Betting Unders
heres an old strategy. take the lowest nba total score on the board and bet the under. there has to be at least 4 teams playing. I think its like a 55 to 60 percent hit rate in previous years.
Clipprs/NO won tonight. If this is correct an agreesive Labby may be a play here.
heres an old strategy. take the lowest nba total score on the board and bet the under. there has to be at least 4 teams playing. I think its like a 55 to 60 percent hit rate in previous years.
Clipprs/NO won tonight. If this is correct an agreesive Labby may be a play here.
heres an old strategy. take the lowest nba total score on the board and bet the under. there has to be at least 4 teams playing. I think its like a 55 to 60 percent hit rate in previous years.
5W 5L so far this season i believe.One of the losses occurred because of overtime.
heres an old strategy. take the lowest nba total score on the board and bet the under. there has to be at least 4 teams playing. I think its like a 55 to 60 percent hit rate in previous years.
5W 5L so far this season i believe.One of the losses occurred because of overtime.
heres an old strategy. take the lowest nba total score on the board and bet the under. there has to be at least 4 teams playing. I think its like a 55 to 60 percent hit rate in previous years.
6W 5 L
BUT , betting the under vs. the highest total minimum 4 game card is
9 W -2 L
Can someone verify or refute.
heres an old strategy. take the lowest nba total score on the board and bet the under. there has to be at least 4 teams playing. I think its like a 55 to 60 percent hit rate in previous years.
6W 5 L
BUT , betting the under vs. the highest total minimum 4 game card is
9 W -2 L
Can someone verify or refute.
6W 5 L
BUT , betting the under vs. the highest total minimum 4 game card is
9 W -2 L
Can someone verify or refute.
Very nice pic up there my man...![]()
6W 5 L
BUT , betting the under vs. the highest total minimum 4 game card is
9 W -2 L
Can someone verify or refute.
Very nice pic up there my man...![]()
6W 5 L
BUT , betting the under vs. the highest total minimum 4 game card is
9 W -2 L
Can someone verify or refute.
both systems won last night
sys-1 bet under lowest total--min. 4 games
7 W 5 L
sys-2 bet under highest total--min. 4 games
10 W 2 L
just tracking currently.
6W 5 L
BUT , betting the under vs. the highest total minimum 4 game card is
9 W -2 L
Can someone verify or refute.
both systems won last night
sys-1 bet under lowest total--min. 4 games
7 W 5 L
sys-2 bet under highest total--min. 4 games
10 W 2 L
just tracking currently.
heres an old strategy. take the lowest nba total score on the board and bet the under. there has to be at least 4 teams playing. I think its like a 55 to 60 percent hit rate in previous years.
boards meaning on Covers or which particular book ?
heres an old strategy. take the lowest nba total score on the board and bet the under. there has to be at least 4 teams playing. I think its like a 55 to 60 percent hit rate in previous years.
boards meaning on Covers or which particular book ?
both systems lost last night 13Nov10
soooooooooooooooo......
sys-1 bet under lowest total--min. 4 games
7 W 6L
sys-2 bet under highest total--min. 4 games
10 W 3L
just tracking currently.
both systems lost last night 13Nov10
soooooooooooooooo......
sys-1 bet under lowest total--min. 4 games
7 W 6L
sys-2 bet under highest total--min. 4 games
10 W 3L
just tracking currently.
I used the GS/MIL game for the "under highest total" pick. It opened at 204 according to Covers. It won!
Lucky you
....the games I used BOTH lost...![]()
![]()
Tonights plays:
Under 200.5 Det/Sac...lowest
Under 216.5 Hou/NY...highest
![]()
I used the GS/MIL game for the "under highest total" pick. It opened at 204 according to Covers. It won!
Lucky you
....the games I used BOTH lost...![]()
![]()
Tonights plays:
Under 200.5 Det/Sac...lowest
Under 216.5 Hou/NY...highest
![]()
I would have selected PHX/LAL for the high play based on the opening line from here.
The low play looks good as the line is already dropping.
I would have selected PHX/LAL for the high play based on the opening line from here.
The low play looks good as the line is already dropping.
Clipprs/NO won tonight. If this is correct an agreesive Labby may be a play here.
dubbledime...show me how to bet an aggressive labby line... I've always wanted to follow the betting amounts...thanks
Clipprs/NO won tonight. If this is correct an agreesive Labby may be a play here.
dubbledime...show me how to bet an aggressive labby line... I've always wanted to follow the betting amounts...thanks
....opening lines will be hard to establish...from where?
I was just using Covers lines at the time of this post...
I'm using Covers lines too. Click on the word "here" in my previous post (#15).
....opening lines will be hard to establish...from where?
I was just using Covers lines at the time of this post...
I'm using Covers lines too. Click on the word "here" in my previous post (#15).
Hot Forum Topics
-
🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵
449,470
-
Monday 09/21/2026
458
-
Serious Streak Survivor Strategies
1,918,167
-
Giants vs Rams MNF in-game live
1,896
-
NFL LOCKED IN!
99,543
-
New York Giants @ Los Angeles Rams
5,014
-
***Macwesties * Mon. Sept. 21, 2026 * Birthday * NFL * MNF * Football Play***
3,862
-
Where are they getting enough explosive offense to separate from New York by more than a touchdown
2,374
-
?? KBO Plays 🥎
14,762
-
Week Two-Post Plays Here
1,444
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
