• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Kalshi Referral Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • Polymarket Referral Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • Betr Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
      • Gemini Predictions Promo Code
    • NFL Week 3
      NFL Week 3
      • NFL Odds
      • NFL Picks
      • Falcons-Packers Picks
      • Survivor Picks
      • Week 3 Odds
      • NFL Prediction Markets
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | Systems & Strategies

    nfl systems

    hunter49
    eppy224
    AcresofDiamonds
    ILLflipYA
    king08
    ...
    Participants:
    Search model icon
    Views: 2290
    Posts: 24
     
    hunter49
    hunter49
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2006
    Posts: 13
    Posted: Sep. 5, 2008 - 1:12 PM ET #1


    I Was Reading Another Thread And I Saw Someone Ask About The Bounce Back System. Last Year I Made Over 7,000 With A System Record Of 44-23-1. (135-77 Over The Last 3 Years) If Anyone Else Is Wondering How It Works Here Is The System And An Example.
    IF A TEAM UNDERACHIEVES THE SPREAD BY 14 PTS. OR MORE BET ON THEM THE FOLLOWING WEEK.
    EX: WEEK3 DETROIT LOST TO PHILADELPHIA 56-21 AS A 5 PT. DOG(UNDERACHIEVED THE SPREAD BY A WHOPPING 30 PTS). THE FOLLOWING WEEK DETROIT WAS A 2.5 PT. DOG TO THE BEARS AND WON THE GAME STRIAGHT UP 37-27. (DETROIT COVERS).
    THAT'S THE SYSTEM I USE
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    To remove first post, remove entire topic.

    I Was Reading Another Thread And I Saw Someone Ask About The Bounce Back System. Last Year I Made Over 7,000 With A System Record Of 44-23-1. (135-77 Over The Last 3 Years) If Anyone Else Is Wondering How It Works Here Is The System And An Example.
    IF A TEAM UNDERACHIEVES THE SPREAD BY 14 PTS. OR MORE BET ON THEM THE FOLLOWING WEEK.
    EX: WEEK3 DETROIT LOST TO PHILADELPHIA 56-21 AS A 5 PT. DOG(UNDERACHIEVED THE SPREAD BY A WHOPPING 30 PTS). THE FOLLOWING WEEK DETROIT WAS A 2.5 PT. DOG TO THE BEARS AND WON THE GAME STRIAGHT UP 37-27. (DETROIT COVERS).
    THAT'S THE SYSTEM I USE
     
    hunter49
    hunter49
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2006
    Posts: 13
    Posted: Sep. 5, 2008 - 1:13 PM ET #2


    HERE'S A FEW MORE:
    1. Play under when you have a home favorite of three or less points and off a bye week. 30-6 under. since 2003


    2. A team that beat a division opponent by 28 or more points and is playing a non-division opponent....and the team who won by 28 is an underdog taking the favorite is 10-0 ATS since 2004

    3. Play on home dogs of six or more points off a bye week. 24-7ATS since 2003

    4. Play against any NFL road underdog or pik in a non-division game if they threw a shotout ond won by 14 or more. 30-9 ATS since 2001
    5. playing against a team that won su by 28 or more 22-9ATS last year
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    HERE'S A FEW MORE:
    1. Play under when you have a home favorite of three or less points and off a bye week. 30-6 under. since 2003


    2. A team that beat a division opponent by 28 or more points and is playing a non-division opponent....and the team who won by 28 is an underdog taking the favorite is 10-0 ATS since 2004

    3. Play on home dogs of six or more points off a bye week. 24-7ATS since 2003

    4. Play against any NFL road underdog or pik in a non-division game if they threw a shotout ond won by 14 or more. 30-9 ATS since 2001
    5. playing against a team that won su by 28 or more 22-9ATS last year
     
    eppy224
    eppy224
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2007
    Posts: 111
    Posted: Sep. 5, 2008 - 7:24 PM ET #3

    Good info Mr. Hunter.  Appreciate the contribution.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Good info Mr. Hunter.  Appreciate the contribution.
     
