Posted:
#126
FLA 
0
NHL RPI now out
Posted:
#143
Bigger, bigger and bigger..............
Let's imagine L3 situation for ml -200 bets. Labby, first bet is 5 % (2,5 % + 2,5 %) of bankroll to win (10 %).
1st loss -10 % / 90 % of bank / next bet is 10 % + 2,5 % = 12,5 % to win (25 %)
2nd loss -25 % / 65 % of bank / next bet 25% + 2,5 % = 27,5 % to win (55 %)
3rd loss - 55 % / 10 % of bankroll remain.
You can make the 1st bet smaller but it only will reduce you profit before loosing streak, after that increase the number of iterations and won't protect from loss in a long run.
A similar situation will be with 5-6 losses in a row with -150 ML. And it is much more then possible.
Martingale on -200 ML is a suicide.
-5 %, -20 %, -40 %, all in?
There may participate either insane or steel-eggs-man.
0
Posted:
#144
Your just imagining, but lets look at the real world. Last 8 plays are 7-1 which equals $$$$ RC is trying to duplicate B2W's rpi strategy for mlb for the nhl. Check out the mlb rpi thread which went 83-1 for the season. Everybody knows the risk, so either grow a pair and bet or be gone.
0
Posted:
#149
Another thing t consider is regardless of the juice a win is a win. Even with the juice at -276 your still making money. Some argue that it isn't worth the risk, but I disagree. Most bettors can't see past todays game. When your playing systems like this you have to look at the season.
0
Hot Forum Topics
