nfl systems
2. A team that beat a division opponent by 28 or more points and is playing a non-division opponent....and the team who won by 28 is an underdog taking the favorite is 10-0 ATS since 2004
3. Play on home dogs of six or more points off a bye week. 24-7ATS since 2003
4. Play against any NFL road underdog or pik in a non-division game if they threw a shotout ond won by 14 or more. 30-9 ATS since 2001
2. A team that beat a division opponent by 28 or more points and is playing a non-division opponent....and the team who won by 28 is an underdog taking the favorite is 10-0 ATS since 2004
3. Play on home dogs of six or more points off a bye week. 24-7ATS since 2003
4. Play against any NFL road underdog or pik in a non-division game if they threw a shotout ond won by 14 or more. 30-9 ATS since 2001
That's six!
That's six!
because my english isnt so good I dont understand something...
1)off a bye week means after bye week?
2) underdog or pik ...what is pik?
3) if they threw a shotout ....whats this?
4) team that won su by 28....means last game?
2. A team that beat a division opponent by 28 or more points and is playing a non-division opponent....and the team who won by 28 is an underdog taking the favorite is 10-0 ATS since 2004
3. Play on home dogs of six or more points off a bye week. 24-7ATS since 2003
4. Play against any NFL road underdog or pik in a non-division game if they threw a shotout ond won by 14 or more. 30-9 ATS since 2001
because my english isnt so good I dont understand something...
1)off a bye week means after bye week?
2) underdog or pik ...what is pik?
3) if they threw a shotout ....whats this?
4) team that won su by 28....means last game?
2. A team that beat a division opponent by 28 or more points and is playing a non-division opponent....and the team who won by 28 is an underdog taking the favorite is 10-0 ATS since 2004
3. Play on home dogs of six or more points off a bye week. 24-7ATS since 2003
4. Play against any NFL road underdog or pik in a non-division game if they threw a shotout ond won by 14 or more. 30-9 ATS since 2001
detroit would be only 13 pts and
you guys forgot cleveland
so its:
sea
stl
hou
cle
oak
indy
No. Detroit was a fav of 3.5, meaning the ats score was 34-17.5, a difference of 16.5 so yes they would be a play.
Cleveland was a 6 point dog, meaning the ats score was 28-16, a difference of only 12, so no that wouldn't be a play.
detroit would be only 13 pts and
you guys forgot cleveland
so its:
sea
stl
hou
cle
oak
indy
No. Detroit was a fav of 3.5, meaning the ats score was 34-17.5, a difference of 16.5 so yes they would be a play.
Cleveland was a 6 point dog, meaning the ats score was 28-16, a difference of only 12, so no that wouldn't be a play.
PLAY ON THE TEAM THAT LOST BY THE MOST POINTS THE WEEK BEFORE:
Rams lost by 35 points on the road to the Eagles last week. Now, Home dogs playing the Super Bowl Champion Giants.
Rams +9½ & a smaller unit +350
PLAY ON THE TEAM THAT LOST BY 28 OR MORE POINTS THE WEEK BEFORE:
Rams lost by 35 points on the road to the Eagles last week. Now, Home dogs playing the Super Bowl Champion Giants.
Rams +9½ & a smaller unit +350
PLAY ON THE TEAM THAT LOST BY THE MOST POINTS THE WEEK BEFORE:
Rams lost by 35 points on the road to the Eagles last week. Now, Home dogs playing the Super Bowl Champion Giants.
Rams +9½ & a smaller unit +350
PLAY ON THE TEAM THAT LOST BY 28 OR MORE POINTS THE WEEK BEFORE:
Rams lost by 35 points on the road to the Eagles last week. Now, Home dogs playing the Super Bowl Champion Giants.
Rams +9½ & a smaller unit +350
PLAY ON THE TEAM THAT LOST BY THE MOST POINTS THE WEEK BEFORE:
Rams lost by 35 points on the road to the Eagles last week. Now, Home dogs playing the Super Bowl Champion Giants.
Rams +9½ & a smaller unit +350
PLAY ON THE TEAM THAT LOST BY 28 OR MORE POINTS THE WEEK BEFORE:
Rams lost by 35 points on the road to the Eagles last week. Now, Home dogs playing the Super Bowl Champion Giants.
Rams +9½ & a smaller unit +350
What are the stats on this?
PLAY ON THE TEAM THAT LOST BY THE MOST POINTS THE WEEK BEFORE:
Rams lost by 35 points on the road to the Eagles last week. Now, Home dogs playing the Super Bowl Champion Giants.
Rams +9½ & a smaller unit +350
PLAY ON THE TEAM THAT LOST BY 28 OR MORE POINTS THE WEEK BEFORE:
Rams lost by 35 points on the road to the Eagles last week. Now, Home dogs playing the Super Bowl Champion Giants.
Rams +9½ & a smaller unit +350
What are the stats on this?
Tomspeople
I admire your efforts on the HFOUDL System. It is a nice piece of work.
The following are through the first sixteen weeks of the NFL. Best not to play any games in the final week, and concentrate on the College Bowls because no telling which team is going to show up for the last game. Playing these losers also SU when they are Dogs produces some nice paydays.
PLAY ON THE TEAM THAT LOST BY THE MOST POINTS THE WEEK BEFORE:
Last Season 8-5-1 ATS 7-7 SU
PLAY ON THE TEAM THAT LOST BY 28 OR MORE POINTS THE WEEK BEFORE:
Last Season 11-4 ATS 8-7 SU
Tomspeople
I admire your efforts on the HFOUDL System. It is a nice piece of work.
The following are through the first sixteen weeks of the NFL. Best not to play any games in the final week, and concentrate on the College Bowls because no telling which team is going to show up for the last game. Playing these losers also SU when they are Dogs produces some nice paydays.
PLAY ON THE TEAM THAT LOST BY THE MOST POINTS THE WEEK BEFORE:
Last Season 8-5-1 ATS 7-7 SU
PLAY ON THE TEAM THAT LOST BY 28 OR MORE POINTS THE WEEK BEFORE:
Last Season 11-4 ATS 8-7 SU
No. Detroit was a fav of 3.5, meaning the ats score was 34-17.5, a difference of 16.5 so yes they would be a play.
Cleveland was a 6 point dog, meaning the ats score was 28-16, a difference of only 12, so no that wouldn't be a play.
oh... ok, didnt realize it was ats
No. Detroit was a fav of 3.5, meaning the ats score was 34-17.5, a difference of 16.5 so yes they would be a play.
Cleveland was a 6 point dog, meaning the ats score was 28-16, a difference of only 12, so no that wouldn't be a play.
oh... ok, didnt realize it was ats
I fine tuned it with three additional criteria:
1. Do NOT play on a qualifying team who underperformed the week prior if that team has yet to win a game ATS. (this eliminated the poor teams at the beginning of last year like the Saints and Rams, who kept qualifying but just could not get out of the starting gate).
2. Do NOT play on a qualifying team who underperformed the week prior if that team has an ATS winning percentage of .375 (this eliminated the bad teams throughout the season).
3. Do not play the system on the last weekend of the season. At this point, the playoff teams are mostly determined and no-one tends to play for anything that last week.
Last year: the record was 27-12 ATS (69%)
Below are the teams and their records ATS following this system using the criteria outlined above.
Buffalo (2-0)
Cincinnati (1-0)
Denver (2-1)
Houston (1-1)
Jacksonville (1-0)
Kansas City (1-0)
New England (0-1)
Oakland (1-0)
San Diego (1-1)
Tennessee (1-1)
Arizona (3-0)
Carolina (4-1)
Dallas (1-1)
Detroit (3-1)
Green Bay (1-0)
Minnesota (1-0)
New Orleans (0-1)
NY Giants (2-0)
Philadelphia (1-0)
San Francisco (0-1)
Seattle (1-1)
Tampa Bay (1-0)
Washington (0-1)
After dissecting this system every way I could think of, I found a subset and additional tightener for this system that really made a profit last year. Granted there aren't many games a year, but you have a higher probability of winning.
Using the system and applying the three criteria above, if the team qualifying the week following their terrible performance played at home, the record last year was 16-3 ATS (84%).
Of those 19 games in this subset, if the qualifying team underperformed on the road the week before, the ATS record is 11-3 (78%). However if the qualifying team underperformed at home the week before and are playing at home again, they perform much better. They were a perfect 5-0 ATS (100%) last season.
To summarize: Play on any team this week that underperformed last week by 14 or more ATS points, if they have already won at least one ATS game and have at least a .375 ATS winning percentage, especially if the qualifying team is playing at home this week.
The system is designed to begin in week 3 of the season. While there were six teams that qualify for week 2, they all fail the first two criteria ;-) The record so far is 2-2 ATS without the criteria, but look who the losers are - the Rams and Lions. And right now, I wouldn't bet a dime on them until they prove to me they can cover.
However, as of this post, looks like the only qualifier so far for next week is Kansas City. The Chiefs won ATS in week 1, but underperformed today against the Raiders. So I will be taking them unless Atlanta lays an egg in the 4th against the Bucs.
I will need to back-test this system prior to last year. I will post my findings once I have the time to do the research.
Happy winning!
I fine tuned it with three additional criteria:
1. Do NOT play on a qualifying team who underperformed the week prior if that team has yet to win a game ATS. (this eliminated the poor teams at the beginning of last year like the Saints and Rams, who kept qualifying but just could not get out of the starting gate).
2. Do NOT play on a qualifying team who underperformed the week prior if that team has an ATS winning percentage of .375 (this eliminated the bad teams throughout the season).
3. Do not play the system on the last weekend of the season. At this point, the playoff teams are mostly determined and no-one tends to play for anything that last week.
Last year: the record was 27-12 ATS (69%)
Below are the teams and their records ATS following this system using the criteria outlined above.
Buffalo (2-0)
Cincinnati (1-0)
Denver (2-1)
Houston (1-1)
Jacksonville (1-0)
Kansas City (1-0)
New England (0-1)
Oakland (1-0)
San Diego (1-1)
Tennessee (1-1)
Arizona (3-0)
Carolina (4-1)
Dallas (1-1)
Detroit (3-1)
Green Bay (1-0)
Minnesota (1-0)
New Orleans (0-1)
NY Giants (2-0)
Philadelphia (1-0)
San Francisco (0-1)
Seattle (1-1)
Tampa Bay (1-0)
Washington (0-1)
After dissecting this system every way I could think of, I found a subset and additional tightener for this system that really made a profit last year. Granted there aren't many games a year, but you have a higher probability of winning.
Using the system and applying the three criteria above, if the team qualifying the week following their terrible performance played at home, the record last year was 16-3 ATS (84%).
Of those 19 games in this subset, if the qualifying team underperformed on the road the week before, the ATS record is 11-3 (78%). However if the qualifying team underperformed at home the week before and are playing at home again, they perform much better. They were a perfect 5-0 ATS (100%) last season.
To summarize: Play on any team this week that underperformed last week by 14 or more ATS points, if they have already won at least one ATS game and have at least a .375 ATS winning percentage, especially if the qualifying team is playing at home this week.
The system is designed to begin in week 3 of the season. While there were six teams that qualify for week 2, they all fail the first two criteria ;-) The record so far is 2-2 ATS without the criteria, but look who the losers are - the Rams and Lions. And right now, I wouldn't bet a dime on them until they prove to me they can cover.
However, as of this post, looks like the only qualifier so far for next week is Kansas City. The Chiefs won ATS in week 1, but underperformed today against the Raiders. So I will be taking them unless Atlanta lays an egg in the 4th against the Bucs.
I will need to back-test this system prior to last year. I will post my findings once I have the time to do the research.
Happy winning!
I was just looking at the bounceback theory just this afternoon as a matter of fact, I played it last year with great results.
I fine tuned it with three additional criteria:
1. Do NOT play on a qualifying team who underperformed the week prior if that team has yet to win a game ATS. (this eliminated the poor teams at the beginning of last year like the Saints and Rams, who kept qualifying but just could not get out of the starting gate).
2. Do NOT play on a qualifying team who underperformed the week prior if that team has an ATS winning percentage of .375 (this eliminated the bad teams throughout the season).
3. Do not play the system on the last weekend of the season. At this point, the playoff teams are mostly determined and no-one tends to play for anything that last week.
Last year: the record was 27-12 ATS (69%)
Below are the teams and their records ATS following this system using the criteria outlined above.
Buffalo (2-0)
Cincinnati (1-0)
Denver (2-1)
Houston (1-1)
Jacksonville (1-0)
Kansas City (1-0)
New England (0-1)
Oakland (1-0)
San Diego (1-1)
Tennessee (1-1)
Arizona (3-0)
Carolina (4-1)
Dallas (1-1)
Detroit (3-1)
Green Bay (1-0)
Minnesota (1-0)
New Orleans (0-1)
NY Giants (2-0)
Philadelphia (1-0)
San Francisco (0-1)
Seattle (1-1)
Tampa Bay (1-0)
Washington (0-1)
After dissecting this system every way I could think of, I found a subset and additional tightener for this system that really made a profit last year. Granted there aren't many games a year, but you have a higher probability of winning.
Using the system and applying the three criteria above, if the team qualifying the week following their terrible performance played at home, the record last year was 16-3 ATS (84%).