    AcresofDiamonds
    AcresofDiamonds
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2007
    Posts: 44
    Posted: Sep. 6, 2008 - 6:25 AM ET #4

    I remember that Chicago Bears at Detroit Lions game as if it was played today. Chicago led 13-3 after three quarters, collapsed, and allowed an NFL record setting 34 fourth quarter points. The very embarrassed Bears traveled to Green Bay the following week upsetting the Packers as +3 1/2 dogs, paying +165 on the money line in a Sunday Night Football game. My favorite, and most profitable bet ever is on a team that allowed a record set against them the week before.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    I remember that Chicago Bears at Detroit Lions game as if it was played today. Chicago led 13-3 after three quarters, collapsed, and allowed an NFL record setting 34 fourth quarter points. The very embarrassed Bears traveled to Green Bay the following week upsetting the Packers as +3 1/2 dogs, paying +165 on the money line in a Sunday Night Football game. My favorite, and most profitable bet ever is on a team that allowed a record set against them the week before.
     
    ILLflipYA
    ILLflipYA
    Covers Rehab
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2008
    Posts: 167
    Posted: Sep. 6, 2008 - 6:13 PM ET #5

    5. playing against a team that won su by 28 or more 22-9ATS last year
     
    can you explain this one alittle more for me
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    5. playing against a team that won su by 28 or more 22-9ATS last year
     
    can you explain this one alittle more for me
     
    king08
    king08
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2006
    Posts: 3293
    Posted: Sep. 9, 2008 - 12:23 PM ET #6

    so what are the plays for this week?
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    so what are the plays for this week?
     
    iamian
    iamian
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2008
    Posts: 64
    Posted: Sep. 9, 2008 - 2:21 PM ET #7

    I think the first system ( 14 PTS):

    indianapolis

    st. louis

    seattle

    detroit
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    I think the first system ( 14 PTS):

    indianapolis

    st. louis

    seattle

    detroit
     
    eppy224
    eppy224
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2007
    Posts: 111
    Posted: Sep. 9, 2008 - 4:15 PM ET #8

    Quote Originally Posted by iamian:

    I think the first system ( 14 PTS):

    indianapolis

    st. louis

    seattle

    detroit

    What about Houston?

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by iamian:

    I think the first system ( 14 PTS):

    indianapolis

    st. louis

    seattle

    detroit

    What about Houston?

     
    eppy224
    eppy224
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2007
    Posts: 111
    Posted: Sep. 9, 2008 - 4:17 PM ET #9

    Quote Originally Posted by eppy224:

    What about Houston?

    And Oakland, for that matter.  Didn't they underacheive by more than 14 points?

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by eppy224:

    What about Houston?

    And Oakland, for that matter.  Didn't they underacheive by more than 14 points?

     
    duby
    duby
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2005
    Posts: 1936
    Posted: Sep. 9, 2008 - 8:51 PM ET #10

    I have a total of seven games that falls in this system:
     
    Detroit
    Seattle
    StLouis
    Houston
    Oakland
    Indy
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    I have a total of seven games that falls in this system:
     
    Detroit
    Seattle
    StLouis
    Houston
    Oakland
    Indy
     
    eppy224
    eppy224
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2007
    Posts: 111
    Posted: Sep. 9, 2008 - 10:00 PM ET #11

    Quote Originally Posted by duby:

    I have a total of seven games that falls in this system:
     
    Detroit
    Seattle
    StLouis
    Houston
    Oakland
    Indy

    That's six!

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by duby:

    I have a total of seven games that falls in this system:
     
    Detroit
    Seattle
    StLouis
    Houston
    Oakland
    Indy

    That's six!

     
    iamian
    iamian
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2008
    Posts: 64
    Posted: Sep. 10, 2008 - 2:55 PM ET #12

    Hi,
    Hunter, you have created this system or found it somewhere?

    Jan

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Hi,
    Hunter, you have created this system or found it somewhere?

    Jan

     
    duby
    duby
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2005
    Posts: 1936
    Posted: Sep. 10, 2008 - 6:35 PM ET #13

    My bad, your right its 6 games...hahaha
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    My bad, your right its 6 games...hahaha
     
    NeimanMarcus
    NeimanMarcus
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2008
    Posts: 108
    Posted: Sep. 11, 2008 - 3:41 AM ET #14

    Where do you guys get the previous weeks spreads?
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Where do you guys get the previous weeks spreads?
     
    iamian
    iamian
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2008
    Posts: 64
    Posted: Sep. 12, 2008 - 1:32 PM ET #15

    Hi there,
    because my english isnt so good I dont understand something...
    1)off a bye week  means after bye week?
    2) underdog or pik  ...what is pik?
    3) if they threw a shotout ....whats this?
    4) team that won su by 28....means last game?



