Series 39 Game A BOS RL -1 @ BAL got the ML at -142 and the RL at +110.
Tampa was an option and Bannister has been terrible away from Kauffman this year...but I could see a letdown on Sunday after an easy series thus far.
STL was an option, too. Like the matchup, but Norris' debut could present problems if they don't have a good scouting report. On the under as a side play here actually, amongst others.
0
The whole world is on this game but I like it.
Series 39 Game A BOS RL -1 @ BAL got the ML at -142 and the RL at +110.
Tampa was an option and Bannister has been terrible away from Kauffman this year...but I could see a letdown on Sunday after an easy series thus far.
STL was an option, too. Like the matchup, but Norris' debut could present problems if they don't have a good scouting report. On the under as a side play here actually, amongst others.
Sorry boys been on a business trip. Have been making plays with relatively poor results. Here's the rundown:
8/3: Game A PIT RL -1 @ +101 vs. WAS LOSS
8/4: Game B FLA RL -1.5 @ -105 @WAS LOSS
8/5: Game C Split play
DET RL -1 @ -130 vs. BAL WIN
ATL RL -1 @-104 @ SD WIN
So that series cleared.
This morning: 8/6: Game A FLA RL -1.5 @ PK @WAS LOSS
So tonight we have:
8/6: Game B Split play
NYY RL -1.5 vs. BOS @ -103
ARI RL -1 @ PIT @ +108
System YTD: 40-0
USA, the system is 40-0. The actual overall YTD needs to be counted. I haven't been doing a good job of accounting lately, but I believe the plays are hitting at 60% or so...give or take.
Longest chase is the 4th day. But I also split lines a lot and stuff like that to decrease risk...
0
Sorry boys been on a business trip. Have been making plays with relatively poor results. Here's the rundown:
8/3: Game A PIT RL -1 @ +101 vs. WAS LOSS
8/4: Game B FLA RL -1.5 @ -105 @WAS LOSS
8/5: Game C Split play
DET RL -1 @ -130 vs. BAL WIN
ATL RL -1 @-104 @ SD WIN
So that series cleared.
This morning: 8/6: Game A FLA RL -1.5 @ PK @WAS LOSS
So tonight we have:
8/6: Game B Split play
NYY RL -1.5 vs. BOS @ -103
ARI RL -1 @ PIT @ +108
System YTD: 40-0
USA, the system is 40-0. The actual overall YTD needs to be counted. I haven't been doing a good job of accounting lately, but I believe the plays are hitting at 60% or so...give or take.
Longest chase is the 4th day. But I also split lines a lot and stuff like that to decrease risk...
Boycali, honestly as far as I have been running this system, I have gone a little away from picking purely the highest juiced play of the day. Technically, the system does call for an RL play on the team with the highest ML.
You're not supposed to cap with systems, but then again, I feel confident enough in small, minor capping ability that I don't feel the need to strictly adhere to the system. Kreatture has done something similar.
The FLA game was a bit of a risk but I figured with a Game A, it was worth a situational shot. I really didn't think the Nats would sweep them, especially with the gas can Stammen pitching (the kid barely touches 90 with the fb), but hey, strange things happen.
The ARI game was one where I capped and really felt like ARI was gonna take it. Well...I got very lucky here with a 5 run 12th, but I felt strongly about the game. Hart's peripherals and minor league track record are not in line with his current ERA and the fact that linesmakers gave the D-Backs a decent favorite line over a Pirates team that plays well at home told me something. I also put this in before I saw the D-Backs' AAA lineup (no Upton, Ryan Roberts, C. Young)...but like I said, you win some like this.
In regards to why I split the line, when there are two games I like on the board, I feel like it is a decent way to alleviate risk.
USA Surfer, I haven't actually backtracked that far. I believe in the thread labeled "System Integrity" on the sbrforums, they do backtrack it and find STUNNING results for the RL -1. I think it may never have lost the past few years.
But honestly oftentimes it does not make feasible sense to play the -1 because it gets heavily juiced.
I have chosen to alelviate risk, as I said, by splitting lines. Once I get to a Game C or D...I'm starting to play two games at once just so I don't have all my eggs in one basket. For instance, if you lose two, well that sucks, but it's on to the enxt game. If you win both, you clear. If you win one, lose one...it's a wash and you're basically chasing the same game another day. It extends the days of your chase without adding more $ to chase. I also figure with heavily juiced teams...chances are larger that you win 2 than lose 2 at a time...
