Why State-Regulated Sports Betting Still Makes Sense to Circa’s Derek Stevens

Geoff Zochodne - Sports Betting Journalist at Covers.com
Geoff Zochodne • Senior News Analyst 15+ years betting experience
Updated: Aug 5, 2026 , 12:50 PM ET • 4 min read

The timing is right, the price of admission is right, and the location is ideal. That, along with a bearish outlook for sports prediction markets, contributed to Circa snagging an online sports betting license in Arizona.

Photo By - Circa.

If you’re looking to offer sports betting these days, you might be more inclined to call the CFTC than the ADG.

After all, federally regulated prediction markets now offer a near-nationwide alternative to state-licensed sports betting. Why pay for a gambling license and state taxes to operate in just one market?

And yet, that’s exactly what Circa Sports and CEO Derek Stevens are doing in Arizona. The Arizona Department of Gaming (ADG) announced Monday that it had allocated an online sports betting license to Circa as a designee for the San Juan Southern Paiute Tribe.

“With Circa's unique … low-hold model, we've got to have the right regulatory environment in place,” Stevens told Covers in an interview Tuesday. “We have to be able to cut a type of deal that makes sense."

Covers Icon
Key Takeaways
  • Circa Sports chose to enter Arizona because the regulatory environment fits its low-hold business model, the market is mature, and its proximity to Las Vegas creates cross-promotion opportunities.
  • CEO Derek Stevens believes Circa can attract experienced bettors by launching after the initial wave of sportsbook competition and focusing on its distinct approach rather than heavy marketing.
  • Stevens remains confident in state-regulated sports betting, arguing prediction markets face regulatory and legal challenges that make their long-term outlook uncertain.

In Arizona, everything lined up (including the fact that the tribe's old partner, Betway, exited the U.S. entirely), and the state will be Circa’s seventh market in the U.S. for its online sportsbook. It will also be the fourth market in which Circa will use its new sportsbook technology.

The ADG said it is now working with Circa on the “next steps,” and Stevens said their goal is to launch in Arizona in January 2027.

Stevens is eyeing additional markets, too, although he said the company doesn't have “another deal in the hopper” at this point.

Nevertheless, the CEO aims to keep growing the online business through the state-regulated model that was historically the only way to do it - until it wasn’t - and for reasons he sees as solid. 

For starters, Arizona neighbors Nevada, and a lot of Arizona customers already walk through the doors of Stevens’ properties in Las Vegas, namely, the brick-and-mortar Circa, the D, and the Golden Gate.

So there’s already some familiarity between Arizona sports bettors and Circa. An Arizona user of the Circa Sports app could be easily nudged toward Vegas. 

Stevens said the company plans to provide “a substantial amount of additional benefits” for Arizona users, with some tie-ins to Vegas as well.

A long time coming 

Arizona launched legalized sports betting back in 2021. That means the Arizona sports betting market and the bettors who populate it have had nearly five years to mature, to learn what they like and don’t like, and, in some instances perhaps, to be turned away by certain online sportsbooks for betting too big or winning a bit too much.

More than $35 billion has been bet in the state, according to the ADG. Now along comes Circa, with a low-hold, high-volume model that caters to a sharper and deeper-pocketed bettor. 

“We think we bring something different to that market,” Stevens said. 

In addition to proximity and maturity, Circa can also come in and shake things up in Arizona after the dust of its online sports betting launch has been settled for some time. The operator has only done one Day 1 launch, which was Missouri last December.

In Arizona, there's no more rush to partner with anything that moves merely for advertising opportunities, or to blow big sums of cash on marketing and promotion in general. The bettors are there, and you can introduce yourself at your own pace. You might already know them, too. 

Circa is not going to be the biggest online sportsbook in any given state. In Missouri, for example, Circa took $2.2 million in bets in June, compared to $76.3 million for FanDuel.

However, as Stevens sees it, spending a ton on advertising still makes more sense for operators interested in taking a dozen smaller bets a day from as many customers as possible. Circa, meanwhile, can take bigger bets from customers over a longer period. 

“I enjoy coming in after the hurricane or the tornado of launches come about,” Stevens said.

Enjoying Covers content? Add us as a preferred source on your Google account Add as a preferred source on Google

After the gold rush

And then there’s the fact that Stevens just doesn’t believe the sports prediction market gold rush will last. 

The CEO doesn’t think states are just going to give up the jobs and tax revenue tied to legal sports betting, or that the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) is “remotely prepared” to regulate what he sees as just more gambling. 

While the CFTC and prediction market operators believe federal legislation and regulation shield them from state-level gambling rules, the growing number of legal challenges involving sports prediction markets suggest the states aren't just going to go away.

States are indeed fighting back, including 44 that signed on to a letter to the CFTC urging the agency to “clarify that sports bets and gambling cannot be traded on (prediction markets) but are instead subject to state law.”

Those federal regulatory efforts are in addition to the court battles that are raging across the U.S., such as a recent win for Utah in its fight with Kalshi.

Stevens says he still believes "reasonable heads will prevail" and the historical state-by-state regulation of gambling will carry the day.

“I just don't think that it's a reasonable position to think that these pirates of the prediction markets are able to come in and successfully do an end-around, not paying state taxes, not paying federal excise taxes, not paying league fees, not paying data fees,” Stevens said. “I think that's a very cavalier position.”

Pages related to this topic

Geoff Zochodne, Covers Sports Betting Journalist
Senior News Analyst

Geoff has been writing about the legalization and regulation of sports betting in Canada and the United States for more than four years. His work has included coverage of launches in New York, Ohio, and Ontario, numerous court proceedings, and the decriminalization of single-game wagering by Canadian lawmakers. As an expert on the growing online gambling industry in North America, Geoff has appeared on and been cited by publications and networks such as Axios, TSN Radio, and VSiN. Prior to joining Covers, he spent 10 years as a journalist reporting on business and politics, including a stint at the Ontario legislature. More recently, Geoff’s work has focused on the pending launch of a competitive iGaming market in Alberta, the evolution of major companies within the gambling industry, and efforts by U.S. state regulators to rein in offshore activity and college player prop betting.

Popular Content

Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo