Posted:
#5676
Quote Originally Posted by phixer:
one solid play 1.1k
one solid play 1.1k
over 109.5 first half hou - gs
yes. 1k won
Has anyone made any money betting on sports steadily throughout the past year? 'cause I did! See how
Posted:
#5682
Quote Originally Posted by phixer:
won over 109.5 first half in houston +1k
won over 109.5 first half in houston +1k
My record total after that win
19-17-1
+20,360 $
9-3 solid big plays +21030 $
2-4-1 medium plays -290 $
8-10 small plays -380 $
Probably the best capper with the best "system" on the Covers. I have been watching you since your emergence in 2013 as a capper and have to admit - you are all money. I'm disregarding your medium and small plays as they are from before. But since you started with solid plays - the sky is the limit. Another prove that you don't need to play the whole board but one strong "phixed" play
Posted:
#5686
Just a side note here Mavin, and I don't mean to be negative, but I'm pretty sure you had mentioned earlier that you would not play $200 bets until you were up to $1000 profit. You are technically down money for the year, but are laying out the $200 bets, which goes against your basic betting theories
Posted:
#5687
Quote Originally Posted by phixer:
won over 109.5 first half in houston +1k
won over 109.5 first half in houston +1k
My record total after that win
19-17-1
+20,360 $
9-3 solid big plays +21030 $
2-4-1 medium plays -290 $
8-10 small plays -380 $
This is when I question the logic of differing unit sizes in your bets, not just of you, but anyone. (You are in the green, so I'll question you!) But as is evident in your records for medium and small plays, as well as overall profit of those plays, why even bother with medium/small plays? Why not just stick straight to solid big plays and whatever unit bet size you have for them? Not criticizing just asking a question.
Posted:
#5689
Quote Originally Posted by SportsMavin:
On the night when I lost both my plays and total of 430$ - phixer is a most refreshing phenomenon - I absolutely agree.
On the night when I lost both my plays and total of 430$ - phixer is a most refreshing phenomenon - I absolutely agree.
no matter what happens and what our records are - youre number one mavin. i have so much respect for your patience and your skills. here and on financials that i will always be your number one groupie
Posted:
#5690
Quote Originally Posted by ChasingTheOdds:
This is when I question the logic of differing unit sizes in your bets, not just of you, but anyone. (You are in the green, so I'll question you!) But as is evident in your records for medium and small plays, as well as overall profit of those plays, why even bother with medium/small plays? Why not just stick straight to solid big plays and whatever unit bet size you have for them? Not criticizing just asking a question.
This is when I question the logic of differing unit sizes in your bets, not just of you, but anyone. (You are in the green, so I'll question you!) But as is evident in your records for medium and small plays, as well as overall profit of those plays, why even bother with medium/small plays? Why not just stick straight to solid big plays and whatever unit bet size you have for them? Not criticizing just asking a question.
medium and small plays were before the solid play run. this is a different phaze of my capping. i am simply being "lucky" here guys. dont make too much phuzz about it
Posted:
#5691
Quote Originally Posted by 14allall41:
Probably the best capper with the best "system" on the Covers. I have been watching you since your emergence in 2013 as a capper and have to admit - you are all money. I'm disregarding your medium and small plays as they are from before. But since you started with solid plays - the sky is the limit. Another prove that you don't need to play the whole board but one strong "phixed" play
i feel like ringo star here. i am being simply lucky. for sure no model to follow. but thanks
Posted:
#5695
Quote Originally Posted by CMJohnson1:
Just a side note here Mavin, and I don't mean to be negative, but I'm pretty sure you had mentioned earlier that you would not play $200 bets until you were up to $1000 profit. You are technically down money for the year, but are laying out the $200 bets, which goes against your basic betting theories
Just a side note here Mavin, and I don't mean to be negative, but I'm pretty sure you had mentioned earlier that you would not play $200 bets until you were up to $1000 profit. You are technically down money for the year, but are laying out the $200 bets, which goes against your basic betting theories
The unit size didn't grow. Those were the 2 unit plays each. That is how strong I felt about those plays.
Posted:
#5697
BROOKLYN Nets -4 (-115) 230$
Loss -230$
Parlay Additional Game totals 7 point
Over 191 BROOKLYN Nets - LA Lakers with Over 210 HOUSTON Rockets - GS Warriors (+109) 200$
Loss -200$
Overall yesterday: 0-2 -430$
Overall NFL 8-8-1 -300 $
Overall Parlays 9-10-1 -23 $
Overall NBA 78-74-3 -125 $ (57-41-1 ATS 21-34-1 Totals)
Overall NCAAF 1-1 -120 $
Overall NCAAB 1-1 -10 $
Overall 97-93-5 -248 $
Started with 2,000 $ Now 1322 $
Hot Forum Topics
