Ok after carefully going over the past stats this year I found a couple mistake in the systems favor, 2 series loses have been removed from careless subtraction on my part. Yesterday's Cleveland loss and a loss from June 3rd.
The correct record going forth is 47-3
Up 35.92 units
There has been 20 (A) wins. 20 (B) wins and 7 (C) wins
Today's series plays are BOS, CLEVE , HOU
0
Ok after carefully going over the past stats this year I found a couple mistake in the systems favor, 2 series loses have been removed from careless subtraction on my part. Yesterday's Cleveland loss and a loss from June 3rd.
The correct record going forth is 47-3
Up 35.92 units
There has been 20 (A) wins. 20 (B) wins and 7 (C) wins
Jeff, I don't get it? So, who would you or bets be placed here? Trackmlb, he puts a play out on his thread and is golden! Just trying to understand yours, Jeff! Lets make$$!!
0
Jeff, I don't get it? So, who would you or bets be placed here? Trackmlb, he puts a play out on his thread and is golden! Just trying to understand yours, Jeff! Lets make$$!!
It's his system that he wants to keep close to the vest. He's putting the plays out there as proof that it works, you know provided it makes $$$ err units.
0
It's his system that he wants to keep close to the vest. He's putting the plays out there as proof that it works, you know provided it makes $$$ err units.
It's his system that he wants to keep close to the vest. He's putting the plays out there as proof that it works, you know provided it makes $$$ err units.
Kind of strange that he will only respond to the question about whether or not his picks are random, but no further explanation.
I will pass on a stranger just posting "random" picks with no apparent rhyme or reason other than him just posting a supposed record of 47-3. Thanks and good luck.
0
Quote Originally Posted by BuckeyeKaptn:
It's his system that he wants to keep close to the vest. He's putting the plays out there as proof that it works, you know provided it makes $$$ err units.
Kind of strange that he will only respond to the question about whether or not his picks are random, but no further explanation.
I will pass on a stranger just posting "random" picks with no apparent rhyme or reason other than him just posting a supposed record of 47-3. Thanks and good luck.
Kind of strange that he will only respond to the question about whether or not his picks are random, but no further explanation.
I will pass on a stranger just posting "random" picks with no apparent rhyme or reason other than him just posting a supposed record of 47-3. Thanks and good luck.
Yes quite strange isn't it! I'm just a stranger on here have no clue what I'm doing and just pulled a 47-3 record out of my rear! Thank for the well wishes good luck on your wagers sir! Maybe next time I'll pull a 140-0 record out of my rear that's way better!
0
Quote Originally Posted by flwareagle:
Kind of strange that he will only respond to the question about whether or not his picks are random, but no further explanation.
I will pass on a stranger just posting "random" picks with no apparent rhyme or reason other than him just posting a supposed record of 47-3. Thanks and good luck.
Yes quite strange isn't it! I'm just a stranger on here have no clue what I'm doing and just pulled a 47-3 record out of my rear! Thank for the well wishes good luck on your wagers sir! Maybe next time I'll pull a 140-0 record out of my rear that's way better!