Of those 19 games in this subset, if the qualifying team underperformed on the road the week before, the ATS record is 11-3 (78%). However if the qualifying team underperformed at home the week before and are playing at home again, they perform much better. They were a perfect 5-0 ATS (100%) last season.
To summarize: Play on any team this week that underperformed last week by 14 or more ATS points, if they have already won at least one ATS game and have at least a .375 ATS winning percentage, especially if the qualifying team is playing at home this week.
The system is designed to begin in week 3 of the season. While there were six teams that qualify for week 2, they all fail the first two criteria ;-) The record so far is 2-2 ATS without the criteria, but look who the losers are - the Rams and Lions. And right now, I wouldn't bet a dime on them until they prove to me they can cover.
However, as of this post, looks like the only qualifier so far for next week is Kansas City. The Chiefs won ATS in week 1, but underperformed today against the Raiders. So I will be taking them unless Atlanta lays an egg in the 4th against the Bucs.
I will need to back-test this system prior to last year. I will post my findings once I have the time to do the research.
Happy winning!
Great info USA. Very interesting. Enjoying this thread very much.
I was just looking at the bounceback theory just this afternoon as a matter of fact, I played it last year with great results.
I fine tuned it with three additional criteria:
1. Do NOT play on a qualifying team who underperformed the week prior if that team has yet to win a game ATS. (this eliminated the poor teams at the beginning of last year like the Saints and Rams, who kept qualifying but just could not get out of the starting gate).
2. Do NOT play on a qualifying team who underperformed the week prior if that team has an ATS winning percentage of .375 (this eliminated the bad teams throughout the season).
3. Do not play the system on the last weekend of the season. At this point, the playoff teams are mostly determined and no-one tends to play for anything that last week.
Last year: the record was 27-12 ATS (69%)
Below are the teams and their records ATS following this system using the criteria outlined above.
Buffalo (2-0)
Cincinnati (1-0)
Denver (2-1)
Houston (1-1)
Jacksonville (1-0)
Kansas City (1-0)
New England (0-1)
Oakland (1-0)
San Diego (1-1)
Tennessee (1-1)
Arizona (3-0)
Carolina (4-1)
Dallas (1-1)
Detroit (3-1)
Green Bay (1-0)
Minnesota (1-0)
New Orleans (0-1)
NY Giants (2-0)
Philadelphia (1-0)
San Francisco (0-1)
Seattle (1-1)
Tampa Bay (1-0)
Washington (0-1)
After dissecting this system every way I could think of, I found a subset and additional tightener for this system that really made a profit last year. Granted there aren't many games a year, but you have a higher probability of winning.
Using the system and applying the three criteria above, if the team qualifying the week following their terrible performance played at home, the record last year was 16-3 ATS (84%).
Of those 19 games in this subset, if the qualifying team underperformed on the road the week before, the ATS record is 11-3 (78%). However if the qualifying team underperformed at home the week before and are playing at home again, they perform much better. They were a perfect 5-0 ATS (100%) last season.
To summarize: Play on any team this week that underperformed last week by 14 or more ATS points, if they have already won at least one ATS game and have at least a .375 ATS winning percentage, especially if the qualifying team is playing at home this week.
The system is designed to begin in week 3 of the season. While there were six teams that qualify for week 2, they all fail the first two criteria ;-) The record so far is 2-2 ATS without the criteria, but look who the losers are - the Rams and Lions. And right now, I wouldn't bet a dime on them until they prove to me they can cover.
However, as of this post, looks like the only qualifier so far for next week is Kansas City. The Chiefs won ATS in week 1, but underperformed today against the Raiders. So I will be taking them unless Atlanta lays an egg in the 4th against the Bucs.
I will need to back-test this system prior to last year. I will post my findings once I have the time to do the research.
Happy winning!
Great info USA. Very interesting. Enjoying this thread very much.
Hot Forum Topics
-
🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵
449,489
-
Giants vs Rams MNF in-game live
2,481
-
Monday 09/21/2026
460
-
Serious Streak Survivor Strategies
1,918,168
-
***Macwesties * Mon. Sept. 21, 2026 * Birthday * NFL * MNF * Football Play***
4,130
-
NFL LOCKED IN!
99,546
-
New York Giants @ Los Angeles Rams
5,056
-
Where are they getting enough explosive offense to separate from New York by more than a touchdown
2,566
-
?? KBO Plays 🥎
14,775
-
Monday Night
4,406
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
