NEW Nfl systems to add for next year.

Question

Been at this a long time so here we go.Teams that did great ATS and caused books to lose money are adjusted for next year higher spreads on tougher schedules.Broncos and Seahawks and 49ers The superbowl loser will not be back year following we now have 21 years of losers in playoffs 49ers last one Patriots year before and they were at home.Teams that score 40 pts &gt; in playoffs are now 2-24 ATS in next playoff game Patriots &amp; Colts Teams that had to overcome a 17 point or higher defecit in 2nd half are toast next week as a favorite.Example Patriots down 24-0 to broncos came back to win in OT next week away @ Texans - 7 1/2 points Pats almost lost the game 34-31 win.Many teams are burning money when chalked by DD&#x27;s 10 &#x2B; or more Patriots , Packers, Broncos,, Steelers,Cowboys,49ers   notice the teams i referenced? YES the ones that people bang the hardest and spreads move 1- 2 points.1st week fade every favored playoff team.The super bowl losers are burning up cash faster than freifgt trains ruuning down hill except when we had scab refs and of course the worst playoff avenger ever the Packers now are 1-6 when avenging playoff lossesBUT superbowl winners for some reason win that thurs. night opener but has to be Same team of course not like ravens were this year!Year before Giants were fraud superbowl winner. BUT the scab refs were in also!Fade any team after winning a game they won becuse of refs fook up. That is some flag was thrown aginst other team gifting them a win. rare it happens but next week 100% losers they become. In other words you cant steal games by refs flags  and get away with it next week&gt;AS in 49ers after Beating Panthers 1st two scores FG&#x27;s from flags OMG and end of half the gifted TD bye bye @ Seahawks fortywhiners This situation is rare only 5 times it happened.huge losers are teams that lost in OT as a DOG next week are losing vs healthy playing teams.matter of fact teams that won in ot also seem to be blowing covers next week.another fade is Teams who were a dog of 3 or more points losing by 1 point exactly have torched walllets at a 95% rate 100% when favored. I mean really losing by 1 point as in a doink FG miss. or was winning game by 2 and other team breaks long play to get in FG range.  also fade teams who hang around to cover a spread then are favored next game at home or away  95% losers as chalks   These are NOT trends! WHY? Beacsue they effect every team in NFL every year.OF course this is vs teams that are resonably helthy and arent towell tossing season to make sure Coach is gone as DID Browns and Buccaneers other teams just are bad and dont feel like playing.Fade any team that had historical performance or one play this week. They are 100% losers s/u and ATS. Eagles after that huge win vs Lions yadda yadda all the hype on Foles the SI cover etc... next week a -5 point favorite away at Vikings 48-30 loss fade any team that scores 100 points or more in 2 or 3 games 98% losers ats in 3rd or 4th game free info for you courtesy of me tracking all Teams past 20 years

BUSTERDOUGLASS · Answer

Been at this a long time so here we go.Teams that did great ATS and caused books to lose money are adjusted for next year higher spreads on tougher schedules.Broncos and Seahawks and 49ers The superbowl loser will not be back year following we now have 21 years of losers in playoffs 49ers last one Patriots year before and they were at home.Teams that score 40 pts &gt; in playoffs are now 2-24 ATS in next playoff game Patriots &amp; Colts Teams that had to overcome a 17 point or higher defecit in 2nd half are toast next week as a favorite.Example Patriots down 24-0 to broncos came back to win in OT next week away @ Texans - 7 1/2 points Pats almost lost the game 34-31 win.Many teams are burning money when chalked by DD&#x27;s 10 &#x2B; or more Patriots , Packers, Broncos,, Steelers,Cowboys,49ers   notice the teams i referenced? YES the ones that people bang the hardest and spreads move 1- 2 points.1st week fade every favored playoff team.The super bowl losers are burning up cash faster than freifgt trains ruuning down hill except when we had scab refs and of course the worst playoff avenger ever the Packers now are 1-6 when avenging playoff lossesBUT superbowl winners for some reason win that thurs. night opener but has to be Same team of course not like ravens were this year!Year before Giants were fraud superbowl winner. BUT the scab refs were in also!Fade any team after winning a game they won becuse of refs fook up. That is some flag was thrown aginst other team gifting them a win. rare it happens but next week 100% losers they become. In other words you cant steal games by refs flags  and get away with it next week&gt;AS in 49ers after Beating Panthers 1st two scores FG&#x27;s from flags OMG and end of half the gifted TD bye bye @ Seahawks fortywhiners This situation is rare only 5 times it happened.huge losers are teams that lost in OT as a DOG next week are losing vs healthy playing teams.matter of fact teams that won in ot also seem to be blowing covers next week.another fade is Teams who were a dog of 3 or more points losing by 1 point exactly have torched walllets at a 95% rate 100% when favored. I mean really losing by 1 point as in a doink FG miss. or was winning game by 2 and other team breaks long play to get in FG range.  also fade teams who hang around to cover a spread then are favored next game at home or away  95% losers as chalks   These are NOT trends! WHY? Beacsue they effect every team in NFL every year.OF course this is vs teams that are resonably helthy and arent towell tossing season to make sure Coach is gone as DID Browns and Buccaneers other teams just are bad and dont feel like playing.Fade any team that had historical performance or one play this week. They are 100% losers s/u and ATS. Eagles after that huge win vs Lions yadda yadda all the hype on Foles the SI cover etc... next week a -5 point favorite away at Vikings 48-30 loss fade any team that scores 100 points or more in 2 or 3 games 98% losers ats in 3rd or 4th game free info for you courtesy of me tracking all Teams past 20 years