    Quote Originally Posted by hunter49:


    HERE'S A FEW MORE:
    1. Play under when you have a home favorite of three or less points and off a bye week. 30-6 under. since 2003


    2. A team that beat a division opponent by 28 or more points and is playing a non-division opponent....and the team who won by 28 is an underdog taking the favorite is 10-0 ATS since 2004

    3. Play on home dogs of six or more points off a bye week. 24-7ATS since 2003

    4. Play against any NFL road underdog or pik in a non-division game if they threw a shotout ond won by 14 or more. 30-9 ATS since 2001
    5. playing against a team that won su by 28 or more 22-9ATS last year
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Hi there,
    because my english isnt so good I dont understand something...
    1)off a bye week  means after bye week?
    2) underdog or pik  ...what is pik?
    3) if they threw a shotout ....whats this?
    4) team that won su by 28....means last game?



    Quote Originally Posted by hunter49:


    HERE'S A FEW MORE:
    1. Play under when you have a home favorite of three or less points and off a bye week. 30-6 under. since 2003


    2. A team that beat a division opponent by 28 or more points and is playing a non-division opponent....and the team who won by 28 is an underdog taking the favorite is 10-0 ATS since 2004

    3. Play on home dogs of six or more points off a bye week. 24-7ATS since 2003

    4. Play against any NFL road underdog or pik in a non-division game if they threw a shotout ond won by 14 or more. 30-9 ATS since 2001
    5. playing against a team that won su by 28 or more 22-9ATS last year
     
    openbahr
    openbahr
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2002
    Posts: 497
    Posted: Sep. 13, 2008 - 6:22 PM ET #16

    detroit would be only 13 pts and
    you guys forgot cleveland

    so its:
    sea
    stl
    hou
    cle
    oak
    indy
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    detroit would be only 13 pts and
    you guys forgot cleveland

    so its:
    sea
    stl
    hou
    cle
    oak
    indy
     
    Tomspeople
    Tomspeople
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2007
    Posts: 1476
    Posted: Sep. 13, 2008 - 7:23 PM ET #17

    Quote Originally Posted by openbahr:

    detroit would be only 13 pts and
    you guys forgot cleveland

    so its:
    sea
    stl
    hou
    cle
    oak
    indy

    No. Detroit was a fav of 3.5, meaning the ats score was 34-17.5, a difference of 16.5 so yes they would be a play.

    Cleveland was a 6 point dog, meaning the ats score was 28-16, a difference of only 12, so no that wouldn't be a play.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by openbahr:

    detroit would be only 13 pts and
    you guys forgot cleveland

    so its:
    sea
    stl
    hou
    cle
    oak
    indy

    No. Detroit was a fav of 3.5, meaning the ats score was 34-17.5, a difference of 16.5 so yes they would be a play.

    Cleveland was a 6 point dog, meaning the ats score was 28-16, a difference of only 12, so no that wouldn't be a play.

     
    AcresofDiamonds
    AcresofDiamonds
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2007
    Posts: 44
    Posted: Sep. 13, 2008 - 8:04 PM ET #18

    Here is a variation of the hunter49 plays. I  had great success over the years with the following strategy:
     

    PLAY ON THE TEAM THAT LOST BY THE MOST POINTS THE WEEK BEFORE:
    Rams lost by 35 points on the road to the Eagles last week. Now, Home dogs playing the Super Bowl Champion Giants.
    Rams +9½  & a smaller unit +350
     

    PLAY ON THE TEAM THAT LOST BY 28 OR MORE POINTS THE WEEK BEFORE:
    Rams lost by 35 points on the road to the Eagles last week. Now, Home dogs playing the Super Bowl Champion Giants.
    Rams +9½  & a smaller unit +350
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Here is a variation of the hunter49 plays. I  had great success over the years with the following strategy:
     

    PLAY ON THE TEAM THAT LOST BY THE MOST POINTS THE WEEK BEFORE:
    Rams lost by 35 points on the road to the Eagles last week. Now, Home dogs playing the Super Bowl Champion Giants.
    Rams +9½  & a smaller unit +350
     

