• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • NFL Prediction Prices
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
      • Politics
        • Back
        • Politics
        • Politics Home
        • Presidential Election Odds
        • Midterm Election Odds
        • House Midterm Odds
        • Senate Midterm Odds
        • Texas Midterm Odds
        • Michigan Midterm Odds
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Kalshi Referral Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • Polymarket Referral Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • Betr Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
      • Gemini Predictions Promo Code
    • NFL Week 8
      NFL Week 8
      • NFL Odds
      • NFL Picks
      • Panthers-Packers Picks
      • NFL Prediction Markets
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | Technology

    720p vs. 1080p HDTV: The final word

    Lippsman
    heinmanIam
    WILLIECHIL
    69_Amazin_Mets
    Jurassic2
    ...
    Participants:
    Search
    Views: 3259
    Posts: 15
     
    Lippsman
    Lippsman
    Covers Linesmen
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2001
    Posts: 87445
    Posted: Dec. 10, 2007 - 8:47 AM ET #1

    A couple of years ago, I wrote a column about HDTV resolution and whether you should just buy a "standard" 720p/1080i set or pay the extra bucks for a higher-resolution 1080p set. It was called 1080i vs. 1080p HDTV: Should you care?

    When I write a column, it usually gets a nice little shot of promotion on the CNET home page, a bunch of people read it, then it finds its resting place in the Fully Equipped archive, where it gets a wee bit of traffic, typically less than a 100 hits a day. The exception is when I happen to come up with a title for a column that jives well with what people are searching for on Google--and it helps when the column appears at the top of a Google search results list. For example, that old "1080i vs. 1080p" column averages about 4,000 hits a day. Not bad for a two-year-old story that's just lying around. The only downside is when that many people are reading a dated article, it tends to make them e-mail you, requesting that you update it. And so I have, with a little twist: Instead of calling the piece "1080i vs. 1080p" again, I'm going with 720p vs. 1080p because that's the how TV manufacturers tend to market their HDTVs these days to delineate between basic HDTVs (720p) and higher-end models (1080p).

    1. What's so great about 1080p?
    1080p resolution--which equates to 1,920x1,080 pixels--is the current Holy Grail of HDTV resolution. That's because most 1080p HDTVs are capable of displaying every pixel of the highest-resolution HD broadcasts. They offer more than twice the resolution of step-down models, which are typically 1,366x768, 1,280x720, or 1,024x768. These days, HDTVs with any of those three of lower resolutions are typically called "720p." Nobody wants to remember all those numbers, and "768p" doesn't really roll off the tongue.

    2. How much extra does a 1080p TV cost?
    When I wrote my original article two years ago, you had to pay a premium of about $1,000 to get a 1080p model at the same screen size as a "720p" set. In two years, the gap has closed somewhat, but in many cases, particularly when it comes to plasma, you have to pay significantly more for 1080p--usually anywhere from $500 to $800. Panasonic's two 50-inch plasmas with antiglare screens are a good example. At Circuit City, the 1,366x768 (er, 720p) TH50PX77U costs $1,700 while the 1080p version, the TH50PZ77U, costs $2,500 (the two sets are otherwise identical). The gap between same-size 720p and 1080p LCD TVs is typically narrower: at Amazon, the 1,366x768 Samsung LN-T4042H costs $400 less than its most affordable 1080p counterpart model, the LN-T4061F.

    3. Why is 1080p theoretically better than 1080i?
    1080i, the former king of the HDTV hill, actually boasts an identical 1,920x1,080 resolution but conveys the images in an interlaced format (the i in 1080i). In a tube-based television, otherwise known as a CRT, 1080i sources get "painted" on the screen sequentially: the odd-numbered lines of resolution appear on your screen first, followed by the even-numbered lines--all within 1/30 of a second. Progressive-scan formats such as 480p, 720p, and 1080p convey all of the lines of resolution sequentially in a single pass, which makes for a smoother, cleaner image, especially with sports and other motion-intensive content. .

