IS THE NFL RIGGED? ***THINK ABOUT IT***
If it isn't rigged how do you explain horrible call after horrible call in last year's Super Bowl? One or 2 bad calls, sure... but SO many against Seattle. It was obvious that the league wanted Pittsburgh to win it.
It just seems like pro wrestling sometimes. Like how some teams don't win for so long and then BAM they are winning it all. Denver got 2 before Elway retired. Green Bay got one because they haven't won it in awhile.
The Rams move to St Louis and get one shortly thereafter, while the Oilers never made one, moved, and went to one.
Cleveland never went to a SB, then Modell moves to Baltimore and suddenly gets his ring.
If it isn't rigged how do you explain horrible call after horrible call in last year's Super Bowl? One or 2 bad calls, sure... but SO many against Seattle. It was obvious that the league wanted Pittsburgh to win it.
It just seems like pro wrestling sometimes. Like how some teams don't win for so long and then BAM they are winning it all. Denver got 2 before Elway retired. Green Bay got one because they haven't won it in awhile.
The Rams move to St Louis and get one shortly thereafter, while the Oilers never made one, moved, and went to one.
Cleveland never went to a SB, then Modell moves to Baltimore and suddenly gets his ring.
1) In my opinion there's no shame in questioning 9/11. Your attitude and candor towards the events are evident that you would blindly accept anything that occurs in front of your face even if there are gaping wounds in the event itself or the theory. Nothing is impossible and for people to question the government whether they allowed the attacks to happen, turned a blind eye on them, or perpetrated the attacks itself is not only acceptable but highly difficult to avoid. There is plenty of viable and reliable revisionist history that points out and uncovers that the government was aware of the Pearl Harbor attacks and offered no warning and little preparation to those that perished in the navy that day.
2) It didn't need to snow in New England for the game to be fixed. In fact, Oakland could have very well won the game but won on a fluky field goal thus saving the NFL and which ever other entities that wanted a team named the Patriots in the Super Bowl. In fact, they spruced up an old rule and switched around the meaning of it following the season in order to give the Pats the victory. Oh, and never mind the fact that the Patriot defensive backs were allowed to manhandle those receivers in the Super Bowl. Don't you recognize coincidences, especially those so conveniently exposed?
3) The Patriots are the obvious choice. Judging by the governments appropriations for homeland security expenditures towards New York City and State, it is obvious no one gives a rip about New York. Don't seem to recall rallying cries involving the blood of giants anywhere, so you know.
4) Houston taking Williams over Bush stinks on many levels, including Charlie Casserly stepping down immediately following the pick. They knew Dominick Davis and their offense was stagnant. Why take a defensive player, especially a young, spotty end who no one had number one (no one reliable) on their draft boards? Don't give me that Mel Kiper bullshit either.
1) In my opinion there's no shame in questioning 9/11. Your attitude and candor towards the events are evident that you would blindly accept anything that occurs in front of your face even if there are gaping wounds in the event itself or the theory. Nothing is impossible and for people to question the government whether they allowed the attacks to happen, turned a blind eye on them, or perpetrated the attacks itself is not only acceptable but highly difficult to avoid. There is plenty of viable and reliable revisionist history that points out and uncovers that the government was aware of the Pearl Harbor attacks and offered no warning and little preparation to those that perished in the navy that day.
2) It didn't need to snow in New England for the game to be fixed. In fact, Oakland could have very well won the game but won on a fluky field goal thus saving the NFL and which ever other entities that wanted a team named the Patriots in the Super Bowl. In fact, they spruced up an old rule and switched around the meaning of it following the season in order to give the Pats the victory. Oh, and never mind the fact that the Patriot defensive backs were allowed to manhandle those receivers in the Super Bowl. Don't you recognize coincidences, especially those so conveniently exposed?
3) The Patriots are the obvious choice. Judging by the governments appropriations for homeland security expenditures towards New York City and State, it is obvious no one gives a rip about New York. Don't seem to recall rallying cries involving the blood of giants anywhere, so you know.
4) Houston taking Williams over Bush stinks on many levels, including Charlie Casserly stepping down immediately following the pick. They knew Dominick Davis and their offense was stagnant. Why take a defensive player, especially a young, spotty end who no one had number one (no one reliable) on their draft boards? Don't give me that Mel Kiper bullshit either.
WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOWCausesSigns/Symptoms
|
WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOWCausesSigns/Symptoms
|
1) In my opinion there's no shame in questioning 9/11. Your attitude and candor towards the events are evident that you would blindly accept anything that occurs in front of your face even if there are gaping wounds in the event itself or the theory. Nothing is impossible and for people to question the government whether they allowed the attacks to happen, turned a blind eye on them, or perpetrated the attacks itself is not only acceptable but highly difficult to avoid. There is plenty of viable and reliable revisionist history that points out and uncovers that the government was aware of the Pearl Harbor attacks and offered no warning and little preparation to those that perished in the navy that day.
