Final Sep 11
NCST 34 -7.0 o52.0
WAKE 24 7.0 u52.0
Final Sep 12
INST 0 47.5 o61.5
IU 73 -47.5 u61.5
Final Sep 12
COLG 24 36.5 o64.0
SYR 66 -36.5 u64.0
Final Sep 12
COLO 20 4.0 o45.0
HOU 36 -4.0 u45.0
Final Sep 12
KSU 17 -1.5 o56.0
ARIZ 23 1.5 u56.0
Final Sep 12
UNM 35 16.0 o52.0
UCLA 10 -16.0 u52.0
Final Sep 13
MEM 28 -4.0 o51.0
TROY 7 4.0 u51.0
Final Sep 13
TOWS 17 28.5 o52.5
MD 44 -28.5 u52.5
Final Sep 13
ORE 34
NW 14
Final Sep 13
SAM 7 52.0 o64.5
BAY 42 -52.0 u64.5
Final Sep 13
CWM 16 31.0 o53.5
UVA 55 -31.0 u53.5
Final Sep 13
HCU 7 48.5 o59.0
NEB 59 -48.5 u59.0
Final Sep 13
OKLA 42 -24.0 o51.0
TEM 3 24.0 u51.0
Final Sep 13
CMU 3
MICH 63
Final Sep 13
BUFF 31 -24.0 o48.5
KENT 28 24.0 u48.5
Final Sep 13
WIS 14 17.5 o45.0
ALA 38 -17.5 u45.0
Final Sep 13
CLEM 21 -3.0 o50.0
GT 24 3.0 u50.0
Final Sep 13
USA 15 25.5 o56.5
AUB 31 -25.5 u56.5
Final Sep 13
ULL 10 27.5 o47.0
MIZZ 52 -27.5 u47.0
Final Sep 13
UNH 29 3.0 o46.5
BALL 34 -3.0 u46.5
Final 4OT Sep 13
CONN 41 -8.5 o53.0
DEL 44 8.5 u53.0
Final 4OT Sep 13
UGA 44 -3.0 o50.5
TENN 41 3.0 u50.5
Final Sep 13
WSU 10 7.0 o57.5
UNT 59 -7.0 u57.5
Final Sep 13
NORF 10
RUTG 60
Final 4OT Sep 13
PITT 24
WVU 31
Final Sep 13
RICH 6 24.0 o47.5
UNC 41 -24.0 u47.5
Final Sep 13
VILL 6
PSU 52
Final Sep 13
NWST 0 48.5 o55.5
CIN 70 -48.5 u55.5
Final Sep 13
USC 33 -20.5 o59.5
PUR 17 20.5 u59.5
Final Sep 13
MORG 0 34.0 o54.5
TOL 60 -34.0 u54.5
Final Sep 13
SMU 28 -28.5 o61.0
MOSU 10 28.5 u61.0
Final Sep 13
YSU 24 24.0 o55.0
MSU 41 -24.0 u55.0
Final Sep 13
IW 20
UTSA 48
Final Sep 13
ORST 14 24.0 o61.5
TTU 45 -24.0 u61.5
Final Sep 13
ISU 24 -21.0 o56.0
ARST 16 21.0 u56.0
Final Sep 13
UTEP 10 39.5 o52.0
TEX 27 -39.5 u52.0
Final Sep 13
USF 12 17.5 o57.0
MIA 49 -17.5 u57.0
Final Sep 13
MTU 14 9.0 o50.0
NEV 13 -9.0 u50.0
Final Sep 13
LIB 13 -6.0 o51.5
BGSU 23 6.0 u51.5
Final Sep 13
FAU 28 1.5 o56.0
FIU 38 -1.5 u56.0
Final Sep 13
MONM 35 2.5 o65.5
CHAR 42 -2.5 u65.5
Final Sep 13
MERR 13 17.0 o44.0
KENN 27 -17.0 u44.0
Final Sep 13
EKY 7 14.5 o49.5
MRSH 38 -14.5 u49.5
Final Sep 13
ALCN 0 43.0 o56.5
MSST 63 -43.0 u56.5
Final Sep 13
PV 17 28.0 o48.0
RICE 38 -28.0 u48.0
Final Sep 13
JVST 34 3.5 o58.5
GASO 41 -3.5 u58.5
Final Sep 13
MURR 21 32.0 o63.5
GSU 37 -32.0 u63.5
Final Sep 13
APP 22 -3.0 o56.0
USM 38 3.0 u56.0
Final Sep 13
ODU 45 5.5 o51.0
VT 26 -5.5 u51.0
Final Sep 13
OHIO 9 28.0 o49.5
OSU 37 -28.0 u49.5
Final Sep 13
WMU 0 27.5 o51.0
ILL 38 -27.5 u51.0
Final Sep 13
ARK 35 4.0 o60.5
MISS 41 -4.0 u60.5
Final Sep 13
FLA 10 4.5 o47.5
LSU 20 -4.5 u47.5
Final Sep 13
EMU 23 26.5 o49.0
UK 48 -26.5 u49.0
Final Sep 13
TAM 41 6.5 o50.5
ND 40 -6.5 u50.5
Final Sep 13
ECU 38 -7.5 o57.5
CCU 0 7.5 u57.5
Final Sep 13
MASS 7 35.0 o44.0
IOWA 47 -35.0 u44.0
Final Sep 13
NMSU 14 10.0 o43.0
LT 49 -10.0 u43.0
Final Sep 13
VAN 31 3.0 o49.0
SOCAR 7 -3.0 u49.0
Final Sep 13
UTAH 31 -24.0 o47.5
WYO 6 24.0 u47.5
Final Sep 13
DUKE 27 1.0 o52.5
TULN 34 -1.0 u52.5
Final Sep 13
ACU 21 42.0 o60.5
TCU 42 -42.0 u60.5
Final Sep 13
NAVY 42 -14.0 o53.0
TLSA 23 14.0 u53.0
Final Sep 13
AKR 28 12.0 o58.5
UAB 31 -12.0 u58.5
Final Sep 13
AFA 30 -4.0 o51.5
USU 49 4.0 u51.5
Final Sep 13
SOU 7 37.5 o50.0
FRES 56 -37.5 u50.0
Final Sep 13
TXST 15 18.5 o61.5
ASU 34 -18.5 u61.5
Final Sep 13
MINN 14 -3.0 o40.5
CAL 27 3.0 u40.5
Final Sep 13
BC 20 -14.0 o45.0
STAN 30 14.0 u45.0
Final Sep 14
PRST 3 35.5 o54.0
HAW 23 -35.5 u54.0
Wake Forest 4th ACC6-6
Duke 11th ACC3-9

