San Francisco Giants Picks
4th in National League West
(61 - 85)
Next Game
Wed, Sep 9
15:45 ET
STL @ SF Picks
MLB PicksEV Model Rating
Star rating: 3 out of 5
The leading projection system (THE BAT X) projects Jordan Walker in the 92nd percentile when assessing his home run skill.. Jordan Walker is projected to bat 4th in the batting order in this matchup.. The San Francisco Giants infield defense grades out as the 4th-worst among every team on the slate today.. Jordan Walker has been hot recently, raising his seasonal exit velocity of 92.5-mph to 96-mph in the past week's worth of games.. With a .502 Slugging Percentage (SLG) this year, Jordan Walker has performed in the 94th percentile.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 3 out of 5
Alec Burleson's batting average ability is projected to be in the 94th percentile according to the leading projection system (THE BAT X).. Alec Burleson is projected to hit 3rd in the lineup in this matchup.. Oracle Park has the 2nd-shallowest RF dimensions in the majors.. Alec Burleson will receive the benefit of the platoon advantage against Blade Tidwell today.. The San Francisco Giants infield defense grades out as the 4th-worst among every team on the slate today.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 3 out of 5
Nolan Gorman will have the handedness advantage against Blade Tidwell in today's matchup.. Nolan Gorman pulls a lot of his flyballs (36.1% — 87th percentile) and is a great match for the park considering he'll be hitting them towards the game's 2nd-shallowest RF fences today.. The San Francisco Giants infield defense grades out as the 4th-worst among every team on the slate today.. Nolan Gorman has made big improvements with his Barrel% lately, improving his 10.1% seasonal rate to 16.7% in the past two weeks' worth of games.. Nolan Gorman has seen a big gain in his exit velocity in recent games; just compare his 93.5-mph average over the past 7 days to his seasonal 89.5-mph mark.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 4 out of 5
Andre Pallante has averaged 91.8 adjusted pitches per outing this year, checking in at the 77th percentile.. The San Francisco Giants have 4 hitters in their projected lineup today with a high (i.e. over 27%) underlying K% (per the leading projection system, THE BAT X) (Drew Cavanaugh, Shay Whitcomb, Jonah Cox, Bryce Eldridge).. Oracle Park's altitude is near sea-level, one of the lowest among all parks, which usually leads (as a rule of thumb) to less offense.. Low humidity has a small yet noteworthy correlation with less offense (and more strikeouts), and the weather forecast projects the 2nd-least humid conditions of the day at 37%.. Given that flyball hitters perform worse against flyball pitchers, Andre Pallante (56.8% GB% per the leading projection system, THE BAT) is well-situated in this game with 4 FB hitters in the opposing team's projected batting order.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 4 out of 5
Nolan Gorman will have the handedness advantage against Blade Tidwell in today's matchup.. Nolan Gorman pulls a lot of his flyballs (36.1% — 87th percentile) and is a great match for the park considering he'll be hitting them towards the game's 2nd-shallowest RF fences today.. The San Francisco Giants infield defense grades out as the 4th-worst among every team on the slate today.. Nolan Gorman has made big improvements with his Barrel% lately, improving his 10.1% seasonal rate to 16.7% in the past two weeks' worth of games.. Nolan Gorman has seen a big gain in his exit velocity in recent games; just compare his 93.5-mph average over the past 7 days to his seasonal 89.5-mph mark.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 3 out of 5
Rafael Devers projects as the 16th-best hitter in baseball, via the leading projection system (THE BAT X).. Rafael Devers is penciled in 2nd on the lineup card today.. Oracle Park has the 2nd-shallowest RF dimensions in the majors.. Rafael Devers will receive the benefit of the platoon advantage against Andre Pallante in today's game.. Rafael Devers will benefit from the home field advantage today, which ought to boost all of his stats.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 3 out of 5
The leading projection system (THE BAT X) projects Ivan Herrera in the 92nd percentile when assessing his overall offensive skill.. Ivan Herrera is projected to hit 2nd on the lineup card today.. The San Francisco Giants infield defense grades out as the 4th-worst among every team on the slate today.. Ivan Herrera has been hot in recent games, raising his seasonal exit velocity of 89.2-mph to 93.8-mph over the last 7 days.. Using Statcast metrics, Ivan Herrera ranks in the 92nd percentile for offensive skills per the leading projection system (THE BAT X)'s version of Expected wOBA (xwOBA) since the start of last season at .367.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 3 out of 5
Oracle Park has the 2nd-shallowest RF dimensions in the majors.. Batting from the opposite that Blade Tidwell throws from, Nathan Church will have an advantage in today's game.. The San Francisco Giants infield defense grades out as the 4th-worst among every team on the slate today.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 4 out of 5
Nolan Gorman will have the handedness advantage against Blade Tidwell in today's matchup.. Nolan Gorman pulls a lot of his flyballs (36.1% — 87th percentile) and is a great match for the park considering he'll be hitting them towards the game's 2nd-shallowest RF fences today.. The San Francisco Giants infield defense grades out as the 4th-worst among every team on the slate today.. Nolan Gorman has made big improvements with his Barrel% lately, improving his 10.1% seasonal rate to 16.7% in the past two weeks' worth of games.. Nolan Gorman has seen a big gain in his exit velocity in recent games; just compare his 93.5-mph average over the past 7 days to his seasonal 89.5-mph mark.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 3 out of 5