Moneygod · Answer

Again good info....can&#39;t wait to try out your systems!

JEFFTHEHAT · Answer

That was a typo when you said 98% winners on the 100 point trend right? You really meant to say 51% right!

JEFFTHEHAT · Answer

Buster, not sure what your trying to do here. You have some good thoughts for the beginning gambler but all of your stats, trends info about the NFL couldn't be more incorrect! Teams in OT that were dogs that's a 50%+ stat. Playoff teams that score 42 lose next game ATS are 2-24? LMAO they are 8-15 last 29 years! The most ridiculous stat is the 100 point stat. That's hitting about 52% past 29 years. For betting sports past 20 years you must have LOST a ton of money because none of your stats you say you follow are true. Might want to do your research a little better before you try and look like you know what your talking about. I've been doing this for my 31st year so I have quite a bit of knowledge in handicapping!

The Hat

BUSTERDOUGLASS · Answer

um jeff your misunderstanding what i wrote

teams that score 40 points or more in playooffs are now 2 -24 ats in next playoff game and i have all the results documented in marck lawrences playbook

I said teams that were a DOG that LOST in OT are losing at high percent next game home or away it's a heart breaking loss and when facing a helthy team that isnt towel toosing season they LOSE s/u and ATS

ok now we clear?

BUSTERDOUGLASS · Answer

adding another fact about NFL games tracked it for past 15 years and it never sways from %

Theres are 256 games played in NFL 17 weeks schedule. THE amount of times that favorite wins but dosent cover the spread is about 50 games or 19% that is creating a tie as - 3 chalk or winning by 2 points or les as a - 3 favorite

this means 81% of the time you need to bet the winning team

however on MNF games it's worse DO NOT back a DOG to cover the wager that is losing teams that are dogged in the 16 weeks of regualr schedule start times of MNF will cash no more than 4 MNF games normally it's 3 or 2 for 16 games

your % is lower only 18 % of dog teams on MNF cover while losing the game as far as ties on MNF rare very rare buying points on MNF games is not smart you only are risking to LOSE more money -120 instaed of -110.

I never bought a 1/2 point on any MNF game if a lose to 3 1/2 dog then i lost the game not to the half point.

Matter of fact buying half point down only gives you a push at 3 so if you like dog to cover then buy up to 4

I just laugh when seeing other forums guys buying points and wound up buying the loser even in this years playoffs people bought DOG patriots up to 5 1/2 bought 49ers up to 4 1/2 both 100% losers at higher cost - 130

end of post have great day

JEFFTHEHAT · Answer

No, not clear at all. Your 2-24 ATS is very wrong. Hell S.F. Themselves won 2 games after scoring over 40. You need to go back and fix your stats. The overtime stat is hitting 51% c&#x27;mon man.

BUSTERDOUGLASS · Answer

adding to MNF games this year we had two dogs cover while losing MNF..

Understanding the word cover here it means team has to win by more than points given or lose by less than points taken.

