Winning on sunday is huge for Fed in that, not only will it be #17 and break Sampras' record, he will re-assume #1 in world which means Nadal and Djokovic will have to face off in the semi's at the USOpen. Alot easier to win majors when you only have to go through 1 of those guys, rather than 2. But lets be serious...Federer only wins majors when someone knocks Nadal off for him. This will be his 3rd straight major he won b/c someone knocked off Rafa for him. It's been 5 years since Federer beat Nadal at a major - '07 Wimby.
There is too much at stake for Roger to be denied on sunday. Doesnt matter who he plays.
this statement shows how tennis dumb you are
#1 could play #3 or #4 as its a random draw you idiot
the end
0
Quote Originally Posted by rzagza:
Winning on sunday is huge for Fed in that, not only will it be #17 and break Sampras' record, he will re-assume #1 in world which means Nadal and Djokovic will have to face off in the semi's at the USOpen. Alot easier to win majors when you only have to go through 1 of those guys, rather than 2. But lets be serious...Federer only wins majors when someone knocks Nadal off for him. This will be his 3rd straight major he won b/c someone knocked off Rafa for him. It's been 5 years since Federer beat Nadal at a major - '07 Wimby.
There is too much at stake for Roger to be denied on sunday. Doesnt matter who he plays.
this statement shows how tennis dumb you are
#1 could play #3 or #4 as its a random draw you idiot
If you are here to push your agenda, why not make this info public for everyone to hear? I still have no clue what the hell you're doing on a tennis forum that you never give picks on if you're some local Vegas MMA hotshot who goes on ESPN affiliates to give out picks?
ESPN Radio has about 25 affiliates. Which one?
0
Quote Originally Posted by sharpstick:
Tune into ESPN radio at 2:10 pm to find out.
If you are here to push your agenda, why not make this info public for everyone to hear? I still have no clue what the hell you're doing on a tennis forum that you never give picks on if you're some local Vegas MMA hotshot who goes on ESPN affiliates to give out picks?
What is the benefit of being the #1 player in the world if you're not going to reap the benefits of that ranking when the draws come out? May as well be the #10 seed then.
0
What is the benefit of being the #1 player in the world if you're not going to reap the benefits of that ranking when the draws come out? May as well be the #10 seed then.
What is the benefit of being the #1 player in the world if you're not going to reap the benefits of that ranking when the draws come out? May as well be the #10 seed then.
When fed was #3 he would play either #1 or #2 in the semis
With Fed #1 he will play #3 or #4 in the semi, so yes he has a 50% less chance of playing #3 ( Nadal in the semi)
I highly doubt Fed will be #1 when the us open starts
after the Olympics I see him not wanting to train very hard, but only time will tell
With Fed at #1 he has a 75% chance of playing Nadal and joker if the top 4 make the semi
With Fed at #2 he has a 75% " "
With Fed at # 3 is has a 100% chance of playing both
So a 25% better chance can be huge if and only if things work perfect
Like I said I highly doubt his #1 will last long enough to get him to the us open
0
Quote Originally Posted by rzagza:
What is the benefit of being the #1 player in the world if you're not going to reap the benefits of that ranking when the draws come out? May as well be the #10 seed then.
When fed was #3 he would play either #1 or #2 in the semis
With Fed #1 he will play #3 or #4 in the semi, so yes he has a 50% less chance of playing #3 ( Nadal in the semi)
I highly doubt Fed will be #1 when the us open starts
after the Olympics I see him not wanting to train very hard, but only time will tell
With Fed at #1 he has a 75% chance of playing Nadal and joker if the top 4 make the semi
With Fed at #2 he has a 75% " "
With Fed at # 3 is has a 100% chance of playing both
So a 25% better chance can be huge if and only if things work perfect
Like I said I highly doubt his #1 will last long enough to get him to the us open
Winning on sunday is huge for Fed in that, not only will it be #17 and break Sampras' record, he will re-assume #1 in world which means Nadal and Djokovic will have to face off in the semi's at the USOpen. Alot easier to win majors when you only have to go through 1 of those guys, rather than 2. But lets be serious...Federer only wins majors when someone knocks Nadal off for him. This will be his 3rd straight major he won b/c someone knocked off Rafa for him. It's been 5 years since Federer beat Nadal at a major - '07 Wimby.
There is too much at stake for Roger to be denied on sunday. Doesnt matter who he plays.
Not federers fault that Nadal lost to a nobody...
How many times does federer lose to scrubs? Federer has been ridiculously consistent for the longest time, he was making 18 of 19 finals in grand slams before he went on his losing streak which is still making every quarterfinal of a grand slam... Nadal cant say that...
0
Quote Originally Posted by rzagza:
Winning on sunday is huge for Fed in that, not only will it be #17 and break Sampras' record, he will re-assume #1 in world which means Nadal and Djokovic will have to face off in the semi's at the USOpen. Alot easier to win majors when you only have to go through 1 of those guys, rather than 2. But lets be serious...Federer only wins majors when someone knocks Nadal off for him. This will be his 3rd straight major he won b/c someone knocked off Rafa for him. It's been 5 years since Federer beat Nadal at a major - '07 Wimby.
There is too much at stake for Roger to be denied on sunday. Doesnt matter who he plays.
Not federers fault that Nadal lost to a nobody...
How many times does federer lose to scrubs? Federer has been ridiculously consistent for the longest time, he was making 18 of 19 finals in grand slams before he went on his losing streak which is still making every quarterfinal of a grand slam... Nadal cant say that...
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.