bigdog420... I truly hope you guys don't base your thoughts on short term cause if you do your so very wrong...
Spencer3000... he had a 6 game losing streak it's called a funk guys if you could cap games yourself you would know that going 6-0 or 0-6 is so very possible... Long Term fellas... all the experts on the board would not be their if they werent any good Trust me... All the Experts represent a well respected site...
I really don't know what else to say to you guys except for shake it off and look to the future... I mean you did'nt lose your house...
All those guys on the board will bring in Positive cash flow over long term... Look it up...
bigdog420... I truly hope you guys don't base your thoughts on short term cause if you do your so very wrong...
Spencer3000... he had a 6 game losing streak it's called a funk guys if you could cap games yourself you would know that going 6-0 or 0-6 is so very possible... Long Term fellas... all the experts on the board would not be their if they werent any good Trust me... All the Experts represent a well respected site...
I really don't know what else to say to you guys except for shake it off and look to the future... I mean you did'nt lose your house...
All those guys on the board will bring in Positive cash flow over long term... Look it up...
I didn't make any comments about the long term. I do know, though, if the casual gambler followed him last week, they would probably be done betting. It wasn't just 6 games. I could go back and add it up, and the whole week would be down a significant number of units. I just think for all of the congratulations for a pick here and there, there shouldn't be anything wrong with pointing out a terrible streak.
I didn't make any comments about the long term. I do know, though, if the casual gambler followed him last week, they would probably be done betting. It wasn't just 6 games. I could go back and add it up, and the whole week would be down a significant number of units. I just think for all of the congratulations for a pick here and there, there shouldn't be anything wrong with pointing out a terrible streak.
JettNole- I did investigate. I also didn't attack anyone. I just pointed out that his other "Play of the Year" also lost. I would be happy to add up all of his losses last week to educate you, though.
JettNole- I did investigate. I also didn't attack anyone. I just pointed out that his other "Play of the Year" also lost. I would be happy to add up all of his losses last week to educate you, though.
Spence, I THOUGHT you were referring to LONG TERM. I'm sure most of us had bad streaks. Never indicated "attack". The show is informative, but did not hear "play of the year" so I'm sure if anyone heard it, they would be all over it....but never bet "the house" on any guarantees.
Spence, I THOUGHT you were referring to LONG TERM. I'm sure most of us had bad streaks. Never indicated "attack". The show is informative, but did not hear "play of the year" so I'm sure if anyone heard it, they would be all over it....but never bet "the house" on any guarantees.
Not talking about the show. All his plays for last week. If most bettors bet 1-2% per unit, then they would be wiped out after following his plays for last week. 2 game of the years, and countless other losses. I just don't want anyone casually reading this thread to see him get one pick right and believe that is indicative of his current streak. If anything, his picks would be worth buying to fade at this time.
Not talking about the show. All his plays for last week. If most bettors bet 1-2% per unit, then they would be wiped out after following his plays for last week. 2 game of the years, and countless other losses. I just don't want anyone casually reading this thread to see him get one pick right and believe that is indicative of his current streak. If anything, his picks would be worth buying to fade at this time.
ouch. Luckily, I didn't follow alot of them, because they were opposite of some of the good cappers I usually follow. I just think it should be pointed out amongst 52 page celebration of his capping abilities. Last week was that horrible.
ouch. Luckily, I didn't follow alot of them, because they were opposite of some of the good cappers I usually follow. I just think it should be pointed out amongst 52 page celebration of his capping abilities. Last week was that horrible.
Yeah...that is a BIG hit, jekyll. But if you have a "slush" fund and wager properly, then the 10k wouldn't make a difference. 10K is MY "slush fund" for a year. Again, sorry to hear. Even if I know you or not.
Yeah...that is a BIG hit, jekyll. But if you have a "slush" fund and wager properly, then the 10k wouldn't make a difference. 10K is MY "slush fund" for a year. Again, sorry to hear. Even if I know you or not.
I have followed covers experts for about 2 months but live in Vegas and have been capping games for over 10 years and all I read is about how you have to follow these guys long term well I don't know how long your suppose to follow because prez has been killing peoples bankrolls for 2 months. If you follow their picks in their last ten its pretty funny how any close number seems to always be in their favor where you would lose if you bet it but they win. Its like they never get a bad beat (one point or half point loss)
I have followed covers experts for about 2 months but live in Vegas and have been capping games for over 10 years and all I read is about how you have to follow these guys long term well I don't know how long your suppose to follow because prez has been killing peoples bankrolls for 2 months. If you follow their picks in their last ten its pretty funny how any close number seems to always be in their favor where you would lose if you bet it but they win. Its like they never get a bad beat (one point or half point loss)
I have followed covers experts for about 2 months but live in Vegas and have been capping games for over 10 years and all I read is about how you have to follow these guys long term well I don't know how long your suppose to follow because prez has been killing peoples bankrolls for 2 months. If you follow their picks in their last ten its pretty funny how any close number seems to always be in their favor where you would lose if you bet it but they win. Its like they never get a bad beat (one point or half point loss)
I have followed covers experts for about 2 months but live in Vegas and have been capping games for over 10 years and all I read is about how you have to follow these guys long term well I don't know how long your suppose to follow because prez has been killing peoples bankrolls for 2 months. If you follow their picks in their last ten its pretty funny how any close number seems to always be in their favor where you would lose if you bet it but they win. Its like they never get a bad beat (one point or half point loss)
BigDog, I see your point and love 420!!! different people have their own version of "long term". Hell, if I have gave an "Expert" a weeks worth of picks and lose. I would second guess about future investments. I have some pics that I use from friends I met on Covers and have been more sucessful than not. Bottom line...tail or fade.
