2010 NCAA Fave/Over - Dog/Under % Correlation Parlays Thread

I get 2.6 and that's usually the norm. Not sure why you are getting juiced on parlays, never seen that before.
I'm in the camp of play them all and never pick and choose which ones to play.

Playing them all will still win but may be a swing week or two that you gotta have the capital to handle. 

So if I'm paying 10% juice on losses plus my payout is only 2.5 to 1 .... I'm starting to wonder if this system is worth it for me.

I'm seeing a lot of games again this week.  Let me know if I missed anything.

 

Ball St/Clemson 26.5/65.5

Mich St/C. Mich 21.5/48

So Cal/Syr 26/59

Fres St/Ore 34.5/75

Wash/LSU 23.5/53

N. Mex/Tex 38/52

Tulane/Tulsa 25/57

Akron/FIU 23.5/54

Memphis/Ark St 23/55.5

LA Mon/ARK 30/60

W. KY/ALA 40/54

Deos this mean you are taking Clemson to cover and the over and parlaying it?

Every bookie takes 10% on losses. But odd he pays 2.5 and not 2.9

Nerman -even winning $140 per parlay based on 110 each parlay bet. It's still worth playing. 

Cool, powerade.  I need to decide if I'm playing them all or just the 41 - 50%'ers and then stick to it. 

I like the idea of taking less games = less risk. 

And I remember a lot of the 75% plus games taking a beating.  It's like the coaches either pull up or the underdog scores some miraculous points to push the total over and stay within the spread.  There were a couple of those this past weekend.

Only 1 last wk. was ark.st.

Bunch of dumb asses 4 posting this shit on here

stats, WTF you talking about? 

The Clemson game is what makes me hate this system.  If teams went 100% the entire game this system would probably hit 90%+!

Rough day today.  Just means More winners to come. 

Slaughterhouse day.  2-6-1 for me.  Just playing the 41 - 50%.

 

Worst week i've ever seen with this....

    

    

I forgot that this exactly why books keeps allowing the correlated parlays for full games

This past weekend was a fucking train wreck 4 these parlays   4 fuck jobs n the last minute of  4 games. Ark,USC,Texas, and Clem.  Or sat. Could have been a decent day with these...   Gotta pay my one book wed. Due 2 these!!!

I'm still in a bad mood from saturday....gonna be a long week 

Wassup guys... 1H plays went 5-1 this week... my books wont let me play correlated of 30% or more, so what plays I could get in went 5-1, including Hou/Mia in the NFL... Good system so far

Well I might have played a few games that just crossed over the 50% mark.  I was thinking I would play 40% all the way up to around 60% and avoid the higher percentage games.  After last week's miserable beating I am locked into this thing now for the long haul.  I'm hopeful to get back what I lost and maybe a little profit.

Been playing this for 7 seasons straight and pray, literally pray, that every year it's still allowed.. with that said last week was literally the worst in the 7 years I've played this system... I do $444 both ways and ALWAYS mix in some other shit.. Horse races.. Golf longshots.. ANYTHING to keep the eyes off..

Anyway, I have always played anything and everything 33% and up which winds up being 13-15 plays a week (way too much bankroll exposure especially during weeks like last week where I got beat up pretty good)

Ive went back the last ten pages and best I can tell the $$ 'filter' seems to be 41-50%? And ALL games regardless of % if the total is in the 40's?  Am I correct ?  Powerade and anyone that can set me straight on the correct filters I should be looking at versus playing the whole board would be much appreciated.. Looking to minimize exposure especially after last week (where thank god I bailed out on Sunday at 4pm hitting all dogs on the ML in a 3 team parlay GIFT from the gambling gods.. Thank you SF, TB and AZ!)

Also.. I noticed a new thread with cryptic title was mentioned although it was also said that its way too late for that I think it'd be GREAT idea... Never too late to keep this from being on the front page !

 

Thanks in advance and GL