Revenge system
Teams like KC went 6-1 (to win at least one game following a sweep)after being swept in a series...YOU HAVE TO CHASE THE WHOLE SERIES THOUGH TO COUNT AS A WIN.....
SEA WERE SWEPT 4 TIMES BACK TO BACK (LOST 17 STRAIGHT LAST YEAR)
Teams like KC went 6-1 (to win at least one game following a sweep)after being swept in a series...YOU HAVE TO CHASE THE WHOLE SERIES THOUGH TO COUNT AS A WIN.....
SEA WERE SWEPT 4 TIMES BACK TO BACK (LOST 17 STRAIGHT LAST YEAR)
kc is not a very good play for today their pct is 286 and thats way to low.
kc is not a very good play for today their pct is 286 and thats way to low.
if your using the martingale method for betting 7 losses = no bankroll
with filters the 7 losses became 1 loss for the year.
this system is better played using the labaurche method
if your using the martingale method for betting 7 losses = no bankroll
with filters the 7 losses became 1 loss for the year.
this system is better played using the labaurche method
your first bet would be your a bet and go on line 1
your second bet would be your b bet and go on line 2
your third bet would be your c bet and go on line 3
say your a 10$ bettor and the game your betting on is favored by -150 this is bet A
your first bet on game 1 line would be 15$ to win 10$ if the first bet is lost then
the bet would go down to line 2 and the 15$ lost would be split between line 1 and line 2
game 1 line: 5-5-5-5
game 2 line 5-5-5-5
game 3 line 5-5-5-5
so it would look like this
game line 1 5-5-5-5-7.5
game line 2 5-5-5-5-7.5
game line 3 5-5-5-5
then if the line on line 2 was lost and the team bet was + 110 underdog game 2 the bet would be 12.5$ taking the 2 outside numbers to get the 12.5 if you lose a bet on line 2 then go to bet c and split the numbers again
game line 1 5-5-5-5-7.5
game line 2 5-5-5-5-7.5 – 6.25
game line 3 5-5-5-5-6.25
if game c was lost then split total amoumt lost on game C between game line 3 and game line 1
for each game won cross out the 2 outside numbers
if game 1 was lost and game 2 was won the lines would look like this
game line 1 5-5-5-5-7.5
game line 2 X-5-5-5-X
the 5 and 7.5 would be crossed off
object is too clear all lines and raise the bet after 2 lines are cleared
recommended bankroll for lines above -150 and higher is 200 units
if one line gets out of hand it's recommended to break it down in smaller numbers and move some up to a different line.
your first bet would be your a bet and go on line 1
your second bet would be your b bet and go on line 2
your third bet would be your c bet and go on line 3
say your a 10$ bettor and the game your betting on is favored by -150 this is bet A
your first bet on game 1 line would be 15$ to win 10$ if the first bet is lost then
the bet would go down to line 2 and the 15$ lost would be split between line 1 and line 2
game 1 line: 5-5-5-5
game 2 line 5-5-5-5
game 3 line 5-5-5-5
so it would look like this
game line 1 5-5-5-5-7.5
game line 2 5-5-5-5-7.5
game line 3 5-5-5-5
then if the line on line 2 was lost and the team bet was + 110 underdog game 2 the bet would be 12.5$ taking the 2 outside numbers to get the 12.5 if you lose a bet on line 2 then go to bet c and split the numbers again
game line 1 5-5-5-5-7.5
game line 2 5-5-5-5-7.5 – 6.25
game line 3 5-5-5-5-6.25
if game c was lost then split total amoumt lost on game C between game line 3 and game line 1
for each game won cross out the 2 outside numbers
if game 1 was lost and game 2 was won the lines would look like this
game line 1 5-5-5-5-7.5
game line 2 X-5-5-5-X
the 5 and 7.5 would be crossed off
object is too clear all lines and raise the bet after 2 lines are cleared
recommended bankroll for lines above -150 and higher is 200 units
if one line gets out of hand it's recommended to break it down in smaller numbers and move some up to a different line.
Thanks Dan. Min has a bad record 7-20 25.9% 3-8H. Also LAA is playing better so I skip them. For the record here, will pick team with 40% winning or better. GL
Can understand your filter to a certain point, but in today's age, I think it is really difficult to sweep a team two times in a row. I would be willing to chase 3 games, especially at home. In their at first 3 game series of this year, the Twins won one of three vs LAA at home. They won tonight as well as a nice home dog. Hindsight is 20/20, but getting generous odds at home over three games is tough to lay off, especially vs a team like the LAA that has done nothing to warrant laying such a high price on the road. One man's opinion.
Nice call on NYY.
Good Luck.
Thanks Dan. Min has a bad record 7-20 25.9% 3-8H. Also LAA is playing better so I skip them. For the record here, will pick team with 40% winning or better. GL
Can understand your filter to a certain point, but in today's age, I think it is really difficult to sweep a team two times in a row. I would be willing to chase 3 games, especially at home. In their at first 3 game series of this year, the Twins won one of three vs LAA at home. They won tonight as well as a nice home dog. Hindsight is 20/20, but getting generous odds at home over three games is tough to lay off, especially vs a team like the LAA that has done nothing to warrant laying such a high price on the road. One man's opinion.
Nice call on NYY.
Good Luck.
Hot Forum Topics
-
🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵
449,442
-
Serious Streak Survivor Strategies
1,918,167
-
Monday 09/21/2026
435
-
Colts vs chiefs in-game live
1,728
-
NFL LOCKED IN!
99,523
-
New York Giants @ Los Angeles Rams
3,914
-
***Macwesties * Mon. Sept. 21, 2026 * Birthday * NFL * MNF * Football Play***
2,542
-
?? KBO Plays 🥎
14,753
-
NCAA FOOTBALL. 151
23,391
-
Week Two-Post Plays Here
1,397
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
