All Forums | Systems & Strategies

NBA 1st Q

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 14761
Posts: 133
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2000
Posts: 11995
Posted: #101

Quote Originally Posted by djknoell:

if your supossed to wait for 3 losses in a row as a hf how is there 5 plays tomorrow. nobody has lost 3 in a row as a hf

This has nothing to do with the 1st Quarter chase.

https://tinyurl.com/dxos8hj

Column G. Home Favorites only and only the 14 teams listed at the bottom of the 1st Q spreadsheet. Full games ATS. There are currently no games ready to play right now.

I'll let you know when to start.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 79
Posted: #102
Quote Originally Posted by cisco:

This has nothing to do with the 1st Quarter chase.

https://tinyurl.com/dxos8hj

Column G. Home Favorites only and only the 14 teams listed at the bottom of the 1st Q spreadsheet. Full games ATS. There are currently no games ready to play right now.

I'll let you know when to start.got it. thank you

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 79
Posted: #103
cisco,according to last years result it looks as though a person could start a chase after a team doesnt cover 4 in a row and start a chase then and win on a 3 game chase.  thoughts anyone
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2000
Posts: 11995
Posted: #104

Quote Originally Posted by djknoell:

cisco,according to last years result it looks as though a person could start a chase after a team doesnt cover 4 in a row and start a chase then and win on a 3 game chase.  thoughts anyone

Better yet.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 55
Posted: #105
At what point would you add or remove a team from your 1Q Home Favorite system? 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 64
Posted: #106
I like what you have provided us here, thanks. When do you post picks? Also in your spread sheet, if it has a 2 in colom A does that mean 2 losses in a row 1st Qtr?
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2000
Posts: 11995
Posted: #107

Quote Originally Posted by CoachIV:

At what point would you add or remove a team from your 1Q Home Favorite system? 

When it feels right. I'm looking to see how Brooklyn does in a week or so.

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2000
Posts: 11995
Posted: #108

Quote Originally Posted by lewis69692003:

I like what you have provided us here, thanks. When do you post picks? Also in your spread sheet, if it has a 2 in column A does that mean 2 losses in a row 1st Qtr?

Look at the summary sheet. It has the dates for upcoming games. Look for tomorrows date. I'll update after all games have been played.

The summary sheet is all wins. For a teams history click it's tab.

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2000
Posts: 11995
Posted: #109
This type of wagering is not for everyone. You should have 200 units to risk. A $1000 bankroll = $5 a unit.

ML players are currently out of pocket 10.68 units. ATS players are +.17 units. (Clippers are -11.32 units ML).... I've add a $ by team tab
Remember, this IS a chase system.

ML 13-0
ATS 11-0
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2000
Posts: 11995
Posted: #110
Friggin Bulls lose by a point. Can't catch a break.

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2012
Posts: 592
Posted: #111
Quote Originally Posted by cisco:

When it feels right. I'm looking to see how Brooklyn does in a week or so.



Brooklyn's shit.  Can't see why people like them this year.

Teams that should be considered: Hornets, Rockets, Blazers and Bucks.  That's it.  Just my opinion of course though. :)
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2000
Posts: 11995
Posted: #112
Maybe remove Chicago and add Houston. (1-0 ML & ATS g1)
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2012
Posts: 592
Posted: #113
Quote Originally Posted by cisco:

Maybe remove Chicago and add Houston. (1-0 ML & ATS g1)


Ooo.  That's bold.  Chicago does seem to struggle in 1Q's though, but they're such a strong team overall.  You'd think they'd dominate box teams. I think that's the toughest part of this though to be honest; finding out which teams qualify.  Such a subjective part to an otherwise great system.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2000
Posts: 11995
Posted: #114

Lat year Chicago went 8-2-3 on the Ml and 7-1-1 Lost 2 ATS.

Looks like a repeat to me.

https://tinyurl.com/95vxe3f

 

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 185
Posted: #115
was anyone lucky enough to lock in the LAC game before it was officially taken off?
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2000
Posts: 11995
Posted: #116

Quote Originally Posted by trychome:

was anyone lucky enough to lock in the LAC game before it was officially taken off?

Clippers (pk +100) was a dog so a no play for us.

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2000
Posts: 11995
Posted: #117
Good night

ML 3-1
ATS 3-1
Halfs 2-0

No plays Thursday
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2000
Posts: 11995
Posted: #118
Friday's lines are up

spreadsheet:
https://tinyurl.com/9hvewfv
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2000
Posts: 11995
Posted: #119
not a good night with the plays.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 185
Posted: #120
LAC 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 79
Posted: #121
thats a chase loss for the bulls and clippers against the spread. what is goin on. maybe we should wait till teams dont cover a couple in a row then chase
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2000
Posts: 11995
Posted: #122

Quote Originally Posted by djknoell:

thats a chase loss for the bulls and clippers against the spread. what is goin on. maybe we should wait till teams dont cover a couple in a row then chase

Since you listed the Bulls you must be talking about ATS as they covered the ML.

ATS is 18-2 -3.21 units. with 3.09 units outstanding. If you started with 200 units you should have 193.7 units left in your piggy bank.

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2000
Posts: 11995
Posted: #123

[Quote: Originally Posted by djknoell] thats a chase loss for the bulls and clippers against the spread. what is goin on. maybe we should wait till teams dont cover a couple in a row then chase [/Quote

You might want to cut your losses now as there are 4 gm 3's waiting.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 79
Posted: #124
Quote Originally Posted by cisco:

Quote Originally Posted by djknoell:

thats a chase loss for the bulls and clippers against the spread. what is goin on. maybe we should wait till teams dont cover a couple in a row then chase [/Quote

You might want to cut your losses now as there are 4 gm 3's waiting.

no im in it till the end. i waited since last season ended to do this. just venting. wasnt there only 2 chase losses ats last year
 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 5372
Posted: #125
Quote Originally Posted by djknoell:

no im in it till the end. i waited since last season ended to do this. just venting. wasnt there only 2 chase losses ats last year


There was 5 ATS system losses last year and 1 ML system loss.

Miami heat had 2 ATS losses, Bulls/Nuggets/76ers has one ATS loss each.

Miami had the ML system loss.

Both systems were still profitable even with the losses.
All Forums | Systems & Strategies
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2025 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.