    PLAY ON THE TEAM THAT LOST BY 28 OR MORE POINTS THE WEEK BEFORE:
    Rams lost by 35 points on the road to the Eagles last week. Now, Home dogs playing the Super Bowl Champion Giants.
    Rams +9½  & a smaller unit +350
     
    Tomspeople
    Tomspeople
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2007
    Posts: 1476
    Posted: Sep. 13, 2008 - 11:36 PM ET #19

    Quote Originally Posted by AcresofDiamonds:

    Here is a variation of the hunter49 plays. I  had great success over the years with the following strategy:
     

    PLAY ON THE TEAM THAT LOST BY THE MOST POINTS THE WEEK BEFORE:
    Rams lost by 35 points on the road to the Eagles last week. Now, Home dogs playing the Super Bowl Champion Giants.
    Rams +9½  & a smaller unit +350
     

    PLAY ON THE TEAM THAT LOST BY 28 OR MORE POINTS THE WEEK BEFORE:
    Rams lost by 35 points on the road to the Eagles last week. Now, Home dogs playing the Super Bowl Champion Giants.
    Rams +9½  & a smaller unit +350

    What are the stats on this?

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by AcresofDiamonds:

    Here is a variation of the hunter49 plays. I  had great success over the years with the following strategy:
     

    PLAY ON THE TEAM THAT LOST BY THE MOST POINTS THE WEEK BEFORE:
    Rams lost by 35 points on the road to the Eagles last week. Now, Home dogs playing the Super Bowl Champion Giants.
    Rams +9½  & a smaller unit +350
     

    PLAY ON THE TEAM THAT LOST BY 28 OR MORE POINTS THE WEEK BEFORE:
    Rams lost by 35 points on the road to the Eagles last week. Now, Home dogs playing the Super Bowl Champion Giants.
    Rams +9½  & a smaller unit +350

    What are the stats on this?

     
    AcresofDiamonds
    AcresofDiamonds
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2007
    Posts: 44
    Posted: Sep. 14, 2008 - 4:41 AM ET #20

    Tomspeople

    I admire your efforts on the HFOUDL System. It is a nice piece of work.

    The following are through the first sixteen weeks of the NFL. Best not to play any games in the final week, and concentrate on the College Bowls because no telling which team is going to show up for the last game. Playing these losers also SU when they are Dogs produces some nice  paydays.

    PLAY ON THE TEAM THAT LOST BY THE MOST POINTS THE WEEK BEFORE:
    Last Season 8-5-1 ATS  7-7 SU

    PLAY ON THE TEAM THAT LOST BY 28 OR MORE POINTS THE WEEK BEFORE:
    Last Season 11-4 ATS  8-7 SU

     

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Tomspeople

    I admire your efforts on the HFOUDL System. It is a nice piece of work.

    The following are through the first sixteen weeks of the NFL. Best not to play any games in the final week, and concentrate on the College Bowls because no telling which team is going to show up for the last game. Playing these losers also SU when they are Dogs produces some nice  paydays.

    PLAY ON THE TEAM THAT LOST BY THE MOST POINTS THE WEEK BEFORE:
    Last Season 8-5-1 ATS  7-7 SU

    PLAY ON THE TEAM THAT LOST BY 28 OR MORE POINTS THE WEEK BEFORE:
    Last Season 11-4 ATS  8-7 SU

     

     
    Redlad
    Redlad
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2001
    Posts: 6822
    Posted: Sep. 14, 2008 - 6:31 AM ET #21

    The 14 point system was sold by Kelso Sturgeon about 20 years ago. It's had it's up & down years since that time. hope that helps.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    The 14 point system was sold by Kelso Sturgeon about 20 years ago. It's had it's up & down years since that time. hope that helps.
     
    openbahr
    openbahr
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2002
    Posts: 497
    Posted: Sep. 14, 2008 - 9:48 AM ET #22

    Quote Originally Posted by Tomspeople:

    No. Detroit was a fav of 3.5, meaning the ats score was 34-17.5, a difference of 16.5 so yes they would be a play.

    Cleveland was a 6 point dog, meaning the ats score was 28-16, a difference of only 12, so no that wouldn't be a play.




    oh... ok, didnt realize it was ats
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by Tomspeople:

    No. Detroit was a fav of 3.5, meaning the ats score was 34-17.5, a difference of 16.5 so yes they would be a play.