    4. What content is available in 1080p?
    Today's high-def broadcasts are done in either 1080i or 720p, and there's little or no chance they'll jump to 1080p any time soon because of bandwidth issues. Even the much-vaunted high-def games on the Xbox 360 and the PlayStation 3 are usually 720p native (if not less), though they can be upscaled to 1080i or 1080p in the user settings of those consoles. Really, the only commercially available way to get true 1080p output--aside from hooking your PC to your HDTV--is to get a Blu-ray or HD DVD player. All Blu-ray players and some high-end HD DVD models support 1080p output, and--more importantly--the vast majority of discs are natively encoded at 1080p. .

    Reply
    To remove first post, remove entire topic.
    A couple of years ago, I wrote a column about HDTV resolution and whether you should just buy a "standard" 720p/1080i set or pay the extra bucks for a higher-resolution 1080p set. It was called 1080i vs. 1080p HDTV: Should you care?

    When I write a column, it usually gets a nice little shot of promotion on the CNET home page, a bunch of people read it, then it finds its resting place in the Fully Equipped archive, where it gets a wee bit of traffic, typically less than a 100 hits a day. The exception is when I happen to come up with a title for a column that jives well with what people are searching for on Google--and it helps when the column appears at the top of a Google search results list. For example, that old "1080i vs. 1080p" column averages about 4,000 hits a day. Not bad for a two-year-old story that's just lying around. The only downside is when that many people are reading a dated article, it tends to make them e-mail you, requesting that you update it. And so I have, with a little twist: Instead of calling the piece "1080i vs. 1080p" again, I'm going with 720p vs. 1080p because that's the how TV manufacturers tend to market their HDTVs these days to delineate between basic HDTVs (720p) and higher-end models (1080p).

    1. What's so great about 1080p?
    1080p resolution--which equates to 1,920x1,080 pixels--is the current Holy Grail of HDTV resolution. That's because most 1080p HDTVs are capable of displaying every pixel of the highest-resolution HD broadcasts. They offer more than twice the resolution of step-down models, which are typically 1,366x768, 1,280x720, or 1,024x768. These days, HDTVs with any of those three of lower resolutions are typically called "720p." Nobody wants to remember all those numbers, and "768p" doesn't really roll off the tongue.

    2. How much extra does a 1080p TV cost?
    When I wrote my original article two years ago, you had to pay a premium of about $1,000 to get a 1080p model at the same screen size as a "720p" set. In two years, the gap has closed somewhat, but in many cases, particularly when it comes to plasma, you have to pay significantly more for 1080p--usually anywhere from $500 to $800. Panasonic's two 50-inch plasmas with antiglare screens are a good example. At Circuit City, the 1,366x768 (er, 720p) TH50PX77U costs $1,700 while the 1080p version, the TH50PZ77U, costs $2,500 (the two sets are otherwise identical). The gap between same-size 720p and 1080p LCD TVs is typically narrower: at Amazon, the 1,366x768 Samsung LN-T4042H costs $400 less than its most affordable 1080p counterpart model, the LN-T4061F.

    3. Why is 1080p theoretically better than 1080i?
    1080i, the former king of the HDTV hill, actually boasts an identical 1,920x1,080 resolution but conveys the images in an interlaced format (the i in 1080i). In a tube-based television, otherwise known as a CRT, 1080i sources get "painted" on the screen sequentially: the odd-numbered lines of resolution appear on your screen first, followed by the even-numbered lines--all within 1/30 of a second. Progressive-scan formats such as 480p, 720p, and 1080p convey all of the lines of resolution sequentially in a single pass, which makes for a smoother, cleaner image, especially with sports and other motion-intensive content. .

