as well. And "life" darned near made me pay bigtime for that foolishness in the final frantic seconds. Had it lost I would have deserved the lesson. Yes, the odds of winning that bet, at that moment LUNDY fouled out, were very high ....but the point is I should *NEVER* risk such high funds on a meagre payout. Flukes happen all the time. It was STUPID! I will NOT do that again.
Quote Originally Posted by Zeus4par: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: PSU LUNDY fouls out late.......so I just threw a TON on Purdue at heavy odds *no, it won't count on my 90 -43 record Vig had to be around 1500 at that stage -1400 I wasn't risking any of my original BR stake, just hard-earned profits.....but in hindsight, that was damn foolish, unnecessary, and greedy. Probably arrogance as well. And "life" darned near made me pay bigtime for that foolishness in the final frantic seconds. Had it lost I would have deserved the lesson. Yes, the odds of winning that bet, at that moment LUNDY fouled out, were very high ....but the point is I should *NEVER* risk such high funds on a meagre payout. Flukes happen all the time. It was STUPID! I will NOT do that again.
"I'm the MOST HONEST human being that GOD EVER created!" - Donald "the felon" Trump
0
Posted:
#697
Quote Originally Posted by jackedward32:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: North Carolina entered the season as the No. 1 team in America in the Associated Press preseason poll. After an improbable fall that ended without a spot in the NCAA tournament on Selection Sunday, UNC's campaign has ended. The Tar Heels, the first team to start No. 1 and miss the NCAA tournament since it expanded in 1985, announced they will not accept an invite to the NIT. They need to give their players the time to write up their press releases announcing their intent to enter the portal.
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: North Carolina entered the season as the No. 1 team in America in the Associated Press preseason poll. After an improbable fall that ended without a spot in the NCAA tournament on Selection Sunday, UNC's campaign has ended. The Tar Heels, the first team to start No. 1 and miss the NCAA tournament since it expanded in 1985, announced they will not accept an invite to the NIT. They need to give their players the time to write up their press releases announcing their intent to enter the portal.
ahh thats whut it is 
"I'm the MOST HONEST human being that GOD EVER created!" - Donald "the felon" Trump
0
Posted:
#698
Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964:
Quote Originally Posted by jackedward32: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: North Carolina entered the season as the No. 1 team in America in the Associated Press preseason poll. After an improbable fall that ended without a spot in the NCAA tournament on Selection Sunday, UNC's campaign has ended. The Tar Heels, the first team to start No. 1 and miss the NCAA tournament since it expanded in 1985, announced they will not accept an invite to the NIT. They need to give their players the time to write up their press releases announcing their intent to enter the portal.
Quote Originally Posted by jackedward32: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: North Carolina entered the season as the No. 1 team in America in the Associated Press preseason poll. After an improbable fall that ended without a spot in the NCAA tournament on Selection Sunday, UNC's campaign has ended. The Tar Heels, the first team to start No. 1 and miss the NCAA tournament since it expanded in 1985, announced they will not accept an invite to the NIT. They need to give their players the time to write up their press releases announcing their intent to enter the portal.
ahh thats whut it is
Perfect sense. LOL
0
Posted:
#700
YTD MENS: 90 - 43
NIT PICKING
Villanova @Liberty
Wildcats better team, BUT ONLY IF starters Moore *AND* Whitmore BOTH play!
Gametime decisions for both. MUST wait and see before betting.
If *BOTH* do not play, then Liberty would become the play, on a cheap ML only
If one plays but not the other - PASS!
3
Hot Forum Topics
