All Forums | The Archives

Moving to Vegas to become a full time pro handicapper

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 973048
Posts: 14201
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2001
Posts: 60107
Posted: #12351
Quote Originally Posted by vegasfballking:

I am getting a little sick and tired of your arrogance also...   How come no one brings up your 5K bet with ur friend... "CG wont be here for football season"   well where am I?  shame he pusssied out of his bet..  did I say I would be here? did I say I would enter the supercontest?

I got a challenge for u and hope you don't back out this time....   we are both in the supercontest correct?   I say I pick a better percentage than you this season. Lets make a bet on it too big boy, unless of course you will back out of it after we agree on it like u did your bet with your friend about me


Oh boy.  I am going to chalk this post up to some midnight coke binge.

The bet I had would have been called off long ago.  The bet required real updates, where we could actually track your financial dealings.  You took about 2 months off from posting.  Who knows if your original bankroll was supplemented by a loan or other means?  Come on.  This is silly.

As far as a supercontest wager....  I have been in it the last 2 years.  I have gone 52-30-3 (came in 9th, won 42k), and last year 51-34.  Both documented.

Do you want to rethink your challenge?

If you decide you want to, I would be happy to wager whatever you want.  But there would have to be a way to escrow.  There is no way I would trust a coke snorting moron with 10k in the bank and a gambling problem to pay me a stack in 4 months.

So it is up to you.  Name the amount, find a legitimate escrow, and consider it done.  But honestly - now is the time for you to back out gracefully.

Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2001
Posts: 60107
Posted: #12352
Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet:

its not a matter of whether you lie or not,obviously vanzack has to operate on sumthing of a trust basis in believing your said actions day to day.so he obviously was trusting to sum extent....but to completely disappear for all intents and purposes for weeks on end???...surely you can see how that wud void his wager by breaking certain critical criteria??....doesnt matter wat did or didnt happen in your "absence".anything COULD have and thats the point...i know its an annoying pain in the ar.se to run the thread but there isnt a single reason why you cudnt continue to do so,as promised by your good self at the very outset.
now i cudnt give 2 shiiits wat you do either way....just that i wanted to point out the obvious in so far as a wager like that is concerned.

Bingo.

Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2001
Posts: 60107
Posted: #12353
And BTW - Louisville has a great shot at beating the Auburn "machine" outright today.

Louisville is my best play of this opening weekend.

GL though.

Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2015
Posts: 28
Posted: #12354

vanzack makes a bet on whether or not CG will be betting football in September. He is, zack loses then creates parameters to ensure he would never have to pay out on the bet.

As for not trusting a 'a coke snorting moron', I would be less inclined to trust someone who makes bets and never pays off after applying retroactive conditions which immunize him from any potential for losing.

Welching and then rationalizing the welch is far more offensive than any drug banging I've ever encountered.

Strong lean to Stanford. If Van were booking the bet he would probably declare it invalid if the on field temperature exceeds 60 degrees.

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2001
Posts: 60107
Posted: #12355
Quote Originally Posted by Jairob:

vanzack makes a bet on whether or not CG will be betting football in September. He is, zack loses then creates parameters to ensure he would never have to pay out on the bet.

As for not trusting a 'a coke snorting moron', I would be less inclined to trust someone who makes bets and never pays off after applying retroactive conditions which immunize him from any potential for losing.

Welching and then rationalizing the welch is far more offensive than any drug banging I've ever encountered.

Strong lean to Stanford. If Van were booking the bet he would probably declare it invalid if the on field temperature exceeds 60 degrees.



Nice try troll.

Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2013
Posts: 15769
Posted: #12356
Quote Originally Posted by vanzack:


Oh boy.  I am going to chalk this post up to some midnight coke binge.

The bet I had would have been called off long ago.  The bet required real updates, where we could actually track your financial dealings.  You took about 2 months off from posting.  Who knows if your original bankroll was supplemented by a loan or other means?  Come on.  This is silly.

As far as a supercontest wager....  I have been in it the last 2 years.  I have gone 52-30-3 (came in 9th, won 42k), and last year 51-34.  Both documented.

Do you want to rethink your challenge?

If you decide you want to, I would be happy to wager whatever you want.  But there would have to be a way to escrow.  There is no way I would trust a coke snorting moron with 10k in the bank and a gambling problem to pay me a stack in 4 months.

So it is up to you.  Name the amount, find a legitimate escrow, and consider it done.  But honestly - now is the time for you to back out gracefully.




 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2013
Posts: 15769
Posted: #12357
Quote Originally Posted by Jairob:

vanzack makes a bet on whether or not CG will be betting football in September. He is, zack loses then creates parameters to ensure he would never have to pay out on the bet.

As for not trusting a 'a coke snorting moron', I would be less inclined to trust someone who makes bets and never pays off after applying retroactive conditions which immunize him from any potential for losing.

