All Forums | Systems & Strategies

save the series will not be swept mlb

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 2199
Posts: 27
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 127
Posted: #1
betting a team who lose the previos 2, or 3 game of the serie.
just to win the last game.

start Sun, Apr 8

atlanta braves

mets win 1x0
mets win 4x2


cleveland indians

toronto win 7x4  extra inning
toronto win 7x4 extra inning



san fco giants

arizona win 5x4
arizona win 5x4

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 127
Posted: #2
cubs chicago

was nationals win 2x1
was nationals win 7x4


boston red sox

detroit win 3x2
detroit win 10x0
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 2153
Posted: #3
Have you done ANY back testing with this system?  I ask because there are A LOT of sweeps in MLB every year. Unfortunately I bet on BOS & ATL both first 2 games. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 2153
Posted: #4
Wow, already a lot of potential sweeps. I see where you are coming from alexboy, you gotta figure 3 outa 5 do not get swept. 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 309
Posted: #5
Add yankess too. Only cubs and indians are at home, all the rest are away. It think it would work well if you only do home teams. Teams that are favorites of -150 to -200 to win a series, sweep a lot more than others. Teams whose series prices are 120 to -140 don't get swept that much and they also don't sweep other teams as often as high favorites.  Series prices this week were det -130, cle -115, nym -110, bal -135, tb -115, ari -120. For small favorites last year, the record was 134-17. I didn't record the small underdogs last year, but it don't think it would be that much different. 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 127
Posted: #6
Quote Originally Posted by bettor2win:

Wow, already a lot of potential sweeps. I see where you are coming from alexboy, you gotta figure 3 outa 5 do not get swept. 


well i will betting flat rate lets see
3 win and 2 lose its winning day just have a try
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2012
Posts: 8
Posted: #7

Quote Originally Posted by pazim:

Add yankess too. Only cubs and indians are at home, all the rest are away. It think it would work well if you only do home teams. Teams that are favorites of -150 to -200 to win a series, sweep a lot more than others. Teams whose series prices are 120 to -140 don't get swept that much and they also don't sweep other teams as often as high favorites.  Series prices this week were det -130, cle -115, nym -110, bal -135, tb -115, ari -120. For small favorites last year, the record was 134-17. I didn't record the small underdogs last year, but it don't think it would be that much different. 

Where did you find the series prices?  I looked at many books and nobody was offering them...

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 127
Posted: #8
Quote Originally Posted by pazim:

Add yankess too. Only cubs and indians are at home, all the rest are away. It think it would work well if you only do home teams. Teams that are favorites of -150 to -200 to win a series, sweep a lot more than others. Teams whose series prices are 120 to -140 don't get swept that much and they also don't sweep other teams as often as high favorites.  Series prices this week were det -130, cle -115, nym -110, bal -135, tb -115, ari -120. For small favorites last year, the record was 134-17. I didn't record the small underdogs last year, but it don't think it would be that much different. 


i totally agree with you home team have more chance
but i will try all the picks

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 127
Posted: #9
yankees

tampa win 7x6
tampa win 8x6



minnesota

baltimore win 4x2
baltimore win 8x2



san diego

dodgers win 5x3
dodgers win 6x0
dodgers win 6x5
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 127
Posted: #10
total 8 picks
4 american league,4 nationals league
5 road
3 home
goal 5 win 3 lose flat bet
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 127
Posted: #11
BOS Red Sox(C Buchholz) @ DET Tigers(M Scherzer)
pick BOS Red Sox odd +106

TOR Blue Jays(J Carreno) @ CLE Indians(D Lowe)
pick CLE Indians odd -119

MIN Twins(A Swarzak) @ BAL Orioles(J Hammel)
pick MIN Twins odd +115

NY Yankees(P Hughes) @ TB Rays(J Hellickson)
pick NY Yankees odd +109
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 127
Posted: #12
ATL Braves(M Minor) @ NY Mets(J Niese)
pick ATL Braves odd -104

WAS Nationals(J Zimmermann) @ CHI Cubs(J Samardzija)
pick CHI Cubs odd +114

LA Dodgers(A Harang) @ SD Padres(C Richard)
pick SD Padres odd -119

SF Giants(M Cain) @ ARI Diamondbacks(J Collmenter)
pick SF Giants odd -120
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2008
Posts: 142
Posted: #13
I have done the math for chasing a home team after losing 1st game of a home series. Results are good but you have to exclude very bad home teams.  SInce I had the excel sheet ready, I also did this homework too. that is bet to win the 3rd game of a home series after the home team loses the first two games.  IT LOOKS VERY GOOD.  Problem is you do not have a lot of bets to place (average of four per team).  I will reports results for 2011 after a while.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 309
Posted: #14
Series prices are not recorded so it's hard to back test it. I use bookmaker and betus for them. They are offered only before the first game of series.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 309
Posted: #15
Quote Originally Posted by 1958a:

I have done the math for chasing a home team after losing 1st game of a home series. Results are good but you have to exclude very bad home teams.  SInce I had the excel sheet ready, I also did this homework too. that is bet to win the 3rd game of a home series after the home team loses the first two games.  IT LOOKS VERY GOOD.  Problem is you do not have a lot of bets to place (average of four per team).  I will reports results for 2011 after a while.