Rafael Devers projects as the 16th-best hitter in baseball, via the leading projection system (THE BAT X).. Rafael Devers is penciled in 2nd on the lineup card today.. Oracle Park has the 2nd-shallowest RF dimensions in the majors.. Rafael Devers will receive the benefit of the platoon advantage against Andre Pallante in today's game.. Rafael Devers will benefit from the home field advantage today, which ought to boost all of his stats.
Consensus Picks
More ConsensusSTL @ SF · Props
| GAME & PLAYER PROPS | PROJECTIONS | ANALYSIS | BEST ODDS | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TOTAL
|
|||||||
|
SPREAD
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
R. Devers
(1B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.94
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
-2.21%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
O. Basabe
(2B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.84
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
-4.08%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
SF
D. Cavanaugh
(C)
0.5 Total Hits
0.75
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
-4.6%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
SF
T. Hill
(LF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.97
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-5.13%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
N. Gorman
(3B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.74
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
-5.3%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
I. Herrera
(DH)
0.5 Total Hits
1.09
PROJECTION
+0.6
DIFFERENCE
-5.5%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
B. Torres
(LF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.96
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-5.92%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
S. Whitcomb
(3B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.73
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
-6.38%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
M. Winn
(SS)
0.5 Total Hits
0.95
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-7.15%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
A. Burleson
(1B)
0.5 Total Hits
1.14
PROJECTION
+0.6
DIFFERENCE
-7.28%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
N. Church
(CF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.86
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
-7.53%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
J. Walker
(RF)
0.5 Total Hits
1.08
PROJECTION
+0.6
DIFFERENCE
-8.56%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
C. Koss
(3B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.78
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
-11.06%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
J. Walker
(RF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.83
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
11.06%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
A. Burleson
(1B)
1.5 Total Bases
1.90
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
9.96%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
N. Gorman
(3B)
1.5 Total Bases
1.39
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
9.17%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
I. Herrera
(DH)
1.5 Total Bases
1.62
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
5.18%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
R. Devers
(1B)
1.5 Total Bases
1.63
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
3.99%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
J. Lee
(RF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.37
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
-5.54%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
SF
T. Hill
(LF)
1.5 Total Bases
0.97
PROJECTION
-0.5
DIFFERENCE
-24.24%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
M. Winn
(SS)
1.5 Total Bases
0.95
PROJECTION
-0.5
DIFFERENCE
-25.72%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
O. Basabe
(2B)
1.5 Total Bases
0.84
PROJECTION
-0.7
DIFFERENCE
-30%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
N. Church
(CF)
1.5 Total Bases
0.86
PROJECTION
-0.6
DIFFERENCE
-30%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
B. Eldridge
(DH)
1.5 Total Bases
0.91
PROJECTION
-0.6
DIFFERENCE
-30%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
C. Koss
(3B)
1.5 Total Bases
0.78
PROJECTION
-0.7
DIFFERENCE
-30%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
S. Whitcomb
(3B)
1.5 Total Bases
0.73
PROJECTION
-0.8
DIFFERENCE
-30%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
N. Gorman
(3B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.17
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
4.26%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
SF
T. Hill
(LF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.02
PROJECTION
-0.5
DIFFERENCE
-2.44%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
M. Winn
(SS)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.06
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-3.45%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
O. Basabe
(2B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.04
PROJECTION
-0.5
DIFFERENCE
-3.57%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
S. Whitcomb
(3B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.07
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-5.19%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
R. Devers
(1B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.16
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-6.23%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
I. Herrera
(DH)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.12
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-6.62%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
A. Burleson
(1B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.17
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-11.34%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
