Heard about this system of playing the under on the lowest total of the day and thought I would chase it for 3 games and track it. I'll also track the over on the highest totals of the day. Not yet sure to martingale and eat the losses or try to recoup with a labline for ABC... May track both methods.
Plays Today -
ORL @ MIA U186.5
LAC @ GS O219.5
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Heard about this system of playing the under on the lowest total of the day and thought I would chase it for 3 games and track it. I'll also track the over on the highest totals of the day. Not yet sure to martingale and eat the losses or try to recoup with a labline for ABC... May track both methods.
Thanks for bringing that up, Michael. There is a 4 game per day minimum. Less than 4 games is a no play. Also, if there are two or more games for the day with the same O/U total, we'll try to pick the best play.
I've decided to use the very popular "aggressive labby" for this with 3 lines for the overs and 3 lines for the unders. Any suggestions or recommendations toward the money management of this system are certainly welcome.
0
Thanks for bringing that up, Michael. There is a 4 game per day minimum. Less than 4 games is a no play. Also, if there are two or more games for the day with the same O/U total, we'll try to pick the best play.
I've decided to use the very popular "aggressive labby" for this with 3 lines for the overs and 3 lines for the unders. Any suggestions or recommendations toward the money management of this system are certainly welcome.
I started playing the unders this season, but have never tracked it before. I'm playing a small labby line. But if it comes up with 9 overs in a row, even with the labby line it would seem to be hard to recover your losses.
0
I started playing the unders this season, but have never tracked it before. I'm playing a small labby line. But if it comes up with 9 overs in a row, even with the labby line it would seem to be hard to recover your losses.
You can win with a Lab. line if you have at least a 39% win rate, AND the wins are sprinkled in amongst the losses, meaning no 6 + losing streaks. When you have long losing streaks and a low win %, it's very difficult to eliminate your lines. I MO (for what it's worth....I'm still waiting to get rich betting on sports) you should stay away from chase systems that have an individual game win rate of less than 50%, unless the system calls for wagering primarily on dogs , then you can drop down to about a 40% win rate. So even though it's an interesting idea, I would have to pass on your system unless further back testing reveals better numbers. But GL if you decide to go ahead with it, and if it starts winning, I'll probably jump on the wagon.
0
You can win with a Lab. line if you have at least a 39% win rate, AND the wins are sprinkled in amongst the losses, meaning no 6 + losing streaks. When you have long losing streaks and a low win %, it's very difficult to eliminate your lines. I MO (for what it's worth....I'm still waiting to get rich betting on sports) you should stay away from chase systems that have an individual game win rate of less than 50%, unless the system calls for wagering primarily on dogs , then you can drop down to about a 40% win rate. So even though it's an interesting idea, I would have to pass on your system unless further back testing reveals better numbers. But GL if you decide to go ahead with it, and if it starts winning, I'll probably jump on the wagon.
you should do the oppsite.... like play the over on the lowest line ..... the lowest line will obviously have to very low scoring teams and the public will drive that number down even more.... thus your loosing value in the system already... bet the under on the highest number on the board and the over on the lowest o/u
0
you should do the oppsite.... like play the over on the lowest line ..... the lowest line will obviously have to very low scoring teams and the public will drive that number down even more.... thus your loosing value in the system already... bet the under on the highest number on the board and the over on the lowest o/u
Hot Forum Topics
