It appears as if the Wink-Snap dispute has most likely taken over headline status within the box. This conflict comes with some history. Although not yet completely understood initial evaluation indicates some sort fraternity type shunning of swink in the past. Not sure what the club was but it was reportedly the penalty box nation boys. It does appear that csnap was either voted in, or accepted by the "nation". Most recently we have swink sticking up for the consistently ostracized BMA , followed by an inflammatory editorial thread created by csnap. In this thread csnap contends that swink is merely trying to create his own band of boys (the gentlemen fingered by csnap to be potentially involved in this movement appears to be most anyone who did not sign the thumbs up emoticon to ban BMA in Renton's ban BMA thread). swink has fought back fiercely with threads indicating a deteriorating posse that when called out goes down like a "bunch of whiny bitches". This battle is spilling over with a rather large group including the likes of csnap, INAD, Renton, dl36, and others taking an anti wink/BMA stance. THere is also a group in the middle that is feeling a bit torn as they are trying to come to terms with the unbalanced dynamics of the dislike for BMA + the past respect for winks + the apparent BMA/Winks alliance=confusion. This camp would likely include Bets and perhaps Milrod although he did make a few fudge packing comments in one thread. Not real sure about AHD and Mikey. They are likely still busy with each other. One must ask is starwink trying to create an opposing party to the current "ruling class"? It would seem he may have the clout. Or is this simply a 1950's communist witch hunt? Let the drama continue
0
It appears as if the Wink-Snap dispute has most likely taken over headline status within the box. This conflict comes with some history. Although not yet completely understood initial evaluation indicates some sort fraternity type shunning of swink in the past. Not sure what the club was but it was reportedly the penalty box nation boys. It does appear that csnap was either voted in, or accepted by the "nation". Most recently we have swink sticking up for the consistently ostracized BMA , followed by an inflammatory editorial thread created by csnap. In this thread csnap contends that swink is merely trying to create his own band of boys (the gentlemen fingered by csnap to be potentially involved in this movement appears to be most anyone who did not sign the thumbs up emoticon to ban BMA in Renton's ban BMA thread). swink has fought back fiercely with threads indicating a deteriorating posse that when called out goes down like a "bunch of whiny bitches". This battle is spilling over with a rather large group including the likes of csnap, INAD, Renton, dl36, and others taking an anti wink/BMA stance. THere is also a group in the middle that is feeling a bit torn as they are trying to come to terms with the unbalanced dynamics of the dislike for BMA + the past respect for winks + the apparent BMA/Winks alliance=confusion. This camp would likely include Bets and perhaps Milrod although he did make a few fudge packing comments in one thread. Not real sure about AHD and Mikey. They are likely still busy with each other. One must ask is starwink trying to create an opposing party to the current "ruling class"? It would seem he may have the clout. Or is this simply a 1950's communist witch hunt? Let the drama continue
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.