    4. What content is available in 1080p?
    Today's high-def broadcasts are done in either 1080i or 720p, and there's little or no chance they'll jump to 1080p any time soon because of bandwidth issues. Even the much-vaunted high-def games on the Xbox 360 and the PlayStation 3 are usually 720p native (if not less), though they can be upscaled to 1080i or 1080p in the user settings of those consoles. Really, the only commercially available way to get true 1080p output--aside from hooking your PC to your HDTV--is to get a Blu-ray or HD DVD player. All Blu-ray players and some high-end HD DVD models support 1080p output, and--more importantly--the vast majority of discs are natively encoded at 1080p. .

     
    Lippsman
    Lippsman
    Covers Linesmen
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2001
    Posts: 87445
    Posted: Dec. 10, 2007 - 8:47 AM ET #2

    5. What kinds of TV technologies offer 1080p resolution?
    These days, everything but CRT (tube) TVs comes in 1080p versions. That means you can find 1080p-capable versions utilizing all fixed-pixel technologies, including microdisplays (DLP, LCoS, and LCD rear-projection/front-projection) and flat-panels (plasma and LCD). Of course, as specified above, more affordable entry-level models are still limited to 720p resolution. But whatever the resolution, all fixed-pixel (non-CRT) TVs are essentially progressive-scan technologies, so when the incoming source is interlaced (1080i, or even good old-fashioned 480i standard-definition), they convert it to progressive-scan for display. .

    At this point, I could just expand on that last point and specify that all fixed-pixel display TVs--all microdisplay rear-projection and all flat-panels--always display everything at their native resolution, which is all they can display. On a 720p TV, that means that all incoming video is displayed at 720p (or 768p, as the case may be); on a 1080p TV, all incoming video is displayed at 1080p. The process of converting resolution is called scaling--sometimes called upconverting or downconverting. A related factor is deinterlacing (see point no. 8, below). How well a TV does or does not handle both of these processes is a big factor in how desirable it is--and something that casual shoppers often overlook, since, compared to the screen size or resolution, it's not as easy to show as a spec sheet bullet point.

    I should probably put that whole previous paragraph in bold, though, because the message never seems to get through. So, at the risk of overkill, let's restate it with specific resolutions:

    6. What happens when you feed a 1080i signal to a 720p TV?
    The 1080i signal is scaled, or downconverted, to 720p. Nearly all recent HDTVs are able to do this.

    7. What happens when you feed a 1080p signal to 720p TV?
    Assuming the TV can accept a 1080p signal, it will be scaled to 720p. But that caveat is important: many older 720p HDTVs--and yes, even some older 1080p models--cannot even accept 1080p signals at all, in which case you'll get a blank screen. Thankfully, most newer HDTVs can accept 1080p signals.

    8. What happens when you feed a 1080i signal to a 1080p TV?
    It's converted to 1080p with no resolution conversion. Instead, the 1080i signal is "de-interlaced" for display in 1080p. Some HDTVs do a better job of this de-interlacing process than others, but usually the artifacts caused by improper de-interlacing are difficult for most viewers to spot.

    9. Side by side, how do 720p and 1080p TVs match up in head-to-head tests?
    We spend a lot of time looking at a variety of source material on a variety of TVs in our video lab here at CNET's offices in New York. When I wrote my original article two years ago, many 1080p TVs weren't as sharp as they claimed to be on paper. By that, I mean a lot of older 1080p sets couldn't necessarily display all 2 million-plus pixels in the real world--technically, speaking, they couldn't "resolve" every line of a 1080i or 1080p test pattern.

    That's changed in the last couple of years. Most 1080p sets are now capable of fully resolving 1080i and 1080p material. But that hasn't altered our views about 1080p TVs. We still believe that when you're dealing with TVs 50 inches and smaller, the added resolution has only a very minor impact on picture quality. On a regular basis in our HDTV reviews, we put 720p (or 768p) sets next to 1080p sets, then feed them both the same source material, whether it's 1080i or 1080p, from the highest-quality Blu-ray and HD DVD players. We typically watch both sets for a while, with eyes darting back and forth between the two, looking for differences in the most-detailed sections, such as hair, textures of fabric, and grassy plains. Bottom line: It's almost always very difficult to see any difference--especially from farther than 8 feet away on a 50-inch TV.