T. Saggese
(LF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.09
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-14.18%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
B. Eldridge
(DH)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.11
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-25.55%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
SF
D. Cavanaugh
(C)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.04
PROJECTION
-0.5
DIFFERENCE
-30%
EV
|
|||||||
|
STRIKEOUTS THROWN
A. Pallante
(SP)
3.5 Strikeouts Thrown
4.03
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
13.68%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
N. Gorman
(3B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.54
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
15.64%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
R. Devers
(1B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.59
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
11.46%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
I. Herrera
(DH)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.52
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
9.28%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
N. Church
(CF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.40
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
7.89%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
O. Basabe
(2B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.32
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
-3.06%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
S. Whitcomb
(3B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.35
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
-3.17%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
C. Koss
(3B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.29
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
-3.76%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
A. Burleson
(1B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.72
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
-5.88%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
SF
T. Hill
(LF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.30
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
-8.35%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
M. Winn
(SS)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.38
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
-10.37%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
B. Eldridge
(DH)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.56
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
-17.39%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
J. Lee
(RF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.38
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
-30%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
N. Gorman
(3B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.82
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
13.68%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
R. Devers
(1B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.22
PROJECTION
+0.7
DIFFERENCE
9.89%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
I. Herrera
(DH)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.25
PROJECTION
+0.7
DIFFERENCE
6.47%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
SF
T. Hill
(LF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.73
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
4.96%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
S. Whitcomb
(3B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.42
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
-7.1%
EV
|
|||||||
- Proj. Diff: Low to High
- Proj. Diff: High to Low
- Proj. Rating: Low to High
- Proj. Rating: High to Low
- +EV: Low to High
- +EV: High to Low
TOTAL
SPREAD
TOTAL HITS
R. Devers
(1B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.94
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
-2.21%
EV
TOTAL HITS
O. Basabe
(2B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.84
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
-4.08%
EV
TOTAL HITS
SF
D. Cavanaugh
(C)
0.5 Total Hits
0.75
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
-4.6%
EV
TOTAL HITS
SF
T. Hill
(LF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.97
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-5.13%
EV
TOTAL HITS
N. Gorman
(3B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.74
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
-5.3%
EV
TOTAL HITS
I. Herrera
(DH)
0.5 Total Hits
1.09
PROJECTION
+0.6
DIFFERENCE
-5.5%
EV
TOTAL HITS
B. Torres
(LF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.96
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-5.92%
EV
TOTAL HITS
S. Whitcomb
(3B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.73
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
-6.38%
EV
TOTAL HITS
M. Winn
(SS)
0.5 Total Hits
0.95
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-7.15%
EV
TOTAL HITS
A. Burleson
(1B)
0.5 Total Hits
1.14
PROJECTION
+0.6
DIFFERENCE
-7.28%
EV
TOTAL HITS
N. Church
(CF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.86
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
-7.53%
EV
TOTAL HITS
J. Walker
(RF)
0.5 Total Hits
1.08
PROJECTION
+0.6
DIFFERENCE
-8.56%
EV
TOTAL HITS
C. Koss
(3B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.78
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
-11.06%
EV
TOTAL BASES
J. Walker
(RF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.83
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
11.06%
EV
TOTAL BASES
A. Burleson
(1B)
1.5 Total Bases
1.90
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
9.96%
EV
TOTAL BASES
N. Gorman
(3B)
1.5 Total Bases
1.39
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
9.17%
EV
TOTAL BASES
I. Herrera
(DH)
1.5 Total Bases
1.62
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
5.18%
EV
TOTAL BASES
R. Devers