You live near henderson? GL, bro
BigDog, I see your point and love 420!!! different people have their own version of "long term". Hell, if I have gave an "Expert" a weeks worth of picks and lose. I would second guess about future investments. I have some pics that I use from friends I met on Covers and have been more sucessful than not. Bottom line...tail or fade.
I live in Southern Highlands bro and thats all I am trying to say is your better off reading stuff on here and doing your own handicapping than paying for these so called experts because anything can really happen in these games and there are alot of good cappers on here that give free opinions.
I live in Southern Highlands bro and thats all I am trying to say is your better off reading stuff on here and doing your own handicapping than paying for these so called experts because anything can really happen in these games and there are alot of good cappers on here that give free opinions.
50 k update, With 10 days left in the 50k challenge,it's been a see-saw battle with prez back on top with half a game lead.Prez(23-16-1) is on the OAKLAND-ANGELS UNDER 8.5. Teddy's (23-17) pick is MICHIGAN ST +7.5. My record playing along here is (22-18) and my selection is SEATTLE-MINNESOTA UNDER 7.5. waiting on lumpiddy's pick BOL everyone.
50 k update, With 10 days left in the 50k challenge,it's been a see-saw battle with prez back on top with half a game lead.Prez(23-16-1) is on the OAKLAND-ANGELS UNDER 8.5. Teddy's (23-17) pick is MICHIGAN ST +7.5. My record playing along here is (22-18) and my selection is SEATTLE-MINNESOTA UNDER 7.5. waiting on lumpiddy's pick BOL everyone.
bigdog - i had a disaster week this past week - 2 disaster weeks of betting (2nd week of Feb) in 1 full year of being on Covers - I appreciate that you think i killed people's bankroll's the last 2 weeks, but I was exactly 2 games under 500 over the last 2 weeks - that although being bad is not a disaster that you allude to. Please g-d everytime I have a bad 2 weeks (every 6 months or so) they are only -2 games bad.
Luck Lump and 44 this week - same odds and the rest of you guys - lets have a big ending to this 50k bet.
bigdog - i had a disaster week this past week - 2 disaster weeks of betting (2nd week of Feb) in 1 full year of being on Covers - I appreciate that you think i killed people's bankroll's the last 2 weeks, but I was exactly 2 games under 500 over the last 2 weeks - that although being bad is not a disaster that you allude to. Please g-d everytime I have a bad 2 weeks (every 6 months or so) they are only -2 games bad.
Luck Lump and 44 this week - same odds and the rest of you guys - lets have a big ending to this 50k bet.
I don't know how you did two weeks ago and did not mention it. Last week, was nowhere near 2 games under 500. You may have been very profitable over the last several years, but the point was last week was terrible. I think you are skewing things when you say you were 2 games under 500. You lost countless units last week, as almost all of your 7 - 10* games were losers. When you're picking 3-5 games a day and playing 7-10*, that would be enough to cripple someones bankroll. So, my point is that the casual gambler who reads this thread and hears how well you're doing is going to go look at purchasing your picks. He'll then be met with all of your BOLD and UNDERLINED steaks. I just want them to know the truth.
I don't know how you did two weeks ago and did not mention it. Last week, was nowhere near 2 games under 500. You may have been very profitable over the last several years, but the point was last week was terrible. I think you are skewing things when you say you were 2 games under 500. You lost countless units last week, as almost all of your 7 - 10* games were losers. When you're picking 3-5 games a day and playing 7-10*, that would be enough to cripple someones bankroll. So, my point is that the casual gambler who reads this thread and hears how well you're doing is going to go look at purchasing your picks. He'll then be met with all of your BOLD and UNDERLINED steaks. I just want them to know the truth.
spenc - last week was one monster disaster - 2 disaster weeks in a year - but ljb's post - lets get this back to the 50k and betting convo - i will not have a brutal week again for another 6 months.
spenc - last week was one monster disaster - 2 disaster weeks in a year - but ljb's post - lets get this back to the 50k and betting convo - i will not have a brutal week again for another 6 months.