0
Thanks for the feedback, guys.
Boycali, honestly as far as I have been running this system, I have gone a little away from picking purely the highest juiced play of the day. Technically, the system does call for an RL play on the team with the highest ML.
You're not supposed to cap with systems, but then again, I feel confident enough in small, minor capping ability that I don't feel the need to strictly adhere to the system. Kreatture has done something similar.
The FLA game was a bit of a risk but I figured with a Game A, it was worth a situational shot. I really didn't think the Nats would sweep them, especially with the gas can Stammen pitching (the kid barely touches 90 with the fb), but hey, strange things happen.
The ARI game was one where I capped and really felt like ARI was gonna take it. Well...I got very lucky here with a 5 run 12th, but I felt strongly about the game. Hart's peripherals and minor league track record are not in line with his current ERA and the fact that linesmakers gave the D-Backs a decent favorite line over a Pirates team that plays well at home told me something. I also put this in before I saw the D-Backs' AAA lineup (no Upton, Ryan Roberts, C. Young)...but like I said, you win some like this.
In regards to why I split the line, when there are two games I like on the board, I feel like it is a decent way to alleviate risk.
USA Surfer, I haven't actually backtracked that far. I believe in the thread labeled "System Integrity" on the sbrforums, they do backtrack it and find STUNNING results for the RL -1. I think it may never have lost the past few years.
But honestly oftentimes it does not make feasible sense to play the -1 because it gets heavily juiced.
I have chosen to alelviate risk, as I said, by splitting lines. Once I get to a Game C or D...I'm starting to play two games at once just so I don't have all my eggs in one basket. For instance, if you lose two, well that sucks, but it's on to the enxt game. If you win both, you clear. If you win one, lose one...it's a wash and you're basically chasing the same game another day. It extends the days of your chase without adding more $ to chase. I also figure with heavily juiced teams...chances are larger that you win 2 than lose 2 at a time...
Love two games tonight starting concurrently, so I'm playing both for a unit each.
CWS RL -1 TOR RL -1
If both win, two series clear. If one wins, one series clears and Game B chase for the other. If both lose, then I'll put one line aside for a Game B chase and Game B chase the other. SF is the probable play tonight regardless of what happens.
0
8/7: Series 41 Game A and Series 42 Game A
Love two games tonight starting concurrently, so I'm playing both for a unit each.
CWS RL -1 TOR RL -1
If both win, two series clear. If one wins, one series clears and Game B chase for the other. If both lose, then I'll put one line aside for a Game B chase and Game B chase the other. SF is the probable play tonight regardless of what happens.
Wow talk about being way off tonight. Looks like two losses pretty
sure. Jeremy Sowers has well below average stuff and relies heavily on
command...and it seems like he has it tonight. And Buehrle has done
jack shit and has actually been bailed out by quite a few DPs.
So I will hold one of those losses till later...(next series will start as a Game B)
0
Wow talk about being way off tonight. Looks like two losses pretty
sure. Jeremy Sowers has well below average stuff and relies heavily on
command...and it seems like he has it tonight. And Buehrle has done
jack shit and has actually been bailed out by quite a few DPs.
So I will hold one of those losses till later...(next series will start as a Game B)
Chasing Game C tomorrow. Will be split for sure. I hate the SF bullpen. What pieces of shit. 5-3 lead and then Affeldt/Romo blow it...and at that point, with the -1.5, it really didn't matter anymore. Down 10-5 now.
Looking at: NYY, DET, ARI, PHI, TB tomorrow. We'll see.
0
Chasing Game C tomorrow. Will be split for sure. I hate the SF bullpen. What pieces of shit. 5-3 lead and then Affeldt/Romo blow it...and at that point, with the -1.5, it really didn't matter anymore. Down 10-5 now.
Looking at: NYY, DET, ARI, PHI, TB tomorrow. We'll see.
Tough. basically came out even, with TOR, NYM covering (chase for literally half of the units), while LAA and SF went down in flames. Really wish I had the stones to just play TOR for all of it, but I spread the risk around...
No plays tonight probably. Looking at NYY tomorrow (Joba vs. Richmond), ATL (Hanson vs. Lannan), MIN (Blackburn vs. Davies), and TB TT over vs. E. Santana.
0
Tough. basically came out even, with TOR, NYM covering (chase for literally half of the units), while LAA and SF went down in flames. Really wish I had the stones to just play TOR for all of it, but I spread the risk around...