SO if you talk about do you think Team + 6 points Covers you are asking that team will hang tough and lose by less than 6 points. Or the favorite team to win by more than 6 points.

any way we only had two dog covers this year week 8 Rams at home really juiced spreads low i saw was 5 1/2 final high was + 10.5 lost by 5 to seahawks 14-9 week 3 was other one but if you grabed Broncos early - 15 you could middle game with raiders + 16 1/2 + 17 happend final 2:20 of game Manning tossed a pick Raiders scored a TD 37-21 final

BUSTERDOUGLASS · Answer

ok jeff here goes again i said TEAMS that score 40 OR more points in playoffs are now 2 -24 ATS in next playoff game was 2-22 before both colts and patriots fell into this system

NOT in season buddy many teams can win ats after scoring 40 or more points but i betcha they dont do it 3rd game more than 25% of the time

BUSTERDOUGLASS · Answer

ooooobtw JEFF you better go back and check how many times the 49ers scored 40 or more points in season .....it was only ONCE at London vs Jaguars won 42-10 then guess what happend when returning home to panthers as a 7 point chalk YEAH they f.....u kkkking lost the game 10-9

so shove that % in your ear !

I will go back n look at all teams from 2003 up to and including this year that scored 40 or more p[oints to see if what i read online that it was 2-22 .i dont have relsuts that far back as you said 29 years i only have results back to 1989

but lets see how many teams failed in next playoff after scoring 40 or more point in previous playoff game

BUSTERDOUGLASS · Answer

ok from 2003 and up to 2013 the record ats for all teams that score 40 or more points in previous PLAYOFF game the next PLayoff game they are pathetic putrid 2 - 13 ATS 86% losers

i think that validates the record stat i saw before somewhere that it was 2-22 before this years

heresc the teams and years it occured Cardinals 09 win 51 -45 vs Packers +7 @ Saints poof* L 45-14
Falcons 04 W 47-17 vs Rams + 5.5 @ Eagles poof* L 27 -10
Bears 06 win vs Saints + 6.5 @ Bowl vs Colts L 29-17

Packers 07 win vs Seat. -8 vs NYG L s/u 23-20
2010 Packer win vs Falcons W - 3 1/2 @ bears That 1st winner after scoring 40 or more points
Colts 03 W vs Denv. +3 @ KC Win s/u 38-31 thats 2nd one who manged to win after scoring 40 or more points in playoff game but Colts last two times went bust 04 win vs denv. + 1 @ Pats L 20-3 2013 win vs KC 45-44 + 7 1/2 @ Pats L 43-22

Patriots are perfect 100% losers 0-4 ats 04-2011 2012 and 2013 1 ats l in bowl - 7 vs Eagles 3 point win 24-21

Saints 09 W vs Packers - 4 vs Vikes L ats 31-28

49ers 2012 win 45-31 vs Packers - 4 1/2 @ Falcons L

Seahawks 2010 win 41 -36 vs saints +10 @ Bears Lose 35-24

JEFFTHEHAT · Answer

Do really want me to list every game? I only used 42 or more so if I drop to 40 it&#x27;s gonna be more against what you said. Yes I know it was the playoffs that you&#x27;re referring to. What about the ridiculous 100 point claim? You still claiming 98% stop while youre behind you&#x27;ve already lost all credibility!

BUSTERDOUGLASS · Answer

ok JEFF i will list teams that scored 100 points or more in 2 or 3 games and see what happend after that these are real results i have in front of me. I do not make things up in my systems i use what happend! Large data base from 1999 up to and including 2013

I will list them in here after reading down every team that went nuts for 2 or 3 weeks scoring 35 - 40 pointd per game totaling in 100's or maybe even high 90's i might add if there is enough. See Jeff it's like this teams have so much energy to use every week just like your gas tank in your vehicle if you use 16 gals up out of 18 you aint goona win next week becuse you only have 2 gals left.

Maybe now you will see why teams fail at high % after whipping up on 2 or 3 losers

BBL with results

BUSTERDOUGLASS · Answer

I&#x27;m using differnt parameters for above SYSTEM it&#x27;s whenever any team totals 100 pts &#x2B; ( 4 games total ) they will fail next game ATS and or s/u the next game without rest.  OK Jeff? so far Cards 0- 4 i&#x27;m up to 2008

JEFFTHEHAT · Answer

If you don&#x27;t make your results up then you have some terrible data bases. I have the results right now for 29 years. In fact I have every single team and the amount of points they scored. Results are 111-121 which translates into the don&#x27;t cover the spread52.16% of the time! As you know that&#x27;s losing money! I&#x27;m waiting for your other results saying teams that cover 2,3,4 times in a row don&#x27;t cover next game. You said so far the first teams that covered 4 in a row went 12-0 ATS kinda curious which 2 teams they were. So you know I have already done the research for all 3 scenarios but only went ack 14 years this time.

