Here's a little system that I've used that seems to work pretty well, however I've never back tested the system:
On wagerline do the following>>>>>>>
Go to the handicapping bar and pull down TOP CAPPERS the your sport say NFL
It will give you the top NFL cappers by $$$$ won to date. Click the blue RSI and it will rearrange the order by RSI status ( read what RSI stands for -wagerline will explain it to you).
Then take the players with a RSI of say 5.0 or higher and click on their pending picks and manually tally their picks (a little time consuming) and use the ones that have a 2 to 1 or 4 to 1 pick results...
It is a system thats all
Good luck
TAXCYCLE
||an_light.gif' border=0>||an_light.gif' border=0>
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Here's a little system that I've used that seems to work pretty well, however I've never back tested the system:
On wagerline do the following>>>>>>>
Go to the handicapping bar and pull down TOP CAPPERS the your sport say NFL
It will give you the top NFL cappers by $$$$ won to date. Click the blue RSI and it will rearrange the order by RSI status ( read what RSI stands for -wagerline will explain it to you).
Then take the players with a RSI of say 5.0 or higher and click on their pending picks and manually tally their picks (a little time consuming) and use the ones that have a 2 to 1 or 4 to 1 pick results...
It is a system thats all
Good luck
TAXCYCLE
||an_light.gif' border=0>||an_light.gif' border=0>
No, just go to handicapping, top cappers by sport it will default to $ rankings but then click RSI or % and it will rank them for you, ||an_light.gif' border=0>||an_light.gif' border=0>
||reallyhappy.gif' border=0>
taxcycle aka
ebbie
0
No, just go to handicapping, top cappers by sport it will default to $ rankings but then click RSI or % and it will rank them for you, ||an_light.gif' border=0>||an_light.gif' border=0>
||reallyhappy.gif' border=0>
taxcycle aka
ebbie
Interesting idea. I don't know if it will work, but I've tried something for today. I'll do it a few more days and see what success we have. Here's what I did for the NBA (3 games tonight): I looked at the picks of the top 15 RSI handicappers who had made their choices. I charted the numbers (not everyone picked every game), and here's what I found: 9 went for Sacramento and only 1 for New Jersey. Seven chose Toronto and 4 the Clippers. And 12 chose the Lakers and only 2 the Bulls. In the over/under, it was nearly even except in the Sac/NJ game, where 5 picked the under and just 1 the over. So with all that in mind, the three strongest choices seem to be Sacramento +5.5, Lakers +2, and Sac/NJ under 187.5. We'll see how they do!!! ||reallyhappy.gif' border=0>
0
Interesting idea. I don't know if it will work, but I've tried something for today. I'll do it a few more days and see what success we have. Here's what I did for the NBA (3 games tonight): I looked at the picks of the top 15 RSI handicappers who had made their choices. I charted the numbers (not everyone picked every game), and here's what I found: 9 went for Sacramento and only 1 for New Jersey. Seven chose Toronto and 4 the Clippers. And 12 chose the Lakers and only 2 the Bulls. In the over/under, it was nearly even except in the Sac/NJ game, where 5 picked the under and just 1 the over. So with all that in mind, the three strongest choices seem to be Sacramento +5.5, Lakers +2, and Sac/NJ under 187.5. We'll see how they do!!! ||reallyhappy.gif' border=0>
My 1st post here but a long time lurker. I have looked at the same thing but seperated by ;
1. Number of plays, the more the better. Over 100 is good.
2. ATS and O/U.
3. I like guys who are beating both the ATS and O/U. I try to come up w/ 10 guys I like.
4. Then I compare this w/ the "team experts" and "top 10" consensis picks.
5. Then I start to get all comfused! But somehow I come up with a few plays.
No hard back tested data but I can't help thinking there is a gold mine here somewhere. This could work for any sport. I am more of a theory guy then a hard data compiler though.
Carl ||confused.gif' border=0>
0
My 1st post here but a long time lurker. I have looked at the same thing but seperated by ;
1. Number of plays, the more the better. Over 100 is good.
2. ATS and O/U.
3. I like guys who are beating both the ATS and O/U. I try to come up w/ 10 guys I like.
4. Then I compare this w/ the "team experts" and "top 10" consensis picks.
5. Then I start to get all comfused! But somehow I come up with a few plays.
No hard back tested data but I can't help thinking there is a gold mine here somewhere. This could work for any sport. I am more of a theory guy then a hard data compiler though.
Carl ||confused.gif' border=0>