(1B)
1.5 Total Bases
1.63
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
3.99%
EV
TOTAL BASES
J. Lee
(RF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.37
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
-5.54%
EV
TOTAL BASES
SF
T. Hill
(LF)
1.5 Total Bases
0.97
PROJECTION
-0.5
DIFFERENCE
-24.24%
EV
TOTAL BASES
M. Winn
(SS)
1.5 Total Bases
0.95
PROJECTION
-0.5
DIFFERENCE
-25.72%
EV
TOTAL BASES
O. Basabe
(2B)
1.5 Total Bases
0.84
PROJECTION
-0.7
DIFFERENCE
-30%
EV
TOTAL BASES
N. Church
(CF)
1.5 Total Bases
0.86
PROJECTION
-0.6
DIFFERENCE
-30%
EV
TOTAL BASES
B. Eldridge
(DH)
1.5 Total Bases
0.91
PROJECTION
-0.6
DIFFERENCE
-30%
EV
TOTAL BASES
C. Koss
(3B)
1.5 Total Bases
0.78
PROJECTION
-0.7
DIFFERENCE
-30%
EV
TOTAL BASES
S. Whitcomb
(3B)
1.5 Total Bases
0.73
PROJECTION
-0.8
DIFFERENCE
-30%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
N. Gorman
(3B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.17
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
4.26%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
SF
T. Hill
(LF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.02
PROJECTION
-0.5
DIFFERENCE
-2.44%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
M. Winn
(SS)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.06
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-3.45%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
O. Basabe
(2B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.04
PROJECTION
-0.5
DIFFERENCE
-3.57%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
S. Whitcomb
(3B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.07
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-5.19%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
R. Devers
(1B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.16
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-6.23%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
I. Herrera
(DH)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.12
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-6.62%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
A. Burleson
(1B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.17
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-11.34%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
T. Saggese
(LF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.09
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-14.18%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
B. Eldridge
(DH)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.11
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-25.55%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
SF
D. Cavanaugh
(C)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.04
PROJECTION
-0.5
DIFFERENCE
-30%
EV
STRIKEOUTS THROWN
A. Pallante
(SP)
3.5 Strikeouts Thrown
4.03
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
13.68%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
N. Gorman
(3B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.54
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
15.64%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
R. Devers
(1B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.59
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
11.46%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
I. Herrera
(DH)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.52
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
9.28%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
N. Church
(CF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.40
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
7.89%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
O. Basabe
(2B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.32
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
-3.06%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
S. Whitcomb
(3B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.35
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
-3.17%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
C. Koss
(3B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.29
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
-3.76%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
A. Burleson
(1B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.72
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
-5.88%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
SF
T. Hill
(LF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.30
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
-8.35%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
M. Winn
(SS)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.38
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
-10.37%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
B. Eldridge
(DH)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.56
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
-17.39%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
J. Lee
(RF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.38
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
-30%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
N. Gorman
(3B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.82
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
13.68%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
R. Devers
(1B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.22
PROJECTION
+0.7
DIFFERENCE
9.89%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
I. Herrera
(DH)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.25
PROJECTION
+0.7
DIFFERENCE
6.47%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
SF
T. Hill
(LF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.73
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
4.96%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
S. Whitcomb
(3B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.42
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
-7.1%
EV
STL @ SF · Trends
Check back shortly to see trends for each team.