BUSTERDOUGLASS · Answer

DUDE 29 years is too long ago i&#x27;m using just more recent with new rules that were not in existence 29 years ago when you back track 29 years your watering down everything and most trends or systems like this one will be reduced to lower %.Try going back only to 2003 up to this year.I just finshed the arizona cardinals they are really bad 3- 12-1 ATS 20% it was worse if i included when they totaled 90&#x2B; points in 3 or 4 games but i stayed with the 100 points and over for reg season. IT took too long to do one team so i will make a video of others then post the you tube url here.OK i was maybe wrong saying it was 95% losers but the past few teams i recalled that did this all failed last year and this. Packers, Patriots, Eagles, Ravens,  i think it was o yeah check out the Bengals they also seem to flop after scoring 100 &#x2B; points in 2- 4 games.also that new system i have added to mines about teams failing after covering 2 staright 3 straight or 4 striaght will not be posted for free i sell my systems to others and teach them how to handicap the NFL so far no one has failed everyone has started winning. Remember i developed these systems from my losses I started betting at young age of 17 and i lost college tuition money in 10 years over 100 thou it got so bad i stopped betting sports from when i was 27 up till i was 35 that was my developing years for NFL and NBA with no internet info available started betting in 99 with offshore at the greek.com wow they hated me .... small bettor won about $3500 that year but it was cool i could only lose what i deposited.Today i use local bookie far from my area 15 min drive. he&#x27;s only one that handles large wagers like those who bet $500 to $2000 daily huge big book and brother you best pay up after losing if he allows you to. I started betting cash up front with him.Now i just use him like a sports book i start out season with 5 thou and every play is e mailed and recorded live so there is no mistake on lines. soon as i have 2000 won i go collect 1500 increase bank $500 use 5% of that balance.This year he said to me Bill if all my bettors did what you do i would be out of business in a year or reduced to small profits that i could not live on.I said to Him J B never fear hardly any have the time to do the work that real wiseguys or sharps do. Most have real time consuming jobs and cannot devote 2 hrs per day to follow teams or lines. I&#x27;m same Way Jeff when i&#x27;m busy working i just do not wager. I wish i could gather a large bank of at laest $50,000 and just sit home in my underware if i desired and just bet sports every day. BUT my nature as a Gemini will not let me i need to be active doing differnt things daily.Travel around see differnt people go to casinos 1 hr away.ahhhhhhhhhhhhhh thats it Jeff

JEFFTHEHAT · Answer

Buster, thx for making this one easy. I just checked Arizona from 2003-2013. First of all there was only 1 game where Arizona scored 100&#x2B; points in 3 games or less and guess what they covered next game! 10/26/08. Next I went down to 90 or less where you said it would get worse % wise and guess what it got better! Well can&#x27;t get better than 100% but it went 5-1 where they covered ATS. Either your data bases are way screwed up or you just have no idea what your doing! Might be smart to not talk stats anymore.