No plays tonight probably. Looking at NYY tomorrow (Joba vs. Richmond), ATL (Hanson vs. Lannan), MIN (Blackburn vs. Davies), and TB TT over vs. E. Santana.
Chasing 8.86 units today: 50% on the NYY RL -1.5 vs. TOR 20% on the ATL RL -1.5 vs. WAS 20% on the MIN RL -1.5 vs. KC 10% on the COL RL -1.5 vs. PIT
Potentially might add more to COL if the others look bad early. Also looking at playing the Tampa TT over or the game Over but will lock that later (10:15 start time).
0
Chasing 8.86 units today: 50% on the NYY RL -1.5 vs. TOR 20% on the ATL RL -1.5 vs. WAS 20% on the MIN RL -1.5 vs. KC 10% on the COL RL -1.5 vs. PIT
Potentially might add more to COL if the others look bad early. Also looking at playing the Tampa TT over or the game Over but will lock that later (10:15 start time).
Increasing COL to a 20% of original chase play. MIN is basically done...Yanks on the ropes. Might just chalk this one up as an L instead of trying to chase more...
0
Increasing COL to a 20% of original chase play. MIN is basically done...Yanks on the ropes. Might just chalk this one up as an L instead of trying to chase more...
Well.. best of luck andy. Tough starts by the Yanks an Twins.
But the Jays usually implode late an the Yanks score in bunches late. And well, the Royals ARE the Royals and the Twins lineup tonight should mash that starter.. it is only the 2nd inning still..
I'm on the Pirates +1.5 tonight myself, guess 1 of us is guaranteed to win some money back! LoL No way in hell should a crappy AAA pitcher be favored by that much against Ohlendorf. The Pirates may lack bite, but they usually compete hard.
Cheers come on Yankees!!!!!!!
0
Well.. best of luck andy. Tough starts by the Yanks an Twins.
But the Jays usually implode late an the Yanks score in bunches late. And well, the Royals ARE the Royals and the Twins lineup tonight should mash that starter.. it is only the 2nd inning still..
I'm on the Pirates +1.5 tonight myself, guess 1 of us is guaranteed to win some money back! LoL No way in hell should a crappy AAA pitcher be favored by that much against Ohlendorf. The Pirates may lack bite, but they usually compete hard.
Chacin is a top prospect who the Pirates haven't seen before. Thought he'd do better. Ohlendorf is terrible on the road...so he'll prob give up some more runs, but at this point, it may not be enough.
Yanks look like toast. Need three in the bottom of the eighth basically...
I'm going to stick a fork in this chase and call it a loss. Back to the drawing board and going to try to recoup losses slowly. Can't extend this chase any more...it just doesn't make $ sense. Lesson learned here from trying to force way too many plays.
0
Chacin is a top prospect who the Pirates haven't seen before. Thought he'd do better. Ohlendorf is terrible on the road...so he'll prob give up some more runs, but at this point, it may not be enough.
Yanks look like toast. Need three in the bottom of the eighth basically...
I'm going to stick a fork in this chase and call it a loss. Back to the drawing board and going to try to recoup losses slowly. Can't extend this chase any more...it just doesn't make $ sense. Lesson learned here from trying to force way too many plays.
Haha thanks Kreatture. Thank God Mo didn't let another in. Yeah I hate Colorado...oh well. Good spot for them tonight then.
So I came out on top by like a unit yesterday. I was on tilt and put two units on the Tampa/LAA over...looked great...except Santana pitched a shutout. What the hell..?
Let's try to finally make some progress today. Enough of the status quo.
Kicking things off with NYY to win 1.74 units.
Total chase left: 8.7 units including 1 unit to win
0
Haha thanks Kreatture. Thank God Mo didn't let another in. Yeah I hate Colorado...oh well. Good spot for them tonight then.
So I came out on top by like a unit yesterday. I was on tilt and put two units on the Tampa/LAA over...looked great...except Santana pitched a shutout. What the hell..?
Let's try to finally make some progress today. Enough of the status quo.
Kicking things off with NYY to win 1.74 units.
Total chase left: 8.7 units including 1 unit to win
RL -1.5 obviously. Freaking Yankees benching Teixeira today, who loves hitting lefties this year. Oh well...Romero's peripherals don't support his ERA, so let's hope for a bombing today.
0
RL -1.5 obviously. Freaking Yankees benching Teixeira today, who loves hitting lefties this year. Oh well...Romero's peripherals don't support his ERA, so let's hope for a bombing today.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.