Runnin' Rebels -156 *BB
daaaaaaBears -136 ml @pinn *BB ...6pm ET MEAC action
daaaaaaBears -2 -113 @pinn
The line looks suspicious. I will be ready to buy back (hedge) should an as yet UNannounced player issue become apparent at gametime...
daaaaaaBears -136 ml @pinn *BB ...6pm ET MEAC action
daaaaaaBears -2 -113 @pinn
The line looks suspicious. I will be ready to buy back (hedge) should an as yet UNannounced player issue become apparent at gametime...
2 *BBs on the SIGNIFICANTLY better team LOSE ....of course.... ![]()
2 *BBs on the SIGNIFICANTLY better team LOSE ....of course.... ![]()
WOW! The HOME TEAM UNLV was up 44 - 31 and dominating at HT....but now they have allowed their weaker opponent a massive 17 - 5 run to come within 1 point and put the game (my *BB) in serious question....... OF COURSE! ![]()
WOW! The HOME TEAM UNLV was up 44 - 31 and dominating at HT....but now they have allowed their weaker opponent a massive 17 - 5 run to come within 1 point and put the game (my *BB) in serious question....... OF COURSE! ![]()
Makes me wonder if (once again!!!) my other bets on BETTER TEAMS with low odds vs weaker opponents will also LOSE outright...Lost 2 bets with Bethune already and now UNLV shows signs of choking (7 - 3) AT HOME in a revenge match, vs a 3 - 7 road team.
Makes me wonder if (once again!!!) my other bets on BETTER TEAMS with low odds vs weaker opponents will also LOSE outright...Lost 2 bets with Bethune already and now UNLV shows signs of choking (7 - 3) AT HOME in a revenge match, vs a 3 - 7 road team.
...and now the HOME TEAM trails 55 - 58 to the weaker opp......OF COURSE! ![]()
...and now the HOME TEAM trails 55 - 58 to the weaker opp......OF COURSE! ![]()
Will the better team (UNLV) which is also the HOME TEAM overcome a late 2h deficit and scratch out a SU win?
Or will UNLV keep missing freebies and LOSE to the game but weaker team?
Will the better team (UNLV) which is also the HOME TEAM overcome a late 2h deficit and scratch out a SU win?
Or will UNLV keep missing freebies and LOSE to the game but weaker team?
Looking like the better team (UNLV), on low odds, after a dominating 44 - 31 HT lead, AT HOME, are about to lose to a weaker opponent...
OF COURSE! ![]()
Looking like the better team (UNLV), on low odds, after a dominating 44 - 31 HT lead, AT HOME, are about to lose to a weaker opponent...
OF COURSE! ![]()
Looking like the better team (UNLV), on low odds, after a dominating 44 - 31 HT lead, AT HOME, are about to lose to a weaker opponent... OF COURSE!
I don't like it when I feel like I am having a cardiac arrest ... ![]()
When the UNLV Rebs were dominating at HT I foolishly GOT GREEDY and dumped a bunch more money on them (moneyline at very HEAVY juice!!!!).....so karma decided to make me suffer through the second half to teach me a lesson about GREED...![]()
Looking like the better team (UNLV), on low odds, after a dominating 44 - 31 HT lead, AT HOME, are about to lose to a weaker opponent... OF COURSE!
I don't like it when I feel like I am having a cardiac arrest ... ![]()
When the UNLV Rebs were dominating at HT I foolishly GOT GREEDY and dumped a bunch more money on them (moneyline at very HEAVY juice!!!!).....so karma decided to make me suffer through the second half to teach me a lesson about GREED...![]()
This game SHOULD BE a near dead-even matchup and anyone's game. McNeese is NOT the better team entering this contest! Actually, if anything, SFA Lumberjacks should hold a very tiny edge....which is what prompted me to take the +3.5 pts.... It's a "value" bet, where they SHOULD not only have a 50/50 shot at winning SU but getting the +3.5 pts means they could lose a close one and I still collect a win. Value, yes, but not guaranteed.![]()
They are failing right now in the 1h but still I would make this "even match" type of bet every time without hesitation (after I checked for injuries of course) If it loses, so be it....still a sound play going in.
This game SHOULD BE a near dead-even matchup and anyone's game. McNeese is NOT the better team entering this contest! Actually, if anything, SFA Lumberjacks should hold a very tiny edge....which is what prompted me to take the +3.5 pts.... It's a "value" bet, where they SHOULD not only have a 50/50 shot at winning SU but getting the +3.5 pts means they could lose a close one and I still collect a win. Value, yes, but not guaranteed.![]()
They are failing right now in the 1h but still I would make this "even match" type of bet every time without hesitation (after I checked for injuries of course) If it loses, so be it....still a sound play going in.
daaaaaaBears -2 -113 @pinn
The line looks suspicious. I will be ready to buy back (hedge) should an as yet UNannounced player issue become apparent at gametime...
Coming up is my BEARS (2 *BBs)
They are 2nd top team in the MEAC at 10 - 4 in conf vs the weakass WORST TEAM in the MEAC just 2 - 12.
This SHOULD BE a line of -6.5 or so on daaaaBEARS, but it was only -2 a couple hrs ago when I bet. Now up to -3....
This line isn't right!! Something is up to make it off by 3 - 4 pts. Likely a starter for MORGAN is going to be sidelined but we don't know about it until gametime...
Worrel, Davis, Lawson, Peggs, and Alvin (in that order) are their top players...
daaaaaaBears -2 -113 @pinn
The line looks suspicious. I will be ready to buy back (hedge) should an as yet UNannounced player issue become apparent at gametime...