BUSTERDOUGLASS · Answer

see Jeff you dont read it&#x27;s like 4 games where they scored 100 &#x2B; points and not 3 or less the system is when teams score 100 points or more all my resukts are documented in marc lawrence&#x27;s play book i have every isssue except one from past 12 years.&#xD;&#xA;i can go back to 1989 but that&#x27;s stuoid becuase of rules changes field conditions etc.. so i stay within where i have enough data to show enough wins or losses for each team !&#xD;&#xA;Here&#x27;s Cardinals results &#xD;&#xA;Cards 2007 wks 2 - 5 scored 101 pts home - 6 vs Car. L s/u repeat later in yr wks 10 - 13 scored 124 pts week 14 @ Seat &#x2B;7 L 42-21   0- 2 so far 2008  wks 1-4  scored 106 pts wek 5 home -2.5 vs Bills W 41-17 1-2 later on in yr again wks 5-9 scored 128 pts  wk 10 H - 10 vs SF L $ 29-24  1-3 wks 8-11 112 pts wk 12 &#x2B; 3 H vs NYG L 37-29 1-4 wks 9-12 118 wk 13  @ Philly &#x2B;3 pts L 48-20 1- 5 ATS wks 11- 14 scored 109 pts wk 15 - 4.5 pts L S/U  to Vikes 35-14 1- 6 ATS&#xD;&#xA; 2009 wks 5-8 scored 100 pts wk 9 @ Chi. &#x2B;2 W 41 -21 2-6 ATS &#xD;&#xA;wks 7-10 scored 117 wk 11 - 9 1/2 @ Rams L $  21-13 2-7 ATSwks 8-11 = 114 pts wk 12 &#x2B; &#x2B;3  @ Titans T 20-17 2-7-1 ATS &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;wks 10-13 =100 wk 14 - 4 @ SF L s/u 24-9 2-8-1 ATS &#xD;&#xA;wks 13- 16 = 112 pts wk 17 H - 3 vs GB L S/U 33-7 2-9-1 ATS &#xD;&#xA;2010 wks 5-9 = 100 pts wk 10 - 4 vs Seat. L S/U 36-18  2-10 -1 ATS&#xD;&#xA;2013 wks 10 -13 = 115 wk 14 H - 7 1/2 vs Rams W 30-10 3-10-1 ATS&#xD;&#xA; wks 11-14 118 wk 15 - 3 1/2 @ Titans L$ 37-34 3-11-1 &#xD;&#xA;wks 13-16 =105 wk 17 H - 3 vs SF L S/U 23-20 3-12 -1 ATS 20% &#xD;&#xA;(note i could of made it worse when they also scored in 90&#x27;s they failed ATS also in playoffs games ) &#xD;&#xA;Thats the real results according to MY set of parameters however this is way to time consuming by hand and now will just mark them in my book and post up you tube video with results.&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;IT will be a lenghty video also showing how i use the data to create systems and team trends that now are super secret systems some teams are horrible when scoring 40 points or more the Bears are worse so far like 1-5 ATS and some games lost when favored &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;long time nfl system , a system is when it applies to all teams every year Teams flipping roles that is win as a DOG then favored next game are 65% losers worse team in League is the Cardinals &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;1W 12 L  with 7 S/U losses 0-4 in Div games with 3 S/U losses &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;my other catergories i use are how teams are after 0- 7 points spread results that is a loss vs the number or after a win vs the number then after 7 1/2 pts up to highest 18 1/2 &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;next i use margin of wins or losses from 1-9 points from 10-19 points then 20 points &gt; &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;then each teams worst game # of year NOT week # thier Game &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;check out browns ats 1st game of year All but one are at home) this year - 3 vs Dolphins Browns lost the whole game &#xD;&#xA;and panthers home openers talk about just those two teams &#xD;&#xA;Panthers blew it again as a &#x2B;3 dog vs Seattle and it was early East game??? I took them and cried &#xD;&#xA;lost by 5 12-7 &#xD;&#xA;Teams own teams ats and or s/u Cards beeech at HOME is Lions &#xD;&#xA;7-0 s/u and ATS &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;i also use how teams are post bye weeks some stink the joint up some are good &#xD;&#xA; then i use how teams are after cashing tickets as a DOG then favored wooooooooooo ieeeeeeeeeeeee some teams really stink up the joint 4000 lb mooses &#xD;&#xA;i use how teams are after div wins and losses &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;Packers and Bears after lions wins OMFG Bears are 4-11 ats 0-4 in div. games packers now are 9 -15 ATS 2-2 in div. games &#xD;&#xA;GB again bad playoff revngers 1-5 ATS and s/u  LOST by 6 @ 49ers as a 5 point dog 49ers kick a late FG to cover but packers could of scored a TD to win game s/u i think Rodgers tossed a pick or they just couldnt get past 49ers D SO again if Packers meet up with 49ers Fade em.&#xD;&#xA;Texans of course you know 100% losers s/u and ATS @ rival colts house &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;will they ever win there ? YES if a certain situation pops up!&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;However thats team trend it only applies to Texans&#xD;&#xA; Jaguars horrible west of Mississippi except as a 27 1/2 point dog this year @ Broncos &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;Eagles when favored vs good afc teams OMFG even going way back these chumps will lose s/u or blow $ &#xD;&#xA;i have to update it using from 89 up to 2013 they really cant play vs afc teams home or away lions also bad vs afc teams &#xD;&#xA;Packers away @ TB fuggehedabbottit lost s/u every time from when favre was there past 10 years i think.&#xD;&#xA;then i now added how teams are after streaks of ATS covers after 2 after 3 after 4 &#xD;&#xA;however all these systems and trends i keep out of here because i have to sell them to whoever wants them plus how i handicap teams each week using 3 systems ATS ..... performance ATS  that is on a chart using a 5 point scale then schedule traps &#xD;&#xA;a Trap occoured with Seahawks at home after two wins vs div rivals VS TB they had to go into OT to win.&#xD;&#xA;Keep a sharp EYE on dem bucs this Yaer they will play thier Hearts out for Lovie smith.&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;I also have a 100% system involving all pro teams NBA MLB and NFL you have to message me to get that one free &#xD;&#xA;one sure thing in NFL whomever is selected super bowl host city never got there Giants 0-6 start this year &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;when Cowboys had it every ESPN JO and others Said this team can get there and play at home .... LOL 1-6 start &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;2015 - 2016 scratch 49ers .....forot who host it this next year &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;see ya laters everyone &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;ooooo btw i tracked my plays using 5 games per week as in the LVH super contest would have tied 7th place with 52 1/2 points &#xD;&#xA;prize $ was $14,750  pretty damn good with only cost $1750 w/ a proxy next year me and 4 others go in for only $350 each if you averge 3 wins per week that puts you in the money 57 points took #1 alone so if i had 5 weeks at 4-1 i would have taken 1st place with two weeks at 5-0 &#xD;&#xA;what i gave you here FREE is worth $1000&#x27;s of dollars

