Did you change the parameters of your NCAA hoops? I thought you stopped doing them?
Why are NW and PU plays? They don't meet the specifics (at least technically as you previously explained)
Lastly, I read your thought about the Superbowl. You explain that Big Ben is bad in pressure situation or will be and Rodgers is a Fire sign which means he is good in the clutch. Did you not watch them last week at the end of the game. Rodgers couldn't buy a 1st down and Big Ben was once again, clutch. The superbowl against Arizona wouldn't dismiss his water sign as being bogus? Rodgers is very good don't get me wrong, but he hasn't proven squat in the playoffs when the chips are on the line. There have been only 2 instances where he was challenged in the 4th quarter with a small lead or being tied. Arizona last year and the Bears this year. He couldn't do squat in the cluctch either time.
Have a good one today, Carl.
0
Good luck, tafter
Did you change the parameters of your NCAA hoops? I thought you stopped doing them?
Why are NW and PU plays? They don't meet the specifics (at least technically as you previously explained)
Lastly, I read your thought about the Superbowl. You explain that Big Ben is bad in pressure situation or will be and Rodgers is a Fire sign which means he is good in the clutch. Did you not watch them last week at the end of the game. Rodgers couldn't buy a 1st down and Big Ben was once again, clutch. The superbowl against Arizona wouldn't dismiss his water sign as being bogus? Rodgers is very good don't get me wrong, but he hasn't proven squat in the playoffs when the chips are on the line. There have been only 2 instances where he was challenged in the 4th quarter with a small lead or being tied. Arizona last year and the Bears this year. He couldn't do squat in the cluctch either time.
Did you change the parameters of your NCAA hoops? I thought you stopped doing them?
Why are NW and PU plays? They don't meet the specifics (at least technically as you previously explained)
Lastly, I read your thought about the Superbowl. You explain that Big Ben is bad in pressure situation or will be and Rodgers is a Fire sign which means he is good in the clutch. Did you not watch them last week at the end of the game. Rodgers couldn't buy a 1st down and Big Ben was once again, clutch. The superbowl against Arizona wouldn't dismiss his water sign as being bogus? Rodgers is very good don't get me wrong, but he hasn't proven squat in the playoffs when the chips are on the line. There have been only 2 instances where he was challenged in the 4th quarter with a small lead or being tied. Arizona last year and the Bears this year. He couldn't do squat in the cluctch either time.
Have a good one today, Carl.
I appreciate your contesting the pattern I found. Big Ben does have two rings; however, his defense has been the most impacting on those game, IMO. Aaron Rodgers will prevail this year just like Brady and Manning began to do so in their 3/4th years into the league.
As far as NCAAB is concerned, I ran the numbers per conference, making these picks less risky and deviating. In the NBA, I've found much success using each teams individual average with an NBA STD. For NCAAB, I'm using each teams average with each conferences STD. I know it's going to be favorable for us. Hop on board. I know it' early, but I've already gotten the 1st 3 plays.
The STDs for each conference are 6, 7, 8, & 9. The Big Ten is 6, and it goes up from there. Thanks for following up with me, and do check out my new plays. I've posted them in the website forum.
0
Quote Originally Posted by alldayinvestor:
Good luck, tafter
Did you change the parameters of your NCAA hoops? I thought you stopped doing them?
Why are NW and PU plays? They don't meet the specifics (at least technically as you previously explained)
Lastly, I read your thought about the Superbowl. You explain that Big Ben is bad in pressure situation or will be and Rodgers is a Fire sign which means he is good in the clutch. Did you not watch them last week at the end of the game. Rodgers couldn't buy a 1st down and Big Ben was once again, clutch. The superbowl against Arizona wouldn't dismiss his water sign as being bogus? Rodgers is very good don't get me wrong, but he hasn't proven squat in the playoffs when the chips are on the line. There have been only 2 instances where he was challenged in the 4th quarter with a small lead or being tied. Arizona last year and the Bears this year. He couldn't do squat in the cluctch either time.
Have a good one today, Carl.
I appreciate your contesting the pattern I found. Big Ben does have two rings; however, his defense has been the most impacting on those game, IMO. Aaron Rodgers will prevail this year just like Brady and Manning began to do so in their 3/4th years into the league.
As far as NCAAB is concerned, I ran the numbers per conference, making these picks less risky and deviating. In the NBA, I've found much success using each teams individual average with an NBA STD. For NCAAB, I'm using each teams average with each conferences STD. I know it's going to be favorable for us. Hop on board. I know it' early, but I've already gotten the 1st 3 plays.
The STDs for each conference are 6, 7, 8, & 9. The Big Ten is 6, and it goes up from there. Thanks for following up with me, and do check out my new plays. I've posted them in the website forum.
You picked a good nite to dive back in college hoops. Slow and steady wins the race.
Thanks for noticing Travis; however, I believe I picked the right was to used the system rather than picking the right night. I've said it before, and I'll say it again; this system will produce at least 57% winners over it's lifetime. Next year, I'm going to have so many plays, that crossing them over will be most desired, and 60% minimum will be the case for my plays.
This is mathematics. I don't know a single player's name on any freakin hockey team, but I'm steamrolling NHL.
This NCAAB is nothing different from after I refined the NBA plays. Many people jumped ship - probably b/c they don't know how to manage their money, and you Travis, along with Larry and Tophat, will reap some awesome benefits from being so loyal.
Let's get back at it again and go at least 2-1 today.
0
Quote Originally Posted by alldayinvestor:
You picked a good nite to dive back in college hoops. Slow and steady wins the race.
Thanks for noticing Travis; however, I believe I picked the right was to used the system rather than picking the right night. I've said it before, and I'll say it again; this system will produce at least 57% winners over it's lifetime. Next year, I'm going to have so many plays, that crossing them over will be most desired, and 60% minimum will be the case for my plays.
This is mathematics. I don't know a single player's name on any freakin hockey team, but I'm steamrolling NHL.
This NCAAB is nothing different from after I refined the NBA plays. Many people jumped ship - probably b/c they don't know how to manage their money, and you Travis, along with Larry and Tophat, will reap some awesome benefits from being so loyal.
Let's get back at it again and go at least 2-1 today.
I appreciate your contesting the pattern I found. Big Ben does have two rings; however, his defense has been the most impacting on those game, IMO. Aaron Rodgers will prevail this year just like Brady and Manning began to do so in their 3/4th years into the league. 
The STDs for each conference are 6, 7, 8, & 9. The Big Ten is 6, and it goes up from there. Thanks for following up with me, and do check out my new plays. I've posted them in the website forum. 
Big night tonight bosses
system is now 56 – 45 ~ 55.4%
Tomorrow looks like three plays: one 17, and two 15s
Hot Forum Topics
