Tracked this last year and had a nice return. Bet any home dog +130 or higher, double up on losses. If more than one teams qualifies, play them both for whatever the units are at that time. If you profit for the day, start back over at 1 unit. Returned over 100 units last year.
First play:
Washington +149 1 unit
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Tracked this last year and had a nice return. Bet any home dog +130 or higher, double up on losses. If more than one teams qualifies, play them both for whatever the units are at that time. If you profit for the day, start back over at 1 unit. Returned over 100 units last year.
First play:
Washington +149 1 unit
In NHL I had a good year betting all home dogs that were a low level dog say about 160 or less.
What made you decide on +130. It would seem that it would work on lower home dogs as well as those are the games where the public is struggling to make a pick. Just curious
Either way it looks good and I'm not trying to reinvent the wheel
0
In NHL I had a good year betting all home dogs that were a low level dog say about 160 or less.
What made you decide on +130. It would seem that it would work on lower home dogs as well as those are the games where the public is struggling to make a pick. Just curious
Either way it looks good and I'm not trying to reinvent the wheel
Well, I read somewhere a few years ago about dogs +130 and higher, so that number has always stuck in my head. If I get time someday, maybe I'll go back and check the system with all home dogs.
0
Well, I read somewhere a few years ago about dogs +130 and higher, so that number has always stuck in my head. If I get time someday, maybe I'll go back and check the system with all home dogs.
Could be, that would make sense. If you hit a higher dog, it's just a bonus. The whole goal is to make one unit.
Cincy now a play, Cincinnati +132 1 unit
0
Could be, that would make sense. If you hit a higher dog, it's just a bonus. The whole goal is to make one unit.
Cincy now a play, Cincinnati +132 1 unit