Wake Forest @ Duke preview

Wallace Wade Stadium

Last Meeting ( Sep 11, 2010 ) Duke 48, Wake Forest 54


THE STORY: Wake Forest and Duke both stumbled last week in their toughest tests of the season. Wake scored just one touchdown in the first three quarters of a 38-17 loss to Virginia Tech, while Duke was never competitive in a 41-16 loss to Florida State. Duke needs three wins over its final six games to become bowl eligible, and it’s unlikely that will happen without a home win over Wake. The Demon Deacons can’t afford a loss if they want to stay in the thick of the ACC Atlantic Division race. The in-state rivalry has produced some recent classics, with only one of the last five matchups decided by more than six points.

TV: ACC Network. LINE: Wake Forest -3

ABOUT WAKE FOREST (4-2, 3-1 ACC): The Demon Deacons have relied too much on the big play and it caught up to them in a big way against a more athletic and ultra-disciplined Hokie defense last week. Tanner Price’s 79-yard touchdown to Chris Givens gave Wake an early lead, but it followed with nine straight possessions of four plays or less. Long, sustained drives will continue to be a rarity for this offense unless coach Jim Grobe can find balance with the ball. Wake ranks 105th in rushing with just 103.5 yards per game.

ABOUT DUKE (3-3, 1-1 ACC): The Blue Devils are banged up on the offensive line but that might not be as a big a detriment as it was last week considering Wake ranks last in the conference with just six sacks. Quarterback Sean Renfree would cherish extra time in the pocket, particularly in the red zone. The Blue Devils rank last in the ACC in red-zone efficiency, while Wake leads the conference in that category. Renfree has been efficient in between the 20s but has thrown just six touchdowns. He could certainly boost that number against a Wake Forest defense that's allowed 13 touchdowns on 20 red-zone trips.

EXTRA POINTS


1. Wake Forest has won the last 11 meetings, including a 54-48 barnburner last year.

2. For all of Price’s athleticism, he hasn’t been able to succeed on third downs, where the Demon Deacons rank last in the ACC with a 37.4 percent conversion rate.

3. Price could take plenty of chances deep against a Duke secondary that has just three interceptions.

PREDICTION: Wake Forest 42, Duke 30 – Givens enters the game with three straight 100-yard receiving efforts and should torch Duke's secondary.

Pages Related to This Topic

Weather Forecast