guys, there are several threads on here about this strategy (about 100 pages total) and i've read them all. i know the people who started those threads don't want attention called to it, but oh well.
this strategy also works with the first half, but the parameters are spread -7+ (preferably 7.5+) and total less than 35 (preferably less than 28).
i've been doing that for cfl the last 2 weeks and i hit both - 1 fave/over and 1 dog/under (-7 & 23.5 and -7.5 & 24).
it sucks, will hill doesn't have o/u's up yet for me. thanks for listing those games, traderjoe
guys, there are several threads on here about this strategy (about 100 pages total) and i've read them all. i know the people who started those threads don't want attention called to it, but oh well.
this strategy also works with the first half, but the parameters are spread -7+ (preferably 7.5+) and total less than 35 (preferably less than 28).
i've been doing that for cfl the last 2 weeks and i hit both - 1 fave/over and 1 dog/under (-7 & 23.5 and -7.5 & 24).
it sucks, will hill doesn't have o/u's up yet for me. thanks for listing those games, traderjoe
Guys, I use four different books, none of which accept these correlated parlays on ncaa football.......anyone know what books still take them? GL to all this season.
Guys, I use four different books, none of which accept these correlated parlays on ncaa football.......anyone know what books still take them? GL to all this season.
Guys, I use four different books, none of which accept these correlated parlays on ncaa football.......anyone know what books still take them? GL to all this season.
You can't bet a team to win and the Over? That is a pretty standard football parlay. I'm not betting the dog and under on the same game.
Stay disciplined and manage your bankroll
Quote Originally Posted by kenkean89:
Guys, I use four different books, none of which accept these correlated parlays on ncaa football.......anyone know what books still take them? GL to all this season.
You can't bet a team to win and the Over? That is a pretty standard football parlay. I'm not betting the dog and under on the same game.
Hey Dan, not when the spread is more than 30-35% of the total, they will not allow the parlay. I use 5dimes for most of my foots, and they quit taking them a couple of years ago.
Hey Dan, not when the spread is more than 30-35% of the total, they will not allow the parlay. I use 5dimes for most of my foots, and they quit taking them a couple of years ago.
You can't bet a team to win and the Over? That is a pretty standard football parlay. I'm not betting the dog and under on the same game.
Actually, most books stopped taking these bets a few years back. However, I know on 5dimes you can bet these using "IF BETS".
Example: You can bet $210 on Auburn -20 to win IF Aub/Ark Over 55 for $100 wins. You can also bet $210 on Arkansas +20 to win IF Aub/Ark Under 55 wins for $100.
Quote Originally Posted by Danrules24:
You can't bet a team to win and the Over? That is a pretty standard football parlay. I'm not betting the dog and under on the same game.
Actually, most books stopped taking these bets a few years back. However, I know on 5dimes you can bet these using "IF BETS".
Example: You can bet $210 on Auburn -20 to win IF Aub/Ark Over 55 for $100 wins. You can also bet $210 on Arkansas +20 to win IF Aub/Ark Under 55 wins for $100.
Actually, most books stopped taking these bets a few years back. However, I know on 5dimes you can bet these using "IF BETS".
Example: You can bet $210 on Auburn -20 to win IF Aub/Ark Over 55 for $100 wins. You can also bet $210 on Arkansas +20 to win IF Aub/Ark Under 55 wins for $100.
Thanks wareagle, I will check it out......
Quote Originally Posted by flwareagle:
Actually, most books stopped taking these bets a few years back. However, I know on 5dimes you can bet these using "IF BETS".
Example: You can bet $210 on Auburn -20 to win IF Aub/Ark Over 55 for $100 wins. You can also bet $210 on Arkansas +20 to win IF Aub/Ark Under 55 wins for $100.
The parlay is not available on Cantor. IF BETS may be the only option here.
I think what I'll look at is to bet to win X amount on the first part and do the IF bet for 1/2 X for the second part. If you lose the first part, you would have lost the parlay anyway. If you win the first part, betting only 1/2 for the second part assures a profit even with a loss, which would have cost the whole parlay previously.
Maybe I'll try and go back and run through a few previous years to see how that would have worked. Betting to win $100 on the first and $50 on the second part would be a $150 win on each of those parlays instead of $260 on my original numbers. Will be curious to see how many partial wins we can get from the previous losses.
When testing I think I'll use the total as the first part since that seems more likely to hit than a heavy favorite covering a big number while staying under the total. We shall see.
Stay disciplined and manage your bankroll
The parlay is not available on Cantor. IF BETS may be the only option here.
I think what I'll look at is to bet to win X amount on the first part and do the IF bet for 1/2 X for the second part. If you lose the first part, you would have lost the parlay anyway. If you win the first part, betting only 1/2 for the second part assures a profit even with a loss, which would have cost the whole parlay previously.
Maybe I'll try and go back and run through a few previous years to see how that would have worked. Betting to win $100 on the first and $50 on the second part would be a $150 win on each of those parlays instead of $260 on my original numbers. Will be curious to see how many partial wins we can get from the previous losses.
When testing I think I'll use the total as the first part since that seems more likely to hit than a heavy favorite covering a big number while staying under the total. We shall see.
Hot Forum Topics