2) It didn't need to snow in New England for the game to be fixed. In fact, Oakland could have very well won the game but won on a fluky field goal thus saving the NFL and which ever other entities that wanted a team named the Patriots in the Super Bowl. In fact, they spruced up an old rule and switched around the meaning of it following the season in order to give the Pats the victory. Oh, and never mind the fact that the Patriot defensive backs were allowed to manhandle those receivers in the Super Bowl. Don't you recognize coincidences, especially those so conveniently exposed?
3) The Patriots are the obvious choice. Judging by the governments appropriations for homeland security expenditures towards New York City and State, it is obvious no one gives a rip about New York. Don't seem to recall rallying cries involving the blood of giants anywhere, so you know.
4) Houston taking Williams over Bush stinks on many levels, including Charlie Casserly stepping down immediately following the pick. They knew Dominick Davis and their offense was stagnant. Why take a defensive player, especially a young, spotty end who no one had number one (no one reliable) on their draft boards? Don't give me that Mel Kiper bullshit either.
1) In my opinion there's no shame in questioning 9/11. Your attitude and candor towards the events are evident that you would blindly accept anything that occurs in front of your face even if there are gaping wounds in the event itself or the theory. Nothing is impossible and for people to question the government whether they allowed the attacks to happen, turned a blind eye on them, or perpetrated the attacks itself is not only acceptable but highly difficult to avoid. There is plenty of viable and reliable revisionist history that points out and uncovers that the government was aware of the Pearl Harbor attacks and offered no warning and little preparation to those that perished in the navy that day.
2) It didn't need to snow in New England for the game to be fixed. In fact, Oakland could have very well won the game but won on a fluky field goal thus saving the NFL and which ever other entities that wanted a team named the Patriots in the Super Bowl. In fact, they spruced up an old rule and switched around the meaning of it following the season in order to give the Pats the victory. Oh, and never mind the fact that the Patriot defensive backs were allowed to manhandle those receivers in the Super Bowl. Don't you recognize coincidences, especially those so conveniently exposed?
3) The Patriots are the obvious choice. Judging by the governments appropriations for homeland security expenditures towards New York City and State, it is obvious no one gives a rip about New York. Don't seem to recall rallying cries involving the blood of giants anywhere, so you know.
4) Houston taking Williams over Bush stinks on many levels, including Charlie Casserly stepping down immediately following the pick. They knew Dominick Davis and their offense was stagnant. Why take a defensive player, especially a young, spotty end who no one had number one (no one reliable) on their draft boards? Don't give me that Mel Kiper bullshit either.
The execution footage was leaked because it was bound to happen and do you really think a bunch of shiites were going to frisk one another for cell phone cameras? Why didn't anyone try to stop him? Oh, I don't know, because someone WANTED us to see it. What a joke that whole thing was.
2) These refs have an innate understanding and knowledge of the rule book. They could bullshit with the best, also. If the play called for it then the call was going to be there and be right on the nose.
3) Just agree with me
4) You mean a running back who was on pace for 100 receptions? A running back who causes defenses multi-dimensional problems? You mean a guy who can cut up turf like a fucking knife through butter? Oh sure, I'd take some standardized defensive end over a once-in-a-lifetime sort of talent. Why not? It was all wretched and stunk from the moment the news that Houston was taking Williams the Thursday before the draft.
You act like the game is decided solely on the field and not in the referee crew's brains, the corporate offices, or the TV ratings. If you don't think there are highly influential forces at play then you are plain crazy.
At least we know the Seahawks were robbed, though.
The execution footage was leaked because it was bound to happen and do you really think a bunch of shiites were going to frisk one another for cell phone cameras? Why didn't anyone try to stop him? Oh, I don't know, because someone WANTED us to see it. What a joke that whole thing was.
2) These refs have an innate understanding and knowledge of the rule book. They could bullshit with the best, also. If the play called for it then the call was going to be there and be right on the nose.
3) Just agree with me
4) You mean a running back who was on pace for 100 receptions? A running back who causes defenses multi-dimensional problems? You mean a guy who can cut up turf like a fucking knife through butter? Oh sure, I'd take some standardized defensive end over a once-in-a-lifetime sort of talent. Why not? It was all wretched and stunk from the moment the news that Houston was taking Williams the Thursday before the draft.
You act like the game is decided solely on the field and not in the referee crew's brains, the corporate offices, or the TV ratings. If you don't think there are highly influential forces at play then you are plain crazy.
At least we know the Seahawks were robbed, though.
Hot Forum Topics
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
