playing same teams system?

do u guys think betting the same team each week for football would work with the right team or group of teams... cause ive been looking into this n it looks good on paper but idk if the moneyline would kill me... cause i found sum teams that r good all year on the ml but idk if the juice would kill u... also thinking about this 4 nba but idk how high there ml's r... any ideas,filters, etc. would b appreciated

thanks

If you have the funds to use the Martingale, then yes.

It's unrealistic that any team will go 0-16, but teams do lose 5,6,7 or even 8+ games in a row.  If you have the funds to chase the ML each game until each team wins, then sure, why not?

But that's a LOT of funds...

well the system i made was to use new england, chargers, and colts cause if u look back 4 5 years u would of never had a losing season but thats with the moneyline and i think the most loses in a row was 2... but i didnt realize how bad moneylines were in nfl i thought they were more like baseball... so i dont kno if the juice would kill u, also this year is a weird 1 and it seems that all the teams r pretty equal

it would b good this year if the chargers werent doing bad also i think wen pats played buffalo they were -1000 ml so idk how i would of done that... mayb tease them each week?

I did the math with this on the Lakers last year after about 10 games. I do not have the numbers anymore but I do remember that taking the Lakers on the ML was not Nec. profittable. The reason was because their juice was outrages. One game, against New Jersey, was -2500 on the ML. Yes, NJ was terrible, but would you put $2500 down to win $100? BTW, NJ beat BOS last year. One of these huge upsets literally sets you back a long way. Other games are more like around -600 and so forth. Except for a few other teams the Lakers play against, the money line is outrages. I'm sure it will be for MIA, BOS and a couple other teams as well.  At one stretch I think the Lakers needed to win 10 on the ML to break even with a loss.

If it can can it would have to be with a middle of the road team that plays better than everyone thought.

That's my take. Good Luck Brother.

My bad..

If taking ONE team and playing them on the ML can work it would have to be a middle of the road team that plays better than everyone thought they would.

How do we know though???

yeah i wanted to take lakers, denver, utah, n dallas on the moneyline whenever there home this season but they dont have moneyline 4 preseason so i couldnt c how bad the juice was... i do remember lakers being big favs though but with enough wins with a labby it should work good right?  

just play teams the are good ATS....i ake the line, or fade bad teams ATS..

im also looking 4 3 teams in college bball to bet on the spread 4 the season cause i did this with ncaa n its doing pretty good so far this year... do u think if i round robined them it would work cause at least 2 of them should win most of the time but im not really sure how round robins work

well in the pros there arent really any teams that do good ats... it would probly work good in college... like take the top 20 teams wen they play a team thats not rated

no1 has tried anything like this b4?

best bet in nfl is the lions 5-1 ats  LOL bet they trade that  for 5-1  wins and 1-5 ats