good luck tonight. I'm on the NYY runline tonight as well.
Does anyone know if there are any sites that track teams for the whole season and show what the odds were, other than wagerline? If so then it should be easy enough to back test this.
0
good luck tonight. I'm on the NYY runline tonight as well.
Does anyone know if there are any sites that track teams for the whole season and show what the odds were, other than wagerline? If so then it should be easy enough to back test this.
I've checked some on this site to see how the system did in the past, so far it should be positive units, assuming that you'd be getting close to even odds on all of the plays. I'm gonna try to back test this more and have some numbers put together by saturday or sunday, which is when the next set of plays should come up.
0
redsox qualify, as does oakland today.
I've checked some on this site to see how the system did in the past, so far it should be positive units, assuming that you'd be getting close to even odds on all of the plays. I'm gonna try to back test this more and have some numbers put together by saturday or sunday, which is when the next set of plays should come up.
so far you people are a joke. none of you deserve to ever use this system again. in fact i hope none of you ever remember this trend. for yesterday was an extraordinary day that will never occur again this season or maybe next. For i have never seen any more than two teams qualify in one day. And there is a rule that you can add to this where it makes the trend hit at an unbelievable rate, but it comes up only ever so often. wouldnt you complainers like to know it. Oh welll
0
so far you people are a joke. none of you deserve to ever use this system again. in fact i hope none of you ever remember this trend. for yesterday was an extraordinary day that will never occur again this season or maybe next. For i have never seen any more than two teams qualify in one day. And there is a rule that you can add to this where it makes the trend hit at an unbelievable rate, but it comes up only ever so often. wouldnt you complainers like to know it. Oh welll
Happens every time. Once you begin to post then all of a sudden things go south. I still think the system would show a profit, just need to back test to verify.
0
Happens every time. Once you begin to post then all of a sudden things go south. I still think the system would show a profit, just need to back test to verify.
southpark, I'm not saying this system doesn't work, we all have bad days. It's just that fact that you have no statistics as to how well it has done so we really have no way of knowing how good it is. You said "Navarro lazy" and well, if you're lazy, this is not the business for you to be in. To be a successful handicapper and system creator you need to spend ALOT of time doing research. And thank you for stopping with the caps lock.
Just because I'm a nice guy and I also want to see the validity of this system, I'll backtrack it for last season and post the results.
0
southpark, I'm not saying this system doesn't work, we all have bad days. It's just that fact that you have no statistics as to how well it has done so we really have no way of knowing how good it is. You said "Navarro lazy" and well, if you're lazy, this is not the business for you to be in. To be a successful handicapper and system creator you need to spend ALOT of time doing research. And thank you for stopping with the caps lock.
Just because I'm a nice guy and I also want to see the validity of this system, I'll backtrack it for last season and post the results.
that would be nice and check to see when the team who has lost must be above five hundred while playing a team five hundred or below at date of game. i dont remember ever losing one of these.
0
that would be nice and check to see when the team who has lost must be above five hundred while playing a team five hundred or below at date of game. i dont remember ever losing one of these.
that would be nice and check to see when the team who has lost must be above five hundred while playing a team five hundred or below at date of game. i dont remember ever losing one of these.
Sorry, I've already checked the stats and I don't want to go back and filter those, I'm assuming you will since it's your system. Anyway, here's last seasons results..
27-34 (44.26%) +1.81u
0
Quote Originally Posted by southparkCO:
that would be nice and check to see when the team who has lost must be above five hundred while playing a team five hundred or below at date of game. i dont remember ever losing one of these.
Sorry, I've already checked the stats and I don't want to go back and filter those, I'm assuming you will since it's your system. Anyway, here's last seasons results..
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.