Coming up is my BEARS (2 *BBs)
They are 2nd top team in the MEAC at 10 - 4 in conf vs the weakass WORST TEAM in the MEAC just 2 - 12.
This SHOULD BE a line of -6.5 or so on daaaaBEARS, but it was only -2 a couple hrs ago when I bet. Now up to -3....
This line isn't right!! Something is up to make it off by 3 - 4 pts. Likely a starter for MORGAN is going to be sidelined but we don't know about it until gametime...
Worrel, Davis, Lawson, Peggs, and Alvin (in that order) are their top players...
Now up to -3....
This line isn't right!! Something is up to make it off by 3 - 4 pts.
Likely a starter for MORGAN is going to be sidelined but we don't know about it until gametime...
Worrel, Davis, Lawson, Peggs, and Alvin (in that order) are their top players...
Alvin (5th top scorer) is their only FORWARD among the top 5 players so it is possible, the box score in the opening minutes of the game might show a different name among them to give them an extra forward to start......maybe.....I don't panic until substitutes start coming in and then I realize one of their starters is not at least coming of the bench either! THAT is when I may look to hedge, depending on WHO it is.......maybe.....we shall see.....But even at -3 on MORGAN that line just looks waaaaaay "too good to be true"![]()
Now up to -3....
This line isn't right!! Something is up to make it off by 3 - 4 pts.
Likely a starter for MORGAN is going to be sidelined but we don't know about it until gametime...
Worrel, Davis, Lawson, Peggs, and Alvin (in that order) are their top players...
Alvin (5th top scorer) is their only FORWARD among the top 5 players so it is possible, the box score in the opening minutes of the game might show a different name among them to give them an extra forward to start......maybe.....I don't panic until substitutes start coming in and then I realize one of their starters is not at least coming of the bench either! THAT is when I may look to hedge, depending on WHO it is.......maybe.....we shall see.....But even at -3 on MORGAN that line just looks waaaaaay "too good to be true"![]()
This game SHOULD BE a near dead-even matchup and anyone's game. McNeese is NOT the better team entering this contest! Actually, if anything, SFA Lumberjacks should hold a very tiny edge....which is what prompted me to take the +3.5 pts.... It's a "value" bet, where they SHOULD not only have a 50/50 shot at winning SU but getting the +3.5 pts means they could lose a close one and I still collect a win. Value, yes, but not guaranteed.![]()
They are failing right now in the 1h but still I would make this "even match" type of bet every time without hesitation (after I checked for injuries of course) If it loses, so be it....still a sound play going in.
...and there we have it as we could almost predict: the value bet is LOSING 25 - 42 at HT versus an equal opponent...
OF COURSE! ![]()
This game SHOULD BE a near dead-even matchup and anyone's game. McNeese is NOT the better team entering this contest! Actually, if anything, SFA Lumberjacks should hold a very tiny edge....which is what prompted me to take the +3.5 pts.... It's a "value" bet, where they SHOULD not only have a 50/50 shot at winning SU but getting the +3.5 pts means they could lose a close one and I still collect a win. Value, yes, but not guaranteed.![]()
They are failing right now in the 1h but still I would make this "even match" type of bet every time without hesitation (after I checked for injuries of course) If it loses, so be it....still a sound play going in.
...and there we have it as we could almost predict: the value bet is LOSING 25 - 42 at HT versus an equal opponent...
OF COURSE! ![]()
NO missing players on MORGAN that I see.
So far after almost 4.5 mins of play, each team is 1 for 6.....
MORGAN is the #2 team in the conference with an excellent 10 - 4 conf record vs 2 - 12 Dela.St
NO missing players on MORGAN that I see.
So far after almost 4.5 mins of play, each team is 1 for 6.....
MORGAN is the #2 team in the conference with an excellent 10 - 4 conf record vs 2 - 12 Dela.St
Thought this was a neutral site game now see its on McNeese's home court. Seems strange the 2 seed gets home court advantage...too late for me now it looks. ![]()
Thought this was a neutral site game now see its on McNeese's home court. Seems strange the 2 seed gets home court advantage...too late for me now it looks. ![]()
NO missing players on MORGAN that I see. So far after almost 4.5 mins of play, each team is 1 for 6.....
MORGAN is the #2 team in the conference with an excellent 10 - 4 conf record vs 2 - 12 Dela.St
LIVE BET early-1h trail 4 - 11: MORGAN +2.5 -115 @B365 *BB
NO missing players on MORGAN that I see. So far after almost 4.5 mins of play, each team is 1 for 6.....
MORGAN is the #2 team in the conference with an excellent 10 - 4 conf record vs 2 - 12 Dela.St
LIVE BET early-1h trail 4 - 11: MORGAN +2.5 -115 @B365 *BB
PHUCK!! ![]()
I made a BLUNDER on the venue!!!
A bet I never would have made had I noticed this....![]()
PHUCK!! ![]()
I made a BLUNDER on the venue!!!
A bet I never would have made had I noticed this....![]()
MORGAN is the #2 team in the conference with an excellent 10 - 4 conf record vs 2 - 12 Dela.St LIVE BET early-1h trail 4 - 11: MORGAN +2.5 -115 @B365 *BB
LIVE BET#2 mid-1h trail 9 -13: MORGAN -115 @B365 *BB
MORGAN is the #2 team in the conference with an excellent 10 - 4 conf record vs 2 - 12 Dela.St LIVE BET early-1h trail 4 - 11: MORGAN +2.5 -115 @B365 *BB
LIVE BET#2 mid-1h trail 9 -13: MORGAN -115 @B365 *BB

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.