Wonju Dongbu Promy 2.5 | |
grab it fast, soft line
If 20 member's could contribute $300 each making our average unit size $6,000 per play and the fund could average series wins of 15 wins at +110 for every loss each month that is an earnings total of $57,000. An administrative fee of 15% would earn S&S $8550.00 and return each member $2,122 in profits or over 700% of initial investment.
Second month we each contribute an extra unit to the fund and repeat the same winning ratio of 15-1 and S&S earns $17,100 for their time with each member receiving $4,545 or 1500% of their original $300 investment.
Assuming 20 members contribute one additional unit to the fund each month to increase our unit size gradually and the 15-1 win ratio is met. At the end of September S&S would have earned themselves $179,500 with each member receiving just over $50,271...not too bad considering our initial risk as a member is $300 out of pocket!
As for the IRS issue, if 40% goes to them oh well, I am still up $30,000 for doing nothing!
Just a thought!
If 20 member's could contribute $300 each making our average unit size $6,000 per play and the fund could average series wins of 15 wins at +110 for every loss each month that is an earnings total of $57,000. An administrative fee of 15% would earn S&S $8550.00 and return each member $2,122 in profits or over 700% of initial investment.
Second month we each contribute an extra unit to the fund and repeat the same winning ratio of 15-1 and S&S earns $17,100 for their time with each member receiving $4,545 or 1500% of their original $300 investment.
Assuming 20 members contribute one additional unit to the fund each month to increase our unit size gradually and the 15-1 win ratio is met. At the end of September S&S would have earned themselves $179,500 with each member receiving just over $50,271...not too bad considering our initial risk as a member is $300 out of pocket!
As for the IRS issue, if 40% goes to them oh well, I am still up $30,000 for doing nothing!
Just a thought!
Q, how is your system doing?
Today is game 2 on chase of CHICAGO -7. Newfie found this system, now 7 - 0, I just documented it.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0ArtvW2coXCHsdEYxLU50cTdIUUtGZmkwekVxMVdQN1E#gid=0
Q, how is your system doing?
Today is game 2 on chase of CHICAGO -7. Newfie found this system, now 7 - 0, I just documented it.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0ArtvW2coXCHsdEYxLU50cTdIUUtGZmkwekVxMVdQN1E#gid=0
If 20 member's could contribute $300 each making our average unit size $6,000 per play and the fund could average series wins of 15 wins at +110 for every loss each month that is an earnings total of $57,000. An administrative fee of 15% would earn S&S $8550.00 and return each member $2,122 in profits or over 700% of initial investment.
Second month we each contribute an extra unit to the fund and repeat the same winning ratio of 15-1 and S&S earns $17,100 for their time with each member receiving $4,545 or 1500% of their original $300 investment.
Assuming 20 members contribute one additional unit to the fund each month to increase our unit size gradually and the 15-1 win ratio is met. At the end of September S&S would have earned themselves $179,500 with each member receiving just over $50,271...not too bad considering our initial risk as a member is $300 out of pocket!
As for the IRS issue, if 40% goes to them oh well, I am still up $30,000 for doing nothing!
Just a thought!
I LIKE IT! And as for the IRS, you can always pay your 40% and sleep better at night!
If 20 member's could contribute $300 each making our average unit size $6,000 per play and the fund could average series wins of 15 wins at +110 for every loss each month that is an earnings total of $57,000. An administrative fee of 15% would earn S&S $8550.00 and return each member $2,122 in profits or over 700% of initial investment.
Second month we each contribute an extra unit to the fund and repeat the same winning ratio of 15-1 and S&S earns $17,100 for their time with each member receiving $4,545 or 1500% of their original $300 investment.
Assuming 20 members contribute one additional unit to the fund each month to increase our unit size gradually and the 15-1 win ratio is met. At the end of September S&S would have earned themselves $179,500 with each member receiving just over $50,271...not too bad considering our initial risk as a member is $300 out of pocket!
As for the IRS issue, if 40% goes to them oh well, I am still up $30,000 for doing nothing!
Just a thought!
I LIKE IT! And as for the IRS, you can always pay your 40% and sleep better at night!
McShady and I have the discipline to run this for you guys and we only want the guys who share our passion for making money not making bets and also understand there is a risk involved in any investment! I think this will work and we could create shares with a weekly/daily price per share based on the amount of money in the accounts..
McShady and I have the discipline to run this for you guys and we only want the guys who share our passion for making money not making bets and also understand there is a risk involved in any investment! I think this will work and we could create shares with a weekly/daily price per share based on the amount of money in the accounts..
Note: This in-state hardwood-battle may not quite classify as a ‘Civil War’ (as it does on the gridiron) but the revenge-minded Beavers arrive in Eugene with plenty of ammunition. For starters, the dog in OSU games this season is 15-7-1 ATS this season. And that fits like a needle in the Biogenesis Clinic to Oregon’s 2012-2013 campaign.
You see, the Ducks are the epitome of a team playing to the level of its
opposition this season, going 8-1 SU and 7-2 ATS versus greater than .666 foes –
but only 3-12 ATS versus .666 or less competition. Add the fact that the webbed
ones enter off a same-season revenger versus Stanford (1-5 SU and 2-4 ATS after
clashing with the Cardinal) with a same-season revenger against Colorado waiting
on deck and you can see why we feel they may be bringing just a water gun to
this Thursday night tussle. With that, we say grab the points as the Beavers
make amends for an earlier home loss.
Note: This in-state hardwood-battle may not quite classify as a ‘Civil War’ (as it does on the gridiron) but the revenge-minded Beavers arrive in Eugene with plenty of ammunition. For starters, the dog in OSU games this season is 15-7-1 ATS this season. And that fits like a needle in the Biogenesis Clinic to Oregon’s 2012-2013 campaign.
You see, the Ducks are the epitome of a team playing to the level of its
opposition this season, going 8-1 SU and 7-2 ATS versus greater than .666 foes –
but only 3-12 ATS versus .666 or less competition. Add the fact that the webbed
ones enter off a same-season revenger versus Stanford (1-5 SU and 2-4 ATS after
clashing with the Cardinal) with a same-season revenger against Colorado waiting
on deck and you can see why we feel they may be bringing just a water gun to
this Thursday night tussle. With that, we say grab the points as the Beavers
make amends for an earlier home loss.
I think Chips was saying $300 initial investment and then start using profits to increase bets. Then once a betting level is reached, then profits are distributed (didvidends). Max outlay $300
Perhaps, there would be several cluds with varying investments. The $100 club, $500 club, etc. Each club would have it's own betting site with McShady and Semper access to the bets and funds and a few others to coordinate distributions...
As Nads says, there is a trust factor here. No offense to anyone! But maybe that's why you have different club levels.
More food for thought...
I think Chips was saying $300 initial investment and then start using profits to increase bets. Then once a betting level is reached, then profits are distributed (didvidends). Max outlay $300
Perhaps, there would be several cluds with varying investments. The $100 club, $500 club, etc. Each club would have it's own betting site with McShady and Semper access to the bets and funds and a few others to coordinate distributions...
As Nads says, there is a trust factor here. No offense to anyone! But maybe that's why you have different club levels.
More food for thought...
