How does Gajdosova -260 and Barber -250 ml lose to qualifiers forget about Vinci which was a pickem match tennis is fixed such bullshit I fell for the game such bullshit f oooooooo u I hope u got paid well for losing to qualifiers in first round they made it look real suspicious when they all three Vinci,Barthel and Gajdosova all on first set and gag the match away I was taken for a ride fooooooooooock u bitches
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
How does Gajdosova -260 and Barber -250 ml lose to qualifiers forget about Vinci which was a pickem match tennis is fixed such bullshit I fell for the game such bullshit f oooooooo u I hope u got paid well for losing to qualifiers in first round they made it look real suspicious when they all three Vinci,Barthel and Gajdosova all on first set and gag the match away I was taken for a ride fooooooooooock u bitches
How does Gajdosova -260 and Barber -250 ml lose to qualifiers forget about Vinci which was a pickem match tennis is fixed such bullshit I fell for the game such bullshit f oooooooo u I hope u got paid well for losing to qualifiers in first round they made it look real suspicious when they all three Vinci,Barthel and Gajdosova all on first set and gag the match away I was taken for a ride fooooooooooock u girl
No it's NOT. Understand this FAST. Anything can happen in this game on any given day.
Like Nadal losing to Soderling 2009 and yet winning 9 French opens in 10 years.
That's tennis. Worry less about the players and more about the PRICE the bookmakers give them. That's how you win long term. I see too many people get too involved with the players that the number one mistake. Day in day out. Year in year out every price range gets its share of winners REGARDLESS OF WHOSE PLAYING. That's what has to register in more minds.
The only players who are going to kill it consistently are players at the top of the tree like Djokovic. But they have no value.
Quote Originally Posted by benjmns:
How does Gajdosova -260 and Barber -250 ml lose to qualifiers forget about Vinci which was a pickem match tennis is fixed such bullshit I fell for the game such bullshit f oooooooo u I hope u got paid well for losing to qualifiers in first round they made it look real suspicious when they all three Vinci,Barthel and Gajdosova all on first set and gag the match away I was taken for a ride fooooooooooock u girl
No it's NOT. Understand this FAST. Anything can happen in this game on any given day.
Like Nadal losing to Soderling 2009 and yet winning 9 French opens in 10 years.
That's tennis. Worry less about the players and more about the PRICE the bookmakers give them. That's how you win long term. I see too many people get too involved with the players that the number one mistake. Day in day out. Year in year out every price range gets its share of winners REGARDLESS OF WHOSE PLAYING. That's what has to register in more minds.
The only players who are going to kill it consistently are players at the top of the tree like Djokovic. But they have no value.
Where does these odds come from those qualifiers barely played this year and won matches on heavy favorites such a crock of shit tennis has a history of fixing matches what a scam for people not knowing the game TENNIS NEEDS TO CLEANUP THE CORRUPTION some PEOPLE made a HUGE money this morning even parlaying the underdogs Sorry bitches Ihope u got paid well Barthel,Gajdosova and Vinci cause all three easily won first set and gag the match away so obvious u fix the matches pathetic bitches
Where does these odds come from those qualifiers barely played this year and won matches on heavy favorites such a crock of shit tennis has a history of fixing matches what a scam for people not knowing the game TENNIS NEEDS TO CLEANUP THE CORRUPTION some PEOPLE made a HUGE money this morning even parlaying the underdogs Sorry bitches Ihope u got paid well Barthel,Gajdosova and Vinci cause all three easily won first set and gag the match away so obvious u fix the matches pathetic bitches
Be careful with the Italians and Russians. They fix matches all the time for huge paydays. Russian Syndicates pay very good money for throwing matches much more than they get in prize money. Just ask ole Davydenko Its been proven time and time again. Tennis is such an easy sport to fix.
Be careful with the Italians and Russians. They fix matches all the time for huge paydays. Russian Syndicates pay very good money for throwing matches much more than they get in prize money. Just ask ole Davydenko Its been proven time and time again. Tennis is such an easy sport to fix.
There you go again blaming your bad selection process on fixing.
Number ONE. AVOID matches where the favourite is priced below 1.4 or 2/5. That's where things go WRONG more often. I pick RANDOM matches from a price range I call THE ZONE. 1.40---1.80. I Touch NOTHING. AND I MEAN NOTHING. Outside of those boundaries. And I've been successful FOR YEARS.
GREED KILLS. You have to be prepared TO WAIT TO WIN. Any fool who thinks he is going to get rich overnight betting any sport is a SUPER IDIOT. Ultimately your PATIENCE (or lack of) and MONEY MANAGEMENT makes or breaks you in this game.
I've seen fools bet on 1.10 1/10 favourites and shrug their shoulders and roll their eyes when it goes wrong.
THINK!!! If there's any fixing going on the fixers want the biggest payback possible. They're not going to fix matches where the favourite is priced 1.67 and the dog 2.38. They're going to go after matches where the favourite is sub 1.20. So what they want to back will be 5.00--4/1 Or better.
With my range being 1.40--1.80 I've eradicated the vast majority of foul play right from the start. I choose matches where I see consistency in performance from the players OVER TIME.
I.E They WIN he vast majority of their matches between 1.40---1.80
And that's all there is to it.
Quote Originally Posted by benjmns:
Tennis is fixed watch out everyone
There you go again blaming your bad selection process on fixing.
Number ONE. AVOID matches where the favourite is priced below 1.4 or 2/5. That's where things go WRONG more often. I pick RANDOM matches from a price range I call THE ZONE. 1.40---1.80. I Touch NOTHING. AND I MEAN NOTHING. Outside of those boundaries. And I've been successful FOR YEARS.
