Week 6 NFL CatchM's Triangle System

Balt -3 against Car. that covered against the Browns, in turn the Brown covered against the Ravens.
Det +1 against Buf. that covered against the Vikings, in the Vikings covered against the Lions.

Good luck everyone this week.

I can't give you any stats but there has only been i believe one loss if you wait til game 3 for this season.  That loss being Carolina this year versus NO.  The system there was NO-Car-Atl.  Atl beat Car, NO beat Atl bad, Car won SU but loss at the spread due to 85 yard moose.  Mooses happen for every system.  But worked for me last year too.  And last year was my first year betting so I can't go farther than that.  Last week had the triangle system for Jax-Indy-NYJ.  That hit but the other system pushed because the line move from +3 to -3 for St. Louis.  I've never seen any system be perfect but this one will keep you on the positive side if you think about how the public also bets with these games.  Take for example the Jax game, I think the public was around 50-50 for this game, but should have been more like 75-25 but do to the close win by Indy against the Jets, the books got 50-50 action.  That's the ideal spot for them.  Even though I missed on my NO-Car play, NO had so much action on the money line also.  I think it was more NO trying to prove that they are the real deal.  Someone could backtrack this but when systems are working for now you should stick with them until they prove so right.  Anyways, sorry about the long paragraph.  I just like to write alot.  If you think more about these lines they help with letdown situations, I think that's what this system is coincided with.  But anyways, good luck to you Giantsfan this year.  

Powerade has got it a little messed up.  Your above scenario has it to where you beat billy and billy beats johnny and then you beat johnny.  All but the last part is right.  In this scenario, you schould be able to beat johnny easily, thus the public looks back on these two events and see that you should win the fight.  My system has Johnny winning the fight.  It helps bookies on the third game to get the public on the team to bet against.  I understand you being skeptical about it.  It doesn't work all the time but how many times have you look at a team with a common opponent and say that that team should beat this one easily. 

I'll give an example:
Minn-Buff-Chi was a triangle system you could have seen within the last three weeks.  In which, Chi-Minn played and the line was -3 or -3 1/2 for Chicago right.  3 pushes and 3 1/2 wins ats for Minn.  So lets say we give this win to Minn b/c at no point could you win by taking Chi unless you bought the hook.  With that being said Buff was favored the next week and won SU against Minn.  So by looking at these three teams, Buff looks like the easy cover against Chi right.  Chicago blew out Buff this past week. 

I hope this helps you guys understand it better.
Another example:
Indy-NYJ-Jax

Keep in mind if you use one of the games already in the system you can't use it again for another triangle system.  So with the example above you can not use the Chi-Minn game to add another opponent that they both have in common.  And also the system works better, if there is at least 1 game each for the three weeks meaning that lets say the 3 teams have games for the triangle system in three consecutive weeks. 

Hope this helps DCP and Powerade.
The logic of it makes since and you guys probably already noticed it but it's one of those things where you say that can't be right.  But it's simple to use.

Good luck to you guys this week.  I used that system you were using last year Powerade, works pretty well.  Another system I used last year was a sportsbook system for college football.  I took all the nationally televised games and looked at sportsbook's betting trends.  If you noticed yet, the games usually go 50-50, meaning that the public either gets the side or the total right in the game.  So I did parlays in both ways like your system, in which one bet would be public side and public fade total, and the other would be public fade side and public total. 

Just thought I'd add another system in here. 

I like to use them in succession unless the final team to play is the one on the bye week before the game.  But preferably without it because if the team you are gonna bet on in the third week stinks the second week, then the public will be more heavily sided towards the other side giving you a better line.

Yea, must have overlooked it.  Sorry about that Days.  Balt screwed me out of this week too.  McNair in a concussion, just my luck.  But yea you absolutely got it right.  Systems not perfect but works over the long haul.  I think Balt would have covered if McNair was still in there. Can't always predict these kind of things though.       

Sorry didn't answer your question.  I think you should wait til week 3.  Because if the second game of the triangle play doesn't hit, then you gotta throw it out.  Like Indy-Wash-Tenn, the second game was Wash-Tenn and Tenn won SU.  There's no play to make it where Indy-Wash would have heavy betting on either side which is the essense of this system. 
I'll see if there are any games for this week, but I think it will mostly be for the second leg of the system which is to be wary about.  If you still got questions, feel free to ask.

No plays for this week.  Sorry guys.  Hopefully we'll have some next week.

Week 8 No third legs system plays this week for this system.

Second leg System:

Hou-beat-Jax, Now it Tenn vs. Hou.

Take Tenn and then the following week take Jax vs. Tenn

StL-SD-KC

KC-beat-S.D., Now its S.D. vs StL

Take S.D. and then the following week take StL vs. K.C.  Not sure if I like this third game yet.

First Leg System:

Ideal situation for this game.  No way constituting a play, but hear me out.  And it will fit into some of the other system plays.

Pitt-Oak-Den

Pitt-beats-Oakland
Den-beats-Pitt
Oak-beats-Den

Should constitute in a nice one-sided public betting on Denver with no one really like betting Oakland anymore.

Good luck all.

None of these games were in the third leg of the system.  So take them as you will.  Personally I like the Jax Second Leg system because it sets up for a nice third leg blowout which can be done when the Jags are at home.  Don't really care for the other system with K.C.  K.C. will be at home on the third leg and unless StL is being given at least a touchdown with the hook, I don't see how I could take them.

Made a mistake K.C. is not at home for the third leg of the system:

So the plays are:
St.Louis -2.5
Jax -9.5

Good luck everyone.

I wouldn't advise on doing that because I just use this system for consecutive weeks.  3 in a row.  It may work but I haven't tried it all this season.  Maybe I can backtrack and see how it worked but not sure as of yet.  I'll get back to you on that SP.