    I said so much in a 2006 column I wrote called The case against 1080p, but some readers knocked us for not looking at high-end TVs in our tests. But the fact is, resolution is resolution, and whether you're looking at a Sony or a Westinghouse, 1080p resolution--which relates to picture sharpness--is the same and is a separate issue from black levels and color accuracy.

    Our resident video guru, Senior Editor David Katzmaier, stands by what he said two years ago: The extra sharpness afforded by the 1080p televisions he's seen is noticeable only when watching 1080i or 1080p sources on a larger screens, say 55 inches and bigger, or with projectors that display a wall-size picture. Katzmaier also says that the main real-world advantage of 1080p is not the extra sharpness you'll be seeing, but instead, the smaller, more densely packed pixels. In other words, you can sit closer to a 1080p television and not notice any pixel structure, such as stair-stepping along diagonal lines, or the screen door effect (where you can actually see the space between the pixels). This advantage applies regardless of the quality of the source.

    Reply

    5. What kinds of TV technologies offer 1080p resolution?
    These days, everything but CRT (tube) TVs comes in 1080p versions. That means you can find 1080p-capable versions utilizing all fixed-pixel technologies, including microdisplays (DLP, LCoS, and LCD rear-projection/front-projection) and flat-panels (plasma and LCD). Of course, as specified above, more affordable entry-level models are still limited to 720p resolution. But whatever the resolution, all fixed-pixel (non-CRT) TVs are essentially progressive-scan technologies, so when the incoming source is interlaced (1080i, or even good old-fashioned 480i standard-definition), they convert it to progressive-scan for display. .

    At this point, I could just expand on that last point and specify that all fixed-pixel display TVs--all microdisplay rear-projection and all flat-panels--always display everything at their native resolution, which is all they can display. On a 720p TV, that means that all incoming video is displayed at 720p (or 768p, as the case may be); on a 1080p TV, all incoming video is displayed at 1080p. The process of converting resolution is called scaling--sometimes called upconverting or downconverting. A related factor is deinterlacing (see point no. 8, below). How well a TV does or does not handle both of these processes is a big factor in how desirable it is--and something that casual shoppers often overlook, since, compared to the screen size or resolution, it's not as easy to show as a spec sheet bullet point.

    I should probably put that whole previous paragraph in bold, though, because the message never seems to get through. So, at the risk of overkill, let's restate it with specific resolutions:

    6. What happens when you feed a 1080i signal to a 720p TV?
    The 1080i signal is scaled, or downconverted, to 720p. Nearly all recent HDTVs are able to do this.

    7. What happens when you feed a 1080p signal to 720p TV?
    Assuming the TV can accept a 1080p signal, it will be scaled to 720p. But that caveat is important: many older 720p HDTVs--and yes, even some older 1080p models--cannot even accept 1080p signals at all, in which case you'll get a blank screen. Thankfully, most newer HDTVs can accept 1080p signals.

    8. What happens when you feed a 1080i signal to a 1080p TV?
    It's converted to 1080p with no resolution conversion. Instead, the 1080i signal is "de-interlaced" for display in 1080p. Some HDTVs do a better job of this de-interlacing process than others, but usually the artifacts caused by improper de-interlacing are difficult for most viewers to spot.

    9. Side by side, how do 720p and 1080p TVs match up in head-to-head tests?
    We spend a lot of time looking at a variety of source material on a variety of TVs in our video lab here at CNET's offices in New York. When I wrote my original article two years ago, many 1080p TVs weren't as sharp as they claimed to be on paper. By that, I mean a lot of older 1080p sets couldn't necessarily display all 2 million-plus pixels in the real world--technically, speaking, they couldn't "resolve" every line of a 1080i or 1080p test pattern.