BUSTERDOUGLASS · Answer

OH Jeff check out this stat go back as far as you wish FADE every playoff team as a favorite week one.prfer vs NON div team before a big DIV rival game but use them all see what you come up with W L T

BUSTERDOUGLASS · Answer

oooooooo yes heres another thing ever see teams favored that have no wins vs teams who had one win or also no wins

also how many times you see teams favored after getting a DD loss fail! I really want to know how odds makers make teams 7 pt or more favorites after losing 21-3 or 29-3 like fortywhiners did @ Seattle then came home vs a better team as an 11 point chalk and got waxed again 27-7 sorry i didnt take Colts ML that game

JEFFTHEHAT · Answer

Buster , I was ready for you to change your rules, at first you said 3 games now you say 4. So here are the real results for the 4 game chase. This includes 90 points.

Arizona when scoring 90+ points in up to 4 games is:

24-19-1 from 2003- 2013 those are the facts!

Buster please quit trying to reinvent history to make you think you know what you're doing! For just the 100 points it's 20-12. This is all I do everyday your not going to get away with fabricated stats! Maybe you should have me teach you a few things, I can't believe anybody pays you for your knowledge. I knew within 10 seconds most if not all of your stats were incorrect.

JEFFTHEHAT · Answer

P.S what you gave me for free is a headache and a bunch of wrong info that anyone who does the research will see. Youre giving out info on how to lose your bankroll before seasons end!

JEFFTHEHAT · Answer

Oh and one last thing, look at the end of post #1 where it says fade any team that scores 100&#x2B; points in 2 or 3 games! I didn&#x27;t  write it you did! C&#x27;mon man.

BUSTERDOUGLASS · Answer

finished with arguing with you I&#x27;ll do my way you do yours!so far i&#x27;m done up to broncos who finshed best losing % at 61% with 23 W&#x27;s and 47 Losses ATS with 20 S/U losses asa favorite after scoring 100 &#x2B;points in 3 games or 4 or 5 as i have noticed lately...but some you said Cards are winning even after i posted the results of that team showing the losses in RED.So your adjusting it to falsely show wins trying to discredit my new system for NFLDONE JEFF ok i will no longe try to prove anything with you.or argue anything i come up with.

punta · Answer

Its best to observe and keep notes for 2+ yrs, then see if u can find a system within the numbers. I am doing this now and I hv seen a few things. Understand the complete gm scenario and go from there. Find an alpha and an end. Learn gm analysis .

gd lk

NEW Nfl systems to add for next year.

Hot Forum Topics