Welching and then rationalizing the welch is far more offensive than any drug banging I've ever encountered.

Strong lean to Stanford. If Van were booking the bet he would probably declare it invalid if the on field temperature exceeds 60 degrees.





GTFOH you dunce....i have no dog in this fight.but can you seriously not see how THIS little thing here that you are reading is the only piece of "evidence" of college gamblers journey and betting habits and therefore plays a fairly critical role in the documentation of the results which determine the outcome of vanzacks bet????

it stands to reason that if he goes totally AWOL,not even passing on information to his off-sider golden goose,for weeks and weeks at a time that it wud arouse serious suspicion in anyone,right???......we dont know wat did or didnt happen in the interim but there is no legitimate reason,apart from death, for total communications to cease.

"creates retroactive conditions and parameters"???....he didnt need to.....college gambler did it all himself.no-one in their rite mind wud honour that wager.it wud be a PUSH at absolute worst........and,given wat an unstable sociopath college gambler has shown himself to be,it is a stretch for sumone to even believe wat was being posted regularly on a daily basis......we just dont know really.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 35351
Posted: #12358
Quote Originally Posted by vegasfballking:

your a good nfl capper but I went 74-52 last year in nfl all documented so im good too.

no im not backing off, we all know your a bigshot and money is not an object for you  so lets make the wager a simple one....  loser has to stop posting from covers forever, what do you say?


Your new account will be banned in a matter of days so why even bother? 
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2001
Posts: 60107
Posted: #12359
Quote Originally Posted by vegasfballking:

your a good nfl capper but I went 74-52 last year in nfl all documented so im good too.

no im not backing off, we all know your a bigshot and money is not an object for you  so lets make the wager a simple one....  loser has to stop posting from covers forever, what do you say?


Hey - you made this challenge not me.  If I remember (just 12 hours ago) you told me to put my money where my mouth is.

Putting up our usernames (vanzack VS vegasfballking) is like a challenge between Tom Brady and the quarterback from Sam Houston State and the loser can never play football again.

Not much incentive for me there.

Look - its no problem if you dont want to put money up - this was your idea not mine - and you called me out not the other way around.

I suggest you go back to posting about machines and teams who are angry - keep the comedy coming - start winning for the organization.  Chalk up your post last night to a momentary lapse of reason.

Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2001
Posts: 60107
Posted: #12360
Dont be so sensitive.  Just messing around.

This is a forum afterall.

GL today and in the season.

Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 12677
Posted: #12361
Quote Originally Posted by vegasfballking:

I wasent even going to say anything but u insulted me based on one statement "auburn is a machine" but neglected me mentioning the conference they r in, how highly they r ranked, where the game is being played, how good there offense is and how they have a top 5 coach.. Ur boy TSW makes statement "lousiville is loaded" how is that any different than my auburn statement saying they R a machine?

What does it matter what Auburn is ranked?  I don't have them ranked #6 that's for sure.  I pointed out the 3 big time transfers Ville got ( 2 from your beloved SEC and Fields from TCU) because I feel the odds don't reflect that giving one value on the Ville. Louisville has covered 9 straight as a road dog as well.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 12677
Posted: #12362
Quote Originally Posted by vegasfballking:

74-52 in nfl last year So not sure how it is such a "mismatch". Question is how will I perform picking 5 games a weekend. Could have actually been better than ur percentage based on the fact I made near 50 more total bets overall. You are a proven great nfl bettor so it is a risky challenge for me but I know I can compete with u in nfl at least. Stanford was a bad bet I will admit. Usually don't take this many favs but week one usually favs roll hasent been that case yet tho the first two days this season dogs been barking

If I recall a lot of those wins were from one big run of square favorites winning where you got multiple "wins" from betting say 1st half, 2nd half, and game lines on the same team.  Weren't money line wins counted too I don't remember?  Anyway, a lot different than picking games in the super contest.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2001
Posts: 60107
Posted: #12363
So wait....

You count ML favorites in your record?  There are ML winners in that 74-52 record you are so proud of?

Huh?

Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2002
Posts: 22961
Posted: #12364
CG,

Could you please mention a few hundred more times what your football record was last year ... just in case someone missed it.

Also, don't forget to say how bad your luck was this year, and whine incessantly about "phantom" losses, there may be a few who haven't read that yet.

Oh, and don't forget to remind your readers just how good of a capper you are ... never want folks to forget that little item.

Lastly ... and for this comment I will take my tongue out of my cheek ...
STFU with your constant BS and just cap games.
If there is a need to remind everyone just how good you are, then perhaps you're not that good to begin with.

GL with your bets 

 

 

bigreds daddy
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2001
Posts: 60107
Posted: #12365
I stand corrected.