    That's changed in the last couple of years. Most 1080p sets are now capable of fully resolving 1080i and 1080p material. But that hasn't altered our views about 1080p TVs. We still believe that when you're dealing with TVs 50 inches and smaller, the added resolution has only a very minor impact on picture quality. On a regular basis in our HDTV reviews, we put 720p (or 768p) sets next to 1080p sets, then feed them both the same source material, whether it's 1080i or 1080p, from the highest-quality Blu-ray and HD DVD players. We typically watch both sets for a while, with eyes darting back and forth between the two, looking for differences in the most-detailed sections, such as hair, textures of fabric, and grassy plains. Bottom line: It's almost always very difficult to see any difference--especially from farther than 8 feet away on a 50-inch TV.

    I said so much in a 2006 column I wrote called The case against 1080p, but some readers knocked us for not looking at high-end TVs in our tests. But the fact is, resolution is resolution, and whether you're looking at a Sony or a Westinghouse, 1080p resolution--which relates to picture sharpness--is the same and is a separate issue from black levels and color accuracy.

    Our resident video guru, Senior Editor David Katzmaier, stands by what he said two years ago: The extra sharpness afforded by the 1080p televisions he's seen is noticeable only when watching 1080i or 1080p sources on a larger screens, say 55 inches and bigger, or with projectors that display a wall-size picture. Katzmaier also says that the main real-world advantage of 1080p is not the extra sharpness you'll be seeing, but instead, the smaller, more densely packed pixels. In other words, you can sit closer to a 1080p television and not notice any pixel structure, such as stair-stepping along diagonal lines, or the screen door effect (where you can actually see the space between the pixels). This advantage applies regardless of the quality of the source.

     
    Lippsman
    Lippsman
    Covers Linesmen
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2001
    Posts: 87445
    Posted: Dec. 10, 2007 - 8:48 AM ET #3

    10. OK, so what's the bottom line: Should I go 1080p or 720p?
    First and foremost, some people just want what's considered the best spec on a TV. If you're one of those people, spend the extra dough, you'll feel better in the long run. Secondly, if you're thinking of going big, really big (a 55-inch or larger screen), or you like to sit really close (closer than 1.5 times the diagonal measurement), the extra resolution may make it worth the difference--as long as you have a pristine, 1080i or 1080p HD source to feed into the set. And finally, it's a good idea to go with 1080p if you plan to use your TV a lot as a big computer monitor. That said, if you set your computer to output at 1,920x1,080, you may find that the icons and text on the screen are too small to view from far away (as a result, you may end up zooming the desktop or even changing to a lower resolution). But a 1080p set does give you some added flexibility (and sharpness) when it comes to computer connectivity.

    If none of those factors jump out at you as true priorities--and you are working on a tight budget and want to save some dough--a 720p set is going to do you just fine. HD will still look great on your set, I swear. In fact, our current highest-scoring HDTV, the Pioneer Kuro PDP-5080HD, is a 720p, er--768p, model.

    Reply

    10. OK, so what's the bottom line: Should I go 1080p or 720p?
    First and foremost, some people just want what's considered the best spec on a TV. If you're one of those people, spend the extra dough, you'll feel better in the long run. Secondly, if you're thinking of going big, really big (a 55-inch or larger screen), or you like to sit really close (closer than 1.5 times the diagonal measurement), the extra resolution may make it worth the difference--as long as you have a pristine, 1080i or 1080p HD source to feed into the set. And finally, it's a good idea to go with 1080p if you plan to use your TV a lot as a big computer monitor. That said, if you set your computer to output at 1,920x1,080, you may find that the icons and text on the screen are too small to view from far away (as a result, you may end up zooming the desktop or even changing to a lower resolution). But a 1080p set does give you some added flexibility (and sharpness) when it comes to computer connectivity.

