If you know how to take advantage of a system, it's a lot more beneficial than you are making it out to be.
hmmm plz do tell mr guru. I played this exactly as it was laid out. bet 1 unit on 1st half. if it fails bet 2 on 2nd half. so far it is -6.4 units, including juice. so tell me how I am not taking advantage of a system.
0
Quote Originally Posted by GreenMachine22:
If you know how to take advantage of a system, it's a lot more beneficial than you are making it out to be.
hmmm plz do tell mr guru. I played this exactly as it was laid out. bet 1 unit on 1st half. if it fails bet 2 on 2nd half. so far it is -6.4 units, including juice. so tell me how I am not taking advantage of a system.
I find it quite amusing calling Green "Mr Guru" when you have no clue. He understands dB's systems. dB has several and they are right in front of you. Apparently you have not taken advantage of any others as I have and I have mad a significant amount of cash off his systems and only his systems. There are so many pretenders on here and you can choose to follow them. dB does back tests that support the systems he uses. Please go elsewhere and take your "Mr Guru" statements with you. I had a thread at the beginning if the year and was hitting almost 70%. Go search the thread if you don't believe it and the one losing week that I had on my larger plays was my last because I REFUSED to provide winners to people like you. It was a pile on. All the haters came a calling trying to destroy my credibility, well that was the last time that happened. I have a tremendous amount of winning selections again this football season and dB's systems have provided more $$$ in the pocket than I would have
0
I find it quite amusing calling Green "Mr Guru" when you have no clue. He understands dB's systems. dB has several and they are right in front of you. Apparently you have not taken advantage of any others as I have and I have mad a significant amount of cash off his systems and only his systems. There are so many pretenders on here and you can choose to follow them. dB does back tests that support the systems he uses. Please go elsewhere and take your "Mr Guru" statements with you. I had a thread at the beginning if the year and was hitting almost 70%. Go search the thread if you don't believe it and the one losing week that I had on my larger plays was my last because I REFUSED to provide winners to people like you. It was a pile on. All the haters came a calling trying to destroy my credibility, well that was the last time that happened. I have a tremendous amount of winning selections again this football season and dB's systems have provided more $$$ in the pocket than I would have
#1 NEVER bet on a football team missing their starting QB. #2 Only betting (C) & (D) plays in the 4H chase = 4-0 with minimal risk. #3 FLAT betting the 2H chase = 2 units profit...with minimal risk. #4 Turn your 2H loss into a 4H chase by adding on the next 2H play #5 Spread risk among other systems #6 Play with TINY amounts until you have the experience to figure this out on your own. #7 No system is perfect/All systems will lose at some time #8 Be prepared
....Don't ask again.
0
My good deed for the week:
#1 NEVER bet on a football team missing their starting QB. #2 Only betting (C) & (D) plays in the 4H chase = 4-0 with minimal risk. #3 FLAT betting the 2H chase = 2 units profit...with minimal risk. #4 Turn your 2H loss into a 4H chase by adding on the next 2H play #5 Spread risk among other systems #6 Play with TINY amounts until you have the experience to figure this out on your own. #7 No system is perfect/All systems will lose at some time #8 Be prepared
im not saying anything negative about the plays. I appreciate them, and have played them. I don't understand how im not using them properly when its pretty abc. you play a 2 half chase, or a 4 half chase. I chose the 2 half chase . I was only answering someone elses query when I said the 2 half chase was down -6 units which it is. The way green has listed is NOT the simple way bd outlined to play it. However, if u all have found a better way to play this sytem, great! but playing it as stated in the opening thread has done well for the 4h chase, not so well for the 2 half chase. As for the remark by red sox guys like you, im not sure what that means as I was only trying to answer breezys query. Perhaps he has a negative opinion of the systems, but I do NOT. I only took issue when I was told I did not know how to use something that says very clearly how to use it, and is very straightforward. unless we want to overcomplicate it to make it appear as it cannot lose? ty bd for ur research and sharing, and ty green for trying to help explain!!
0
im not saying anything negative about the plays. I appreciate them, and have played them. I don't understand how im not using them properly when its pretty abc. you play a 2 half chase, or a 4 half chase. I chose the 2 half chase . I was only answering someone elses query when I said the 2 half chase was down -6 units which it is. The way green has listed is NOT the simple way bd outlined to play it. However, if u all have found a better way to play this sytem, great! but playing it as stated in the opening thread has done well for the 4h chase, not so well for the 2 half chase. As for the remark by red sox guys like you, im not sure what that means as I was only trying to answer breezys query. Perhaps he has a negative opinion of the systems, but I do NOT. I only took issue when I was told I did not know how to use something that says very clearly how to use it, and is very straightforward. unless we want to overcomplicate it to make it appear as it cannot lose? ty bd for ur research and sharing, and ty green for trying to help explain!!
I find it quite amusing calling Green "Mr Guru" when you have no clue. He understands dB's systems. dB has several and they are right in front of you. Apparently you have not taken advantage of any others as I have and I have mad a significant amount of cash off his systems and only his systems. There are so many pretenders on here and you can choose to follow them. dB does back tests that support the systems he uses. Please go elsewhere and take your "Mr Guru" statements with you. I had a thread at the beginning if the year and was hitting almost 70%. Go search the thread if you don't believe it and the one losing week that I had on my larger plays was my last because I REFUSED to provide winners to people like you. It was a pile on. All the haters came a calling trying to destroy my credibility, well that was the last time that happened. I have a tremendous amount of winning selections again this football season and dB's systems have provided more $$$ in the pocket than I would have
I find it amusing that you can't even get his name right.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Red_Soxxxxxxxx:
I find it quite amusing calling Green "Mr Guru" when you have no clue. He understands dB's systems. dB has several and they are right in front of you. Apparently you have not taken advantage of any others as I have and I have mad a significant amount of cash off his systems and only his systems. There are so many pretenders on here and you can choose to follow them. dB does back tests that support the systems he uses. Please go elsewhere and take your "Mr Guru" statements with you. I had a thread at the beginning if the year and was hitting almost 70%. Go search the thread if you don't believe it and the one losing week that I had on my larger plays was my last because I REFUSED to provide winners to people like you. It was a pile on. All the haters came a calling trying to destroy my credibility, well that was the last time that happened. I have a tremendous amount of winning selections again this football season and dB's systems have provided more $$$ in the pocket than I would have
I find it amusing that you can't even get his name right.
The first week is over, but could have been better. The researching and back testing showed (4-0) for each of the last three years. So even though I followed the same numerical format, there were more games.
I should have just gone to a 4 game format from the beginning. But having said that, no one should have lost their shirt if they followed all of the plays. Most of them this upcoming week will be in that format as they show more ability to win while covering all the games.
At least until further notice. Hope this clears things up...
bD
0
The first week is over, but could have been better. The researching and back testing showed (4-0) for each of the last three years. So even though I followed the same numerical format, there were more games.
I should have just gone to a 4 game format from the beginning. But having said that, no one should have lost their shirt if they followed all of the plays. Most of them this upcoming week will be in that format as they show more ability to win while covering all the games.
At least until further notice. Hope this clears things up...