    Cleveland was a 6 point dog, meaning the ats score was 28-16, a difference of only 12, so no that wouldn't be a play.




    oh... ok, didnt realize it was ats
     
    usakangy
    usakangy
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2006
    Posts: 2894
    Posted: Sep. 14, 2008 - 6:43 PM ET #23

    I was just looking at the bounceback theory just this afternoon as a matter of fact, I played it last year with great results.

    I fine tuned it with three additional criteria:

    1.  Do NOT play on a qualifying team who underperformed the week prior if that team has yet to win a game ATS.  (this eliminated the poor teams at the beginning of last year like the Saints and Rams, who kept qualifying but just could not get out of the starting gate).
    2.  Do NOT play on a qualifying team who underperformed the week prior if that team has an ATS winning percentage of .375 (this eliminated the bad teams throughout the season).
    3.  Do not play the system on the last weekend of the season.  At this point, the playoff teams are mostly determined and no-one tends to play for anything that last week.

    Last year: the record was 27-12 ATS (69%)


    Below are the teams and their records ATS following this system using the criteria outlined above.

    Buffalo (2-0)
    Cincinnati (1-0)
    Denver (2-1)
    Houston (1-1)
    Jacksonville (1-0)
    Kansas City (1-0)
    New England (0-1)
    Oakland (1-0)
    San Diego (1-1)
    Tennessee (1-1)

    Arizona (3-0)
    Carolina (4-1)
    Dallas (1-1)
    Detroit (3-1)
    Green Bay (1-0)
    Minnesota (1-0)
    New Orleans (0-1)
    NY Giants (2-0)
    Philadelphia (1-0)
    San Francisco (0-1)
    Seattle (1-1)
    Tampa Bay (1-0)
    Washington (0-1)


    After dissecting this system every way I could think of, I found a subset and additional tightener for this system that really made a profit last year.  Granted there aren't many games a year, but you have a higher probability of winning. 

    Using the system and applying the three criteria above, if the team qualifying the week following their terrible performance played at home, the record last year was 16-3 ATS (84%). 

    Of those 19 games in this subset, if the qualifying team underperformed on the road the week before, the ATS record is 11-3 (78%).  However if the qualifying team underperformed at home the week before and are playing at home again, they perform much better.  They were a perfect 5-0 ATS (100%) last season.


    To summarize: Play on any team this week that underperformed last week by 14 or more ATS points, if they have already won at least one ATS game and have at least a .375 ATS winning percentage, especially if the qualifying team is playing at home this week.


    The system is designed to begin in week 3 of the season.  While there were six teams that qualify for week 2, they all fail the first two criteria ;-)  The record so far is 2-2 ATS without the criteria, but look who the losers are - the Rams and Lions.  And right now, I wouldn't bet a dime on them until they prove to me they can cover.

    However, as of this post, looks like the only qualifier so far for next week is Kansas City.  The Chiefs won ATS in week 1, but underperformed today against the Raiders.  So I will be taking them unless Atlanta lays an egg in the 4th against the Bucs.

    I will need to back-test this system prior to last year.  I will post my findings once I have the time to do the research.

    Happy winning!
     


    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    I was just looking at the bounceback theory just this afternoon as a matter of fact, I played it last year with great results.

    I fine tuned it with three additional criteria:

    1.  Do NOT play on a qualifying team who underperformed the week prior if that team has yet to win a game ATS.  (this eliminated the poor teams at the beginning of last year like the Saints and Rams, who kept qualifying but just could not get out of the starting gate).
    2.  Do NOT play on a qualifying team who underperformed the week prior if that team has an ATS winning percentage of .375 (this eliminated the bad teams throughout the season).
    3.  Do not play the system on the last weekend of the season.  At this point, the playoff teams are mostly determined and no-one tends to play for anything that last week.

    Last year: the record was 27-12 ATS (69%)


    Below are the teams and their records ATS following this system using the criteria outlined above.