    If none of those factors jump out at you as true priorities--and you are working on a tight budget and want to save some dough--a 720p set is going to do you just fine. HD will still look great on your set, I swear. In fact, our current highest-scoring HDTV, the Pioneer Kuro PDP-5080HD, is a 720p, er--768p, model.

     
    Lippsman
    Lippsman
    Covers Linesmen
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2001
    Posts: 87445
    Posted: Dec. 10, 2007 - 8:48 AM ET #4

    By David Carnoy 
    Executive editor, CNET Reviews
    Reply
    By David Carnoy 
    Executive editor, CNET Reviews
     
    heinmanIam
    heinmanIam
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jun, 2007
    Posts: 1413
    Posted: Dec. 10, 2007 - 9:21 AM ET #5

    TY Lippsman....going to print and save future reference.
    Reply
    TY Lippsman....going to print and save future reference.
     
    WILLIECHIL
    WILLIECHIL
    MVP
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2003
    Posts: 18255
    Posted: Dec. 10, 2007 - 1:36 PM ET #6

    Nice write up
    Reply
    Nice write up
     
    69_Amazin_Mets
    69_Amazin_Mets
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2007
    Posts: 15399
    Posted: Dec. 10, 2007 - 6:52 PM ET #7

    too many big words
    Reply
    too many big words
     
    Jurassic2
    Jurassic2
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2006
    Posts: 5238
    Posted: Dec. 11, 2007 - 8:58 AM ET #8

    Thanks for the info.
    Reply
    Thanks for the info.
     
    kickinA
    kickinA
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2004
    Posts: 13462
    Posted: Jan. 10, 2008 - 4:27 AM ET #9

    Great article.
     
    As I'm pondering which to get for the bedroom. I think that Pioneer Kuro will do just fine. (Provided they have in a size 37")
    Reply
    Great article.
     
    As I'm pondering which to get for the bedroom. I think that Pioneer Kuro will do just fine. (Provided they have in a size 37")
     
    jrock88
    jrock88
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2007
    Posts: 8559
    Posted: Jan. 10, 2008 - 12:56 PM ET #10

    KickinA - you're not gonna be able to find that TV in a 37" model, because Plasma's do not come any smaller than 40".  If you absolutely cannot go any bigger than 37" you'll have to get an LDC.  But, if you can, I reccomend a 40" plasma. 

    Also, anything under 50", the difference between 1080 and 720 is quite miniscule to the untrained eye.  So, for the bedroom, a 40" 720p plasma should do you just fine, IMO
    Reply
    KickinA - you're not gonna be able to find that TV in a 37" model, because Plasma's do not come any smaller than 40".  If you absolutely cannot go any bigger than 37" you'll have to get an LDC.  But, if you can, I reccomend a 40" plasma. 

    Also, anything under 50", the difference between 1080 and 720 is quite miniscule to the untrained eye.  So, for the bedroom, a 40" 720p plasma should do you just fine, IMO
     
    THEMUGG
    THEMUGG
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2003
    Posts: 38242
    Posted: Jan. 10, 2008 - 7:46 PM ET #11

    Quote Originally Posted by jrock88:



    Also, anything under 50", the difference between 1080 and 720 is quite miniscule to the untrained eye.  So, for the bedroom, a 40" 720p plasma should do you just fine, IMO

    Good point...............right now is a good time to pick up a 720p set as they are getting less hype now that there are so many 1080p sets out. A friend of mind paid around $3000 for a 50" 720p DLP about 3-4 years ago.............that was the going price. Still a nice set but the same one can be had for less than half that now.

