Good one bro........... Yeah its been around for a minute but cant' find any prior results myself neither Also don't forget for what its worth the team with the .600 hm win % must be above .500 The team with below .400 rd win % must be below .500 if I'm correct if I am correct Yes I would say about the injuries applies to only the starting line up or at least a good 6th man Pending how it goes would it be an option to chase considering the risk vs payout ratio regarding the ML parlays Your right about whether to parlay the spread or ML's Hmmm............ If your able to track both just in case that be cool ................... man
0
Good one bro........... Yeah its been around for a minute but cant' find any prior results myself neither Also don't forget for what its worth the team with the .600 hm win % must be above .500 The team with below .400 rd win % must be below .500 if I'm correct if I am correct Yes I would say about the injuries applies to only the starting line up or at least a good 6th man Pending how it goes would it be an option to chase considering the risk vs payout ratio regarding the ML parlays Your right about whether to parlay the spread or ML's Hmmm............ If your able to track both just in case that be cool ................... man
If you search for a poster under the name "fritz" you will find some results from the previous two years.
I took a look at that. it looks like it started out good then fell apart.
heres another thought I have. the plays could probably be bet on the spreadpoint but just bet them straight and don't parlay them. could try it both ways. for me personally I think with parlays I'm sticking to 2 or 3 teams and I'm going to also try just betting them straight on spreadpoint line. I'm going to be playing both ways.
0
Quote Originally Posted by PatrickBateman:
If you search for a poster under the name "fritz" you will find some results from the previous two years.
I took a look at that. it looks like it started out good then fell apart.
heres another thought I have. the plays could probably be bet on the spreadpoint but just bet them straight and don't parlay them. could try it both ways. for me personally I think with parlays I'm sticking to 2 or 3 teams and I'm going to also try just betting them straight on spreadpoint line. I'm going to be playing both ways.
Since 2004, 0.600 teams are 249-290-18 ATS (468-89 SU) at home against sub-0.400 teams. The ATS winning percentage is 46.1%. The break even winning percentage for each team in a 2-team parlay is 52.7%.
Betting your system against the point spread is not going to be profitable in the long run.
0
Since 2004, 0.600 teams are 249-290-18 ATS (468-89 SU) at home against sub-0.400 teams. The ATS winning percentage is 46.1%. The break even winning percentage for each team in a 2-team parlay is 52.7%.
Betting your system against the point spread is not going to be profitable in the long run.
Since 2004, 0.600 teams are 249-290-18 ATS (468-89 SU) at home against sub-0.400 teams. The ATS winning percentage is 46.1%. The break even winning percentage for each team in a 2-team parlay is 52.7%.
Betting your system against the point spread is not going to be profitable in the long run.
do you have the breakdown for the last 5 years
0
Quote Originally Posted by jbrent95:
Since 2004, 0.600 teams are 249-290-18 ATS (468-89 SU) at home against sub-0.400 teams. The ATS winning percentage is 46.1%. The break even winning percentage for each team in a 2-team parlay is 52.7%.
Betting your system against the point spread is not going to be profitable in the long run.
I was also thinking about putting SU on a 10% method betting it looks like it would definitly work out thou some bets would be real steep. I'm thinking as far as parlays go to parlay starting with strongest teams and going to weakest teams I wonder if theres a way to go back and check how that turned out ats in previous years.
0
I was also thinking about putting SU on a 10% method betting it looks like it would definitly work out thou some bets would be real steep. I'm thinking as far as parlays go to parlay starting with strongest teams and going to weakest teams I wonder if theres a way to go back and check how that turned out ats in previous years.
I forgot to state what the rest of the system was in my first post but montanamax stated what the rest was in the six post. thinking about filters like maybe not to include teams playing east against west or something like that. especially if it's the first game of a 2 or 3 game road trip. those types of teams often cover. maybe after this season is over and see where my losses are.
0
I forgot to state what the rest of the system was in my first post but montanamax stated what the rest was in the six post. thinking about filters like maybe not to include teams playing east against west or something like that. especially if it's the first game of a 2 or 3 game road trip. those types of teams often cover. maybe after this season is over and see where my losses are.