    Buffalo (2-0)
    Cincinnati (1-0)
    Denver (2-1)
    Houston (1-1)
    Jacksonville (1-0)
    Kansas City (1-0)
    New England (0-1)
    Oakland (1-0)
    San Diego (1-1)
    Tennessee (1-1)

    Arizona (3-0)
    Carolina (4-1)
    Dallas (1-1)
    Detroit (3-1)
    Green Bay (1-0)
    Minnesota (1-0)
    New Orleans (0-1)
    NY Giants (2-0)
    Philadelphia (1-0)
    San Francisco (0-1)
    Seattle (1-1)
    Tampa Bay (1-0)
    Washington (0-1)


    After dissecting this system every way I could think of, I found a subset and additional tightener for this system that really made a profit last year.  Granted there aren't many games a year, but you have a higher probability of winning. 

    Using the system and applying the three criteria above, if the team qualifying the week following their terrible performance played at home, the record last year was 16-3 ATS (84%). 

    Of those 19 games in this subset, if the qualifying team underperformed on the road the week before, the ATS record is 11-3 (78%).  However if the qualifying team underperformed at home the week before and are playing at home again, they perform much better.  They were a perfect 5-0 ATS (100%) last season.


    To summarize: Play on any team this week that underperformed last week by 14 or more ATS points, if they have already won at least one ATS game and have at least a .375 ATS winning percentage, especially if the qualifying team is playing at home this week.


    The system is designed to begin in week 3 of the season.  While there were six teams that qualify for week 2, they all fail the first two criteria ;-)  The record so far is 2-2 ATS without the criteria, but look who the losers are - the Rams and Lions.  And right now, I wouldn't bet a dime on them until they prove to me they can cover.

    However, as of this post, looks like the only qualifier so far for next week is Kansas City.  The Chiefs won ATS in week 1, but underperformed today against the Raiders.  So I will be taking them unless Atlanta lays an egg in the 4th against the Bucs.

    I will need to back-test this system prior to last year.  I will post my findings once I have the time to do the research.

    Happy winning!
     


     
     
    eppy224
    eppy224
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2007
    Posts: 111
    Posted: Sep. 14, 2008 - 11:16 PM ET #24

    Quote Originally Posted by usakangy:

    I was just looking at the bounceback theory just this afternoon as a matter of fact, I played it last year with great results.

    I fine tuned it with three additional criteria:

    1.  Do NOT play on a qualifying team who underperformed the week prior if that team has yet to win a game ATS.  (this eliminated the poor teams at the beginning of last year like the Saints and Rams, who kept qualifying but just could not get out of the starting gate).
    2.  Do NOT play on a qualifying team who underperformed the week prior if that team has an ATS winning percentage of .375 (this eliminated the bad teams throughout the season).
    3.  Do not play the system on the last weekend of the season.  At this point, the playoff teams are mostly determined and no-one tends to play for anything that last week.

    Last year: the record was 27-12 ATS (69%)


    Below are the teams and their records ATS following this system using the criteria outlined above.

    Buffalo (2-0)
    Cincinnati (1-0)
    Denver (2-1)
    Houston (1-1)
    Jacksonville (1-0)
    Kansas City (1-0)
    New England (0-1)
    Oakland (1-0)
    San Diego (1-1)
    Tennessee (1-1)

    Arizona (3-0)
    Carolina (4-1)
    Dallas (1-1)
    Detroit (3-1)
    Green Bay (1-0)
    Minnesota (1-0)
    New Orleans (0-1)
    NY Giants (2-0)
    Philadelphia (1-0)
    San Francisco (0-1)
    Seattle (1-1)
    Tampa Bay (1-0)
    Washington (0-1)


    After dissecting this system every way I could think of, I found a subset and additional tightener for this system that really made a profit last year.  Granted there aren't many games a year, but you have a higher probability of winning. 

    Using the system and applying the three criteria above, if the team qualifying the week following their terrible performance played at home, the record last year was 16-3 ATS (84%). 

    Of those 19 games in this subset, if the qualifying team underperformed on the road the week before, the ATS record is 11-3 (78%).  However if the qualifying team underperformed at home the week before and are playing at home again, they perform much better.  They were a perfect 5-0 ATS (100%) last season.


    To summarize: Play on any team this week that underperformed last week by 14 or more ATS points, if they have already won at least one ATS game and have at least a .375 ATS winning percentage, especially if the qualifying team is playing at home this week.