      Also........when shopping for a new set, you're going to see a lot of variation in the picture quality of the sets when viewed side by side (as can be done in the larger stores like Magnolia A/V) & it's not necessarily that one is really better than another, but rather how they are set up. I've seen some 720p's look better than a 1080p (when viewed on the same channel of course). Many times the manuf. (or salesman) has set the tv in "torch mode".............having the color, brightness, contrast, etc. all set way up in an effort to get that particular set to stand out among the others. It makes it tricky to compare............& can also lead to a little "bait & switch" action. You get lured in by a set advertised on sale only to see that it looks crappy compared to the ones on either side of it. If you're comfortable with it (& the remote is handy), try turning down (or up in some cases) all the settings to about 1/3 of their max & see how you like the picture then.

    Here is a link describing how to "tune" your new HDTV when you get it home. It states that it's for LCD sets but most of the same principles apply.............good info.

    https://www.lcdtvbuyingguide.com/lcdtv/lcd-tv-calibration.html
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by jrock88:



    Also, anything under 50", the difference between 1080 and 720 is quite miniscule to the untrained eye.  So, for the bedroom, a 40" 720p plasma should do you just fine, IMO

    Good point...............right now is a good time to pick up a 720p set as they are getting less hype now that there are so many 1080p sets out. A friend of mind paid around $3000 for a 50" 720p DLP about 3-4 years ago.............that was the going price. Still a nice set but the same one can be had for less than half that now.

      Also........when shopping for a new set, you're going to see a lot of variation in the picture quality of the sets when viewed side by side (as can be done in the larger stores like Magnolia A/V) & it's not necessarily that one is really better than another, but rather how they are set up. I've seen some 720p's look better than a 1080p (when viewed on the same channel of course). Many times the manuf. (or salesman) has set the tv in "torch mode".............having the color, brightness, contrast, etc. all set way up in an effort to get that particular set to stand out among the others. It makes it tricky to compare............& can also lead to a little "bait & switch" action. You get lured in by a set advertised on sale only to see that it looks crappy compared to the ones on either side of it. If you're comfortable with it (& the remote is handy), try turning down (or up in some cases) all the settings to about 1/3 of their max & see how you like the picture then.

    Here is a link describing how to "tune" your new HDTV when you get it home. It states that it's for LCD sets but most of the same principles apply.............good info.

    https://www.lcdtvbuyingguide.com/lcdtv/lcd-tv-calibration.html
     
    kickinA
    kickinA
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2004
    Posts: 13462
    Posted: Jan. 11, 2008 - 4:34 AM ET #12

    Great site there Mugg, very informative.
     
    jrock
     
    I have a 42" Panasonic Plasma (1080P) for the living room already and I'm looking for a good unit to replace my 4 year old CRT 27" Sony Trinitron for the bedroom.
     
    Since plasma is out of the question in that size, I'm currently I'm looking at a 37" LCD instead. While I'm reading great reviews on the Sharp Aquos, it's quite pricey over the competition. It's still hovering around $1300 for the 37". Since the master bedroom is quite large, I decided to skip over the 32". Maybe I'll just have to settle for an Olevia instead.
    Reply
    Great site there Mugg, very informative.
     
    jrock
     
    I have a 42" Panasonic Plasma (1080P) for the living room already and I'm looking for a good unit to replace my 4 year old CRT 27" Sony Trinitron for the bedroom.
     
    Since plasma is out of the question in that size, I'm currently I'm looking at a 37" LCD instead. While I'm reading great reviews on the Sharp Aquos, it's quite pricey over the competition. It's still hovering around $1300 for the 37". Since the master bedroom is quite large, I decided to skip over the 32". Maybe I'll just have to settle for an Olevia instead.
     
    jrock88
    jrock88
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2007
    Posts: 8559
    Posted: Jan. 11, 2008 - 11:24 AM ET #13

    Kickin - Personally I'm a big fan of anything Samsung, but those too can be pricey.  Olevia's are good for the price, but don't really compare in picture to the pricier sets.  I just bought a 40" LG plasma.  I got it from this store in Montana called Vann's.  I bought it the day after Thanksgiving, online, and signed up for their card and got 2 years interest free.  The set was $900, and the picture is sick.  If you can get 2 yrs interest free then it pays to buy a pricer set b/c you're looking at maybe $60 - $70 a month.