Go ahead and tell us again about last years record.  You deserve it.

Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 466
Posted: #12366
To be fair you did make one ML favorite bet last year.  Jets at home against Bears.  
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2012
Posts: 1286
Posted: #12367
I'll put my bogus, multi-personality account up vs. Yours toughguy!

-if it gets banned before the end of FB season, tough
-if you throw out monetary figures, I'll bring up past garbage
-if I lose, I reserve the right to claim "hacking"

weren't you the one appearing on YT begging for the guy's help on how to approach the Supercontest???  I guess your friends and family only care if you look like a jackass on YT; covers is fair game, huh.


Won't wish you luck, I/WE all know you don't need it...but "northwestern probably won't score more than 10 points" just went to hell, and your stakes are all over the place.  Already had a bailout bomb too, and opening weekend isn't halfway over.  #whatdiscipline  







 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 17830
Posted: #12368
Quote Originally Posted by vegasfballking:

yes that was a direct quote about NFL tho.. if ur going to post at least post facts.   U must be butthurt still  over phil Jackson ruining the knicks organization for the next 30 years?  


There has not been one second of my life where I was a Knicks fan, but good call. 

And even if I was, I am a fan of money at this point of my life. Not my teams. Keep trying though. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2012
Posts: 1286
Posted: #12369
"I like Hogan... experienced QB..   Stanford will run the rock and play some great D...  settle for TWO fg's but i honestly don't see a shitt big 10 football organization like Northwestern being able to score on them much with there suspect qb situation.   I doubt Stanford scores over 10 pts"

 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 17830
Posted: #12370
Quote Originally Posted by vegasfballking:

I am in no means saying it has not been a disaster here after 3.5 weeks  betting basketball and baseball especially but   vanzacks bet was simply "CG wont be in vegas by football season"  and I haven't had to touch the 401K or anything..    

you all know I can cap I think you are all worried after seeing phantom historic losses on a nightly basis swinging thousands of dollars (college, nba and baseball)  that if my luck ever evens out with my historic capping ability that I will be here for a long long time and one of the most respected handicappers ever to step foot in sin city  


This is exactly why people root against you and you just don't get it. You said from the very beginning of your thread that you were a humble, likable dude. You blow up in epic fashion (gambling and non gambling related) and you STILL spew this nonsense. 

99% in your current position would at least take a step back, admit you got ahead of yourself, and at the very least go back to something that resembles a humble guy. But no, you are still spewing nonsense like the above, "football god/hollywood cg" and so much other bull sh it that makes you as unlikable as someone on this site can be. 

But keep playing the victim card. You should be marching for black lives matter 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 52
Posted: #12371
Looks like auburn will cover. Louisville getting the first downs but auburn taking advantage. It's hard to make a living betting sports.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 52
Posted: #12372
Looks like auburn covers despite Louisville getting first downs. It's to hard to win money betting sports
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 52
Posted: #12373
Hi
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2015
Posts: 28
Posted: #12374

vanzack "the legend" speaks: 'Louisville is my best play of this opening weekend.'

Now as hard as it might be for some to disregard the 'advice' of a legend (he of the 'I really didn't lose my bet that CG wouldn't make it to see September in Vegas' fame), I quickly realized that betting against this legend's best play should represent a strong play on my part. To be honest, I was relatively neutral on the play until I read that.

Now I know its early but does anyone really think that it was a bad strategy.

Cardinal rule in sports betting, always bet against someone who doesn't acknowledge that they've lost a bet! "Yes but where did CG's revenue really come from?" The whining of a loser!

.

 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2013
Posts: 15769
Posted: #12375
Quote Originally Posted by Jairob:

vanzack "the legend" speaks: 'Louisville is my best play of this opening weekend.'

Now as hard as it might be for some to disregard the 'advice' of a legend (he of the 'I really didn't lose my bet that CG wouldn't make it to see September in Vegas' fame), I quickly realized that betting against this legend's best play should represent a strong play on my part. To be honest, I was relatively neutral on the play until I read that.

Now I know its early but does anyone really think that it was a bad strategy.

Cardinal rule in sports betting, always bet against someone who doesn't acknowledge that they've lost a bet! "Yes but where did CG's revenue really come from?" The whining of a loser!

.




...no no no no no no no..i do believe that the cardinal rule in sports betting is "it aint over till its OVER!!"....i didnt give a crap who covered this game but by god,now im hoping and praying(with a QUARTER of the game left no less) that louisville covers.

perhaps if you removed college gamblers nut.sack from your mouth you mite find it easier to think strait??

remember it IS actually college gambler that has annointed HIMSELF the betting legend,NOT vanzack.
All Forums | The Archives
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gambling
Betting Sites
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
21+
Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
Covers is verified safe by:
Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 Genius Sports. All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.