Thats why chase them and instead of betting small on every series, I chose 4 home teams each week and bet more on them. You can also try doing 2 games chase and implementing a labby.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 127
Posted: #16
well the deal its going to be just betting home teams

home teams all 3 win today
road teams all 5 lose san fco was up 6x0 and lose
and boston patetic.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 1479
Posted: #17
it's suppose to be all losing teams it's profitable just about every year.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 1479
Posted: #18
 
Quote Originally Posted by jv040:

it's suppose to be all losing teams it's profitable just about every year.


3 and 4 game series.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 1479
Posted: #19
Quote Originally Posted by bettor2win:

Wow, already a lot of potential sweeps. I see where you are coming from alexboy, you gotta figure 3 outa 5 do not get swept. 


I think it's like 75% to 80% don't swept if I recall right.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 1479
Posted: #20
Quote Originally Posted by pazim:

Add yankess too. Only cubs and indians are at home, all the rest are away. It think it would work well if you only do home teams. Teams that are favorites of -150 to -200 to win a series, sweep a lot more than others. Teams whose series prices are 120 to -140 don't get swept that much and they also don't sweep other teams as often as high favorites.  Series prices this week were det -130, cle -115, nym -110, bal -135, tb -115, ari -120. For small favorites last year, the record was 134-17. I didn't record the small underdogs last year, but it don't think it would be that much different. 


I'm assuming there was profit last year do you know what it was?
it sounds better to do it this way. the system I bought also says to bet on every 3 or 4 game series for a win in the last game not to get swept

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 1479
Posted: #21
Quote Originally Posted by pazim:

Add yankess too. Only cubs and indians are at home, all the rest are away. It think it would work well if you only do home teams. Teams that are favorites of -150 to -200 to win a series, sweep a lot more than others. Teams whose series prices are 120 to -140 don't get swept that much and they also don't sweep other teams as often as high favorites.  Series prices this week were det -130, cle -115, nym -110, bal -135, tb -115, ari -120. For small favorites last year, the record was 134-17. I didn't record the small underdogs last year, but it don't think it would be that much different. 

.
are you posting plays this year for the parameters given?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 309
Posted: #22
Quote Originally Posted by jv040:


.
are you posting plays this year for the parameters given?
No I am not. I started tracking this halfway through the season last year and I only kept track of the chase record. This year I am doing record for the last game too, if they lose the first two of the series. Chase system isn't much profitable. Each loss is equal to 7 units. I am going to try adding more filters to it and by next year I should be able to minimize losses and try posting plays.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 1479
Posted: #23
Quote Originally Posted by pazim:

Add yankess too. Only cubs and indians are at home, all the rest are away. It think it would work well if you only do home teams. Teams that are favorites of -150 to -200 to win a series, sweep a lot more than others. Teams whose series prices are 120 to -140 don't get swept that much and they also don't sweep other teams as often as high favorites.  Series prices this week were det -130, cle -115, nym -110, bal -135, tb -115, ari -120. For small favorites last year, the record was 134-17. I didn't record the small underdogs last year, but it don't think it would be that much different. 


how far into the season do you play?
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 1479
Posted: #24
Quote Originally Posted by pazim:

Add yankess too. Only cubs and indians are at home, all the rest are away. It think it would work well if you only do home teams. Teams that are favorites of -150 to -200 to win a series, sweep a lot more than others. Teams whose series prices are 120 to -140 don't get swept that much and they also don't sweep other teams as often as high favorites.  Series prices this week were det -130, cle -115, nym -110, bal -135, tb -115, ari -120. For small favorites last year, the record was 134-17. I didn't record the small underdogs last year, but it don't think it would be that much different. 


are you talking about a 3 game chase for small series was 134-17

the chase at home after the 2 losses was 134 to 17 cause I'm backtracking this and no way.
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 309
Posted: #25
Quote Originally Posted by jv040:



are you talking about a 3 game chase for small series was 134-17

the chase at home after the 2 losses was 134 to 17 cause I'm backtracking this and no way.
I am talking about 3 games chase.
All Forums | Systems & Strategies
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gambling
Betting Sites
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
21+
Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
Covers is verified safe by:
Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.