GREED KILLS. You have to be prepared TO WAIT TO WIN. Any fool who thinks he is going to get rich overnight betting any sport is a SUPER IDIOT. Ultimately your PATIENCE (or lack of) and MONEY MANAGEMENT makes or breaks you in this game.
I've seen fools bet on 1.10 1/10 favourites and shrug their shoulders and roll their eyes when it goes wrong.
THINK!!! If there's any fixing going on the fixers want the biggest payback possible. They're not going to fix matches where the favourite is priced 1.67 and the dog 2.38. They're going to go after matches where the favourite is sub 1.20. So what they want to back will be 5.00--4/1 Or better.
With my range being 1.40--1.80 I've eradicated the vast majority of foul play right from the start. I choose matches where I see consistency in performance from the players OVER TIME.
I.E They WIN he vast majority of their matches between 1.40---1.80
if you actually played tennis, you would know how dramatic on/off days can really be to a player. it's like with basketball players, some days the shots are just not on. couple this with the fact that it's just a 1 on 1 sport, one person having an off day means anyone can lose to anyone at that level..
it's not fixed, there's just a slight margin for error in the sport and everyone has bad days. when it only takes 1 person having a bad day to lose for a side, of course there is a greater chance for variance.
if you actually played tennis, you would know how dramatic on/off days can really be to a player. it's like with basketball players, some days the shots are just not on. couple this with the fact that it's just a 1 on 1 sport, one person having an off day means anyone can lose to anyone at that level..
it's not fixed, there's just a slight margin for error in the sport and everyone has bad days. when it only takes 1 person having a bad day to lose for a side, of course there is a greater chance for variance.
Where does these odds come from those qualifiers barely played this year and won matches on heavy favorites such a crock of garbage tennis has a history of fixing matches what a scam for people not knowing the game TENNIS NEEDS TO CLEANUP THE CORRUPTION some PEOPLE made a HUGE money this morning even parlaying the underdogs Sorry girl Ihope u got paid well Barthel,Gajdosova and Vinci cause all three easily won first set and gag the match away so obvious u fix the matches pathetic girl
To call the Vinci match a fix involves extreme ignorance.
So Vinci was 4-0 against Cornet beforehand. Big deal. Does losing 4 straight to her opponent mean Cornet is forever incapable of ever beating her? Nonsense, of course. So if one goes beyond the 4-0 hth record Vinci brought into that match, then one would have found that
(1) Vinci had only ever won 30% of her 1st round French Open matches, whereas Cornet had only ever lost 30% of her 1st round French Open matches. These historical stats said that this stage of this tournament was a prime spot for Cornet to end her losing ways against Vinci.
(2) Vinci had made the final in Nuremberg played the previous Saturday, and a mere 2 days later was being asked to defeat a top 30 ranked opponent playing in her home Grand Slam (Cornet is French). For a player 32 years of age, that's physically no simple walk-in-the-park task. It's no surprise the 3rd set scoreline was so one sided: Vinci ran out of gas.
(3) If Vinci was throwing the match, why at 2-5 down in the 2nd set did she bother to fight to break Cornets serve to eventually get it back to 4-5 before she lost the set? Why did she fight to win her serve at 0-5 down in the 3rd set, instead of just mailing it completely? Since when does showing some pride (to avoid a bagel) have anything to do with fixing? Why did she needlessly spend energy fighting a cause she was, from this fixing pov, helping to lose?
I see others have offered various replies to your assertion, but none have mentioned that these are females: they feel like garbage once a month. just remember you have no idea if your player was passing blood out of her box just before, during and/or just after the match. If she was, how can you be surprised she lost, no matter what her odds?
Quote Originally Posted by benjmns:
Where does these odds come from those qualifiers barely played this year and won matches on heavy favorites such a crock of garbage tennis has a history of fixing matches what a scam for people not knowing the game TENNIS NEEDS TO CLEANUP THE CORRUPTION some PEOPLE made a HUGE money this morning even parlaying the underdogs Sorry girl Ihope u got paid well Barthel,Gajdosova and Vinci cause all three easily won first set and gag the match away so obvious u fix the matches pathetic girl
To call the Vinci match a fix involves extreme ignorance.
So Vinci was 4-0 against Cornet beforehand. Big deal. Does losing 4 straight to her opponent mean Cornet is forever incapable of ever beating her? Nonsense, of course. So if one goes beyond the 4-0 hth record Vinci brought into that match, then one would have found that
(1) Vinci had only ever won 30% of her 1st round French Open matches, whereas Cornet had only ever lost 30% of her 1st round French Open matches. These historical stats said that this stage of this tournament was a prime spot for Cornet to end her losing ways against Vinci.
(2) Vinci had made the final in Nuremberg played the previous Saturday, and a mere 2 days later was being asked to defeat a top 30 ranked opponent playing in her home Grand Slam (Cornet is French). For a player 32 years of age, that's physically no simple walk-in-the-park task. It's no surprise the 3rd set scoreline was so one sided: Vinci ran out of gas.
(3) If Vinci was throwing the match, why at 2-5 down in the 2nd set did she bother to fight to break Cornets serve to eventually get it back to 4-5 before she lost the set? Why did she fight to win her serve at 0-5 down in the 3rd set, instead of just mailing it completely? Since when does showing some pride (to avoid a bagel) have anything to do with fixing? Why did she needlessly spend energy fighting a cause she was, from this fixing pov, helping to lose?
I see others have offered various replies to your assertion, but none have mentioned that these are females: they feel like garbage once a month. just remember you have no idea if your player was passing blood out of her box just before, during and/or just after the match. If she was, how can you be surprised she lost, no matter what her odds?
Established in 1995,
Its been proven time and time again. Tennis is such an easy sport to fix.
Hot Forum Topics