    The system is designed to begin in week 3 of the season.  While there were six teams that qualify for week 2, they all fail the first two criteria ;-)  The record so far is 2-2 ATS without the criteria, but look who the losers are - the Rams and Lions.  And right now, I wouldn't bet a dime on them until they prove to me they can cover.

    However, as of this post, looks like the only qualifier so far for next week is Kansas City.  The Chiefs won ATS in week 1, but underperformed today against the Raiders.  So I will be taking them unless Atlanta lays an egg in the 4th against the Bucs.

    I will need to back-test this system prior to last year.  I will post my findings once I have the time to do the research.

    Happy winning!
     


    Great info USA.  Very interesting.  Enjoying this thread very much.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by usakangy:

    I was just looking at the bounceback theory just this afternoon as a matter of fact, I played it last year with great results.

    I fine tuned it with three additional criteria:

    1.  Do NOT play on a qualifying team who underperformed the week prior if that team has yet to win a game ATS.  (this eliminated the poor teams at the beginning of last year like the Saints and Rams, who kept qualifying but just could not get out of the starting gate).
    2.  Do NOT play on a qualifying team who underperformed the week prior if that team has an ATS winning percentage of .375 (this eliminated the bad teams throughout the season).
    3.  Do not play the system on the last weekend of the season.  At this point, the playoff teams are mostly determined and no-one tends to play for anything that last week.

    Last year: the record was 27-12 ATS (69%)


    Below are the teams and their records ATS following this system using the criteria outlined above.

    Buffalo (2-0)
    Cincinnati (1-0)
    Denver (2-1)
    Houston (1-1)
    Jacksonville (1-0)
    Kansas City (1-0)
    New England (0-1)
    Oakland (1-0)
    San Diego (1-1)
    Tennessee (1-1)

    Arizona (3-0)
    Carolina (4-1)
    Dallas (1-1)
    Detroit (3-1)
    Green Bay (1-0)
    Minnesota (1-0)
    New Orleans (0-1)
    NY Giants (2-0)
    Philadelphia (1-0)
    San Francisco (0-1)
    Seattle (1-1)
    Tampa Bay (1-0)
    Washington (0-1)


    After dissecting this system every way I could think of, I found a subset and additional tightener for this system that really made a profit last year.  Granted there aren't many games a year, but you have a higher probability of winning. 

    Using the system and applying the three criteria above, if the team qualifying the week following their terrible performance played at home, the record last year was 16-3 ATS (84%). 

    Of those 19 games in this subset, if the qualifying team underperformed on the road the week before, the ATS record is 11-3 (78%).  However if the qualifying team underperformed at home the week before and are playing at home again, they perform much better.  They were a perfect 5-0 ATS (100%) last season.


    To summarize: Play on any team this week that underperformed last week by 14 or more ATS points, if they have already won at least one ATS game and have at least a .375 ATS winning percentage, especially if the qualifying team is playing at home this week.


    The system is designed to begin in week 3 of the season.  While there were six teams that qualify for week 2, they all fail the first two criteria ;-)  The record so far is 2-2 ATS without the criteria, but look who the losers are - the Rams and Lions.  And right now, I wouldn't bet a dime on them until they prove to me they can cover.

    However, as of this post, looks like the only qualifier so far for next week is Kansas City.  The Chiefs won ATS in week 1, but underperformed today against the Raiders.  So I will be taking them unless Atlanta lays an egg in the 4th against the Bucs.

    I will need to back-test this system prior to last year.  I will post my findings once I have the time to do the research.

    Happy winning!
     


    Great info USA.  Very interesting.  Enjoying this thread very much.

    All Forums | Systems & Strategies

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 449,489 Covers arrow
    • Giants vs Rams MNF in-game live 2,481 Covers arrow
    • Monday 09/21/2026 460 Covers arrow
    • Serious Streak Survivor Strategies 1,918,168 Covers arrow
    • ***Macwesties * Mon. Sept. 21, 2026 * Birthday * NFL * MNF * Football Play*** 4,130 Covers arrow
    • NFL LOCKED IN! 99,546 Covers arrow
    • New York Giants @ Los Angeles Rams 5,056 Covers arrow
    • Where are they getting enough explosive offense to separate from New York by more than a touchdown 2,566 Covers arrow
    • ?? KBO Plays 🥎 14,775 Covers arrow
    • Monday Night 4,406 Covers arrow

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.