For what it's worth I profited last year by fading your system....much better odds, i was even able to play some of the dogs at +1.5 PL with low juice (less than -140) both plays being winners. I was up money going into the last 3 series last season and decided to close up shop with 8.5u profit.I'm sitting this season out.Good luck as always Dan hope you cash 'em all!
oilcountry99, are you thinking about maybe Starting a thread that follows this strategy? Might be interesting to contrast/compare.
No. I run with Dan's selections using a very conservative labby strategy. 3 lines, 1 for each game.
A- .25u|.25u|.25u|.25u
B- .5u|.5u|.5u|.5u
C- .75u|.75u|.75u|.75u
For example game A losses will go back into game A line.
These plays can get juicy hence the conservative strategy, sometimes I'll play the -0.5 ML to reduce juice, depends on the matchup and handicap.
Worked out last season so I'll give it another go.
0
Quote Originally Posted by BlueStar57:
Quote Originally Posted by oilcountry99:
For what it's worth I profited last year by fading your system....much better odds, i was even able to play some of the dogs at +1.5 PL with low juice (less than -140) both plays being winners. I was up money going into the last 3 series last season and decided to close up shop with 8.5u profit.I'm sitting this season out.Good luck as always Dan hope you cash 'em all!
oilcountry99, are you thinking about maybe Starting a thread that follows this strategy? Might be interesting to contrast/compare.
No. I run with Dan's selections using a very conservative labby strategy. 3 lines, 1 for each game.
A- .25u|.25u|.25u|.25u
B- .5u|.5u|.5u|.5u
C- .75u|.75u|.75u|.75u
For example game A losses will go back into game A line.
These plays can get juicy hence the conservative strategy, sometimes I'll play the -0.5 ML to reduce juice, depends on the matchup and handicap.
Worked out last season so I'll give it another go.
oilcountry99, are you thinking about maybe Starting a thread that follows this strategy? Might be interesting to contrast/compare. No. I run with Dan's selections using a very conservative labby strategy. 3 lines, 1 for each game. A- .25u|.25u|.25u|.25u B- .5u|.5u|.5u|.5u C- .75u|.75u|.75u|.75u For example game A losses will go back into game A line. These plays can get juicy hence the conservative strategy, sometimes I'll play the -0.5 ML to reduce juice, depends on the matchup and handicap. Worked out last season so I'll give it another go.
Great conservative strategy Oil.Do you run the same Labby lines with BOTH Dan's system and your own fade system?Thanks for the idea.
I don't run the fade system, just Dan's
0
Quote Originally Posted by Irish7878:
Quote Originally Posted by oilcountry99:
oilcountry99, are you thinking about maybe Starting a thread that follows this strategy? Might be interesting to contrast/compare. No. I run with Dan's selections using a very conservative labby strategy. 3 lines, 1 for each game. A- .25u|.25u|.25u|.25u B- .5u|.5u|.5u|.5u C- .75u|.75u|.75u|.75u For example game A losses will go back into game A line. These plays can get juicy hence the conservative strategy, sometimes I'll play the -0.5 ML to reduce juice, depends on the matchup and handicap. Worked out last season so I'll give it another go.
Great conservative strategy Oil.Do you run the same Labby lines with BOTH Dan's system and your own fade system?Thanks for the idea.