    Mugg - excellent points.  I own 3 DLP's.  The oldest of which, is a 50" Samsung 1080i I got in November  of 04.  I paid $2,800 and the TV is now about $1,500.  Personally, I'm a big fan of DLP's.  the reason we got the Plasma was to put it in the bedroom so we could save space and get rid of some furniture.  And great info with that web site


    Reply
    Kickin - Personally I'm a big fan of anything Samsung, but those too can be pricey.  Olevia's are good for the price, but don't really compare in picture to the pricier sets.  I just bought a 40" LG plasma.  I got it from this store in Montana called Vann's.  I bought it the day after Thanksgiving, online, and signed up for their card and got 2 years interest free.  The set was $900, and the picture is sick.  If you can get 2 yrs interest free then it pays to buy a pricer set b/c you're looking at maybe $60 - $70 a month.

    Mugg - excellent points.  I own 3 DLP's.  The oldest of which, is a 50" Samsung 1080i I got in November  of 04.  I paid $2,800 and the TV is now about $1,500.  Personally, I'm a big fan of DLP's.  the reason we got the Plasma was to put it in the bedroom so we could save space and get rid of some furniture.  And great info with that web site


     
    THEMUGG
    THEMUGG
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2003
    Posts: 38242
    Posted: Jan. 12, 2008 - 3:42 AM ET #14

    jrock...........My buddies' DLP is a Samsung & he's had no problems with it. He just had it cleaned & they told him it had over 4000 hours on the bulb.......beyond the forecasted lifespan.......& they replaced it anyhow ( I believe he bought an extended warr.). Solid, solid set. I know all DLP's are ultimately a product of Texas Instruments, but I always like 1st (or at least 2nd) hand knowledge of a set I might buy, & Samsung has a good track record.
      DLP's are still regarded highly for their PQ.........plasmas are getting tough to beat though.
    Reply
    jrock...........My buddies' DLP is a Samsung & he's had no problems with it. He just had it cleaned & they told him it had over 4000 hours on the bulb.......beyond the forecasted lifespan.......& they replaced it anyhow ( I believe he bought an extended warr.). Solid, solid set. I know all DLP's are ultimately a product of Texas Instruments, but I always like 1st (or at least 2nd) hand knowledge of a set I might buy, & Samsung has a good track record.
      DLP's are still regarded highly for their PQ.........plasmas are getting tough to beat though.
     
     
    jrock88
    jrock88
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2007
    Posts: 8559
    Posted: Jan. 12, 2008 - 4:22 PM ET #15

    Couldn't agree more man.  If you have the room and the means, Samsung DLP's are the way to go.  I haven't had an ounce of problems with it.  Which is a lot more than I can say for my Mitsubishi DLP.  I got suckered into that one.  Long story. 


    Reply
    Couldn't agree more man.  If you have the room and the means, Samsung DLP's are the way to go.  I haven't had an ounce of problems with it.  Which is a lot more than I can say for my Mitsubishi DLP.  I got suckered into that one.  Long story. 


    All Forums | Technology

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 463,061
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 286,829
    • Thursday 10/29/2026 475
    • I’m on the Brewers to defeat the Rays in the World Series 6,495
    • NFL LOCKED IN! 110,924
    • Happening just recently . . . 39,405
    • **$$$ MD Thursday 10/29 $$$** 3,322
    • We have picked a terrible time to have the stupidest president ever 31,371
    • Week 9 Money 6,609
    • ***Macwesties * Thur. Oct. 29 * Sun. Nov. 01, 2026 * NFL * Week #8 * Football Plays*** 2,915

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Privacy Choices Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo
    Covers Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 Genius Sports. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.